Greenhouse gasses triggering more changes than we can handle

From Eurekalert

Public Release: 19-Nov-2018

Prediction is, by 2100, the number of hazards occurring concurrently will increase, making it even more difficult for people to cope

University of Hawaii at Manoa

186297_web
IMAGE: Map displays the cumulative number of climate hazards by 2100 under business as usual scenario. Interactive data at: https://maps.esri.com/MoraLab/CumulativeChange/index.html Credit: Camilo Mora.

A new study published in Nature Climate Change provides one of the most comprehensive assessments yet of how humanity is being impacted by the simultaneous occurrence of multiple climate hazards strengthened by increasing greenhouse gas emissions. This research reveals that society faces a much larger threat from climate change than previous studies have suggested.

An analysis of thousands of peer-reviewed scientific papers reveals 467 ways in which human health, food, water, economy, infrastructure, and security have been impacted by multiple climatic changes including: warming, drought, heatwaves, wildfires, precipitation, floods, storms, sea level rise and changes in land cover and ocean chemistry.

Until now, with few exceptions, climate hazards due to greenhouse gas emissions have been studied individually. However, focusing on one or few hazards may mask the impacts of other hazards resulting in incomplete assessments of the consequences of climate change on humanity.

Ongoing greenhouse gas emissions are known to increase atmospheric temperature, in turn enhancing soil water evaporation resulting in drought, wildfires and heatwaves in normally dry places, or massive rain and floods in commonly wet areas. In the oceans, warmer waters also evaporate faster, increasing wind speeds and the downpours of hurricanes, whose surges can be aggravated by sea level rise. As a result, greenhouse gas emissions can aggravate simultaneously multiple climate hazards.

In a systematic review of thousands of papers, the study details 467 ways of how these hazards have already impacted human health, including death, disease and mental well-being; food supply from animals and plants on land and sea; quantity and quality of freshwater; infrastructure including electricity, transportation and “life line” services such as water and sewage lines, and economic losses including property damage and reduced labor productivity; all while triggering multiple cases of migrations and violence. Over 3,000 documented case examples, with supporting papers, are listed at http://impactsofclimatechange.info/.

“Greenhouse gas emissions pose a broad threat to humanity by simultaneously intensifying many hazards that have proven harmful in the past,” said lead author Camilo Mora, associate professor of geography in the College of Social Sciences at the University of Hawaii at Manoa “Further, we predict that by 2100 the number of hazards occurring concurrently will increase, making it even more difficult for people to cope.”

The study, co-authored by 23 scientists, combines exhaustive data mining and the technological abilities of Mora’s graduate students analyzing vast amounts of big data, with the longtime expertise of veteran climate scientists, including several lead authors on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports.

In the year 2100, for instance, New York is projected to face up to four climate hazards, if greenhouse gas emissions are not mitigated, including sea-level rise and extreme precipitation. That same year, Sydney and Los Angeles will face three concurrent climate hazards, Mexico City will face four, and the Atlantic coast of Brazil will face five. Even under strong mitigation scenarios, increasing cumulative exposure to the multitude of climate hazards will impact rich and poor countries alike and especially in tropical coastal areas.

A web-application that accompanies the paper allows users to see the cumulative number of climate hazards likely to occur anywhere on Earth, under different emissions scenarios through 2100 (see figure).

“The study is a compelling review of how climate change is literally redrawing lines on the map, clearly showing the threats that our world faces at every level. The maps and data hammer home how much danger humanity truly faces, and the need for immediate action,” said Dawn Wright, ESRI Chief Scientist

“Our health depends on multiple factors, from clean air and water, to safe food and shelter and more,” said co-author Jonathan Patz, professor and director of the University of Wisconsin’s Global Health Institute. “So without a real systems approach to climate change impacts, we cannot adequately understand the full risks. If we only consider the most direct threats from climate change, for example heatwaves or severe storms, we inevitably will be blindsided by even larger threats that, in combination, can have even broader societal impacts.”

