Hate on display – climate activists go bonkers over #Irma and nonexistent climate connection

I blame it on Trump Derangement Syndrome, oh wait, some were deranged before he got elected. Here is a collection of some of the most hateful tweets, essays, and posts from climate alarmists that are trying to pin hurricanes Harvey and Irma on the shoulders of climate skeptics. I must not be trying hard enough, because I’m not on the death sentence list.

Brad Johnson, formerly of Think Progress and currently with Climate Hawksdeclared:

The Nation: ‘To refuse to act against global warming…is murder’ – ‘Climate Denialism Is Literally Killing Us’

Mag: After Harvey, ‘climate change denial should be a crime’ – ‘Denial can and will leave people dead’

Not Funny: Monty Python’s Eric Idle: Climate skeptics should be put on trial for ‘crimes against humanity’

Skepticism a crime against humanity? ‘Campaign to discredit scientific evidence [for AGW] amounts to a crime against humanity,whose perpetrators should be punished accordingly’

Climate Depot’s Morano & other skeptics ‘sentenced to death’ for ‘Crimes against Humanity’ – Climate activists set 2029 for big ‘Crimes against Humanity’ trials of skeptics – “Sentenced to death for the critical roles they played in retarding any meaning action to mitigate climate change in the United States were as follows.

Sen. James Inhofe, Marc Morano (CFACT), Chris Horner (CEI), Myron Ebell (CEI), Steve Milloy (CEI), Patric Michaels (Cato Institute), Bjorn Lomborg (CCC), Matt Ridley (CWPF)(sic), Christopher Monckton, Fred Singer, Roy Spenser (sic).”

 

 

Climate Depot’s Morano receives threatening email: ‘You and your children should be burned in public’ – Recent hate mail to Morano: ‘Let’s meet man to man and I’ll rip that stupid smile off your face’ – Other Hate Mail sample to Morano: ‘If you have children, I hope beyond hopes that you must bury them, and that your grief will know no end.’

h/t to Climate Depot for some of the links.

Last but not least, the Pope:

Pope Francis HUGE RANT on Hurricane Irma: History will JUDGE the climate change deniers


Here’s the deal: there’s no current climate to hurricane connection, even NOAA says so. History too.

NOAA doesn’t think the alleged impact of anthropogenic CO2 on storm intensity is detectable.

… It is premature to conclude that human activities–and particularly greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming–have already had a detectable impact on Atlantic hurricane or global tropical cyclone activity. That said, human activities may have already caused changes that are not yet detectable due to the small magnitude of the changes or observational limitations, or are not yet confidently modeled (e.g., aerosol effects on regional climate). …

Read more: https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/global-warming-and-hurricanes/

Fact: Hurricanes Harvey and Irma Can’t Be Blamed on Global Warming

The Hurricane Harvey Hustle

Hurricane expert Klotzbach: #Irma at landfall comes in 7th behind 1935 Labor Day storm

A useful retort for those claiming #Irma & #Harvey hurricanes are a sure sign of ‘climate change’

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
173 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
spren
September 11, 2017 3:11 pm

Perhaps they should be careful of the precedent they are setting with these threats. Maybe criminal trials and executions should be in store for those who have pushed the greatest fraud in scientific history resulting in the misallocation of critical energy sources leaving billions of third world people impoverished in misery condemned to live lives of desperation, disease, and despair which all could have been avoided by access to clean water and electricity. These people denied these poor souls of things that could have enjoyed decent lives while continuing to use these very same commodities themselves without any shame.

Bitter&twisted
September 11, 2017 3:14 pm

Alarmists who suggest execution or jail time for those who disagree with their fantasies, need indefinite treatment in secure psychiatric units.

hunter
Reply to  Bitter&twisted
September 11, 2017 4:09 pm

We should beware of this rapidly progressing dark age.
It is not to be ignored.
The dark age of climate obsession has captured many otherwise good people.
These open calls to jail skeptics for disagreeing on believing in a climate catastrophe is extremely distasteful and antithetical to civil society.
That the Pope has chosen the dark side in this is tragic beyond belief.

Reply to  hunter
September 11, 2017 6:23 pm

Specially ironic is that the same people with whom the pope has allied himself, also violently support the Muslim’s are an oppressed minority-religion of peace nonsense.
Were Muslims ever to gain power, among the first things they’d do is oppress Catholics and slap around the pope (if not kill him outright).

Reply to  hunter
September 11, 2017 6:53 pm

“if not kill him outright”
Pat Frank is ignorant of the tenets of Islam . Murder is Haram in Islam.

catweazle666
Reply to  hunter
September 13, 2017 3:04 pm

Mark S Johnson September 11, 2017 at 6:53 pm “Pat Frank is ignorant of the tenets of Islam . Murder is Haram in Islam”
Rubbish.
The killing of Kufir (non-believers) is not considered murder.

