AEMO: Plant Closures Helping to Stabilise South Australia's Green Electricity Grid

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

h/t JoNova – The closure of South Australia’s GM Holden Car Factory (13,000 jobs) will help stabilise South Australia’s green electricity grid, according to the government AEMO.

Holden closure will help Energy Market Operator manage SA’s blackout risk, report finds

By political reporter Nick Harmsen

Part of the soon-to-be vacated Holden factory in Adelaide is about to be transformed into a temporary power station to help stave off load-shedding blackouts this summer.

But the car industry’s closure will help the authorities manage the risk of blackouts in another way.

The exit of a once powerful manufacturing sectorwill see the state using less electricity, particularly during the all-important summer peak.

The information is contained in the latest Electricity Forecasting Insights published by the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO).

Projections for strong growth in rooftop PV and other consumer changes, along with closure of the automotive industry, are forecast to result in lower consumption in the next two years,” the report said.

Read more:

The AEMO web page which contains the quote about closing the automotive industry is available here. Also archived here, in case the AEMO decides to edit the entry about South Australia.

I guess this is one sure way to stabilise a green electricity grid. The more factories you shut down, particularly energy intensive heavy industry, and the more workers you fire, the more you stabilise the grid.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
August 2, 2017 12:52 am

The closure in the near future of the last of industry in South Australia will result in a totally stable green generated energy system in South Australia, to the great delight of the South Australian government. The last worker will then switch out the lights and trek to Queensland.

Reply to  ntesdorf
August 2, 2017 2:10 am

Don’t get too excited about Queenslands prospects, our illustrious premier has promised we’ll be running (staggering more like it) on 50% unreliables by 2030 here.

Reply to  Bushkid
August 2, 2017 4:53 am

you already have 30% of households using solar panels…

Reply to  Bushkid
August 2, 2017 6:21 am

You say that like it means something.

Bryan A
Reply to  Bushkid
August 2, 2017 10:10 am
Reply to  Bushkid
August 2, 2017 10:28 am

Say, Griff, are those homes getting 100% from solar panels 100% of the day, 24 / 7 / 365?

Patrick MJD
Reply to  Bushkid
August 2, 2017 6:33 pm

Griff, as usual, hasn’t a clue what he’s talking about.

Gary Pearse
Reply to  ntesdorf
August 2, 2017 4:04 am

A sad move on a checkerboard with only 7 squares.

John of Cloverdale, WA, Australia
Reply to  ntesdorf
August 2, 2017 6:02 am

We know where Queensland gets its income. And its Coal, coal, coal!
“Queensland exported more coal than ever before in 2016, riding the wave of higher commodity prices.
The state exported 221 million tonnes of coal during the year, according to the Queensland Resources Council, beating last year’s record by one million tonnes, while shipments of the state’s other main resources export, LNG, more than tripled to 17.5 million tonnes.
“This has been an enormous boost to the Queensland economy, providing vital export income, royalties and jobs for Queenslanders,” QRC chief executive Ian Macfarlane said in a statement.”

Reply to  ntesdorf
August 2, 2017 10:52 am

Good news for South Australia!! Ontario, Alberta and Canada are following their lead.
No more nasty industry and dirty industry jobs. Now everyone can work as a barista.
This is what happens when you elect “energy imbeciles” into political power.
Here is a primer for those who do not understand energy:
“Cheap, abundant, reliable energy is the lifeblood of society. It IS that simple.”
Wind and solar power are too intermittent and diffuse to be practical – these non-dispatchable forms of power destabilize the grid, require ~100% conventional backup and cost far too much, harming the economy, killing jobs and driving up winter mortality rates among the elderly and the poor.
A decade ago I tried to simplify this message for our imbecilic politicians and those who vote for them, and wrote:
“Wind power – it doesn’t just blow – it sucks!”
“Solar power – stick it where the Sun don’t shine!”
Apparently these concepts were still too complicated for the idiot left.

George Tetley
Reply to  Allan M.R. MacRae
August 3, 2017 5:30 am

Google average sunshine a day in Germany, the please someone ( Griff perhaps ) tell me which German Politician has a readable IQ !

August 2, 2017 12:54 am

My aunt in Cork (Ireland) installed a solar heater. She’s into this kind of thing. When we discussed renewables we both agreed that at a micro level the individual will adapt to the power source. In the same way you can choose to change when you eat e.g. Intermittent Fasting. She’s a lot more “green” than me but understands economics well.
But at a meso or macro level you cannot adapt society with such volatity to balance the inherent volatility of the power source. Hence renewables by themselves are a terrible idea. As in conceptually. The only reason they are used is because they are backed up by a stable and much less volatile energy source. And that the myth of better storage is just around the corner.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  mickyhcorbett75
August 2, 2017 1:12 am

Is she a retirie as they get free coal. Well, my nan does in Waterford.

Reply to  Patrick MJD
August 4, 2017 1:22 am

She still works and runs her own business ventures. So I’m not sure if you is a retiree in that sense. She’s old enough though to qualify

Reply to  mickyhcorbett75
August 2, 2017 8:45 am

Solar thermal systems are head and shoulders above all other renewable energy sources. I grew up with one that was installed in the 70s and it is basically unchanged if you were to install one today because it is very simple and pragmatic. Not really that “green” minded, just practical and smart.

Reply to  mickyhcorbett75
August 2, 2017 8:47 am

We could institute work with “blackout” days. If the power is projected to be enough for the day, everyone can work. On blackout days – you have to stay home with all your appliances off.
It already is kind of that way in California. On fairly hot days, companies that signed up turn off 20% of their power. You walk into grocery stores and they are all dark, but the registers still run.

Reply to  marque2
August 2, 2017 12:20 pm

Companies are already doing that in SA. If the price of power is too high, they send the workers home without pay and shut down for the day.

Joe Shaw
Reply to  marque2
August 2, 2017 6:06 pm

Sure. The two day work week seems to be going great in Venezuela. Of course one can’t buy toilet paper there any more. But not to worry – the banknotes are fit for purpose.

Patrick MJD
August 2, 2017 1:09 am

It’s not just the energy Holden used but also their suppliers. But yes, one way to go renewable is to shutdown your industry and throw people out of employment. Power prices in SA highest nationally. Unemployment is highest nationally.

Reply to  Patrick MJD
August 2, 2017 3:59 am

yeah, and all those now on subsistence level unemployment benefits cant afford to USE power or gas either.
salisbury council banned all new wood burning heaters some yrs ago
mind you woods around 400$ a tonne now anyway so thats not affordable
Kerosines more expensive than petrol and the old kero heaters are hard to find too.