Said Michael Mann, Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Science at Penn State University who was not involved in the study, “This new research provides rigorous, quantitative support for a point we have emphasized for some time: the costs of inaction greatly outweigh the costs of taking action on climate change. It also provides robust support for another key point: we can still reduce future damage and suffering if we act quickly and dramatically to reduce carbon emissions.”

“The collision of cumulative climate hazards is not something on the horizon, it is already here,” said Mora. “Co-occurring and colliding climate hazards are already making headlines worldwide. Last year, for instance, Florida recorded extreme drought, record high temperatures, over 100 wildfires, and the strongest ever recorded hurricane in its Panhandle: the category 4 Hurricane Michael. Likewise, California is currently experiencing ferocious wild fires and one of the longest droughts, plus extreme heatwaves this past summer.”

“The evidence of climate change impacting humanity is abundant, loud and clear,” said Assistant Professor Daniele Spirandelli at the University of Hawaii at Manoa and co-author of the study. “Clearly, the outstanding question is–how many wake-up calls will it take to wake up?”

The paper concludes urgently: “Overall, our analysis shows that ongoing climate change will pose a heightened threat to humanity that will be greatly aggravated if substantial and timely reductions of greenhouse gas emissions are not achieved.”

###

Original Press Release

Addendum. Contributor Eric Worral notes that Camilo Mora also attacked democracy, complaining “one person can reverse it all” in a Sydney Morning Herald interview –

https://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/mind-blowing-hazards-to-multiply-and-accumulate-with-climate-change-20181119-p50gx7.html .

 

 

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
101 Comments
November 20, 2018 6:59 am

Check out the Ocasio-Cortez plan on how to combat climate change. Talk about a change that we can’t handle!

ResourceGuy
November 20, 2018 7:08 am

Life is good when you can write scare fiction in the morning and then go out to the beach for the rest of the day.

Samuel C Cogar
November 20, 2018 7:25 am

It should be obvious to most every anti-CAGW proponent that the lead author and associate professor Camilo Mora and his 22 co-authors simply composed and published that silly paper for the simple reason of garnering “national attention” for the University of Hawaii.

Their hope is that along with said “national attention”, also will come a big increase in Government Grant Funding as well as a big increase of out-of-State-enrolments.

garyh845
November 20, 2018 7:31 am

Anthropogenic fear-mongering.

MarkW
November 20, 2018 7:36 am

Any day now, we will start seeing changes.
And once you do, they will be awesome changes.

Bruce Cobb
November 20, 2018 7:37 am

Clearly, the climate propaganda campaign has failed. Hilariously, they seem to think that doubling and tripling down on the number of lies, and shouting louder, that their “message” will finally get through. It’s Climate Numptyism, on steroids.

Reply to  Bruce Cobb
November 20, 2018 1:39 pm

The chilling thing is that with some people, it does…

Walter Sobchak
November 20, 2018 7:38 am

oakwood
November 20, 2018 7:40 am

This story reminds me of an extract from ‘Three Men in a Boat’ (Jerome K Jerome, 1889) – after reading the medical book, the only ailment I didn’t have was housemaids knee!
“I remember going to the British Museum one day to read up the treatment for some slight ailment of which I had a touch – hay fever, I fancy it was. I got down the book, and read all I came to read; and then, in an unthinking moment, I idly turned the leaves, and began to indolently study diseases, generally. I forget which was the first distemper I plunged into – some fearful, devastating scourge, I know – and, before I had glanced half down the list of “premonitory symptoms,” it was borne in upon me that I had fairly got it.

