When environmentalism becomes corruption – Part 1

Environmental principles are too often used to stop lawful, responsible, vital land uses

Craig Liukko

All across the United States, private property rights are under assault – assault by state and federal legislators and regulators, environmentalist groups, wealthy liberal foundations, corporations and other special interests, often acting in coordination or collusion with one another. They are seizing or taking control of lands and other valuable property without due process or just compensation, under a host of environmental and other justifications, many of which are fictional at best.

I have personally witnessed attempts to shut down the small mining industry in my state of Colorado. Exploration and development by this industry often results in discoveries of major deposits of minerals that are essential for everything we make, use and do – including medical equipment, cell phones, computers, aircraft, aerospace, automobiles, wind turbines, solar panels, batteries, and modern high-tech weapon and communication systems.

Actions that block mineral development in the United States make us 50-100% dependent on sometimes less than friendly foreign sources, and on mines that are operated using, abusing and under-paying parents and children, often under horrendous health, safety and environmental conditions.

Stories like what my company went through can be found everywhere in the United States now. Worse, they are no longer confined only to businesses that rely on development of our nation’s vast and highly available natural resources – done today with the highest regard for laws, worker safety and the ecology.

My parents co-founded our family’s mining business. In their later years, they suffered incredible, needless physical and financial pain – at the hands of clever crooks who defrauded our company and ideologically corrupt bureaucrats who took advantage of corrupt legal and regulatory systems to devise yet another opportunity to close yet another mining operation.

The Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (DRMS) eagerly supported the crooks in an attempt to steal and destroy our hard work and the investments of 135 mostly senior citizen shareholders in our privately held Colorado corporation. In the process, our corporate and personal names were slandered in local newspapers by false reports from DRMS officials.

Far too many government agencies are corrupted now because they have been largely taken over by radical environmentalists, who know little about mining or society’s crucial need for minerals, who are ideologically opposed to mining and other productive land uses, and whose ideologies too often make them think they are above the law.

Environmentalism has become a new religion, whose extremists will do whatever it takes to fulfill their misguided life missions, to engage in what far too often amounts to injustice and legalized theft.

Worst of all, they have no respect for those who literally stake their time, their fortunes and even their lives mining for metals that make our modern technologies, lives, health and living standards possible. There is little difference between them and other radical religious zealots who cross the line from respectful observance into insanity and acts of depravity. They miss few opportunities to undermine America’s once incredible opportunities under the guise of “saving the planet” – mostly from problems and dangers that have been wildly exaggerated or willfully misrepresented or even concocted.

When we began underground hard rock mining near Silverton in the San Juan Mountains of Colorado in 1980, regulations were comparatively few – but compared to earlier times of few or no rules, mostly sensible and more than ample to ensure human safety and environmental protection.

Dynamite was available at the local hardware store. It was very important for us to protect the environment and operate with the utmost safety. We did exactly that, as we were initially regulated by the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) for the environment and the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) for safety. In all those years, our company never had a single lost time accident; always took great care to protect the air, water and wildlife habitats; and made sure we never disturbed any more land than was absolutely necessary.

The DRMS began regulating our silver mine several years later. The transition went smoothly for several years, but then silver prices dropped to unsustainable levels. We reclaimed much of the historically mined silver property at our own expense for later use – then raised more capital from family and friends to expand into gold mining in 1988 with the purchase of 370 acres of private mineral property and associated permits. Our new property was surrounded by USFS public land.

A private litigation ensued, which we won handily – even though the DRMS entered the fray in an attempt to use the opportunity to gain more control over our property and mining in general. A concerned Colorado state representative came to our rescue at the time and blocked the DRMS action.

The agency had just become involved in the Summitville open pit mine disaster in the 1990s. The environmental disaster involved extensive pollution of local streams due to leakage of acidic water that contained large quantities of toxic heavy metals originating from decades-old mine tunnels from decades-old mining operations and poorly constructed storage pits associated with more recent open-pit mining.

