The craziest reactions to Trump pulling out of the #ParisAgreement

Heads are exploding today, get popcorn. Here are some of the best emotionaly based reactions from the climate alarmist squad.

Here’s billionaire climate activist Tom Steyer saying it’s a “traitorous act of war”. Yeah, right.

“Scientific” American thinks the future is dead trees, everywhere:

Neil Degrasse-Tyson thinks Trump is just too stupid.

So does Carbon Brief Editor Leo Hickman, though he’s got a bit of an ego problem to think Trump should read his stuff:

He also helpfully provided Weepy Bill McKibben’s nutty op-ed:

Bill McKibben provided a flag and a funeral:

The other Leo must have been crying on his mega-yacht:

The execrably ugly Michael Moore:

You think that’s bad? Mr. Sulu goes full-retard:

Buh bye! Going to pay back all that money you got from the government anytime soon?

Apparently, this is a Golden opportunity to play the race-card, according to the ACLU:

The mayor of Pittsburgh was apparently not happy that Trump said: “I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris.”

Robert Preston channels Trump Via cartoonist “Matt”:

Al Gore, still boring:

Hollywood actress Patricia Arquette suggested a class-action lawsuit against Trump’s decision to stop participating in what is an entirely voluntary and non-binding agreement.

Useless actor Mark Ruffalo: waaaahhh! At least Kathy Griffin shut-up.

Obama, Zzzzz:

One of Pope Francis’s right-hand men “Crux” said it would be “a slap in the face” to the Vatican if Trump did not continue with the agreement. Maybe the Pope could turn the other cheek?

Al-Ed reacts:

This eco-green grassroots organizer said Trump’s announcement will prevent everyone from living on planet earth. We are dead already. Who knew?

Joltin Joe Room tries the scare tactic of showing Florida flooded:

Maybe the most ridiculous one is this map from the Sierra Club. They probably need to work on their color scheme.

The Huffington Post is predictably huffy and puffy:

This one is just psychotic, IMHO:

https://twitter.com/mims/status/870367084609515521

Josh sums it up pretty well after I chided Leo Hickman for thinking Trump should read his work::

UPDATE:

A new addition, Andrew Freedman from Mashable who once penned a ridiculous piece on sea-level, complete with a flooded runway, forgetting that airplanes can move faster than water:

https://twitter.com/afreedma/status/870425624967606272

I’m not the least bit ashamed of my reply:

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

480 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Windsong
June 1, 2017 4:19 pm

The MSM is reporting this afternoon that numerous large US companies wanted us to continue honoring the Paris accord. Yet, the broad market indexes did very well today, knowing the gist of the President’s announcement early this morning. S&P 500 up .76%, NASDAQ up .78%, Morningstar Small Cap up 1.84%. Hmmm. What’s up with that?

Reply to  Windsong
June 1, 2017 4:24 pm

Turns out not being forced to waste money by the trainload is good for profits!
Whodathunkit?

Reply to  Windsong
June 2, 2017 1:20 pm

And today, weak job numbers and the major indices set new records yet again.
The markets love Trump, no matter what anyone says.

June 1, 2017 4:19 pm

Oh, and by the way…the US is already decreasing emissions of CO2 by more than any other country in the history of forever!
Without even trying!
And the biggest emitter, the one leading all others by huge margins and is increasing the rate of emissions faster than any other country in history…is not even forced by Paris to change one freakin’ thing!
The whole thing is meaningless in terms of CO2…even if you are convinced that CO2 matters!
This sickens me…histrionic mindlessness from clueless jackasses.
Can someone please post updated emissions trend charts broken out by country…so we can all spread it around and try to quell this nincompoopery before I vomit up my internal organs in disgust?

Reply to  Menicholas
June 1, 2017 4:30 pm

Yes, please. And for the Kyoto signatory countries, go as far back as needed to show how well they complied with their mandatory commitments to reduce emissions.

Raven
Reply to  Menicholas
June 2, 2017 7:58 am

Here’s a PDF from EIA that shows the
emissions outlook for OECD and Non-OECD countries
As can be seen, OECD emissions are rising slowly from a dip in ~2010.
Non-OECD emissions are rocketing away.