I sat for awhile, frozen with horror; and then, in the listlessness of despair, I again turned over the pages. I came to typhoid fever – read the symptoms – discovered that I had typhoid fever, must have had it for months without knowing it – wondered what else I had got; turned up St. Vitus’s Dance – found, as I expected, that I had that too, – began to get interested in my case, and determined to sift it to the bottom, and so started alphabetically – read up ague, and learnt that I was sickening for it, and that the acute stage would commence in about another fortnight. Bright’s disease, I was relieved to find, I had only in a modified form, and, so far as that was concerned, I might live for years. Cholera I had, with severe complications; and diphtheria I seemed to have been born with. I plodded conscientiously through the twenty-six letters, and the only malady I could conclude I had not got was housemaid’s knee.”

James Clarke
Reply to  oakwood
November 20, 2018 8:15 am

Bad news, Oakwood. Increase atmospheric CO2 has been linked to acute housemaid’s knee! Not only linked, but in a far worse way than was originally thought!

Thanks for sharing!

Martin557
November 20, 2018 7:42 am

This looks to me to be yet another compilation of political science intruding on real science. It shouldn’t be too long and the boy that cried wolf is going to get his mouth washed out with soap.

JMichna
November 20, 2018 7:44 am

“…An analysis of thousands of peer-reviewed scientific papers reveals 467 ways in which human health, food, water, economy, infrastructure, and security have been impacted by multiple climatic changes including: warming, drought, heatwaves, wildfires, precipitation, floods, storms, sea level rise and changes in land cover and ocean chemistry….”

Another “research paper of research papers” mess… making predictions by drawing conclusions from the inadequately reviewed/pal-reviewed speculative literature… building a house of cards on a bed of sand. Too bad the keepers of the “Warmlist” stopped updating & adding…. this new “research” could have made their lives much easier.

kent beuchert
November 20, 2018 8:00 am

It’s pretty pathetic that the study of huricanes ignores the record breaking length of time without any major hurricanes coming ashore and instead cited a hurricane (Michael) as the worst Florida panhandle hurricane in recorded history.It should be noted that a Cat 4 is far from the strongest hurricane hitting the Gulf coast and that it is rare for a hurricane to land on the Florida panhandle.
Hurricane Camille, was a Cat 5 plus and hit the Gulf coast in the 1960’s – it made Micheal look like a
small potato affair, which apparently indicates that hurricans have become fewer and weaker
as the planet warmed many years later. There remains no correlation between droughts, hurricanes,floods,tornadoes (also fewer and weaker as warming increased).

Reg Nelson
November 20, 2018 8:10 am

According to climate.gov
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/enso/why-did-it-rain-so-much-california-during-last-year%E2%80%99s-la-ni%C3%B1a

The 2016-2017 water year was the third wettest year on record for California. So how can California be experiencing one of the longest droughts?

Doesn’t say much for their big data mining skills, does it?

Reply to  Reg Nelson
November 20, 2018 11:38 am

Come on, Reg. Who said their facts had to be true? Post-science science relies on post-fact facts to support its conclusions. Which are, by definition, always negative.

Terence Gore
November 20, 2018 8:11 am

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/16/nyregion/snowstorm-total-delays-commute.html

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/nov/20/new-york-city-subway-bus-death-spiral-mta-fares

Both of these stories point more to capital infrastructure deficiencies than climate change to me. However they are not very ‘sexy’ in terms of raising money

D. J. Hawkins
Reply to  Terence Gore
November 20, 2018 10:35 am

The upper deck of the GWB was closed in both directions due to accidents. Rte 280 was closed over several stretches. Rte 3 was likewise closed to accidents and Rte 21 as well, both northbound and southbound. Those closures basically put a cork in travel throughout NE NJ and backed up into NYC. I’m not fond of Democrats of any stripe, but I don’t think this is something that can be laid at their doorstep nor would it have been different if sanders had been out earlier.

Terence Gore
Reply to  D. J. Hawkins
November 21, 2018 7:26 am

“I’m not fond of Democrats of any stripe, but I don’t think this is something that can be laid at their doorstep”

I agree, why pick on solely the democrats. An aging infrastructure I think is more likely to experience and magnify problems. As is who to blame “climate change” is as good a scapegoat as anyone.