Reply to  Patrick MJD
August 2, 2017 11:35 am

Without economically productive employment who provides the money with which to provide the subsidies that the “green” energy companies need if they are to be able to operate?
This whole thing has gone just absolutely as bonkers as a fig tree full of monkeys.

Gerry, England
Reply to  ThomasJK
August 2, 2017 12:29 pm

That is always where socialism comes a cropper. The source of other people’s money dries up.

Lewis P Buckingham
August 2, 2017 1:09 am

Can shipbuilding be saved?
SA is ripe for a nice big coal fired super critical power station.
The Indians could sell us the coal and ship it from Qld at the international price.
We could then get on and build a few air warfare frigates and a few subs.

richard verney
August 2, 2017 1:35 am

This is what the greens want: the de-industrialisation of the West.
Fortunately, Trump can see through this, and that is why he is against the Paris Accord. Other western leaders should be ashamed in not joining him in the withdrawal from that odious and self harming Accord.
There is presently a large transfer of industry/manufacturing from the West to the East. This does not result in the global reduction of CO2, rather that Western Countries are outsourcing the place where their emissions take place to that in the East. This approach is futile if the aim is to reduce on a global level CO2, it merely results in wealth (jobs and prosperity) being transferred from the developed West to the developing nations in the East.
History will eventually judge Western leaders (with the exception of Trump) very badly in deed once the ordinary citizens see their jobs being lost and generally being impoverished by high energy prices being paid for unreliable energy..

Reply to  richard verney
August 2, 2017 4:04 am

richard verney
This is what Christina Figueres stated was the UN’s intention relative to the climate change scare tactics, global wealth re distribution.
As a concept, it’s admirable. Practically, it is idealistic, simplistic and naive. Wealth distribution in the USSR and China in the 20th century was a monumental, and tragic failure with hundreds of millions of people starved and murdered by those regimes. And I only use those as two of many historic examples.
However, the plan has gone well so far, with wealth being transferred to China, India, Russia etc. other than Trump has stepped in and said “enough”.
And therein lies the problem ambitious politicians are blind to. When one starts a government led initiative, just where does it stop, and how does one stop it when an ‘ideal balance’ is reached, which no one has sought to define as far as I’m aware.
But I suspect some people are waking up to what’s happening, and I mean other than members of blogs and forums like WUWT and notalotofpeopleknowthat.
Personally, as a lifelong conservative voter in the UK (historically, roughly equivalent to US Republicans) the final nail in the coffin of my support for them was the insane announcement that our conservative government will impose EV’s on the country by 2040. The march of socialism is now deeply embedded.
I will, in future, be supporting the UK Libertarian Party, one devoted to small government and individual freedom.

Reply to  HotScot
August 2, 2017 4:32 am

Exactly my position. I never thought I’d see a Conservative govt start to introduce a totalitarian state. However hearing the arrogant Gove launching the ban last week was enough. He has history; it was he who inflicted compulsory phonics as the method of learning to read – whether the child could already read or not – on our primary schools. This was on the basis of some experiences from a small school in Clackmannanshire. So he likes shaky evidence bases,

john harmsworth
Reply to  HotScot
August 2, 2017 8:09 am

A much better way is to create wealth, with real people making close judgements about applying their own money to places and projects that make sense. Governments always want to get their hands on the tools (money) to dabble as big shots without any real risk of their own! Socialists want power so they can do this the easy way as they have a deep down feeling that they would never cut it in business- and they’re right!

Reply to  HotScot
August 2, 2017 9:04 am

“…This is what the greens want: the de-industrialisation of the West.This is what Christina Figueres stated was the UN’s intention relative to the climate change scare tactics, global wealth re distribution.” That’s it in a nut shell. It has nothing to do with temperature. Just like globalization has nothing to do with upgrading the losing country to a more sophisticated labor base. It’s implementation of Socialist ideology on a world wide basis.

Reply to  markl
August 2, 2017 9:53 am

Problem is, trying to explain it to someone who doesnt subscribe to sceptical blogs, and therefore doesn’t understand what’s going on, looks at you like you have two heads. No matter how logical the explanation you provide, they can’t grasp any of it.

Gerry, England
Reply to  HotScot
August 2, 2017 12:32 pm

I am surprised that you hadn’t stop voting Tory years ago when they stopped being conservative. I did. Voted for Major first time round and never since.

Reply to  Gerry, England
August 2, 2017 1:13 pm

I was never politically motivated until I started investigating AGW a couple of years ago. Much to my shame.
Sadly, most of the country is the same. They vote the same way their Dad/Mum did, without looking into it.

Reply to  HotScot
August 2, 2017 2:59 pm

Actually phonics makes a lot lot of sense because that is mostly how you learned to talk. See the letters, Learn to match them up with words. When you’re done you know how to talk and hot to spell. English has a lot of variation and adopted words though so it isn’t foolproof.
Whole word reading became a fad in the US as more “scientific” when it was really just another fad, such as climate change or easy money. As a result, most people educated after the 1960’s can’t read well, can’t learn new words well, and don’t understand how languages work.

Reply to  HotScot
August 2, 2017 4:11 pm

I profoundly disagree with you. I was taught ‘whole’ English, as were many others throughout the 1960’s, 70’s and 80’s. We learned the construction of language from it’s basic level, not simply how to recognise words.
From the basic elements, the English language can be adapted, and has flourished and evolved over generations to be inclusive. It is a hybrid language, the mongrel of all languages and all the better for it. We adapt it, and it changes through time, adopting different cultures and dialects. But without the foundation of it’s structure, all sense of it could be, and arguably, is being lost, because of phonetics.
Much like an internal combustion engine, if you have a deep understanding of it’s complicated engineering, one can tune it and make it perform better relative to the prevailing conditions.
English is a living language, it’s expressive and emotive. It empowers subtlety and humour in the same sentence as command and instruction. Giving children the basic tools of English, and the insight into how people like Shakespeare adapted it, empowers them to communicate better than any other language. That’s why it’s the international language across the planet.
Phonics is a simplistic attempt at hybridising a language that is already a hybrid, and all the better for it.
Give people the right tools for the job, and the job is easy. Teaching children Phonics, as a means of learning the English language, is like giving an adult a loaf of bread and expecting a banquet from it.

