Oh noes! Models say Emperor Penguins can't walk away from climate change

From the “not happy feet” department and the “prospects look grim” climate model comes this mostly emotional bit of science PR. Please send money for more research too.

Finding new homes won’t help Emperor penguins cope with climate change

WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION

If projections for melting Antarctic sea ice through 2100 are correct, the vanishing landscape will strip Emperor penguins of their breeding and feeding grounds and put populations at risk. But like other species that migrate to escape the wrath of climate change, can these iconic animals be spared simply by moving to new locations?

WHOI biologist Stephanie Jenouvrier, seen here holding a young Emperor penguin, says the study’s findings conclude that the Emperor penguin is deserving of protection under the Endangered Species Act. Photo courtesy of Stephanie Jenouvrier, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

According to new research led by the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), they cannot. Scientists report that dispersal may help sustain global Emperor penguin populations for a limited time, but, as sea ice conditions continue to deteriorate, the 54 colonies that exist today will face devastating declines by the end of this century. They say the Emperor penguin should be listed as an endangered species. The study was published in the June 6, 2017 edition of the journal Biological Conservation.

“We know from previous studies that sea ice is a key environmental driver of the life history of Emperor penguins, and that the fifty-percent declines we’ve seen in Pointe Géologie populations along the Antarctic coast since the 1950s coincide with warmer climate and sea ice decline,” said Stephanie Jenouvrier, WHOI biologist and lead author of the study. “But what we haven’t known is whether or not dispersal could prevent or even reverse future global populations. Based on this study, we conclude that the prospects look grim at the end of 2100, with a projected global population decline as low as 40 percent and up to 99 percent over three generations. Given this outlook, we argue that the Emperor penguin is deserving of protection under the Endangered Species Act.”

The relationship between Emperor penguins and sea ice is a fragile one: Too little sea ice reduces the availability of breeding sites and prey; too much sea ice means longer hunting trips for adults, which in turn means lower feeding rates for chicks. Only in the past few years have scientists become aware of the penguins’ ability to migrate to locations with potentially more optimal sea ice conditions.

“Before 2014, our studies of the impacts of climate change on these animals hadn’t factored in movement among populations,” said Jenouvrier. “But between then and now, a number of satellite imagery studies and genetic studies have confirmed their ability to disperse, so this was an important new variable to work into the equation.”

To determine whether migration will ultimately help Emperor penguins defend against population decline, Jenouvrier worked with mathematicians to develop a sophisticated demographic model of penguin colonies based on data collected at Pointe Géologie, one of the few places where long-term Emperor penguin studies have been conducted.

The model tracks the population connectivity between penguins as they take their chances moving to new habitats offering better sea ice conditions. “It’s like we’ve added roads between the cities the penguins live in and now get to see what happens when they travel between them,” she said.

A range of model inputs were used, including penguin dispersal distance, behavior and rate of migration. The model also factors in end-of-century sea ice forecasts from climate projection models to predict the fate of each colony.

According to Shaye Wolf, climate science director for the Center for Biological Diversity, the new modeling technique is key to informing policy around “much-needed protections” for the Emperor penguin.

“Dr. Jenouvrier’s research has been at the forefront of advancing our understanding of how climate change is impacting these animals now and into the future,” she said. “Emperor penguins capture our imaginations because they are devoted parents and tough survivors. This work is another wake-up call that we need to make rapid cuts in carbon pollution if emperor penguins are going to have a future.”

One surprising aspect of the study, according to Jenouvrier, was the wide range of penguin responses to various dispersal scenarios represented in the model. In some cases, dispersal boosted populations whereas in other cases, it led to dramatic declines.

“We saw sustained populations through 2036, at which point there was an ‘ecological rescue’ that reversed the anticipated decline expected without dispersion for about a ten-year period,” she explained. “During that time, the penguins made wise choices in terms of selecting the highest-quality habitat they could reach. But the ‘rescue’ was only short-lived, and started plummeting in 2046. When we averaged out all the scenarios, the model painted a very grim picture through 2100, regardless of how far penguins travelled or how wise their habitat selections were.”

The researchers conclude that while dispersal can be a very potent response to climate change in certain cases, the projected accelerated pace at which ice is melting in Antarctica makes for a tricky dynamic. Climate change isn’t stationary, so even if Emperor penguins move to locations with better sea ice conditions, those conditions could change dramatically from one year to the next.

