Mike Bloomberg Devotes $500 Million To Kill Coal Jobs, Influence 2020 Elections

From The Daily Caller

Michael Bastasch | Energy Editor

  • Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg will spend another $500 million to continue his war against the coal industry.
  • Bloomberg will fund environmentalist campaigns at the state and local level to replace coal plants with wind and solar energy.
  • Conservative critics said Bloomberg’s campaign will kill thousands of jobs and leave communities devastated.

Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg will spend $500 million to close every remaining U.S. coal-fired power plant and stop the expansion of natural gas.

Bloomberg will fund environmental activist lobbying campaigns in state legislatures, city councils and public utility commissions. Activists will demand officials replace coal plants with renewable energy, not natural gas.

“We’re in a race against time with climate change, and yet there is virtually no hope of bold federal action on this issue for at least another two years,” Bloomberg said in a statement Thursday.

For Democratic politicians and environmentalists looking to make climate change the top issue in the 2020 elections, Bloomberg’s funding is most welcome. For conservatives and the coal industry, it’s a nightmare.

“This is about feeding the soldiers of the green left to affect the outcome of the 2020 elections,” Dan Kish, a distinguished senior fellow at the Institute for Energy Research, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Former New York City Mayor Bloomberg answers questions from reporters in Nashua
Former New York City Mayor and possible 2020 Democratic presidential candidate Michael Bloomberg answers questions from reporters following a tour of WH Bagshaw Company in Nashua, New Hampshire, U.S., January 29, 2019. REUTERS/Brian Snyder.

Bloomberg will announce his “Beyond Carbon” plan during his commencement speech at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. With this new spending, Bloomberg will have committed roughly $1 billion to the climate crusade since leaving the mayor’s office.

“This campaign will ensure that after the 2020 election, the next Administration inherits a country on its way to a 100 percent clean energy economy,” Bloomberg said.

Beyond Carbon has four goals lobby states to pass 100 percent “clean” energy laws, funnel more money to environmentalists, expand existing anti-fossil fuel campaigns and get “climate champions” elected to state and local office. (RELATED: EPA Reassigns Top Bureaucrat Critics See As Key Resistor Of Trump’s Agenda)

Bloomberg declined to run for president in 2020, but pledged to use his vast wealth to help dismantle the fossil fuel industry, enact gun control and defeat President Donald Trump.

Outside of election funding, the Sierra Club has been a major beneficiary of Bloomberg’s largess. Bloomberg has given more than $150 million the Sierra Club’s anti-fossil fuel campaigns since 2011.

More than 280 coal plants have closed or been slated for closure since 2010, The New York Times reported. Beyond Carbon, Bloomberg says, will aim to close the remaining 241 coal plants by 2030.

Coal power generation and mining employed 160,119 American workers in 2016, according to the U.S. Energy Department. The coal industry has been in decline over the past decade due to federal and state regulations as well as competition from natural gas.

“The loss of fuel-secure electricity sources, especially coal-fueled power plants, pose an increasing threat to the power grid, as well as to national security,” said Michelle Bloodworth, president of the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, which represents coal producers, utilities and railroads.

The annual Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Breakfast hosted by Rev. Al Sharpton and National Action Network, at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, U.S., January 21, 2019. REUTERS/Allison Shelley
Former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg speaks at the annual Martin Luther King, Jr. Day Breakfast hosted by Rev. Al Sharpton and National Action Network, at the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, U.S., January 21, 2019. REUTERS/Allison Shelley.

“While a political campaign aimed at closing all coal plants may make for an attractive soundbite in some quarters, it is not a responsible plan that our policymakers should adopt,” Bloodworth told TheDCNF.

ACCE estimates coal-fired power plants directly employ 28,000 as of April 2019, Bloodworth said. The latest jobs numbers for May 2019 shows 52,900 coal miners were employed.

The cost to replace all that shuttered coal capacity would also be staggering, ClearView Energy Partners director Kevin Book told The Times. He estimated replacing coal with wind and solar power and the necessary battery storage would cost $950 billion.

“It’s not going to be easy to do what he’s talking about doing,” Book told the Times.