Reply to  HotScot
August 3, 2017 10:00 am

The argument can be made, almost from first principles, that phonics allows one to recognize words more efficiently than a whole word approach – as well as being able to handle unfamilar words, since one immediately knows what they sound like. Although I haven’t read widely in the subject, apparently there is evidence that the rise in dyslexia is due to the whole word approach to learning to read.

Reply to  rw
August 3, 2017 10:16 am

I’ll take you’re last point first and postulate that dyslexia has always been a problem, it was just never recognised. The problem isn’t on the rise, the diagnosis is.
I did a quick search on the difference between phonics and whole words and came up with the following:
“Comparison Between Both Philosophies [Phonics & Whole Language]
Phonics Programs tend to help students with better word recognition, spelling, and pronunciation. By “sounding out” the words through letter recognition, young students memorize how to read the words in front of them. Whole language does not have a written formula to follow, so word identification often is like guesswork for children. However, if only Phonic learning is used, children have major difficulties in reading comprehension, as well as having issues with the creative writing process. Whole language teaches better understanding of text.”
It’s a concise illustration that I believe demonstrates phonics is the easy way to learn to read, but all the poorer for it in the long run. It has it’s place, but this analysis suggests a mixture of both should be used.

Reply to  richard verney
August 2, 2017 4:19 am

This reminds me of Chamberlain returning from meeting with Hitler.

I have returned from Germany with peace for our time. link

The pictures of today’s sanctimonious greenie politicians announcing their plans for renewable energy will be seen by history as just as pathetic as the picture of Chamberlain waving his treaty.

Reply to  commieBob
August 3, 2017 11:03 am

Good analogy.
Unfortunately, for our children and grandchildren, is that 5 degrees C of warming doesn’t happen whilst CO2 shoots up to 1,000ppm and the planet is swamped with vegetation.
If it doesn’t happen, they will similarly be plagued by these nonentity greens, wailing, and wringing their hands about the terrors of GW.
However, I have no idea what they’ll claim if the planet starts to cool, God knows what sort of scare stories they’ll make up then, and what they’ll find to blame then. Other than humanity, that is.

Alan Watt, Climate Denialist Level 7
Reply to  richard verney
August 2, 2017 4:31 am

Depends on who writes the history. Historians from the countries that benefit will see Western leaders as “graciously accepting” the West’s “inevitable decline” into secondary significance.

Tab Numlock
Reply to  richard verney
August 2, 2017 7:25 am

“This is what the (((greens))) want: the de-industrialisation of the West.” It’s all part of their Never Again(TM) policy.

Curious George(@moudryj)
Reply to  richard verney
August 2, 2017 7:40 am

The de-industrialisation of the West. The next wave of refugees will be from Australia, Europe, and North America. Saudis will cope with us easily: Behead all infidels, green, red, or pale skin.

Reply to  Curious George
August 2, 2017 8:32 am

Not the pretty women, or young girls and boys, though.

old construction worker
August 2, 2017 1:36 am

South Australia’s GM Holden Car Factory (13,000 jobs): Why Did the Factory close?

Reply to  old construction worker
August 2, 2017 2:57 am

The 13,000 workers is probably a clue, plus the average car worker salary of $69,000, versus $2 per hour minimum wage in Thailand, which makes a lot of cars.
The wikipedia entry for energy in Thailand is a hoot, clearly they don’t like the fact that renewables are nowhere. According to wiki rising temperatures will increase electricity demand, no mention being made of the much higher rise in demand due to increasing prosperity:
Aussie greenies can celebrate the reduction in CO2 from their country, as long as they don’t know that the CO2 emission has simply moved to Thailand and elsewhere in the region.

Samuel C Cogar
Reply to  climanrecon
August 2, 2017 4:02 am

The 13,000 auto workers at an average salary of $69,000 per year is roughly $897,000,000,

WOW, that means that way more than a billion dollars per year is being eliminated from the local economy.

Reply to  Samuel C Cogar
August 2, 2017 4:33 am

Driving people into poverty. It is all the greendiots are about.

Reply to  climanrecon
August 2, 2017 6:23 am

Those making $2/hr, aren’t the ones working in auto factories.

Reply to  old construction worker
August 2, 2017 3:18 am

Cost and lack of demand for the vehicles

Patrick MJD
Reply to  craig
August 2, 2017 6:26 pm

There is plenty of demand for cars in Australia, but now they are being made cheaper overseas, local makers cannot compete with imports.

Reply to  craig
August 3, 2017 11:16 am

Patrick MJD
Welcome to the malaise of the UK.
Although we have Japanese factories here (Nissan & Toyota) and Indian (Jaguar Land Rover) but no mass produced home products.
But then I guess institutional investors, providing pensions, savings etc. can invest in these companies whatever country they are in these days.
I also guess that’s why the City of London is so important as a global financial centre. Arguably, all the profits given to shareholders of Nissan, Toyota etc. eventually end up in UK private pensions.
What a tangled web.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  old construction worker
August 2, 2017 6:25 pm

I thought I had posted this. Two reasons cited. 1; Labor costs. 2; Energy costs. It was 4 times as expensive in labor along to make a car here in Australia than anywhere in Asia, and 2 time as much as anywhere in Europe. Plus the sharp rise in energy costs, even more so since July 1st 2017 with rises for businesses or 20% or more. Many businesses have shut down last month because of it.

August 2, 2017 1:38 am

Don’t forget that those 13000 laid-off workers will now reduce their energy consumption at home to save money. And they won’t be commuting to work every day thus saving fuel and reducing CO2 emissions, so this is a win-win-win.

Reply to  jaffa68
August 2, 2017 2:10 am

Indeed and with the increase in the suicide rate as a result of mass unemployment it becomes a win-win-win-win.
The greens must be bursting with pride……….

David A
Reply to  Jones
August 2, 2017 3:38 am

…add one more win because the increase in suicide can then be blamed on GHG induced hot days.

old construction worker
Reply to  jaffa68
August 2, 2017 4:39 am

“Don’t forget that those 13000 laid-off workers will now reduce their energy consumption at home to save money.” I have news for you. Reducing energy consumption at home will not save money. Why? Simple; The “The GM plant paid for a lot of energy. How with the plant closed your energy provider must make a profit and also paid for all it’s overhead and labor. Those cost will be passed on to the laid off worker as well as other businesses and other home owner. Wait until your energy provider CEO says “WE NEED A RATE INCREASE BECAUSE WE ARE NOT SELLING ENOUGH ENERGY”.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  jaffa68
August 2, 2017 6:21 pm

“jaffa68 August 2, 2017 at 1:38 am
Don’t forget that those 13000 laid-off workers will now reduce their energy consumption at home to save money.”
I guess they will save money because they won’t be earning anything to spend. What a stupid comment.