June 1, 2017 4:19 pm

Watermelons expoding. Everywhere. Fortunately, we loaded in much popcorn in anticipation. And it still early days. Fear might run out of popcorn.

Reply to  ristvan
June 1, 2017 4:31 pm

Just think.
Popcorn is food.
More corn used for food.
Less food used for fuel.
A real “Win-Win”! 8-0

Butch
Reply to  ristvan
June 1, 2017 5:07 pm

But is your Popcorn “Organic” ?? LOL …/sarc

Reply to  Butch
June 2, 2017 2:06 am

Butch all food is organic, try shopping for inorganic food, no sarc it is another word usurped by green idiots to pretend they are saving the planet.

george e. smith
Reply to  Butch
June 5, 2017 10:25 pm

Well it’s got carbon in it; so yes it is organic. And very low in Tantalum Nitrides.
g

Duncan
Reply to  ristvan
June 1, 2017 6:25 pm

I share in your anticipation, beer in hand! 10+ years following this myth. I can only hope it is all down hill from here, this is the unraveling but I am not holding my breath anytime soon.

dennisambler
Reply to  Duncan
June 2, 2017 2:19 am

Been following it for 18 years. In the UK we still have the Climate Change Act, which commits governments to continue the foolishness. We have a long way to go, but this is a great start.

Duncan
Reply to  Duncan
June 2, 2017 4:00 am

Now this is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning.
Winston Churchill

NorwegianSceptic
Reply to  ristvan
June 2, 2017 1:24 am

IMploding – it’s only vacuum inside…..

frozenohio
June 1, 2017 4:19 pm

I’m not tired of winning yet! Like liberal/Socialist tears, these reactions are delicious!

PaulH
June 1, 2017 4:19 pm

The Dow was up 135.53 points today, but Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman-Sacs called the decision a “setback for the environment…blah blah, blah”. When Golden Slacks is moping around, you know things are good for the little guy. ;->

Reply to  PaulH
June 1, 2017 4:37 pm

He is likely sandbagging as they buy up shares like there is once again a tomorrow.

Moa
Reply to  Menicholas
June 2, 2017 1:42 am

Meanwhile, Trump is teabagging all the EU ‘leaders’ in victory. Awesome move Mr President – you are indeed leader of the FREE WORLD 🙂

Reply to  PaulH
June 1, 2017 8:14 pm

BTW, the Dow (up 0.65%) is only 30 stocks, and on a percentage basis was up less than the NASDAQ (up 0.78%), the S&P (up 0.76%, and up far less than the Russell 2000 small cap index (up 1.89%).
The Russell was up nearly 2% on the day! And it is a composite of 2000 companies, which although small cap (shorthand for market capitalization…the combined value of all shares of a companies’ stock), are worth an average of over a billion dollars each, up to as much as $13-14 billion.
Smaller large companies stand to see a larger percent gain in profits if and when energy and regulatory costs decline, or fail to rise as much as had previously been predicted.

Reply to  Menicholas
June 2, 2017 2:31 am

This is bad for GE who have bet a lot on their Green Tech.

PaulID
June 1, 2017 4:23 pm

Lets see Little Billy Mcibbon got it right but he misspelled the last word it should have a capital M and 2 n’s.

D. J. Hawkins
June 1, 2017 4:25 pm

Poor widdle Snowflakes, I feel so sorry for them…NOT!!!!!
I love the sound of watermelons exploding in the morning! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!

Ross King
June 1, 2017 4:26 pm

All we need to cap this laughable collective hyperbole is a comment from Griff.
Hello, Griiff…..???
Hallllooooo? Where are you hiding Griff?
We need more laughs … please oblige.

Lazo
June 1, 2017 4:36 pm

The unintended consequence is that California is now doomed by Comrade Jerry and the “Progressives” doing to us what Paris would do to the USA…All for little or naught.

J. C.
Reply to  Lazo
June 1, 2017 5:59 pm

They elected him. They must like what he plans to do that will bankrupt them. I won’t give a flying monkey butt as long as US tax payers don’t have to bail them out.

