MIAMI—New research shows that not all corals respond the same to changes in climate. The University of Miami (UM) Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science-led study looked at the sensitivity of two types of corals found in Florida and the Caribbean and found that one of them—mountainous star coral—possesses an adaptation that allows it to survive under high temperatures and acidity conditions.
“Stressful periods of high temperature and increasingly acidic conditions are becoming more frequent and longer lasting in Florida waters,” said Chris Langdon, marine biology and ecology professor and lead author on the new study. “However, we found that not all coral species are equally sensitive to climate change and there’s hope that some species that seemed doomed may yet develop adaptations that will allow them to survive as well.”
The researchers exposed two threatened Caribbean reef-building coral species, staghorn coral (Acropora cervicornis) and mountainous star coral(Orbicella faveolata), were exposed to combinations of normal (26 degrees Celsius) and elevated temperature (32 degrees Celsius) and increased carbon dioxide levels (pH 7.8/800 ppm) for nine weeks. Genetic and physiological data such as skeletal growth was then collected on the corals to determine if stress events are recorded in a coral’s skeletal history.
At the end of the nine weeks any corals that were still surviving were recovered at the cool temperature and normal pH to determine the capacity of these corals to bounce back once environmental conditions became more hospitable as naturally occurs as summer transitions into fall.
The researchers found that the staghorn coral was more sensitive to heat stress. It experienced 100 percent mortality after 25 days at the elevated temperature of 1.5 degrees Celsius above the historical maximum monthly mean temperature for the Florida Keys. South Florida waters could begin to experience hot spells of this intensity and duration once every five years by 2035, which according to the researchers suggests that the species could become increasingly rare within 20 years.
The mountainous star coral survived 62 days at the elevated temperature and quickly recovered when temperature was reduced at the end of the experiment. Reduced pH did not affect survival but did significantly impact growth under normal temperatures.
“Based on these results we predict that mountainous star coral will very conservatively be able to tolerate any warming the Florida Keys is likely to experience now until 2060 and very possibly to the end of the century,” said Langdon. “This optimistic prediction needs to be qualified by the fact that decreasing pH will impact the reproductive potential of this species. While the decreasing pH won’t kill the corals outright it will mean that fewer baby corals will be produced to replace adult corals that die of natural or unnatural causes.”
Coral reefs are especially vulnerable to climate change because they are easily affected by warm water. When ocean temperatures rise, the algae that give coral its bright colors leave their host, causing it to look white, a condition known as ‘coral bleaching’. The loss of algae, which provide coral with much of its energy, make corals vulnerable to starvation and disease.
The mountainous star coral had special algae, called D symbionts, which the researchers believe made it able to adapt to the experimental climate change conditions.
Rapidly warming oceans are resulting in more frequent and severe mass bleaching events, while the uptake of CO2by the surface ocean is driving down the pH making it more difficult for corals and other organisms to build their skeleton and shells.
The study allows researchers to better understand how corals respond to heat stress and ocean acidification, which is important since these conditions are expected to affect corals in coming decades and to understand how these stressors are recorded in coral skeletons.
The study, titled “Two threatened Caribbean coral species have contrasting responses to combined temperature and acidification stress,” was published on July 31, 2018 in the journal Limnology and Oceanography, DOI: 10.1002/Ino.10952.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Ah, organisms in nature can adapt to changing conditions, who knew?
Great Barrier Reef
I read recently that the sea temp difference from North to Southern extremes is some 5* C.
I don’t see any mention of this in the comments, so perhaps that indicates some of you are not familiar with the Bikini Atoll. That was the site of a series of high-yield thermonuclear tests from 1946 to 1954. Testing was done in the coral reefs, seabed, waters, and airspace. Unimaginable heat. Tremendous shockwaves and craters. Radiation that remains too high for human habitats to this day.
No idea how it changed the pH of the water, but odds are great it changed radically for a while. Note, too, that these were instantaneous changes, not a slow evolution.
The coral reef? It’s fine.
http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/-bikini-atolls-marine-life-is-thriving-70-years-after-nuclear-bomb-tests/
Corals will survive longer than Man, imo.
Yeah but what about the poor coral polyps that were there when the bomb went off? Think of the children!
Don’t know the effects the bombs had on the polyps, but polyps in carbon dioxide infused water are a good thing. If you are old enough, you will remember, “Polyp, polyp, fizz, fizz, oh what a relief it is.”
(Sorry. Couldn’t resist.)
“Stressful periods of high temperature and increasingly acidic conditions are becoming more frequent and longer lasting in Florida waters,” said Chris Langdon, ”
Say no more. Get the kids outa the water now.
(Sarc. coz the protocol requires it)
Somewhere, Darwin searches for his shocked face.
A few years ago I watched a pro-AGW IMAX film on coral reefs, which focused on The Great Barrier Reef. In the narration, they slipped up be revealing that reef sits on the fossilized remains of a dozen other reefs. Instantly I realized that meant that the reef had been completely killed off in other epochs, yet there it is today in all it’s glory. It also means that there is some survival mechanism that allows the reef to completely restore itself in the same place after total destruction.
There have been many articles here at WUWT that have dealt with false representations of how much the reef has been damaged by CAWG or other man-made supposed catastrophes. The use of the word “acidified” causes me to instantly discount an article or post as propaganda. Man has initiated processes that have made a dent in killing The Great Barrier Reef. Despite that, 95 percent of the reef remains a massive living thing. Reading about it before writing this post, I was surprised to learn that not all of it has been explored yet.
It must have been an imposing sight during the last ice age rising like a dead tower out of the ocean. Yet there it is, one of the most beautiful things to explore underwater on our planet.
Having a little bit of knowledge about the Florida Keys environment it is hard for me to believe that 32 degrees C (89.6 degrees F) is not been a relatively common occurrence in the Keys. Yet it would be interesting to know exactly where they got their temperature data from “the wild.” The Florida Keys, especially the reef system is an extremely dynamic place, most especially the outer edges of the reef that are influenced by the Florida Current. And the Florida Current doesn’t exactly stay in one place for very long.
Corals are difficult to keep in captivity. Some species do not do well even if you match what you might believe are optimum conditions. I have known only a couple of people that kept more than a couple of species successfully. Interestingly the folks I knew that kept corals really well were not degreed scientists.
Coral reefs that have survived for millions of years. I am totally surprised they can adapt of climate change. Next someone will work out that polar bears, turtles and crocodiles maybe able to adapt as well.
Corals are a non issue. They just move around on the currents to wherever is best for them. The GBR is older than the current series of ice ages, when sea levels drop 100 metres and you can walk from Cairns to the GBR most of the time… Coarls are not endangered, they are prolific and regenerate wherever conditions are appropraiate. When the reefs move, which natural change ensures, the tourist hence research money moves with them. But very slowly, there is a difference between regional weather cycles and sea level change, cyclonic damage recovery, and any effect from much smaller and slower actual global climate change, which is almost imperceptible in comparison. Nothing to sea hear.