The new findings will help inform a scientific status review launched in 2014 by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service aimed at determining if the Emperor Penguin should be protected under the Endangered Species Act. Wolf views the study as confirmation that climate change is putting the animals in danger, and as such, agrees with Jenouvrier that protection is in order. “Decisions to protect species under the Act must be based on science and not politics, so we hope the Fish and Wildlife Service will heed the science and give Emperor penguins the protections they deserve,” she said.

Jenouvrier agrees, and believes that adding Emperor penguins to the Endangered Species list could help accomplish a number of things. For example, it’s likely to trigger new fishing regulations in the Southern Ocean and highlight the need for new global conservation strategies. It may also help increase public awareness and “sensitize people to the impacts of climate change” which in turn could help reduce emissions. And, it may spur the need for more studies of Emperor penguins — something she’s already eyeing for the future.

“While we’ve learned that dispersal doesn’t change the ultimate fate of these animals,” she said, “we need to better understand the dynamics of what happens when they disperse. To do this, we’ll need to tag penguins from several colonies and monitor them. Eventually, we also want to understand if populations may eventually adapt to sea ice change, and more generally, how they will respond to the changing landscape in terms of breeding and other life history stages.”

###

This research was supported by WHOI, Mission Blue and The French National Research Agency.

The Study: https://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n8/full/nclimate2280.html


Gosh, it’s just tragic, right?

Back in 2012, it was reported:

Emperor penguins in Antarctica are far more plentiful than previously thought, a study that used extremely high-resolution imagery snapped by satellites has revealed.

“It surprised us that we approximately doubled the population estimate,” said Peter Fretwell, a scientist with the British Antarctic Survey and lead author of a paper published today in the journal PLoS One.

Fretwell said that in contrast to previous estimates, which put emperor penguin numbers somewhere between 270,000 and 350,000 birds, the new research counted 595,000 birds.

https://www.livescience.com/19677-emperor-penguin-numbers-double-previous-estimates-satellites-show.html

Despite that good news, plus more colonies being found, the IUCN “redlist” still lists them as “near threatened” even though the first count in 2009 was wrong, by their own admission:

A survey of satellite images from 2009 found 46 colonies containing c.238,000 breeding pairs, suggesting a total of c.595,000 individuals (Fretwell et al. 2012). Since then, a further seven colonies have been discovered bringing the total number to 53 (Fretwell, pers. com.). The global population estimate has not yet been updated.

Why? Climate models of course!

This species has been uplisted to Near Threatened because it is projected to undergo a moderately rapid population decline over the next three generations owing to the effects of projected climate change. However, it should be noted that there is considerable uncertainty over future climatic changes and how these will impact the species.

Aptenodytes forsteri has a circumpolar range, restricted when breeding to the coast of Antarctica where breeding colonies occur right around the continent (Fretwell et al. 2012). At least ¾ of the breeding colonies of this species are vulnerable to predicted changes in sea ice conditions and 1/5 may be quasi-extinct by 2100 (Jenouvrier et al. 2014). There are regional variations in population declines but colonies located north of 70°S have a probability of 46% to decrease by up to >90% by the end of this century (Jenouvrier et al.2014).

Quasi-extinct? Hmmm.

Conservation status: Near Threatened (Population stable) according to the Encyclopedia of Life

So now four years later, thanks to the same researcher (Jenouvrier) who got them on the “near threatened status, that doubled population faces a certain doom, according to “projections”. One wonders if their “projections” are any better than the ability to count populations from satellite imagery in 2009.

But it seems the researchers goal to do more banding of penguins, might do more harm than good, as Jim Steele reported on WUWT:

There is a much more parsimonious explanation for the DuDu penguins’ decline. Between 1967 and 1980 researchers from DuDu attached flipper bands to breeding penguins, and that is exactly when the penguins began to desert the colony as seen in Figure A. By the time the much-ballyhooed “warm spike” occurred in the winter of 1981, the colony had already declined by 50%.