Editor
November 20, 2018 9:07 am

There seems to be a problem with the headline. It should read:

Greenhouse Gases Triggering More Snowflakes Than Seems Possible

w.

Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
November 20, 2018 9:29 am

Exactly!
An excellent summation, Willis!

Hugs
Reply to  ATheoK
November 20, 2018 11:13 am

The original title didn’t pass the sniff test. That’s all I’ll say.

Joe Shaw
Reply to  Willis Eschenbach
November 20, 2018 4:09 pm

Actually, Snowflakes seem to be very easily triggered. Hence the need for all the warnings.

Nick Werner
November 20, 2018 9:27 am

Imagine all kinds of things to fret about.
Then count them and fret about how many there are.
I’m guessing that by the time the study was published there were at least 468.

November 20, 2018 9:56 am

“An analysis of thousands of peer-reviewed scientific papers reveals 467 ways in which human health”

What an astonishing approach!?
Why does that approach sound so familiar?

First link in the article is to ‘impactsofclimatechange.info’

Where the Whois record does not show an owner per se; solely the state of Hawaii as location.
One would think a university proud of their work would be more forthright.

“Raw WHOIS Record
Domain Name: IMPACTSOFCLIMATECHANGE.INFO
Registry Domain ID: D503300000037081490-LRMS
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2018-03-24T14:11:42Z
Creation Date: 2017-03-23T17:12:47Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-03-23T17:12:47Z
Registrar Registration Expiration Date:
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: +1.4806242505
Reseller:
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Registrant Organization:
Registrant State/Province: Hawaii
Registrant Country: US
Name Server: NS3.HOSTINGER.COM
Name Server: NS4.HOSTINGER.COM
Name Server: NS1.HOSTINGER.COM
Name Server: NS2.HOSTINGER.COM”

The table of “references” apparently lists every article ever printed that allegedly has instances of “climate change dangers”.

No citation is questioned, No rebuttals or falsifications are applicable, every inclusion has become a “climate change” doom disaster by assumption.
That the same authors published dozens or more of the same tripe is immaterial.

Allegedly, this research was performed by a University. Meaning that some poor sod got a degree out of this foolishness; another mini-me-Mann.

At the basis of this nonsense is another attempt to shove an imagined consensus authority down the public’s gullet. It is pure propaganda.

Ed Bo
Reply to  Charles Rotter
November 20, 2018 12:42 pm

That was my first thought when I saw this post — that the authors went to the numberwatch list and took it in the wrong sense.

Now I’ve got to get my paper published that says climate change makes the problem of ingrown toenails worse…

Peta of Newark
November 20, 2018 10:43 am

What would happen if The Interweb was switched off…..

The guy who invented, Berners Lee, it is really rather regretting having done so in words he uttered recently

Not least coz look wotz just arrived in my inbox, all the way from Oz. Epic innit.
https://www.futurelearn.com/courses/plague-pestilence-pandemic

Doesn’t seem to mention AGW in the intro blurb tho……
Aw look also, who is running the course. Nearly as pretty as me.

Ha. I’ve got it.
Algore’s head would explode

Apart from that, I do sometimes ponder when ‘Alarmism’ becomes ‘Terrorism’ ….
*especially* when propagated into a population not in the very best of mental health through their dietary choices/impositions

November 20, 2018 10:55 am

I can’t blame this study for wrong conclusions based upon what “climate scientists” say will happen. The problem is with climate scientists and the media that keep predicting a 5 degree increase in temperatures without any evidentiary evidence. I do blame these scientists for doing follow on studies without the fundamental assumption of global warming having no empirical evidence that man-made CO2 is the culprit.

Mickey Reno
November 20, 2018 11:00 am

When the hockey stick graph was shown to be malarkey by McIntyre and McKittrick, and the whole premise of CO2 forced warming presumed by virtual climate models is under threat of collapse, OF COURSE the alarmists needed to go to extreme events and weather deaths to maintain their god-awful fiction of impending CAGW. The catastrophes of hurricanes and wildfires are real. They happened before. They will happen in the future. So, now, exactly how many fewer of those kinds of events should we expect if we stop burning fossil fuels? More importantly, how many more deaths from the stopping fossil fuels will their be?