The DRMS and other agencies should have regulated the operations and pollution much more responsibly from the outset. But they were largely inattentive and negligent. The disaster ultimately cost Colorado and U.S. taxpayers over $150,000,000 – a liability that the agency then capitalized on as an excuse to increase the price for reclamation bonds to unreasonable levels.

It was the first major example in Colorado of environmental activist bureaucrats attempting to regulate an industry in which it actually had no or too few qualifications, and doing so more from a position of opposing activities that they disliked and whose value they did not appreciate.

Fast forward to 2015. The historic San Juan Mining District experienced an even greater disaster: the infamous 2015 Gold King Mine Spill, whose direct cause can be laid squarely on the DRMS, in conjunction with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. DRMS policies for handling earthen plugs in old mine portals had already been evaluated by the United States Geological Survey, which strongly advised against this method of remediating leakage from abandoned mines. The USGS was ignored.

Negative environmental impacts from reopening caved-in portals have been a problem for decades. It should be obvious that plugging a leak or opening while water is still flowing into a mine means it will fill up and spill over. If the water mixes with acid-generating elements underground, it will become acidic. Yet the DRMS signed off on its policies and practices anyway – causing a disaster that even today is costing taxpayers more millions of dollars, with ongoing cleanup costs that will eventually make the Summitville clean-up costs look cheap.

And still, when my company was in court with the DRMS in 2017, its lawyer told the judge and courtroom that the DRMS would undoubtedly need to plug our portals. Some bureaucrats never learn, or will say anything to an uneducated populace to shut down legitimate operators.

In fact, another vast area in the San Juans, once one of the richest underground mining districts in the world, is now off limits to mining – not because of shoddy mining practices, but because incompetent and ideologically driven bureaucrats have been handed the reins to regulate access into oblivion.

Craig Liukko has owned and operated underground mining, mineral processing and manufacturing businesses for over 40 years. He has traveled to many countries in Central America, the Middle East and Africa, helping them create jobs – safely and ecologically. Part 2 of this article will appear tomorrow.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

79 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Geoff Sherrington
January 19, 2019 5:13 pm

The problems caused by environmental meddlers into the mineral industries of the world are huge and the threat is largely misunderstood. It is a case of a large, popular movement “save the earth” style with childish average intellect, interfering with a small but highly-skilled industry (small numbers of employees) that now has the label of nasty, dirty, dangerous, a harm to environmental sustainability and the rest of these now-common, knee jerk descriptors.
In 1972 I first met this problem with regard to the Ranger Uranium Mines in northern Australia, which colleagues had discovered in 1969. It was then, by far, the largest known uranium deposit in the world, at a time when many nuclear reactors were being built for peaceful electricity generation. With our in-house solicitor, I chronicled the events here:
http://www.geoffstuff.com/munmarlary_legal.docx

You have to know the terminology to understand this document, so I will use brief, plain language.
From the very beginning, early 1970s, we found unexpected government resistance to our normal, further efforts to develop this place from a prospect to a productive mine, irrespective of the colour of politics in power at the time. Most of the obstruction came from erosion of principles of property rights. Some came from poisoning of the minds of local aborigines by the social history set from major universities.
In the main, the obstruction came from successive acts and regulations that curbed our ability to do customary mining operations. The land around us was proclaimed a National Park, in 3 stages that finally totalled 19,800 square km (7,646 sq miles), more than the area of Massachusetts, USA. That took away our granted ability to explore further virgin country. Our original holdings were reduced to 79 square km, the Ranger Project area. Then, the United Nations came in with a proposal (demand?) to create a World Heritage Area over the Park. That was the bitter end. We retired with the tiny portion thrown to us like scraps to a dog and got on with the mining, resulting in this view taken a few years ago –
http://www.geoffstuff.com/rangeraerial.jpg