Qur’an 2:191 And kill them wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and fitnah is worse than killing. And do not fight them at al-Masjid al- Haram until they fight you there. But if they fight you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers.
Qur’an 8:12 [Remember] when your Lord inspired to the angels, “I am with you, so strengthen those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved, so strike [them] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip.”
Qur’an 8:39 And fight them until there is no fitnah and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah. And if they cease – then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do.
Qur’an 8:60 And prepare against them whatever you are able of power and of steeds of war by which you may terrify the enemy of Allah and your enemy and others besides them whom you do not know [but] whom Allah knows. And whatever you spend in the cause of Allah will be fully repaid to you, and you will not be wronged.
Qur’an 9:5 And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, let them [go] on their way. Indeed, Allah is Forgiving and Merciful.
Qur’an 9:111 Indeed, Allah has purchased from the believers their lives and their properties [in exchange] for that they will have Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah , so they kill and are killed. [It is] a true promise [binding] upon Him in the Torah and the Gospel and the Qur’an. And who is truer to his covenant than Allah? So rejoice in your transaction which you have contracted. And it is that which is the great attainment.
Qur’an 9:123 O you who have believed, fight those adjacent to you of the disbelievers and let them find in you harshness. And know that Allah is with the righteous.
Qur’an 47:4 So when you meet those who disbelieve [in battle], strike [their] necks until, when you have inflicted slaughter upon them, then secure their bonds, and either [confer] favor afterwards or ransom [them] until the war lays down its burdens. That [is the command]. And if Allah had willed, He could have taken vengeance upon them [Himself], but [He ordered armed struggle] to test some of you by means of others. And those who are killed in the cause of Allah – never will He waste their deeds.
Qur’an 61:4 Indeed, Allah loves those who fight in His cause in a row as though they are a [single] structure joined firmly.

Jean Paul Zodeaux
Reply to  Bitter&twisted
September 11, 2017 4:55 pm

“Alarmists who suggest execution or jail time for those who disagree with their fantasies, need indefinite treatment in secure psychiatric units.”
I think anyone with an opinion should probably be executed, jailed or committed because that strategy is so effective.
Note: This is not my opinion (lest I be convicted), just a musing. I mean amusing. No wait…just a thought.

Non Nomen
Reply to  Jean Paul Zodeaux
September 12, 2017 2:23 am

Now Thought Police has you on the watchlist as a dangerous self-thinking unit.

September 11, 2017 3:28 pm

When climate activists go bonkers over hurricanes and a nonexistent climate connection, they scarcely have to move themselves at all. They are already bonkers almost all the time.

September 11, 2017 3:36 pm

The syndrome is not limited to the US, indeed an intervention by “ecojustice” lawyers in Canada has just ended, and not in their favor.
https://rclutz.wordpress.com/2017/09/08/canada-ends-probe-against-climate-change-doubters/

hunter
September 11, 2017 3:48 pm

Last non-rational spew first.
The Holy Father really should reflect on just who is the modern Pharisee, all dressed up and claiming grand titles and infallibility.
At the least, if one were to offer serious counsel on climate, one would question the wisdom of only listening to atheist anti-Chrustisns about climate.
Finally, one would hope that the track record of the Church in choosing sides in science arguments would At least give a pause for reflection before condemning otherwise faithful Catholics for using their faculties of reason and discernment and arriving at a skeptical position on climate.
Sadly, this Pope seems dedicated to fabricating a new gospel and seeking to destroy the old gospel.

clipe
September 11, 2017 4:48 pm
Sara
September 11, 2017 4:54 pm

I firmly believe:
A) that these over-excited, screaming throngs are in the minority, but seem to be larger than life because they make the most noise; and
B) that they would blame a Shoemaker-Levy type of comet (string of pearls) strike on climate change, as if somehow, Earth’s climate has something to do with the rest of the solar system. (Well, it does, but that’s got to do with primordial Earth, not the present.)
and
C) they are as a group completely and willfully ignorant of previous episodes of high category hurricanes (Andrew, Camille, Sandy, Katrina), not because they weren’t alive at the time, but because having to acknowledge those events destroys the fabrication they reliy on to support their selfish, self-centered, attention whoring agendas
and last, but not least
D) they are all, as a group, so stupid they don’t even know they’re alive. Ask them when humans first walked on the Moon. Ask them when Vesuvius destroyed Pompeii. Ask them about the blizzards of 1878, 1887, 1967, 1977, 1978, 1993, 2010, 2011, etc., as an example. They will have no response. Ask them about the 1974 tornado outbreak that started in Arkansas, gained size and volume as it headed northeast and turned into a swarm of tornadoes that flattened Xenia, Ohio.
I promise you that when/if you bring up these events, you will get a blank look, a specious “all due to global warming, man-made this ‘n’ that’ crap, not a sensible reply. Facts mean nothing to them. They don’t want facts, because facts destroy their opportunity to throw a fit and sit in it, which is what they really, really want, above all else. They have the emotional maturity of 4-year-old spoiled brats and the information level of a block of wood.
It’s a sad day when someone even has to suggest that the generations behind mine are dumber than a box of bent screws.

Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy
September 11, 2017 5:20 pm

Yesterday [evening] came to me a reporter from a TV channel to get my opinion on the US present hurricanes. Just before recording my views, the boss from the TV station rang up asking me to support the global warming concept and linking it to hurricanes. But I did not do that and told that there is no connection and in fact global warming is only 0.1 oC. I explained many issues but the telecast at 9.30 pm, as usual started sensationalizing global warming impact and even showed washed away city after city with that. In fact this is the case with majority of prominent TV channels and print media.
Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy

Grant
September 11, 2017 5:44 pm

There is no doubt in my mind that, given the opportunity, people like this would surely murder their fellow citizens in the name of saving the planet.
God help us if these people ever get unlimited power.

Non Nomen
Reply to  Grant
September 12, 2017 2:28 am

…an unidentified American officer gave Associated Press reporter Peter Arnett a memorable explanation for the destruction.
Arnett used it in the opening of the story he wrote:
“It became necessary to destroy the town to save it,” a U.S. major said Wednesday. …

We’ve seen it all before.

MikeH
September 11, 2017 6:08 pm

What I find ironic about these people posting so gleefully that Irma should take out Trump and all of his supporters, but will cry fowl when a minnow is effected when irrigation water is used to grow crops. What they fail to realize is the collateral damage to Hillary/Bernie supporters that would also be inflicted from the storm. These would be the same people that would scream “War Crimes” if a USA smart bomb took out 30 terrorists in a building, but one civilian child was unfortunately injured while passing by in the street.
These are sick people.

LdB
September 11, 2017 8:16 pm

For a group who are supposedly trying to protect everyone they are pretty strong on trampling everyone’s basic rights and acting as dictators. You will believe what I say or off to the concentration camp you go because you are not a true believer.

September 11, 2017 8:35 pm

You see, when HRC called half of all Americans “deplorables” who live in 83%” of the counties in the USA that Trump won (HRC won only 17% of the counties in the country) you can see that lefties really do believe all these Americans are deplorable.
Also note that it is only” “deplorables” that hate crimes can be levied at. These hate tweets would violate Tweet policy were they tweeted by “deplorables”, but don’t hold your breath waiting for these ugly-minded folk to have their accounts closed. These people are clinically ill. Suffering from neuroses as a minimum.
Left violence is also out of control and it is definitely condoned. Trump is in the position of the wild life biologist saving the Nile crocodile while the croc, unaware that he needs saving, is busy trying to snap his A55 off. The entire country would be beyond redemption if Hillary had won.

September 11, 2017 10:02 pm

Sceptiphobia. It is the irrational fear of uncertainty fostered by a lifetime of exposure to persons in authority who are unwilling or unable to say I don’t know. And of course, “science tells me secretly everything”(song from the play Hair), so don’t be scaring the bejesus out of them with factual uncertainty. The age of Aquarius took a wrong turn. “Science” can’t not know, that’s not right!!!

Non Nomen
September 12, 2017 2:06 am

These souls don’t have to be precise or exact. They are the true believers. No qualification required but just to believe. Arguments? Things of the devil. Ignorance is strenght. Believe me.

September 12, 2017 8:38 am

Poor Anthony! What rotten luck. Well here’s the cheap curse courtesy of Rowan Atkinson and Co.:
“Dear Anthony: I curse you, and hope that something slightly unpleasant happens to you, like an onion falling on your head.”
Or the luxury model.
“Dear Anthony: may the Lord hate you and all your kind, may you be turned orange in hue, and may your head fall off at an awkward moment.”

James
September 12, 2017 8:50 am

They can’t win the argument because their data and logic is so bad so they want to lock those that disagree with them up. How 1984 of them

Les
September 12, 2017 12:41 pm

The Pope? Isn’t that the guy of that church that prayed to god for good weather not long ago? That church that, not long ago argued droughts and floods are gods punishment for the sinners?

September 13, 2017 2:17 am

These nasty screechers need to be reminded that Freedom of Speech has limits. Beyond a certain point a peaceful protest becomes “disorderly conduct” and is called a “riot”. In like manner, to urge murder, mayhem, and destruction is called “inciting a riot”.
A good way to remind people, and to clarify this distinction, would be to arrest someone in a state that has sane judges. Have a so-called “test case”, and if necessary bring it to the Supreme Court.
I sometimes think the far-left is resorting to what Mao resorted to when his “Great Leap Forward” proved an abject failure and resulted in China becoming economically backward. How did Mao then respond? Mao then incited a horrible nation-wide riot called the “Cultural Revolution.” Perhaps some young fools see themselves as American versions of China’s “Red Guard”, and see their uncivil procedures as part of some sort of “glorious purge.”
Hopefully cooler heads will prevail and our nation will pass this test of our character. “Now are the times that try men’s souls.”