Placing a band on an Emperor Penguin is no easy task. Male Emperors must conserve energy in order to survive their 4 month winter fast, and tussles with researchers consumed their precious energy. Emperors must also huddle in order to conserve vital warmth (as seen below in the picture from Robertson 2014). But huddling was disrupted whenever researchers “drove” the penguins into files of 2 or 3 individuals in order to systematically read bands or more accurately count the population. “Droving” could also cause the males to drop their eggs that are so precariously balanced on their feet.

When DuDu’s flipper banding finally ended in 1980, coincidentally the Emperors’ “survival rate” immediately rebounded. Survival rates remained high for the next four years despite extreme shifts in weather and sea-ice extent. However, survival rates suddenly plummeted once again in 1985, despite an above-normal pack-ice extent.Coincidentally, that is when the French began building an airstrip at DuDu, and to that end they dynamited and joined three small islands.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/01/blinded-by-beliefs-the-straight-poop-on-emperor-penguins/

 

Maybe the authors were listening to ‘ship of fools” organizers, Chris Turney, who claimed in February 2016 that 150,000 penguins simply disappeared, so they must have died.  https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/02/13/chris-turney-penguins-dont-migrate-theyre-dying/

Oh, wait, never mind, they “walked away”: https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/02/16/the-penguin-strikes-back/

And last year, WUWT reported (thanks to David Middleton) that based on the RCP 8.5 model, penguins would be “exterminated”…unless of course you actually read the paper, something the headline generators don’t count on:

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/06/30/rcp-8-5-to-exterminate-antarcticas-penguins-by-2100/

Perhaps rather than putting the 600,000 strong Emperor penguins on the “endangered list” they could be listed under the “climate horror stories that just won’t die” list, like the Pika.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/02/04/climate-horror-stories-that-wont-die-the-case-of-the-pika-stewart-2015/

Meanwhile, in the real world, the Antarctic sea ice extent max-min difference (the minimum usually occurs in February) has been on the rise, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center:

This graph shows monthly ice extent for February, plotted as a time series of percent differences from the 1981 to 2010 average. The dotted gray line shows the linear trend.

 

Note: within five minute of publication, the paragraph preceding the graph of Antarctic sea ice was edited for clarity and accuracy.

5 1 vote
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

139 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tom Halla
June 12, 2017 10:30 am

The Center for Biological Diversity actually does some research, no matter how deficient? I was familiar with the group only as anti-hunting activists.

Bryan A
Reply to  Tom Halla
June 12, 2017 12:20 pm

Sounds like some of the pinguins might be in Deep DUDU

Greg
Reply to  Tom Halla
June 12, 2017 1:02 pm

“They say the Emperor penguin should be listed as an endangered species.”
Based on a danger that someone’s climate model may show may happen in a hundred years time. HUH?
The word “endangered” means in the present, now, here, at this point in time. It does not mean maybe later, well a lot later, if our models are right. They are NOT endangered now, so should NOT be listed as endangered now.
Get back to us in 50 years.

TA
Reply to  Greg
June 12, 2017 5:33 pm

Good points, Greg. 🙂

Owen in GA
Reply to  Greg
June 12, 2017 6:07 pm

Yeah, but then they wouldn’t be able to use the future projected possible endangerment finding as an excuse to expand totalitarian rule by the UN.

AllyKat
Reply to  Greg
June 12, 2017 6:29 pm

Jenouvrier wants to classify a species with a population of half a million mature individuals as “endangered” when there is no evidence of a decline? Granted, it is under the U.S. ESA (for now), but still. Does she know what endangered means? Perspective: Cheetah populations have declined significantly (and continue to do so), but the IUCN continues to classify them as “Vulnerable” as opposed to “Endangered”. Estimated population is less than 7,000. Let’s compare: 590,000 emperor penguins. She calls herself a biologist?
IUCN claims that the population trend is unknown but also claims that there is a decline in mature individuals. As usual, they invoke the precautionary principle. There is a sign that the assessors might not be completely crazy, illustrated by the following quote from the trend justification section:
“Importantly, it has been argued that a simple latitudinal gradient in the loss of sea ice is unlikely, and that warming has so far been regional in the Antarctic (Zwally et al. 2002, Turner et al. 2009, Trathan et al. 2011, Fretwell et al. 2012).”
Only one other paper is cited in the section, and it is a doom and gloom from 2010. This 2014 paper is cited in the range description section. Jenouvrier is not listed as a contributor, interestingly enough.
“And, it may spur the need for more studies of Emperor penguins — something she’s already eyeing for the future.” The real reason she wants them listed as endangered.