TA
Reply to  Lazo
June 2, 2017 6:56 am

Jerry will show us how his delusional thinking can trash a State economy in ten easy lessons, and will give us all an example of what other States should *not* do. As someone else said, California is our “crash-test dummy”.

Raven
Reply to  Lazo
June 2, 2017 8:07 am

All the Liberals crying in California may well contribute to sea level rise . .

Curious George
June 1, 2017 4:37 pm

I love Bill McKibben’s take on “200 years of science … blown up by an ignorant man.” An ignorant author forgot that in 1970s the scare was global cooling, not warming. The goal then, just like today, was free money to be provided by an idealistic U.S. government. A nice try. This time it almost succeeded.

TA
Reply to  Curious George
June 1, 2017 6:45 pm

Yeah, and they were just as sure back then that humans were causing Global Cooling as they are now about humans causing Global Warming.
They were wrong then, and it looks like they are wrong this time, too, although the jury is still out. But it’s not looking good for the alamist team.
So this is not the first time that humans have gotten hysterical over thinking humanity was changing the climate. The only thing the two time periods have in common though is hysteria over human-caused climate change.

TheLastDemocrat
Reply to  Curious George
June 1, 2017 8:13 pm

McKibbles is owning all of the failed predictions of the recent 200 years?
Wait – Arrhenius wasn’t even around!

Paul Penrose
Reply to  Curious George
June 2, 2017 6:39 am

Bill McKibben wouldn’t know what Science was if it hit him in the face like a dead mackerel.

Matt G
June 1, 2017 4:37 pm

These activists think USA’s 80 year contribution of 0.05 c at most will destroy the planet! #alarmist#activists#clueless.com

June 1, 2017 4:38 pm

I love Bill McKibben saying they’ll double down on their commitments, since zero X 2 is still zero. Few of the Warmists practice what they preach, and, in fact, tend to have higher carbon footprints than Skeptics.

Reply to  William Teach
June 1, 2017 4:52 pm

That is true of people I personally know.
Pretty much to a man and woman…everyone.

clipe
June 1, 2017 4:38 pm

Maybe Griff is in the process of getting a Gripp.

Reply to  clipe
June 1, 2017 5:53 pm

Yes, the “The Arctic is incredibly hot” headlines, in midwinter, are particularly annoying lies.
The disconnect between those headlines and the weather news that record cold air will settle over the East coast tonight as Arctic air barrels in behind the latest front, is how you know these people never even stop to think about anything for even a second.
They do not have the sense they were born with.
They make a run-of-the-mill curious five-year-olds look like Einstein.

June 1, 2017 4:39 pm

Put Up or Shut Up
The likes of Leonardo DiCaprio Elon Musk and Al Gore are very welcomed to give their own millions of dollars to the Paris Climate Treaty
No one is stopping them

eddie willers
June 1, 2017 4:44 pm

I know it’s getting warmer because the Al-Ed girl was hot!

John
June 1, 2017 4:49 pm

They’re going nuts over on Ars Technica over it.

AndyG55
Reply to  John
June 1, 2017 8:26 pm

The 4th letter should “e”

June 1, 2017 4:52 pm

Frightening, isn’t it, that a good number of your fellow citizens in a technological society are insane, ignorant
and completely gullible in believing the AGW hysterical nonsense?

Owen in GA
June 1, 2017 4:57 pm

You know, I was at Zoo Atlanta today, and those folks proved to me that they are not logical. They had all this global warming propaganda embedded in the messaging all over the exhibits. It was completely unavoidable anywhere you looked. Then I got to the Orangutan enclosure where they had all these big posters about the magnificent animals being greatly endangered due to clear cutting of forests for palm oil plantations. It never once dawned on any of the idiots that their very demands for “renewable fuels” were the primary drivers of this habitat destruction. IRONY IS LOST ON ENVIRONMENTALISTS!

Chimp
Reply to  Owen in GA
June 1, 2017 5:00 pm

So is logic.
The Audubon Society of all organizations, supports the very windmills which are massacring birds, including rare and endangered species, in their tens of millions.
Insanity!