John Fish(@jaffa68)
Reply to  Patrick MJD
August 2, 2017 10:25 pm

a stupid comment indeed

Reply to  Patrick MJD
August 3, 2017 11:21 am

I agree with John Fish and Patrick MJD. Stupid comment.
Heartless as well, from a so called concerned, green, socialist.

August 2, 2017 1:39 am

Well at least they’ve fully removed the mask now. It’s nothing less than full reversion to a rustic peasant economy and if that is what the people of SA wish and vote for then that is what they shall have.

Nick Stokes(@bilby)
August 2, 2017 1:48 am

The coming closure of the Holden plant in SA was announced in 2013, soon after Mr Abbott’s government was elected. It didn’t have anything to do with green energy or whatever. One of the first actions of the new government was to institute a Productivity Commission inquiry into support for the car industry, which was clearly likely to be unsympathetic. By the time it reported a year later, the industry had faded away. It has gone from Victoria – SA was about the last. There is an overview article here. The economics of the Australian car manufacturing had been shaky for long time.

David Middleton(@debunkhouse)
Reply to  Nick Stokes
August 2, 2017 4:03 am

None of this alters the fact that AMEO credits the plant closure for helping to stabilize the grid.
Removing consumption from the grid is as important as adding renewable capacity in a greenschist world. This is why the smart grid is of such critical importance to the greenschist-heads pushing renewable portfolio standards.
The only way you can transition from fossil fuels and nuclear power to renewables and still be able to charge your PEV overnight is to give the greenschist-heads a remote off switch, so they can kill your AC to free up power for PEV chargers. It will also empower them to drain your PEV battery, if the Sun and wind are misbehaving.
Anyway… I’m all for Australia’s idiotic energy policies. It’s lagniappe for US coal and LNG exports.

Nick Stokes(@bilby)
Reply to  David Middleton
August 2, 2017 4:36 am

“None of this alters the fact that AMEO credits the plant closure for helping to stabilize the grid.”
No, of course. AEMO is just stating an obvious fact. Cutting demand makes the supply go further. What are you trying to infer? That AEMO procured the auto plant closure? AEMO is just a market manager.
Australia is exporting plenty of coal and LNG. LNG export has caused prices to skyrocket here.

David Middleton(@debunkhouse)
Reply to  David Middleton
August 2, 2017 5:04 am

I’m not trying to infer anything. The removal of load from the grid is a centerpiece of efforts to transition to renewables.
Regarding LNG:
Our advantage is that LNG exports won’t cause prices to “skyrocket” here because 1) natural gas production is growing much faster than demand and 2) coal-fired power plants are running at a very low utilization rate.

Australia’s Energy Luck Runs Out

By David Fickling
April 9, 2017
With its abundance of mineral wealth and sun-kissed shores, Australia takes pride in thinking of itself as the “lucky country.”
That sounds good until you consider the full quote from which the phrase is derived — a warning that this natural endowment was being squandered by the second-rate way the nation is governed.
Politics lies at the heart of Australia’s current energy paradox: How can one of the world’s largest exporters be having trouble keeping its lights on?

Clearing Out

Australian wholesale electricity prices have doubled since the closure of the Hazelwood coal generator was announced


Wholesale electricity prices in Victoria have more than doubled since Nov. 3, when Engie SA announced plans to close its 1.6-gigawatt coal-fired Hazelwood power station. More shocks will follow: About 3.6 GW of coal generation capacity is scheduled for closure at present, rising to 7 GW by 2030 according to Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
Such changes shouldn’t cause this degree of difficulty. The U.S. has shut about 39 GW of coal-fired capacity since the end of 2012 without significant upsets, while the U.K. closed about 8.4 GW in the five years through 2015. Australia ought to be able to handle 1.6 GW dropping off the grid.
Part of the explanation is different trade dynamics. Thanks to its greater exposure to global export markets, gas in Australia has failed to undercut coal on price in the way it has in the U.S. and U.K.
Indeed, the country’s LNG plants are so hungry for volumes that they’ve been in direct competition with local generators. Since the closure of Hazelwood was announced, domestic gas prices have reset to match the regional spot LNG market:

Liquid Market

Australian natural gas prices have reset above those in the Asian LNG market
Rising fuel costs have been so damaging for the economics of gas-fired electricity that the Australian Energy Market Operator expects such generation to decline by about 15 percent between 2016 and 2021.Where coal is being replaced, it’s with renewables: Almost 70 percent of the additional planned capacity in the national electricity market is for wind-power plants, with a further 13 percent going to utility-scale solar.
It’s worth recognizing that this is good news. Faster withdrawal from fossil fuels is clearly better for the global climate, and the volume of wind and solar set to hit the market means there’s little risk of outright shortages over the next five years or so.
One challenge remains. If coal-power retirements accelerate, solar and wind will be unable to fill the gap quickly enough, especially given the way their variability can undermine the stability of the grid. The government’s plans to add 2 GW of hydroelectric capacity in the mountains southwest of Canberra will help, as will battery-storage proposals like the one Tesla Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has offered for South Australia. They won’t make the problem go away altogether.
Bloomberg Gadfly

Australia’s energy plight is indeed “good news” for both U.S. coal and natural gas producers:

JAN 31, 2016

The U.S. and Australian Race to Export Liquefied Natural Gas

Jude Clemente , CONTRIBUTOR
I cover oil, gas, power, LNG markets, linking to human development

Free market economies Australia and the U.S. will be in competition for the export of Liquified Natural Gas (LNG). Since 2010, Australia’s gas demand has increased 10%, but its gas production has increased 35%, compared to an 8% increase for use and 38% gain in production for the U.S. Per BP data, Australia and the U.S. have netted 75% of the 260 Tcf gain in proven global gas reserves since 2005.
In fact, through 2020, the two countries are expected to account for 90% or more new LNG exports. Overall, the global LNG market is set to increase by 50% between 2015 and 2020, nearly 20 Bcf/day. This year alone will see a 2.6 Bcf/day increase in LNG supply
Australia could add six new LNG export terminals by 2020, tripling its liquefaction capacity to over 13 Bcf/day. Although Cheniere Energy’s U.S. LNG export facility at Sabine Pass, the first of its kind in the continental U.S., was delayed until late-February or so, the country could be exporting 10 Bcf/day by 2020, almost equaling current global leader Qatar.
This year’s expansion of the Panama Canal will up competition in the U.S. to ship LNG to Asia, where over 70% of the world’s LNG is consumed. The U.S. has lower production costs and lower capital costs for new infrastructure, namely liquefaction facilities. Bolstered by the “shale revolution,” for instance, the more difficult Gulf of Mexico now produces just 5% of U.S. natural gas, versus over 25% 20 years ago