Reply to  Tom Halla
June 12, 2017 1:41 pm

The Center for Biological Diversity are alarmists lawyers using law suits to push their agenda. They have misrepresented the condition both penguins and polar bears. In one of their media burbs they suggested global warming was causing baby chicks to fall into the sea before they were ready and drown. I attended one their talks by Shaye Wolfe. CBD is more of a propaganda machine not to be trusted.

AllyKat
Reply to  Jim Steele
June 12, 2017 4:49 pm

I had the misfortune of having one of their lawyers visit a conservation class I was taking. He admitted that their schtick was sue-and-settle. A relative who works for the feds confirms that they are one of the worst organizations for suing over anything and everything, and usually advocate for policies and actions that are scientifically unsound and often BAD for the environment. Even the liberals in his office are not fond of the CBD.

Ian Magness
June 12, 2017 10:35 am

If they are all doomed anyway, why don’t we just round them up and dump them in the Arctic – the extra source of protein might prolong the survival of all those starving poley bears.

Henning Nielsen
Reply to  Ian Magness
June 12, 2017 10:54 am

Magness: “…the extra source of protein might prolong the survival of all those starving poley bears.”
Don’t! The poley bears will think the penguins are genetically modified seals, by evil fossil fuel burning humans, and die of heart attack.

Bryan A
Reply to  Henning Nielsen
June 12, 2017 12:21 pm

The Emperor is dead…Long live the Rock Hopper

noaaprogrammer
Reply to  Henning Nielsen
June 12, 2017 7:53 pm

The Emperor has no clothes.

Aphan
Reply to  Ian Magness
June 12, 2017 10:56 am

Emperor penguins they wobble and squawk
With short stubby legs, they just can’t walk the walk.
I see them and wonder an obvious “why”;
“Shouldn’t evolution have already taught them to fly?”

Chimp
Reply to  Aphan
June 12, 2017 11:10 am

Penguins descend from flying birds. Although a mitochondrial DNA study in 2006 found them closer to storks, most molecular and morphological data show they’re more related to seabirds like albatrosses, loons and petrels.

Greg
Reply to  Aphan
June 12, 2017 1:06 pm

Thanks Indur.
They may look silly on land but that is not their element. They are a lot more at home under water.

commieBob
June 12, 2017 10:36 am

The folks at Woods Hole used to annoy some of the folks I worked with. My buddies coined the epithet:

Woods Hole-ier than thou.

Sounds like not much has changed.

Patrick Powers
June 12, 2017 10:36 am

Wonderful rubbish. I am reminded that more than three forms of computer model showed that the bumblebee could not fly – until of course it was discovered that a bumblebee’s wings impart lift on the upstroke as well as the down stroke.
Instead of leaping (yet again) to insane conclusions that ignore the fact that these birds lived through far warmer times in the past they should use their current conclusions to declare that the models are wrong. Now that would be believable.

Reply to  Patrick Powers
June 12, 2017 10:39 am


There are no up and down strokes. fore and aft really.

Greg
Reply to  Leo Smith
June 12, 2017 1:12 pm

no up and down strokes? That is a bee hovering. Are you sure that they also make that movement when they are not hovering?

Chimp
Reply to  Leo Smith
June 12, 2017 1:18 pm

“Up” and “down” stokes:
http://www.pnas.org/content/102/50/18213.full

Reply to  Patrick Powers
June 12, 2017 12:11 pm

>>
the bumblebee could not fly
<<
It’s because some insects operate their airfoils at or near stall speed. You obtain maximum lift just before the airfoil stalls. So they increase the angle-of-attack until it stalls, then rapidly decrease it until the boundary layer returns. This is repeated during flight. Usually we don’t operate our airfoils at or near stall speed–it would lead to a bumpy flight. Plus, air is thicker to an insect, because of their smaller size.
Jim

June 12, 2017 10:36 am

Golly. there are ten times more emperor penguins in the world that there are islamic jihadists in the United Kingdom.
Not many people know that.
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/huge-scale-of-terror-threat-revealed-uk-home-to-23-000-jihadists-3zvn58mhq
Must be climb- it change
😉

Chimp
June 12, 2017 10:38 am

The ancient lineage of Emperor penguins has survived long intervals much warmer than now or in the future. Besides which, less sea ice means they have shorter distances to waddle.

