
Guest essay by Eric Worrall
According to a study by Arizona State University, global warming will accelerate deterioration of roads because the original asphalt won’t cope with the anticipated rapid temperature rise.
Study Says Climate Change Could Lead to Rougher Roads
By Don Jergler | September 28, 2017
…
A study by professors at Arizona State University shows that global warming could add billions of dollars to the nation’s transportation budget for pavement costs alone.
“Transportation infrastructure is built to last decades, but engineering protocols in the United States assume climate stationarity, which may result in accelerated degradation and, consequently, increased costs,” a study out from academics at ASU states.
According to the study, if the standard practice for material selection is not changed to adapt to rising average temperatures, it could add up to $21.8 billion to pavement costs by 2070 under the same moderate global warming scenarios that predict average global temperature increases of 1.8 C.
The standard practice for selecting materials to build roads is based on average temperatures from 1966 to 1995, which differs from averaged based on data studied from 1985 to 2014, according to Shane Underwood, an assistant professor of civil engineering at ASU and one of the authors of the study.
“That may not be applicable going forward,” Underwood said. “That’s largely a decision on expectations that the future will look at lot like the past. That uncertainty can lead to higher costs.”
…
Read more: http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/national/2017/09/28/465946.htm
The abstract of the study;
Increased costs to US pavement infrastructure from future temperature rise
B. Shane Underwood, Zack Guido, Padmini Gudipudi & Yarden Feinberg
Roadway design aims to maximize functionality, safety, and longevity. The materials used for construction, however, are often selected on the assumption of a stationary climate. Anthropogenic climate change may therefore result in rapid infrastructure failure and, consequently, increased maintenance costs, particularly for paved roads where temperature is a key determinant for material selection. Here, we examine the economic costs of projected temperature changes on asphalt roads across the contiguous United States using an ensemble of 19 global climate models forced with RCP 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios. Over the past 20 years, stationary assumptions have resulted in incorrect material selection for 35% of 799 observed locations. With warming temperatures, maintaining the standard practice for material selection is estimated to add approximately US$13.6, US$19.0 and US$21.8 billion to pavement costs by 2010, 2040 and 2070 under RCP4.5, respectively, increasing to US$14.5, US$26.3 and US$35.8 for RCP8.5. These costs will disproportionately affect local municipalities that have fewer resources to mitigate impacts. Failing to update engineering standards of practice in light of climate change therefore significantly threatens pavement infrastructure in the United States.
Read more (paywalled): https://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate3390.html
I’m not questioning Professor Underwood’s expertise with civil engineering, his ability to calculate the impact on existing materials of given arbitrary temperature changes, but an assumption that materials will remain static in coming decades is highly questionable.
There is huge ongoing investment into improving the durability of road paving materials, and increasingly robotic means of laying roads. To assume these advances will not significantly reduce road maintenance costs, to assume unlikely worst case climate scenarios like RCP 8.5, in my opinion is alarmist and absurd.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
They are right that climate change has made the roads rougher here. The frost last winter has made them more like obstacle courses than thoroughfares. It certainly has changed from the predicted Mediterranean climate the climate scientists predicted when they still called it global warming.
This scare will have no effect on California.
If they outlaw the internal combustion engine, they won’t needs roads anymore.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/09/28/why-havent-we-done-something-already-california-mulling-ban-on-fossil-fuel-vehicles/
Is this a new word ‘ United States assume climate STATIONARITY ‘.
happens every 3-4 months here in maine and springtime the worst.
The key words in the abstract is “anthropogenic warming”. Planet warming and cooling have a place but minuscule temperature changes as a result of human activities seem somewhat displaced.
You know what makes roads rougher? Lack of maintenance – Oregon has done a wonderful job of letting everything go ruin – sort of a backwards way of getting people out of their cars. Nothing there to replace the roads, but at least the Progressives fuel their warm-fuzzy buzz by yet another act of destruction – albeit a passive/aggressive approach.
Oregon IS, however, still spending it’s transportation budget – and a LOT of grants from the Feds – on billion-dollar ‘green’ projects – such as our gold-plated ‘MAX’ train which carries approximately 3% of the population (north and south only, but they do have bike racks on the front of the train). They also had a pretty good grift going on ‘researching’ our Interstate bridge project – promising to put the train across the river – again sucking up all those federal dollars.
I don’t remember the exact math, but pretty much every single car on the MAX would pay for a fleet of busses.
Oh yeah – the train doesn’t work if it’s too hot or too cold.
I wonder if that was on the Number Watch list of things caused by global warming?
http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/warmlist.htm
The temperature at which asphalt is laid and compacted isn’t relevant, as it is a condition experienced just once, for few hours at most, in the typical 20-year lifetime of most asphaltic pavements. What the professor seems worried about is the effects over the entire lifetime of the pavement.
But his worry seems highly overblown – given the extremely wide temperature range that most if not all asphalt pavements are exposed to – ranging from well into the 120+ deg F in summer down to well below freezing, even 40-50 degrees below zero in the northern states, a global climate change of 2 deg C or 3.5 deg F is clearly within the noise range.
Also, all asphalt pavement designs are a combination of raw asphalt, from oil, along with various emulsifiers and other additives as well as various aggregate mixes that affect pavement life far more than the extremely minor effect of a 3 to 4 deg F average year long temperature increase.
Freeze thaw does far more damage to road surfaces than heat.
Whoda thunk 1.5 degrees could have this much power?
Roads in the US are not designed to “last decades”. But this truck driver sure wishes they were!
Couldn’t help but remember those jet engines they use dry paved race tracks with when I read this story.
It’s easy to test this hypothesis. If it is true, roads that run north-south would have significantly higher road maintenance costs 50 miles further south of a point than 50 miles further north of a point.
I don’t believe this is true. However, if they have the data that actually shows that, I’d be open to it. From what I do know, more freezing cycles causes more road damage.
In the southern US, fire ants are a major cause of damage to roads, undermining the bed, but his solution would not affect that.
I am really concerned how the Solar Panels, Wind Turbines and Elon’s Batteries will handle this extra heat??
I really should renew my subscription to Asphalt Magazine.
If I could just have my flying car, as I was promised by the wise futurists of the 1960s, I wouldn’t give a damn.
In the north, the big issue is the number of freeze thaw cycles. Guess what happens when you don’t go below freezing as often?
I don’t even need a PhD to know what will happen.
After reading through the comments to date i havent seen an actual explanation of how hot mix asphalt design works. Aside from the aggregate component, the binder or Asphalt Cement is selected for the geographic area based on the local temperature. For example, in many parts of the midwest US the main binder is PG 64-22. The 64 stands for the maximum 7 day average pavement temperature, the -22 stands for the minimum 1 day pavement temperature ( both in degrees C ). So even if over the next 100 years there is a 2C rise, the PG grade would just be adjusted if the job temperature changes to say PG 70-22. The grades are in 6 degree C increments. Also, most Hot Mix Asphalt pavements are designed for 15-20 years max and most require some sort of rehab during that time for a variety of reasons. The aging of the Asphalt Cement is a major contributor to the pavement failure, other than reasons others have listed, heavy trucks, snow plows, freeze-thaw cycling,etc.
it is even worse in Perth Australia it is the opposite http://www.weatherzone.com.au/news/perths-kwinana-freeway-will-be-permanently-flooded-by-2100-oceanographer-warns/526942