 This is in contrast to the expensive offshore gas projects in Australia, now responsible for over 50% of all floating liquefaction capacity under construction. Over 90% of Australia’s traditional gas resources reside in the harder-to-develop North West Shelf offshore.
Escalating labor costs have been a key factor in Australia’s drastic LNG cost overruns. In Australia, oil and gas workers can make $165,000, 30-35% more than in the U.S. and double the world’s average. One Harvard expert finds that “Australian LNG seems to be the worst business case globally,” with costs range being 2-3 times higher than in the U.S. (see here).

Daniel Yergin just said that the Saudi’s “will not destroy the US shale industry…It takes $10bn and five to ten years to launch a deep-water project. It takes $10m and just 20 days to drill for shale.” U.S. gas production is rising by 1.5% per year, three times faster than consumption (projections here).
Thus, U.S. gas prices will remain lower than in other markets, and arbitrage opportunities for companies to ship LNG will remain. North America’s gas prices are mostly set at liquid trading hubs, more linked to supply and demand fundamentals.
The key importing nations are not expected to be producing much more gas, so the internationally traded market will increase its current share of 30% of total gas consumed, closer to the 60% of oil demand that is traded internationally. Making gas more of a global commodity like oil, LNG now accounts for about 33% of all traded gas and 10-12% of total gas demand. The LNG market is just another example of the obvious: the world continues to become more connected, not less.


LNG exports will push US natural gas prices up into the range where coal is very competitive with gas in the electricity markets. However, fracking and shale plays will restrain the upside of natural gas prices. Coal power plants in the US are currently running at about 50% utilization rates. Even with the planned retirement of 38 GW of coal-fired capacity by 2050, a 75% utilization rate, driven by only slightly higher natural gas prices will enable 228 GW of coal-fired capacity to generate 30% more electricity (and burn 30% more coal) than 266 GW at a 50% utilization rate.
So… As someone who makes their living finding oil & natural gas, I say to Australia, “Thanks mates!”

D. J. Hawkins
Reply to  David Middleton
August 2, 2017 8:29 am

@David Middleton
I’m not sure I agree with you that LNG exports from the USA will have no effect on the domestic price. As you point out, domestic over-supply is driving down domestic prices. It would seem that US exports will cause ripples in both directions, driving down world prices and driving up domestic prices as they relieve tight supplies world-wide and lower domestic inventories.

David Middleton(@debunkhouse)
Reply to  D. J. Hawkins
August 2, 2017 8:57 am

I didn’t say that it would have “no” effect. I said it wouldn’t cause them to skyrocket…

LNG exports will push US natural gas prices up into the range where coal is very competitive with gas in the electricity markets. However, fracking and shale plays will restrain the upside of natural gas prices.

That said, if the Marcellus was to crater or Bernie Sanders got elected in 2020 and banned fracking, gas prices would skyrocket.

Reply to  David Middleton
August 2, 2017 9:09 am

What will stabilize the South Australia grid will be the new diesel powered generators that they are now going to install as a temporary measure while building a new gas fired plant due in action in two years. The diesel generators will be used as back up “only to be used if there are shortfalls”.
Apart from that I have to agree with Nick that the GM closure has nothing to do with the current power situation and has been in the making for more then a decade. The Australian state and federal governments have poured billions of dollars into the car industry over many years in a futile bid to keep jobs. It was not making sense any longer (never did but that is union pressure for you). So car makers are leaving the country.
The savings of those subsidies can now pay for the diesel plant, I guess in that sense yes the closing helps to stabilize the grid.

Reply to  David Middleton
August 2, 2017 9:15 am

David Middleton said: “I’m not trying to infer anything. The removal of load from the grid is a centerpiece of efforts to transition to renewables.”
A push for energy efficiency is part of the transition to renewables. Implying that energy efficiency equates to pushing for or applauding companies shutting down is not accurate.

David Middleton(@debunkhouse)
Reply to  Chris
August 2, 2017 10:17 am

Removing load from the grid is part of the plan. That’s why they want the Smart Grid, Smart Meters and Smart Appliances. When everyone plugs in their Tesla Model 3 at 6 PM, the only way they can prevent a grid implosion is to reach into people’s homes and switch off the AC, pool pumps, washing machines, dryers and other energy hogs using the Smart Grid off switch…

Utility Nightmares Of Electric Cars
on July 25, 2011
The first thing commuters in the environmentally aware neighborhood of the future do when they get home is plug in their electric cars, and that’s the problem.
“That’s a looming utility nightmare,” says Jim Pauley, Schneider Electric’s new senior vice president for External Affairs and Government Relations. “Utility infrastructure was built for something completely different,” he said, and neighborhood concentrations pulling new EV loads at 6 p.m. on still-hot afternoons could be disastrous for local distribution grids.
That’s one reason he’s hoping to see continued, and expanded, federal incentives to build out infrastructure for electric vehicle (EV) charging. Targeted charging technology would let utilities “talk” to chargers and spread out the demand and underpin the incentives to integrate an array of “smart” technology across the electricity system.
Two-way communication is the heart of all the “smart grid” talk, the digital controls that can let operators and consumers know and optimize electricity usage. In a recent interview in Washington DC, Pauley told Breaking Energy that communication starts at the generating plant and goes all the way into businesses and homes, where big loads like air-conditioning–and EV chargers–can be cycled by utilities. Communication is integral to municipal EV charging infrastructure, like the system Schneider is working on with Fort Collins, Colorado.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has also been important in leveling the playing field for demand response, Pauley said, with FERC insisting that grid operators treat removing load on par with adding generation.
“The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has also been important in leveling the playing field for demand response, Pauley said, with FERC insisting that grid operators treat removing load on par with adding generation.

Reply to  David Middleton
August 2, 2017 9:17 am

Wow Nick, A newspaper is your source? I guess the aussie papers haven’t learned to fully obfuscate the truth because they accidently slipped in the truth in one paragraph from an actual credible source on why the car industry fizzles in AU:
Holden’s boss of international operations, Stefan Jacoby​, said at the time the decision to quit Australia was “driven purely by business rationale, and not by any direction this government or any future government would give their auto industry in Australia”.
So there you go, the only person to actually see the car industry books says it was purely business rationale, you know, margins. And in what crazy backwards greenwashed world does energy price not affect margins?