In hindsight, we were never going to win. It was a uranium discovery and already the greens hated uranium. It was remote, nearly uninhabited, so city folk deprived of freedom to move wanted it kept that way. New species were rapidly discovered in the region, existing species became threatened with rapid extinction. The aborigines, formerly just guys, girls, mates who shared normal discussions with us, were given reserved areas where we had to get permits to enter. On and on it went, one obstruction after another, one inquiry after another, one more fact-finding government mission after another, another day, another expensive court case ….
Late in this harmful, destructive process, it started to become clearer who was pulling the strings. At first we thought, the NT Government, then the Federal Government in Canberra — but it went far deeper than that to the powers we now see wanting to have one world government, pushing the same way under the banner of climate change. Do not ever doubt that there are shadowy, wealthy figures behind the scenes, pushing and pulling, threatening, rewarding, persuading. We even had Al Gore visit Canberra and insist on some policy changes.
As for us, the miners, who knows how much we lost. There was never talk of compensation. We had the makings of another mine at Ranger 4, but we lost it. On what we knew from drilling, I’d say half a billion $$$ went into the ether just at that one tiny spot.

The lesson? Study property rights. Study the history of failed socialism, of failed communism, of failed Fabian movements. Beware of the political left. They have different moral principles. On the personal level, if you think your own work is threatened, beware of high-ranking officials who come out of nowhere and start talking about different directions, different ideals. Beware in particular those who seek to re-arrange interests in land, for land is the fundamental on which most change is made. Treat world heritage people with the disgust they deserve, for brainwashing your children and mine with images of beauty that they say need protection, when there is no unusual harm to them. Listen to hard science, reject the post-normal garbage that our academics are captured by, stick to facts.
It is so sad when ignorance is allowed to dominate over common sense. Geoff.

January 19, 2019 7:39 pm

The Greens will save the us from climate change but who will save us from the greens?

climanrecon
January 20, 2019 5:23 am

Sadly environmental fundamentalism now starts in schools, just take a look at a modern chemistry textbook, you will find it full of dire warnings about mining causing pollution, and general green propaganda about chemicals being the work of the Devil.

Kevin
January 20, 2019 4:43 pm

Environmentalism began as a religion, in contrast to Conservationism.

The one presumes that natural is good and right.
The other, that nature is morally neutral.

Mankind is some sort of unnatural bane, a curse (or in the current parlance) a virus, needing eradication.
Or man is a part of nature (or biblically speaking, meant to be a steward), who can do evil, but ought not.

Enviros believe that man should serve nature.
People like those who created the national park system believe rather that we are to serve our fellow man, by conserving our natural endowments, for our neighbors and children.

Environmentalists are evil, inhumane beasts, who wish death, disease, and poverty on others, typically those who are often only now making serious strides to exit such a world.

-K

Robert of Texas
January 20, 2019 8:30 pm

I love the San Juan Mountain Area in Colorado and am very familiar with the damage that mining has caused – mostly in the past before their were regulations and enforcement to reduce risks to the environment. One cannot compare what was practice 60 years or more ago with a modern operation – they are night and day different.

By allowing mining companies to just vanish without putting aside money for cleanup, the government is just as responsible for the cleanup mess as the mining companies. Miners did, after all, provide a valuable product that enriched the nation.

Now the government is over-reaching, using the practices of the past they allowed to justify stifling amounts of regulation in the present. There needs to be a teaspoon of Common Sense added, but then I did use the term Government so forget that.

The large sudden release of toxic chemicals in the abandoned mine discharge was purely caused by bad decisions, and purely by government regulators, but there are dozens (maybe hundreds) of abandoned mine shafts and many are leaking toxic water into the local environment. As long as they are left alone, the discharge rate is low enough to be less destructive, but go damning them up and letting it build up capacity and you are setting a ticking time-bomb in place. Treating the water as it comes out is the only logical approach if one wants to reduce the risk, but do NOT stockpile the toxic water. Treatment will be expensive, so if you can’t afford it, leave it alone.

And if mining the minerals will not provide enough profit for setting aside cleanup funds, then leave the minerals alone. Someday they will be worthwhile.