These effing scientific cowards are not prepared to honestly answer those last two questions (which answers would undoubtedly be, we don’t know and we don’t know but there would be many), and so we should discount every word they say.

And will we need a modern gulag, like Stalin had with his Lysenko moment, to hold the dissenters? The Holodomor (the alleged collective farming miracle) killed modestly 10 to 20 million due to starvation, and the gulags were the deaths of 100s of thousands, if not millions. Stalin killed more people than Hitler with his Utopean socialism. Mao’s reeducation camps probably killed more than Stalin with his. In Venezuela, the who productive class of people are clearing out, leaving an empty shell where a vibrant, wealthy economy once thrived. Mostly because the miracle of fossil fuel travel is still somewhat open to the more resourceful. We cannot, we must not vote for idiots promising miracles, like Alex Occasio-Cortez, who wants a Hugo Chavez-esque style command economy in the USA. There is no country to which Americans can flee.

No more funding for climate models, no more funding for IPCC or UNFCCC work. Get the US out of the UNFCCC and the IPCC. Getting out of the UN completely would be even better. Our somewhat free-market, liberty loving survival may be at stake.

November 20, 2018 11:19 am

Anthony’s CO2 in a jar experiment demonstrates that CO2 does not increase atmospheric warming. The CO2 jar should have had about 70 W more available than other jar.

If everything the experts said were true then we should have had a change in the specific heat of air by now. I have not heard of any change.

Tom Abbott
November 20, 2018 12:00 pm

From the article: “said lead author Camilo Mora, associate professor of geography in the College of Social Sciences at the University of Hawaii at Manoa “Further, we predict that by 2100 the number of hazards occurring concurrently will increase, making it even more difficult for people to cope.”

The year 2100? I thought the latest doomsaying claim was it will be all over in the next 12 years! So you are saying humans will still be around in 2100 despite all that Global Warming?

Tom Abbott
November 20, 2018 12:10 pm

From the article: ““The collision of cumulative climate hazards is not something on the horizon, it is already here,” said Mora. “Co-occurring and colliding climate hazards are already making headlines worldwide.”

There are plenty of headlines, but they are not reporting on unusual weather, they are reporting on normal weather and calling it unusual.

There is NO evidence that CO2 is in any way affecting the course of the Earth’s atmosphere. Any claim to the contrary is not based on the facts as established. They can make claims all day long but they cannot show the connection. The facts are there is less severe weather now than in the historic past. Anyone who says these things are getting worse is not looking at real world statistics. It’s just not true.

Earthling2
November 20, 2018 12:16 pm

“Last year, for instance, Florida recorded extreme drought, record high temperatures, over 100 wildfires, and the strongest ever recorded hurricane in its Panhandle: the category 4 Hurricane Michael.”

What does Cat 4 Hurricane Michael have to do with the Florida Panhandle? That is where a hurricane made landfall, not where the hurricane was created. The hurricane was created out in the ocean, and strengthened rapidly in the warm waters of the Gulf. Because it makes landfall in the Panhandle has nothing at all to do with Florida, other than that is where the damage occurred. This paper makes it sounds like Florida is responsible for creating the hurricane.

Tom Abbott
November 20, 2018 12:16 pm

From the article: ““The evidence of climate change impacting humanity is abundant, loud and clear,” said Assistant Professor Daniele Spirandelli at the University of Hawaii at Manoa and co-author of the study.”

Well, the climate does impact humanity, but there is no evidence that CO2 has anything to do with it.

After all these years and still no evidence. Now the Alarmists promoting this farce are trying to repeat the lie often enough to make it come true in people’s minds.

There’s no evidence for your claims Mr. Spirandelli. We, on the other side, are going to keep repeating that.