Reply to  David Middleton
August 2, 2017 1:11 pm

Who is going to pay to have their houses rewired to the smart meter to enable this to happen? The main reason the industry went with smart meters it to allow them to disconnect your power remotely when you cannot afford the bill!

David Middleton(@debunkhouse)
Reply to  James
August 2, 2017 1:28 pm

There’s no need to rewire the house. The smart meter can connect with smart appliances through regular old wiring.
Replacing dumb meters with smart meters is easy. Forcing people to purchase smart appliances will take time… But it’s already in progress.
There’s also the “carrot & stick” program…

How does PECO Smart A/C Saver work?
A PECO Smart A/C Saver Digital Cycling Unit (DCU) is connected to your central air conditioning unit or heat pump. On selected days from June through September, we’ll automatically cycle participating air conditioners to help balance the region’s demand for electricity. These events are known as “conservation events”.
What is “cycling”?
When regional energy demand is high, your switch will receive a radio signal that will put your A/C compressor into a “conservation mode.” Your compressor will then operate 15 minutes of each half hour during the conservation event. However, during the entire conservation event, your A/C fan will run uninterrupted, circulating cool air throughout your home to maintain comfort.
What is a DCU?
A digital cycling unit, or DCU, is a switch that is connected near your exterior air conditioning unit. It receives a radio signal from PECO to turn off your air conditioning compressor (not your entire A/C system) for up to 15 minutes each half hour during “peak” summer afternoons. This helps manage system-wide electricity demand during times of peak usage.
In this program, participants receive about $10/month for allowing the utility to put a remote off switch on their AC compressors.
It all boils down to allowing the utility company to take load off the grid at their convenience.

Reply to  James
August 2, 2017 5:31 pm

Reading meters remotely is the reason people who work for the 3 local electric companies in our area gave when asked, and we asked them about it around the fire at deer camp in 1998 when “smart meter” stories starting popping up in media. I trust them more than any lawyer or activist from either side.

D. J. Hawkins
Reply to  David Middleton
August 2, 2017 4:18 pm

@David Middleton

I didn’t say that it would have “no” effect. I said it wouldn’t cause them to skyrocket…

LNG exports will push US natural gas prices up into the range where coal is very competitive with gas in the electricity markets. However, fracking and shale plays will restrain the upside of natural gas prices.

That said, if the Marcellus was to crater or Bernie Sanders got elected in 2020 and banned fracking, gas prices would skyrocket.

Thank you for that clarification.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  David Middleton
August 2, 2017 6:20 pm

“Chris August 2, 2017 at 9:15 am
A push for energy efficiency is part of the transition to renewables.”
That has to be an oxymoron.

john harmsworth
Reply to  Nick Stokes
August 2, 2017 9:24 am

More laid off workers means more poor people. The Socialists can now tell them stories about the unfairness of the system and how their dole should be increased and the wealthy (former investors in the car industry) should be taxed more aggressively to pay for it. The wealthy and formerly wealthy will read about this in their new beachfront homes in…Thailand! This is pretty much how things played out in the USSR, China, Zimbabwe, Venezuela, etc. Now what did those places have in common?

Reply to  john harmsworth
August 3, 2017 11:33 am

Eloquently illustrated sir.

Paul r 2.8.17
August 2, 2017 1:51 am

Premier jay will say he has solved the energy crisis and prove to the world renewables can power a modern city and renewables are the way to go blah blah blah….vote for me in march. All i can say is please dont.

Reply to  Paul r 2.8.17
August 2, 2017 2:45 am

Thing is Paul, is there anyone standing for election who isn’t a total gibbering, green, socialist lunatic?

Reply to  cephus0
August 2, 2017 3:27 am


Reply to  cephus0
August 2, 2017 1:14 pm

Can anyone remember the SA leader of the opposition’s name!

August 2, 2017 2:08 am

So, things are working out exactly as planned then. Business/manufacturing closing, demand for electricity falling, the fairy dust and unicorn emissions can now cope with the demand. Too bad about all the folks out of a job or who can’t afford to use electricity any more.
The truly ironic thing is that one of the businesses that has had to close in south Australia as a result of exorbitant electricity prices is a recycling plant (you know, something that really does help keep plastics and other rubbish from cluttering up the environment) – go figure.

August 2, 2017 2:09 am

..D’OH !!

Steve (Paris)
August 2, 2017 2:37 am

Its not as if we weren’t told loud and clear.
“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution.”
Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change.

4 Eyes
Reply to  Steve (Paris)
August 2, 2017 3:03 am

Thank you Steve. A couple of years ago I put that quote to my former conservative federal MP (he had what most thought was an unloseable seat in South Australia) and for the first time ever he did not reply to my email. I suspect that rational pollies just don’t believe that those words were ever uttered.

Reply to  Steve (Paris)
August 2, 2017 4:16 am

Steve (Paris)
The real problem with this statement isn’t even it’s ambition, it’s the parameters. Does Christiana Figueres have a definition of what constitutes the end point of the change. In other words, does she even know what an international fair living wage, or living conditions look like?
And once the change has begun, which it has, how does she stop it when it has reached her undefined perfect world’.
I’m sure I have no need to tell you this, but it’s zealous, idealistic, socialist, global subjugation of the world community to a UN single government.

Jim Gorman
Reply to  HotScot
August 2, 2017 5:08 am

What the UN hasn’t realized yet is that they are putting themselves out of business. As the Western nations destroy themselves economically, the funding for the UN will also disappear. If they think the new, prosperous nations will fund them in return, they are crazy.

Reply to  Jim Gorman
August 2, 2017 9:49 am

Jim Gorman,
No problem. Doubtless the UN has plans to liberate the money by means yet unknown.

Robert from oz
August 2, 2017 2:38 am

For our American friends this state is littered with the ruins and abandoned buildings mainly from Government decisions.
It’s an amazing place to visit so you can see first hand the waste and broken dreams just about everywhere throughout the state .

Reply to  Eric Worrall
August 2, 2017 9:40 am

There are 95,000 unemployed 18 to 25 year olds in New Zealand without the skills to work, however they bring in tens of thousands of migrants to fill the jobs.
It appears to be the modern way. It ensures you get a double whammy when the economy falters.