Bruce Cobb
June 12, 2017 10:38 am

“They say the Emperor penguin should be listed as an endangered species.”
Yes, because that worked so well with the Poley Bears. It will boil down to, “if you drive an SUV, and/or live in a western country, then you are guilty of murdering Happy Feet.

June 12, 2017 10:39 am

Quasi-extinct
Is this anything like semi-pregnant?

Richmond
Reply to  Joz Jonlin
June 12, 2017 11:18 am

That is a very good question. It is like the claim of only being a little bit pregnant.
There is meta-pregnant, but that comes later.

MarkW
Reply to  Richmond
June 12, 2017 12:06 pm

meta-pregnant?
Isn’t that the theory that you can use 9 women to make 1 baby in 1 month?

David Chappell
Reply to  Richmond
June 13, 2017 4:18 am

And if you use 270 women that’s a baby a day. Wow such productivity!

Reply to  Richmond
June 13, 2017 4:30 am

Don’t forget Schrödinger’s wife, who on their wedding night was both pregnant and not pregnant

Richmond
Reply to  Richmond
June 13, 2017 10:18 am

That was some nice analysis. I’m just glad I did not say para-pregnant.

Doug
June 12, 2017 10:47 am

In a similar story, in MN they attempted to “save” the MN moose from climate change. The MN DNR had researchers tranquilizer newborn calfs from a helicopter. The DNR who was trying to save the moose noticed the calves dying. Of course the usual suspect was climate change until someone asked what happened to the mother? She reportedly abandoned the calf.

Sheri
Reply to  Doug
June 12, 2017 2:29 pm

I was watching wildlife researchers tranquilizing and radio collaring mountain goats on TV. I have to wonder how it affects the mountains goat—carried off by a helicopter, returned with a neck ornament and the goats won’t even notice, right? People do not give animals nearly enough credit for knowing what is going on.

Reply to  Doug
June 12, 2017 4:02 pm

Yabut she abandoned the calf because of climate change – not because of blitzkrieg from the sciencewaffe donchakno.

J Mac
June 12, 2017 10:47 am

Sheeesh – Leave the penguins alone!
The ‘WHOI’ researchers are bloody penguin molestors!
Did their ‘sophisticated demographic model of penguin colonies’ and population changes include direct human hazing of penguins, man made penguin body piercing, and local dynamiting(!) as variables???
If not, why not?

Richmond
Reply to  J Mac
June 12, 2017 11:20 am

Yes, why can’t they leave them alone? These types come off as being obsessed with penguins. Like they are some kind of penguin perverts.

sophocles
Reply to  Richmond
June 12, 2017 2:11 pm

They have to have something to cry over. The news about the arctic’s polar bears population recovery is now all over the world. They are no longer endangered so they can no longer be wept over.
The antarctic, after six decades of steadily increasing winter sea ice area have two years of lower than normal sea ice extent. Whoopee do. Suddenly the Emperor penguin is `endangered’..
ROTFL.
I hardly think so. The parental birds no longer have so far to go to be able to fish for their young, so it’s much more likely more younger birds will survive these lower ice years than previously. It’s cyclic.
Let’s see how this winter unfolds, first, and do some year-on-year scientific instead of lacrimal research.
It just may return to record growth. It just may not. So what? The penguins can (and do!) move.

noaaprogrammer
Reply to  Richmond
June 12, 2017 8:23 pm

Someone should inform PETA about this. divide et impera !

Grant
June 12, 2017 10:50 am

“The relationship between Emperor penguins and sea ice is a fragile one: Too little sea ice reduces the availability of breeding sites and prey; too much sea ice means longer hunting trips for adults, which in turn means lower feeding rates for chicks. Only in the past few years have scientists become aware of the penguins’ ability to migrate to locations with potentially more optimal sea ice conditions”
It’s a wonder they’ve survived all this time.
God protect us from zealots. How ’bout quit tagging, holding and harassing them for a start!

Sheri
Reply to  Grant
June 12, 2017 2:30 pm

Maybe we could radio collar the researchers and see what they are up to!