“We will employ the same advocacy, legal, and electoral strategies that have proven so successful in retiring coal-fired power plants … and also in passing gun safety background check laws in states around the country,” Bloomberg said.

Conservative critics, however, see Bloomberg’s campaign as an attack on working men and women, often union members, that used to be the backbone of the Democratic Party.

“Bloomberg just made a half-billion dollar contribution to Democrats, who have abandoned American working people and the unions who represent them for the faculty lounge and the students they brainwash to worry about the weather,” Kish said.

Follow Michael on Twitter

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

132 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Flight Level
June 9, 2019 1:35 pm

These guys don’t donate or give.
They invest.
Which is why I would consider this as a combination of tax-deduction and capital risk.

However…

We never come to hear of any similar schemes on behalf of equally wealthy and potentially interested in returns from their investments climate skeptics.

Business is business after all, “what you do I can do”. Or not ?

John W. Garrett
June 9, 2019 1:43 pm

You could look it up:

“…climate change has not produced more frequent nor more costly hurricanes nor other weather-related events covered by insurance…”

-Warren E. Buffett
Chairman
Berkshire Hathaway Corporation
Letter To Shareholders
2015 Annual Report
http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2015ltr.pdf
February 27, 2016
p. 26

ladylifegrows
June 9, 2019 1:59 pm

Count On Coal is a website that runs campaigns for favorable regulations for coal. There is one running right now, so go there if you want to help.

But I am fed up with coals arguments: jobs and economy. True, and the attack on fossil fuel hurts the poor the most. But let’s face it: the costs would be worth it if we would live longer and the ecosystem benefit. The reverse is true.

Coal is saying “we’re selfish,” which is a most ineffective argument. Truth is coal and other fossil fuels are super-renewable in that the CO2 makes plants, including wood, which can then be burned over and over again. That might be a fact around NM and other “renewable” laws. Better, fossil fuels and only fossil fuels make more life possible on Earth. Photosynthesis, elementary, my dear Watson.

I dream of coal miners decorating their coal train cars with
“Burn Me Back To Life: with a lump of coal, arrow, tree. Or coal -> grass->animal
Photosynthesis: CO2 + H2O +sunshine, in a green plant –> sugar and O2
Feed the Poor–burn coal and gas
Coal Makes More Life and Biodiversity

and so on.

RayG
June 9, 2019 2:00 pm

How strange that when a Michael Bloomberg or a Tim Steyer donate very large amounts of money to self-proclaimed “environmentalists” and “progressives” they are greeted with very loud and very long hosannas. Let a very wealthy conservative make a large donation to a favored cause and the conservative is trying to bring down our government and rape and pillage the poor.

Samuel C Cogar
June 9, 2019 2:00 pm

Why is it that so many “billionaires” and “millionaires” who earned their money (fortune) via their US “capitalistic” business ventures, ……. are now intent on spending a large portion of their fortune to destroy the capitalism that permitted their monetary success?

Maybe they are simply PO’ed at the “Venture Capitalists” who made their gazillion$ “the easy way”.

Reply to  Samuel C Cogar
June 9, 2019 2:54 pm

Steyer was a VC.

Whatever …… the dogs bark and the climate moves on.

Viper
June 9, 2019 2:22 pm

What is it about NY that produces these sanctimonious quacks? Like AOC and DeBlasio, Bloomberg is in La La Land. Destroying the coal industry to reduce carbon dioxide emissions will undermine US prosperity. But it will have no effect on the earth’s temperature, because it won’t even affect how much carbon dioxide is in the air.

https://youtu.be/b1cGqL9y548

June 9, 2019 2:42 pm

Remember the “Occupy Wall Street” protesters? “Down with the 1%ers!” or whatever their slogan was.
What happened to them? Is it the same crowd that shows at climate protest?
Do they realize that Bloomberg, Steyer, Soros etc. are all “1%ers” and pulling their strings?

InteliTweeter
June 9, 2019 3:04 pm

..let him waste his money… we all know Solar and wind cannot replace fossil fuels…

Mark Broderick
June 9, 2019 3:05 pm

“Douglas MacKinnon: Bloomberg to coal workers: You’re fired!”

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/douglas-mackinnon-bloomberg-coal-jobs

Doug
June 9, 2019 3:11 pm

Whatever happened to the “global” in “global warming” . If he really wants to cut CO2 for some reason, the half billion would be better spent helping China and India frac some gas charged shales. Eliminating every lump of coal used in the USA would hardly register on global total CO2 emissions.

ResourceGuy
June 9, 2019 3:33 pm

The oligarchs will decide your future for you.

ResourceGuy
June 9, 2019 3:35 pm

Better hurry, time is running out…..

comment image

ResourceGuy
June 9, 2019 4:08 pm

So will the UMW and AFL-CIO be silent on this?

Kramer
June 9, 2019 5:23 pm

I wouldn’t be surprised if we find out he and/or his cronies are invested in green ‘solutions.’

Wiliam Haas
June 9, 2019 6:19 pm

The only rational alternative to fossil fuel fired power plants is nuclear power plants ant that is where Bloomberg should put his money.

June 9, 2019 8:01 pm

Stranded assets – these FOOLS are determined to ‘load’ onto the books STRANDED ASSETS valued into the BB (billions of dollars).

IF Bloomberg were smart (he’s not) he would have some “due diligence” performed on BrLP and Dr. Mills and take a look at recent progress in their area of developed expertise.

michael hart
June 9, 2019 9:53 pm

The shame is that plans like Bloomberg’s will work, or at least stand a good chance of doing so, while the companies waiting in line for the guillotine do nothing to support sites like WUWT financially.

While Antony justifiably seems to take pride in not receiving money from such sources, these companies almost deserve what is in store for them by not employing even a few people to better make their case. In today’s political world it seems like a necessary cost of doing business.

Tim
June 10, 2019 4:41 am

This is a great example of the need for a wealth tax.

Reply to  Tim
June 10, 2019 6:25 am

Except, the “wealth” is mostly in the form of stock and real estate and the like (not money “sitting the the bank” like AOC thinks); would the proposal be to redistribute the “means of production to the people”?

Today, much of that “value” is already owned by employees in 401K accounts and the like, too.

Joel Snider
June 10, 2019 7:53 am

Is there a single progressive policy that doesn’t include destroying entire industries?

Wally
June 10, 2019 8:50 am

So we will need to quadruple our solar/wind production to make up the loss of the coal plants currently generating 1,100 gigawatts per year.

Which doesnt include the all electric car fleet of the near future sucking an additional 800 gigawatts per year which we haven’t planned for.

Easy peasy.

John W. Garrett
June 10, 2019 10:47 am

Mikey Bloomberg has imbibed a toxic amount of the climate Kool-Aid. His early career as a high-pressure bond salesman on Wall Street at the notoriously corrupt Solomon Brothers does not inspire much confidence in his integrity, his knowledge, his analytical abilities or his judgement. Regardless of facts, Mikey is on a deluded crusade to “save the world” from itself.

He has, of course, ordered his flying monkeys to proselytize the climate gospel (the one according to Mikey Bloomberg).

I don’t believe a word out of Bloomberg on the topic (and you shouldn’t either); they’re completely bent.

ResourceGuy
June 10, 2019 2:20 pm

How many tax credits from us to him will be generated?

HI McDonnough
June 11, 2019 1:39 pm

Imagine if all that money went to a real environmental cause like cleaning up ocean pollution or buying up land for rewilding…

Amber
June 11, 2019 10:38 pm

The democrats have doubled down on their plan to destroy not just coal jobs now it’s all fossil fuel related jobs .
Think about this unions support Democrats who plan to destroy union jobs . WTF is that .
Pretend this is not politics . Some $billionaire plans to spend at least half a billion on trying to take out a viable business . Lets just say it was bakeries cause he choked an a doughnut once . You can’t target legitimate businesses because don’t like them . Ok stop buying from them but trying to harm them through a hit job to bury them is not right .

Stu
June 13, 2019 3:07 pm

I would bet good money that he has a back end plan on how this $500 million will turn into several billion.