Chimp
Reply to  Chimp
June 1, 2017 5:04 pm

http://www.audubon.org/content/audubons-position-wind-power
They imagine that “proper siting” will solve the problem of killing birds and bats.
At least they did oppose the Obama Administration’s USFWS rule which would have allowed wind farms to keep killing Bald and Golden eagles, by exempting windmills for 30 years from the Endangered Species Act.

Reply to  Chimp
June 1, 2017 5:47 pm

>>
The Audubon Society of all organizations, supports the very windmills
<<
They weren’t originally, but they put in their place by the other green-bat organizations. It reminds of the doctor’s comment at end of the movie: “The Bridge on the River Kwai” where he simply says: “Madness! Madness!”
Jim

Reply to  Chimp
June 1, 2017 6:00 pm

It reminds me of the end of movies like Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, where by then everyone knows that they are all a bunch of crooks with various angle to profit from and not a sincere thought in their heads or word from their lips.

If you never saw it…do.

Editor
Reply to  Chimp
June 1, 2017 6:18 pm

The Audubon Society seems to be one of several organizations that look at the net worth of the Nature Conservancy ($5,923,968,911 in 2014’s IRS 990 form) and realize they should be striving to become a mini Nature Conservancy.
The American Bird Conservancy seems to have picked up Audubon’s mantle and mantra of defending birds no matter what the cost and are not nearly as fond of wind turbines.
https://abcbirds.org/10-worst-wind-energy-sites-for-birds/

Chimp
Reply to  Chimp
June 1, 2017 7:49 pm

Yup. No such group wants to get read out of the Noble Cause League by daring to sing off a different hymnal. Their voices must be united.
Must join the Borg!

Reply to  Chimp
June 1, 2017 8:23 pm

I used to give money to some of these groups, and not all that long ago.
That changed for good when I found out how malleable they became with regards to their ostensible mission.
Among the most egregious pack of hypocrites I ever became aware of.
Tore their stickers of my bumpers too, along with those of any of “science” organizations I once supported.
It was really a slap in the face and incredibly sobering.
Top it off with what has become of the science periodicals I had been reading monthly for many decades…I do not even know how to finish the sentence…words fail me.

Dems B. Dcvrs
June 1, 2017 4:57 pm

Dear Global Warmers:
Keep up the whining and teeth gnashing, cause it is Music to my ears!
The AGW Scam is Up! The CC Sham is dead!
Sincerely,
Taxpayer you ripped off

David S
June 1, 2017 5:02 pm

Hopefully Trumps action will embolden other leaders who hopefully won’t be spooked by the noisy rantings of the warmist zealots. The silent majority who remain just that are smiling. No media reports to cheers that are coming from them on websites such as this one. I still think it has a while to go before the global warming scare is ” dead, buried, and cremated” but this is surely a major first step.

Editor
Reply to  David S
June 1, 2017 8:41 pm

Agree. Sanity has won an important battle, but there’s still a war going on.

June 1, 2017 5:02 pm

I’ve been following them on Twitter: The world is going to die! The planet is going to cook! We are all going to go extinct! I shake my head at this insanity. And the media is no different. Claims that more “superstorms” like Sandy will happen. It’s total madness.

toorightmate
Reply to  J. Richard Wakefield
June 1, 2017 6:49 pm

The CO2 horses**t has to stop.

Chimp
Reply to  J. Richard Wakefield
June 1, 2017 6:52 pm

More Popular Delusions and Madness of the Crowds.
Down Under!

Dems B. Dcvrs
June 1, 2017 5:02 pm

Elon Musk: “Climate change is real.”
It’s better to keep your mouth shut and appear Smart than open it and remove any and all belief.

Gary Pearse
Reply to  Dems B. Dcvrs
June 1, 2017 5:44 pm

I don’t get Musk. You can generate electricity More reliably and a tenth as cheap with fossil fuels. He dshould be able to sell more cars.! If he doesn’t he will find some upstart competitor that pushes him out of business. Subsidies have infected good old American business acumen.

dennisambler
Reply to  Dems B. Dcvrs
June 2, 2017 2:29 am

Elon Musk: “Climate change is real.”
And I claim my next $4 billion.