J Mac
Reply to  Sheri
June 12, 2017 3:27 pm

Or just staple a numbered plastic tag in their ears and then dart tranquilize them once a year so they can be weighed, check if they’re pregnant or have had offspring, and empty their stomach contents to see what their diet consists of?
If we’re going to save the endangered WHOI population, we must have data!

Auto
Reply to  Sheri
June 12, 2017 3:37 pm

Sheri
Plus Absolute Shedloads!!
An out-of-left-field idea – but a good one.
If colony success appears to inversely correlate with local researcher effort [I have no idea if it will do so, but note that most of these creatures ancestors hadn’t seen a human being until – perhaps – a hundred years ago . . . .} this might be a VERY good idea.
Sheri – thanks indeed.
Auto

2hotel9
Reply to  Sheri
June 12, 2017 7:17 pm

Oh, I agree, all these shysters need to be wearing “radio tracking collars” on their ankles. Right after their 25 year prison sentences for fraud and theft through deception are done.

ShrNfr
June 12, 2017 10:53 am

Yet another paper from Associated Stupid Scientist Holes. These are probably the same folks that extrapolated the decline in temperatures in the 1970s to produce polar bears in Miami. Problem is, their grants are on my bill for the most part.

dp
June 12, 2017 10:55 am

I think the presence of the penguins today indicates they are hardy and robust enough to have survived the ice age and its decline and end 10,000 years ago. That episode also serves as a reminder that the current state of the climate is temporary and that it can and will change. We also need to accept that we have no idea what the climate will do and that the current models are helpless to inform us as to what is ahead. We need to let the people 100 years in the future determine what is best for them and focus on what is best for us.

Chimp
Reply to  dp
June 12, 2017 11:13 am

Not just the last ice age, but dozens of glacial advances and retreats over the past 2.6 million years and the formation of ice sheets on Antarctica from 34 million years ago.

June 12, 2017 11:12 am

Last year Nat Geo said the Adelie penguin was the climate endangered species. Then a revised count found 3.6 million more Agelies than before. So quick, switch the gloom and doom to Emperor penguins. Only 560,000 of those to start with, unlike 14.5 million Adelies. More CAGW whack-a-mole games.

Samuel C Cogar
June 12, 2017 11:20 am

Quoting article:

“We know from previous studies that sea ice is a key environmental driver of the life history of Emperor penguins, and that the fifty-percent declines we’ve seen in Pointe Géologie populations along the Antarctic coast since the 1950s coincide with warmer climate and sea ice decline,” said Stephanie Jenouvrier, WHOI biologist and lead author of the study.

Oh good grief, ……. common sense thinking and logical reasoning should be informing those “dummies” that the Emperor Penguins established their preferred “breeding grounds” on the shores of Antarctica during a time when there was no glacial ice or sea ice to contend with.
And after hundreds of generations, the choice of an “egg laying, incubating, rearing grounds” on the shores of Antarctica became imprinted in their genes as an “inherited survival trait”, …… and thus it mattered not that the Antarctica climate slowly changed from an “ice/snow free environment” to what it is today.
Over thousands of years, as the Antarctica climate cooled down, the Emperor penguins evolved to cope with the changes in their environment, given the fact that said “changes” had no effect whatsoever on their source of food.

Curious George
Reply to  Samuel C Cogar
June 12, 2017 2:09 pm

Biologists must be believing creationists. God created Emperor Penguins as an example of his divine capability. He told them to walk 100 km over a glacier to reach their breeding colony. That keeps them in a top physical shape.
Amazing how low the quality of Woods Hole science sank. Science?? Science is in a catastrophic decline.

AllyKat
Reply to  Curious George
June 12, 2017 6:31 pm

I think you mean “biologists”. Or “quasi-biologists”.

Gabro
Reply to  Samuel C Cogar
June 12, 2017 6:39 pm

Only biologists whose minds have been turned to mush by CACA indoctrination and grant consensus could suppose that animals don’t move to seek optimum environmental conditions when their prior habitat undergoes change.
The definition of animal is a multicellular, heterotrophic, motile eukaryote, with emphasis on “motile”, ie capable of purposeful movement, as opposed to fungi, which can move only by spreading without active motility. Plants of course are multicellular, autotrophic eukaryotes.
So it should surprise no one, even teenagers who have never studied biology, that penguins can move to find better conditions when their prior habitats deteriorate. It’s one of the advantages of being an animal.

Samuel C Cogar
Reply to  Gabro
June 13, 2017 4:13 am

So it should surprise no one, ……. that penguins can move to find better conditions when their prior habitats deteriorate.

True, but in the case of the Emperor penguins, their primary habitat (the Southern Ocean) hasn’t changed in millions of years. T’is only the environment of their “nesting” habitat that has changed and the Emperor penguins have successfully adjusted to that change.
Likewise, with the ringed seals that live in the Arctic. Their per se “nesting” habitat dramatically increased when the Arctic temperature started decreasing and snow covered sea ice started forming on the Arctic Ocean.

June 12, 2017 11:23 am

My models say trouble, give me money. But my real question is why do they have a ‘penguin crib’ set up and why is she holding the chick? If anything is happening there, it is them harming the penguins.

ShrNfr
Reply to  Timo Soren
June 12, 2017 12:38 pm

It would be justice if the chick milted on her.

LOL in Oregon
June 12, 2017 11:25 am

Send money.
The goberment folk aren’t as free with it as they use to be.
…and we have salaries, pensions, medical, transportation, conferences, etc to pay!
(a trip to Antarctica is expense, don’t you know)

June 12, 2017 11:28 am

“We saw sustained populations through 2036 …. ”
Followed by
“While we’ve learned that dispersal …. ”
I really don’t understand how this qualifies as science. Does no-one in the climate science community see the problem with the past tense in reference to 2036? Does no-one see the problem with confusing model output with reality? Did they do any back-testing, any out-of-sample testing, how about an fold validation, anything that would be expected in a statistics heavy enterprise?
I work in the quantitative hedge fund business. These people would be laughed out of the room.

Bill Illis
June 12, 2017 11:33 am

The Emperor Penguins would do a lot better if the Woods Hole scientists would quit picking the chicks up and throwing them in a pen.
Like the scientists who were attaching flipper bands to the Adelie Penguins which affected their survival rates. The colony eventually died out or they moved to another colony because of the interference from the scientists .

Greg
Reply to  Bill Illis
June 12, 2017 1:15 pm

Indeed , botanist Stephanie needs to indulge here maternal instincts elsewhere and stop bugging cute little penguins.
The one in the photo does not look at all amused.

June 12, 2017 11:42 am

It sounds like the biggest danger to Emperor penguins is the French.

Chimp
June 12, 2017 11:43 am

Antarctic sea ice is higher at this point than it was in 1980.

AndyG55
Reply to  Chimp
June 12, 2017 3:28 pm

And higher than 2002.

Chimp
Reply to  Chimp
June 12, 2017 3:35 pm

And despite being lower than average last year due to the super El Nino, this decade has averaged the highest of the satellite era, ie since 1979.

Hazel White
June 12, 2017 11:52 am

Weather dominates life and history?

Sheri
Reply to  Hazel White
June 12, 2017 2:31 pm

Apparently for some, yes.

Not Chicken Little
June 12, 2017 12:11 pm

It’s models all the way down. Why even bother with reality and observations thereof.

June 12, 2017 12:12 pm

Global warming research from 2011.
Band of bothers
Researchers’ flipper bands can seriously dent penguin survival, and also skew the results of research.
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110112/full/news.2011.15.html
From 2004. (Not GW)
Banding kills birds it’s supposed to tag
Banding, a common and simple way of tagging wildlife, can kill the creatures it was designed to monitor, new research has found.

Reply to  Cam_S
June 12, 2017 12:13 pm
Chimp
Reply to  Cam_S
June 12, 2017 12:16 pm

Green Meanies really have it out for birds. When not mincing them in windmills, they starve them to death from tagging.

Rhoda R
Reply to  Chimp
June 12, 2017 3:29 pm

Don’t forget the fried fast food aspect when they fly over the solar farms.

noaaprogrammer
Reply to  Chimp
June 12, 2017 8:35 pm

Did you hear about the guy who shot at birds who were white-washing his solar panels?

Logoswrench
June 12, 2017 12:29 pm

Think of the tonnage of alternative fuel that was wasted over the years by alarmists throwing it against the wall to see if it sticks?

1 2 3