Reply to  Eric Worrall
August 3, 2017 11:43 am

This is the global, socialist way.
If you hold out for the principles of a fair days pay for a fair days work, you’ll be replaced by immigrant workers who’ll live in a sleeping bag whilst sending money home, at the behest of socialism.
It’s no different to setting up a factory in NZ and sending the profits offshore.
The socialist way is a race to the bottom by utilising the lowest common denominator instead of promoting aspiration.
But free market capitalism is blamed.

Samuel C Cogar
Reply to  Robert from oz
August 2, 2017 4:27 am

Robert from oz – August 2, 2017 at 2:38 am

For our American friends this state is littered with the ruins and abandoned buildings mainly from Government decisions.

That would be old news here in America.
For instance, Upstate New York, from Buffalo to Albany, is also littered with the ruins and abandoned buildings of a once great thriving manufacturing economy, the demise of which was mainly the fault of Government decisions.
And when the manufacturing vacated the area, the local business economy quickly followed suite.

Reply to  Samuel C Cogar
August 2, 2017 4:36 am

Yep, more same same. Western PA is littered with abandoned factories. All those lovely “brownfields”.

Reply to  Samuel C Cogar
August 2, 2017 9:15 am

Google Detroit.
Politics and idiocy make strange bedfellows… and will trash the hotel room.

Samuel C Cogar
Reply to  Samuel C Cogar
August 3, 2017 4:21 am

Town, city, county, state and federal governments agencies, including Public School Districts, are the parasitic “blood (tax) sucking” ticks which are the primary “root cause” of the demise of established profitable business ventures in a given local or regional economy.
The aforesaid government agencies keep increasing their employee numbers each year, ……. keep increasing the salaries and entitlements of their employee each year, ……. permit their employee to retire after 20 years with retirement benefits and entitlements almost equal to what they were receiving when working their old “part time do-nothing job” ……. and with many of said retirees receiving increases in retirement pay whenever a pay raise is authorized for the employee(s) position they just retired from.
Thus, the cost of the aforesaid government agencies keep increasing exponentially every year, …… and consequently, …… the taxes are increased every year on the aforesaid established profitable business ventures in a given local or regional economy which eventually forces them into an unprofitable situation and they are forced to close their doors and/or relocate to a locale where the parasitic “blood (tax) sucking” ticks are not taking such a BIG gulp out of their earned profits.
The growth of government agencies, to wit:

Reply to  Samuel C Cogar
August 3, 2017 4:26 am

Dingdingding!!!!!! You win the intratubes thingy for the day!

Terry Warner
August 2, 2017 2:40 am

Reality is that traditional business and industry is slowly dying.
This is not a new concept – in agriculture the workforce required 100-150 years ago was 20-40% of the working population – now reduced to less than 1%.
Product design and technology encourages more reliable products often using less material, all put together automatically. The most efficient plants which will win the race depend on high volumes to reduce unit prices.
Australia does not have cheap labour rates, a large enough local market, or the export potential to justify car plants. So it is going the way of most developed economies, treating manufacturing (except at the high end) as a commodity activity. The energy issues are I suspect a smokescreen.

Les Johnson(@les-johnson)
Reply to  Terry Warner
August 2, 2017 2:55 am

The % of people in the ag sector approached 70-80%, depending on country and century. I use this reference when I am told how many people are employed in solar. I point out that we could increase employment even more, going back to manual farming.

Les Johnson(@les-johnson)
Reply to  Les Johnson
August 2, 2017 3:00 am

Graph here, from that linkcomment image

Reply to  Les Johnson
August 2, 2017 4:04 am

even using some machinery a damn sight more people could do ag work and be healthier and fitter for doing so as well.
i used to earn a one time ayr wage for grapepicking for a max of 6 weeks
that allowed me to buy tyres/reg the car.fix something.
contractors with machines put me and all the other locals out of the meagre wage we did get, hard hot n heavy work and we were happy to have it.

Reply to  Terry Warner
August 2, 2017 4:34 am

Terry Warner
This is the reason Thatcher took the UK from an industrialised nation, to a service nation.
Whilst technology is successfully eliminating expensive labour, and producing better and cheaper products as a consequence, there are fewer opportunities for the less well educated, cue the GIG economy.
However, Thatcher saw this all coming and encouraged the City of London and other intellectually led environments to flourish as there will always be a demand for intellectual innovation and employment.
Subsequent UK governments have almost cut that endeavour off at the knees, with no alternative ambition for the country. It now simply lurches from one crisis to another and even the current conservative government promotes socialism as the answer.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  HotScot
August 2, 2017 6:17 pm

“HotScot August 2, 2017 at 4:34 am
Terry Warner
This is the reason Thatcher took the UK from an industrialised nation, to a service nation.”
She took it too far placing all the eggs in one basket in effect. A nation has to make stuff.

Reply to  Patrick MJD
August 2, 2017 11:54 pm

Like what?
Ships? The South Koreans built them cheaper so Clydeside shipbuilding died.
Cars? Even when our government was chucking money at British Leyland we couldn’t compete against the Japanese.
Steel? Again, competing against low cost land and labour in the far east.
Unless we are willing to accept Chinese wages and watch taxpayers money going on subsidies we can never compete where manual labour is concerned.
What we should be doing is innovating and licensing, it didn’t do Bill Gates any harm at all.

August 2, 2017 2:48 am

Driving the populace into poverty and dependence on government is the primary goal of all greentards, and they are quite proud of themselves in reaching their goal.

Ed Zuiderwijk
August 2, 2017 2:50 am

A country rich in minerals and fossil fuels deciding to not have industries utilising them. Instead they have the lot shipped overseas where others do useful things like making steel and ships from them. And get really rich doing it.
Here’s the intelligence test: what do you call a country like that. Answer: a colony.

Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
August 2, 2017 3:27 am

Good point – we should have been value adding our gifts like heck. EG we should have been the hardwood manufacturing capital of the world. Instead we Woodchip it for paper manufacture. Really???? Every commercial vehicle in Australia (below say 3 tonnes) should have been running on LPG in the 70’s. Not this Ethanol BS we have been sold as a renewable.

Reply to  Ed Zuiderwijk
August 2, 2017 4:40 am

They were England’s colony, now they will be China and Indonesia’s colony.

Reply to  2hotel9
August 2, 2017 9:45 am

They are a colony of the banking system.

Warren Blair
August 2, 2017 3:01 am

To be fair Holden had decided to closed anyway when the conservative gov decided to stop subsidizing GM AU. Gov happy to subsidize green schemes instead!