Ken
Reply to  dennisambler
June 2, 2017 7:45 pm

Elon, you have gotten enough of our tax money. I seriously hope that your empire building will be successful and will provide a bunch more cool products to the world. Just do it without taking Federal subsidies.

george e. smith
Reply to  dennisambler
June 5, 2017 10:32 pm

When duzz he leave for Mars. I’ll hang around for that.
So long as he takes two more Californians with him.
g

K. Kilty
June 1, 2017 5:02 pm

A number of people here are expressing disappointment that Trump did address the science of the issue, but let’s not confuse science with politics. I think Trump did an excellent job on the politics of this. He has “split the baby”, as people say of Solomonic wisdom, by offering to renegotiate. Moreover, this announcement may flush the skunks out the wood pile–we will now see who is willing to go to the mat to somehow impose this voluntary agreement on the U.S. through the courts, perhaps. If Trump had addressed the science of this we would be treated to the tired 97% argument by the 10% with no progress in sight.
Now we have some flexibility to fight this, and also plan our lives. Thanks, Trump.

Eugene WR Gallun
Reply to  K. Kilty
June 1, 2017 7:22 pm

Trump’s offer to renegotiate? Haha! Which takers are going to agree to become givers? China and India?. The same with most of the other signers. Trump is going to raise the price on them for participation — and they will decline the deal.
How much is the rest of the world willing to pay out of pocket to “save the earth from climate change”? Exactly zero.
Eugene WR Gallun

RockyRoad
Reply to  Eugene WR Gallun
June 1, 2017 10:47 pm

I believe that was President Trump’s subtle point, Eugene.
This way none of his critics can accuse him of forcing the issue or shutting down the dialogue.
The ball is in their court and they were counting on the US to pay for it.

Reply to  Eugene WR Gallun
June 2, 2017 6:14 am

I saw quite a number of ‘pundits’ on TV last night saying that Donald Trump has ceded leadership of the CAGW cause to China. That is the LAST thing the PRC wants. They were quite happy with the US footing the bill and tanking its economy while China waited until 2030 to do anything (and then, maybe not do anything). If they are now front and center, they may come under scrutiny they surely don’t want. They will however, gladly take to the bully pulpit to excoriate the US. Expect the mandarins’ hypocrisy quotient to sky rocket.

Peter
June 1, 2017 5:06 pm

On June 1st, Al Gore spoke at the “Jeju Forum for Peace and Prosperity 2017” (http://jejuforum.or.kr) in South Korea. His speech here was totally different than his official statement on his website. According to the Korea Times, Al Gore said: “The United States is going to continue reducing emissions regardless of what President Trump does”. And he “pointed out that Apple, Google and other American businesses are going “100 percent” in developing and using renewable energy”.
http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2017/06/281_230455.html

Dems B. Dcvrs
Reply to  Peter
June 1, 2017 6:32 pm

That is fine if Apple, Google, etc want to go all in for Green. So long as those companies don’t try to force their AGW fanaticism on America.

Ken
Reply to  Dems B. Dcvrs
June 2, 2017 7:41 pm

I don’t care if they want to try to force their AGW fanaticism on America. I only care that they don’t expect the Federal government to subsidize their clean energy schemes. I hope they discover the giant deposit of Unicorn farts that must exist somewhere in the earth and they, in their obviously endless magnanimity, share those farts with the rest of the world.

Eugene WR Gallun
Reply to  Peter
June 1, 2017 7:33 pm

If they don’t take government subsidies then the money they spend is theirs to spend as they want. When subsidies are involved it becomes the public’s money.
The profits off renewable industries have always come from the subsidies. None are independently viable.
Eugene WR Gallun
PS — The business model for renewable industries is — Get a huge government loan — pay yourself well — then go bankrupt.

Editor
June 1, 2017 5:06 pm

All of the NY Times OpEds and Opinion Pieces were obviously written in ADVANCE. They appeared in the online version of the NY Times within minutes of Trump’s announcement.

Verified by MonsterInsights