From the university of Exeter:
Scientists propose solution to ‘Gaia puzzle’
Scientists may have solved a long-standing puzzle over why conditions on Earth have remained stable enough for life to evolve over billions of years.
The ‘Gaia’ hypothesis proposed that living things interacting with inorganic processes somehow keep the planet in a state where life can persist – despite threats such as a brightening sun, volcanoes and meteorite strikes.
The puzzle of how this might work has divided experts for decades, but a team led by scientists from the University of Exeter have proposed a solution.
They say stability could come from “sequential selection” in which situations where life destabilises the environment tend to be short-lived and result in further change until a stable situation emerges, which then tends to persist.
Once this happens, the system has more time to acquire further traits that help to stabilise and maintain it – a process known as “selection by survival alone”.
“We can now explain how the Earth has accumulated stabilising mechanisms over the past 3.5 billion years of life on the planet,” said Professor Tim Lenton, of the University of Exeter.
“The central problem with the original Gaia hypothesis was that evolution via natural selection cannot explain how the whole planet came to have stabilising properties over geologic timescales.”
“Instead, we show that at least two simpler mechanisms work together to give our planet with life self-stabilising properties.”
He added: “Our findings can help explain how we came to be here to wonder about this question in the first place.”
Professor Dave Wilkinson, of the University of Lincoln, who was also involved in the research, added: “I have been involved in trying to figure out how Gaia might work for over 20 years – finally it looks like a series of promising ideas are all coming together to provide the understanding I have been searching for.”
Dr James Dyke, of the University of Southampton, also an author on the paper, said: “As well as being important for helping to estimate the probability of complex life elsewhere in the universe, the mechanisms we identify may prove crucial in understanding how our home planet may respond to drivers such as human-produced climate change and extinction events.”
Creating transformative solutions to the global changes that humans are now causing is a key focus of the University of Exeter’s new Global Systems Institute, directed by Professor Lenton, who said: “We can learn some lessons from Gaia on how to create a flourishing, sustainable, stable future for 9-11 billion people this century.”
The Gaia hypothesis, first put forward by James Lovelock in the 1970s, was named after the deity who personified the Earth in Greek mythology.
The paper, published in the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution, is entitled: “Selection for Gaia across multiple scales.”
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“Creating transformative solutions to the global changes that humans are now causing is a key focus of the University of Exeter’s new Global Systems Institute, directed by Professor Lenton…”
All you need to know.
Expect a call from the Prof for more money.
Anthony Watts :
SERIOUSLY ????
( This should be READ while imagining the greatest extent of incredulity that you can muster ).
YOU ARE……. HAVING US ON !!!??? ……………………AREN’T YOU ??????
The Universities are Lincoln , Southampt-on and EX-ETER-MARKS THE SPOT-ON !
The “researchers” ( acolytes ?? ) are Wilkins-on and Lent-on …………….
and a Dyke !…………..
Well ….not much I do about that one !!
.
“Scientists may have solved a long-standing puzzle over why conditions on Earth have remained stable ”
.
It HAPPENED just after the invention of the HORSE , of course !!
.
( Although there is a legal precedent :
In Hercules case it was Cattle !!! So I four-foot my argument ! )
.
Unfortunately the paper is beyond pay wall so that I cannot verify what they mean by
“We can now explain how the Earth has accumulated stabilising mechanisms over the past 3.5 billion years of life on the planet,”
The only thing that is sure is that their definition of stability must be extremely strange .
If anything the Earth has always been extremely unstable on geological scales .
It started with no liquid water and no oxygen .
Oxygen was deeply destabilizing because it introduced massive oxydation which didn’t exist up to there .
CO2 went down from 15 % to traces .
The incoming solar energy has also significantly changed .
The appearance of water cycle was one of if not THE most massive change of atmospheric and oceanic dynamics .
The plate tectonics, asteroid impacts and volcanos have been destabilizing and are still destabilizing today .
The orbital parameters have been changing and are still changing what shows among others in irregular oscillations creating and destroying ice ages . There is nothing stable in these oscillations .
Etc .
I suspect that this paper has not much in common with serious science .
The ocean is so large relative to the atmosphere, it stabilizes the atmosphere. It is stable itself as it has a limited range of conditions and changes are slow due to its large mass. Problem solved. Has nothing biological to do with it. The biomass of the ocean is too small. The ocean and atmosphere are also stabilized by convection currents meaning the majority of the mass has to be changed to make a global effect. Other changes on shorter timescales than time required to alter the entire mass have no large effect.
The great stabilizer of Earth’s climate are the oceans I would think.