Reply to  Warren Blair
August 2, 2017 11:01 am

“…..Gov happy to subsidize green schemes instead…..! That worked out very well for Spain’s solar industry. sarc/

August 2, 2017 3:21 am

Cool – create an unfriendly economic environment – then when industry closes claim it as a success. We have saved power!! Ah what about jobs, productivity and yes I will say it – our Grandchildren!!!

August 2, 2017 3:36 am

Closing down ship building in South Australia will improve the electricity supply. Non of those high usage elders and machinery.
All on track. Jay and Koutsantonis are both geniuses.

Gary Pearse
August 2, 2017 4:00 am

I knew it was bad, but what better example of the big policy of Maurice Strong to bring down western civilization!

August 2, 2017 4:14 am

If we shut down all industry, we’ll be saved!

Reply to  Richard
August 2, 2017 9:52 am

At least CO2 is a well mixed gas globally so at least Australia gets that back on its way to Antarctica to help grow its crops. Aussie,s get the dreaded output of CO2 back for free.
You see that your just looking at it the wrong way.😁

Jurien Dekter
August 2, 2017 4:22 am

All for 1 in 60 million molecules (Australia’s contribution) of CO2. I am continually astounded by the folly of pollies. Every time I think, “Well that’s the pits” promptly another idiot excels even further.

August 2, 2017 4:32 am

Nothing says “success” in the mind of a climate extremist more than “massive loss of jobs”. Except possibly “massive depopulation”.

Coach Springer
August 2, 2017 4:39 am

ComEd’s harassing letters have turned to letters of praise now that I’ve moved out while I try to sell. What I do isn”t nearly as important as making it easier for ComEd to charge more while providing less.

August 2, 2017 5:29 am

The typical solution for “green” energy to meet customer needs, get rid of the customers.

August 2, 2017 5:49 am

When that plants closes, there will be way more than 13,000 lost jobs. Many of the jobs that are needed to support the plant and it’s employees will also go. Could easily lose more than 50,000 jobs in total.
This is progress towards a lower standard of living.

Reply to  kramer
August 2, 2017 12:26 pm

Which is the point, drive people into poverty and then they depend on government to survive. At that point they are no longer citizens, the essence of the environmentalist dream, total control.

wayne Job
August 2, 2017 6:07 am

As an old ozzie one has to tell the world that we are at the moment encumbered in our federal state and local councils with a pack of idiots. They are all trying to outdo one another with their green credentials, thus we are suffering the pangs of stupidity on a monumental scale. The only things that keep me sane are my V8 Utility, my huge bonfires and rides on my very loud Harley. This is my one finger salute to stupidity.

Steve from Rockwood
August 2, 2017 6:39 am

I wonder where those 13,000 ex-car workers will buy their cars from and whether the Australian government has high import taxes on foreign-made autos.

August 2, 2017 7:33 am

“The exit of a once powerful manufacturing sector will see the state using less electricity, particularly during the all-important summer peak.”
Well, now we know how it’s done!
How will New York smell once horse drawn wagons become the default mode of transportation?

August 2, 2017 7:35 am

Here we have one of the characteristics of a renewable powered grid – it requires a generous overcapacity of generation sources, even during typical conditions. One can achieve that either by reducing demand or by adding more generation capacity. The better solution is to add reliable capacity. Regardless, you will always need overcapacity – the greater the percentage of renewables
the greater the overcapacity required. Overcapacity increases costs. While renewables being accepted onto the grid in preference to non-renewables results (usually, not always – nuclear)
in reduced fuel costs. But fuel costs are often not even the dominant expense of a power plant,
so accepting renewablepower in preference to non-renewable, plant produced power, causes
the per unit costs of the power produced by the plant to increase, since its capacity is reduced.
A plant produces its cheapest power, obviously, when it is operating at full capacity. In the case of nuclear this is very pronounced, since fuel for a nuclear plants costs very little (less than a penny per kWhr) and, in any event, a nuclear plant cannot ramp up and down fast enough to actually save any fuel. So redcuing the capacity of nuclear plant by 50% , increses its per unit costs by almost double. THAT is why some of our nuclear plants have been losing money (those located in regions where a lot of renewable power is avaialble to the grid) which began when utilities were required to accept renewable power in preference to every other type of generation. A really stupid move whose side effects the braindead politicans didn’t even realize. So now the same politicians have to subsidize the nuclear plants, else lose their reliable power source and place the grid in jeopardy.
Stupidiy at every step in the process. At the top of the list is the idiocy that while the object is to use low carbon power, they excluded the lowest carbon producer of them all – nuclear. That compliments of the 40 year campaign by the left wing against nuclear power. Like I said, stupidity
all around.

August 2, 2017 10:08 am

“Plant Closures Helping to Stabilise South Australia’s Green Electricity Grid”
Wonderful. We’re seeing the beginnings of the de-industrialization the leftists have always dreamed of.
“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse. Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” -ex UNEP Director Maurice Strong
“We have wished, we ecofreaks, for a disaster… to bomb us into the stone age, where we might live like Indians.” -Stewart Brand, Whole Earth Catalogue
“A massive campaign must be launched to de-develop the United States.” -John Holdren, Obama’s current Science Czar, 1973

Curious George(@moudryj)
August 2, 2017 11:57 am

We are getting lucky. Maurice Strong is no longer. The Whole Earth Catalogue is no longer. John Holdren is no longer a Science Czar, and Obama is no longer current.

Reply to  Curious George
August 3, 2017 11:51 am

Curious George
Obama’s now a raisin. 🙂

August 2, 2017 1:27 pm

That’s no way to Make Australia Great Again!

Robert from oz
Reply to  notfubar
August 2, 2017 3:06 pm

You’re right , we’re done for ,run save yourselves .

Dr. Strangelove
August 3, 2017 6:09 am

Opening soon in Australia: Mad Max Motor Company
No lithium ion, nitromethane only×677.jpg

August 3, 2017 8:16 pm

“The exit of a once powerful manufacturing sector will see the state using less electricity…”
If they are this giddy about losing manufacturing jobs, how overjoyed would they be if a disaster took out half the state’s population? That would not only result in the use of much less electricity but would also greatly cut human emissions of CO2.

Reply to  Louis
August 4, 2017 7:04 am

Those that survived would twirl&spin to create justifications for all the other’s deaths, at the same time beseeching the world to come save them. Hypocrites, one and all.

%d bloggers like this: