Despite Democrats’ cataclysmal framing of every weather event, Americans are safer than ever.
May 30, 2019
Climate isn’t the same as weather—unless, of course, weather happens to be politically useful. In that case, weather portends climate apocalypse.
So warns Elizabeth Warren as she surveyed Iowan rainstorms, which she claims, like tornadoes and floods, are more frequent and severe. “Different parts of the country deal with different climate issues,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D–Malthusia) cautioned as she too warned of extreme tornadoes. “But ALL of these threats will be increasing in intensity as climate crisis grows and we fail to act appropriately.”
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D–Ore.) recently sent a fundraising email warning Democrats that climate change was causing “growing mega-fires, extremely destructive hurricanes, and horrific flooding” in which “American lives are at stake.”
Even if we pretend that passing a bazillion-dollar authoritarian Green New Deal would do anything to change the climate, there is no real-world evidence that today’s weather is increasingly threatening to human lives. By every quantifiable measure, in fact, we’re much safer despite the cataclysmal framing of every weather-related event.
How many of those taken in by alarmism realize that deaths from extreme weather have dropped somewhere around 99.9 percent since the 1920s? Heat and cold can still be killers, but thanks to increasingly reliable and affordable heating and cooling systems, and other luxuries of the age, the vast majority of Americans will never have to fear the climate in any genuine way.
Since 1980, death caused by all natural disasters and heat and cold is somewhere under 0.5 percent.
It’s true that 2019 has seen a spike in tornadoes, but mostly because 2018 was the first year recorded without a single violent tornado in the United States. Tornadoes killed 10 Americans in 2018, the fewest since we started keeping track of these things in 1875, only four years after the nefarious combustion engine was invented.
There has also been a long-term decline in the cost of tornado damage. In 2018, we experienced near-lows in this regard. The only better years were 2017, 2016, and 2015.
After a few devastating hurricanes around a decade ago, we were similarly warned that it was a prelude to endless storms and ecological disaster. This was followed by nine years without a single major hurricane in the United States. Or, in other words, six fewer hurricanes than we experienced in 1908 alone.
According to the U.S. Natural Hazard Statistics, in fact, 2018 saw below the 30-year average in deaths not only by tornadoes and hurricanes (way under average) but also from heat, flooding, and lighting. We did experience a slight rise in deaths due to cold.
Pointing out these sort of things usually elicits the same reaction: Why do you knuckle-dragging troglodytes hate science? Well, because science’s predictive abilities on most things, but especially climate, have been atrocious. But mostly because science is being used as a cudgel to push leftist policy prescriptions without considering economic tradeoffs, societal reality, or morality.
There are two things in this debate that we can predict with near certitude: First, that modern technology will continue to allow human beings to adapt to organic and anthropogenic changes in the environment. Second, that human beings will never surrender the wealth and safety that technology has afforded and continues to afford them.
People who deny these realities are as clueless as any “denier” of science. That brings me back to Democrats.
There have been a number of stories predicting that 2020 will finally be the year politicians start making climate change an important issue. One can only imagine these reporters started their jobs last week.
It’s true that a number of Democrat presidential hopefuls have taken “no fossil fuel money” pledges—as if they were going to get any of that cash anyway—as they spew carbon into the atmosphere searching for another bad-weather photo-op. Kevin Curtis, the executive director of NRDC Action Fund, told BuzzFeed News that all of this was “really wicked cool.”
The 2018 midterm elections, adds Anthony Leiserowitz, director of the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, are when “climate change was beginning, for the first time, to play a significant role in a few races across the country.”
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Any website that tries to turn the climate change into an ideological is poohing on the truth and supporting a corrupt political establishment. Virtually all 100 Senators and 435 House members peddled the lie of global warming whether they say it is natural or man made. They are no where to be seen when it comes to talking about the grand solar minimum and magnetic excursion. Same in other countries. You need to look at your soul in the mirror.
I have recently been told by someone with a Science background who should know better, that all kinds of weather events are worse due to climate change. I didn’t want to start the battle because it just didn’t seem worth it.
Which brings me to an issue I have with classical literature courses (IE Eng I – IV) at the high school level. These classes are designed to enrich the understanding of how mostly fiction literature is written. It is text analysis to the nth degree, and leaves students wholly unable to decipher journalism literature, be it investigative writing, editorials and opinions, or reporting. It sure as hell does not touch on research literature critique.
No wonder we have half the population believing NPR presenters when they say over and over again, that the addition of a tiny fraction of a fraction of CO2 ppm molecules in our air space caused a particular river to flood. Anyone worth a damn would normally say, “Come on. You are going to have to prove that one to me, and by the way, I am selling ocean front property in Wyoming.” But nope. Apparently we are teaching our young people to believe everything they hear, if said often enough, because that is the new scientific standard needed to reject the null hypothesis.
Idiots.
Climate changes , we are in a warming cycle but not an alarmist holly crap the earth has a fever change .
Enjoy the ride because the next ice age is going to be way more devastating than the one we are coming out of .
Can’t wait for the next AOC ” joke ” about the best before date for earth .j
Don’t these people get it . Every time they make a goofy prediction that never turns out they go further
into the tank . Last time i looked the Arctic still had lots of ice and now we know Antarctica temperatures are steady over decades . Funny thing happens when weather stations aren’t sitting on airport asphalt