More Obama Climate Giveaways: $30 Million Grant to Jamaica

Montigo Bay, Jamaica.
Montigo Bay, Jamaica. By D Ramey Logan (Own work) [CC BY-SA 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons
Guest essay by Eric Worrall

The Jamaica Gleaner reports that Jamaica has just received a $30 Million under the US Clean Energy Finance Facility, to pay for legal, consultancy and engineering costs for a new renewables project.

Jamaica Gets First Grant Under US Clean Energy Finance Facility

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has awarded the first grant through the Clean Energy Finance Facility for the Caribbean and Central America (CEFF-CCA), to help develop a 37 megawatt solar farm in Westmoreland.

CEFF-CCA will provide support to Rekamniar Capital Limited, the project developer, to partner with independent power producer Neoen on forming the Eight Rivers Energy Company, which will build the solar facility, according to a release from the US embassy in Kingston.

The purpose of the grant is to support selected legal, consulting and engineering costs in late stage project development, it said.

US President Barack Obama launched CEFF-CCA on April 9, 2015. The programme seeks to encourage private sector investment in clean-energy projects in the Caribbean and Central America.

Read more: http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/business/20170101/jamaica-gets-first-grant-under-us-clean-energy-finance-facility

Does anyone think this $30 million grant to assist the Jamaican renewables legal process will deliver any value to the Jamaican people, other than a few well connected bureaucrats? But cancelling the grant will stir up diplomatic trouble for President Trump. Diplomatic trouble with Jamaica could impede joint efforts to stamp out drug smuggling into the USA.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
181 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
tony mcleod
January 1, 2017 1:16 am

Better than bombing them I suppose.

ClimateOtter
Reply to  tony mcleod
January 1, 2017 1:27 am

Ah, you mean like oh!bummer! has done. Yes, Trump will be a VAST improvement.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  tony mcleod
January 1, 2017 2:14 am

You have no shame.

Javert Chip
Reply to  Patrick MJD
January 1, 2017 1:24 pm

Well, if you lived in Iran, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Somalia or Oman you’d have good reason to suspect Obama might bomb you (as in he actually bombed you).
Good thing he won the Nobel Peace Prize early in his term.

4 Eyes
Reply to  Patrick MJD
January 1, 2017 1:57 pm

Javert, care to explain why you put Oman in your list?

Reply to  Patrick MJD
January 1, 2017 4:06 pm
Javert Chip
Reply to  Patrick MJD
January 1, 2017 5:05 pm

Oooops – left off Lybia

Gary Pearse
Reply to  tony mcleod
January 1, 2017 6:25 am

Trump will change you to.

Reply to  Gary Pearse
January 1, 2017 9:01 am

Change him to what?

Gareth Phillips
Reply to  Gary Pearse
January 1, 2017 8:00 pm

“Trump will change you to”
Trump will change you to what? A Penguin?

wws
Reply to  Gary Pearse
January 2, 2017 6:56 am

He changed me into a Newt!!!!

Reply to  tony mcleod
January 1, 2017 9:09 am

An averaged world citizen is more likely to be bombed by an Obama than by a Trump. Trump will work to reverse the disastrous US interventions in Syria and Lybia for instance.

tony mcleod
Reply to  ptolemy2
January 2, 2017 1:46 am

An averaged world citizen is more likely to be bombed by an Obama than by a Trump.
Give him a chance ptolemy2, He hasn’t even got the nuke codes yet.

Patrick MJD
Reply to  ptolemy2
January 2, 2017 4:11 am

“tony mcleod January 2, 2017 at 1:46 am
He hasn’t even got the nuke codes yet.”
Ask how many times previous PotUS has lost those “codes”. You will be surprised.

Carbon BIgfoot
Reply to  tony mcleod
January 1, 2017 3:23 pm

“Ganja man something for the head”—as I entered Jamaica to start my graduation reward to myself for completing nine years of college (night) in 1971. Seems things are NO different today. Our current POTUS might have gotten his STASH there and this is a qui pro quo.(sarc) Just sayin’

Manfred
Reply to  Carbon BIgfoot
January 1, 2017 6:49 pm

Yep. There’s a surely several ironies to be found in reporting this from the, “Jamaica Gleaner.”
‘Gleaning is the act of collecting leftover crops from farmers’ fields after they have been commercially harvested or on fields where it is not economically profitable to harvest. Some ancient cultures promoted gleaning as an early form of a welfare system.’, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gleaning

MarkW
Reply to  tony mcleod
January 3, 2017 10:22 am

Trolls will be trolls.
It really is to bad that you have decided to never say anything relevant.

ClimateOtter
January 1, 2017 1:28 am

Trump shouldn’t even care about that piddling amount of cash- just NOT give them any more. That $30 million will vanish into the ether and accomplish less than nothing beyond lining pockets.

Reply to  ClimateOtter
January 1, 2017 6:57 am

Let Soros give $30M to Greenpiece and let Greenpiece give the money for the project.
US taxpayers are off the hook and Soros gets to be the good guy.
What’s not to like?

Taphonomic
Reply to  mikerestin
January 1, 2017 8:47 am

Greenpeace give away money???
Now that’s funny.

Bryan A
Reply to  mikerestin
January 1, 2017 11:07 am

Since the money is earmarked as Legal Fund and engineering costs, some will go into engineering firm coffers for figuring out how to design and build the facility but most of it will go into lawyers pockets. Zero will go to the cost of building and maintaining any power production facilities so zero benefit to end users

Curious George
Reply to  ClimateOtter
January 1, 2017 8:11 am

It would be nice to know how much of it goes to Mr. Soros.

Alan Robertson
Reply to  ClimateOtter
January 1, 2017 9:06 am

Perhaps, but just look at what happens to a taxpayer citizen who makes a simple error on their tax returns. Watch how the government will rationalize a reason to make an example of the unfortunate citizen.

D. J. Hawkins
Reply to  ClimateOtter
January 1, 2017 9:36 am

Re-purpose the loan to assist in building a coal plant to boost their energy infrastructure. Cheaper electricity will win him more good will than anything else.

Felflames
January 1, 2017 1:29 am

All Trump needs to do is get a law though congress making it a requirement of all aid being the complete and open disclosure of where every cent goes, and into whose pocket.
Along with guidelines canceling any aid that gets diverted from its’ intended task and cancellation of future aid for a period if aid is misused.

Ian Macdonald
Reply to  Felflames
January 1, 2017 6:40 am

“All Trump needs to do is get a law though congress making it a requirement of all aid being the complete and open disclosure of where every cent goes”
Needed in the UK too. Also, the need to check where the funding of NGO lobbying groups comes from. If it’s the same place that will benefit then consider the lobbying invalid.

Taphonomic
Reply to  Felflames
January 1, 2017 8:50 am

The article sez: “The purpose of the grant is to support selected legal, consulting and engineering costs in late stage project development”
Lawyers and consultants can blow through $30 million without breaking a sweat.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Felflames
January 1, 2017 1:03 pm

“All Trump needs to do is get a law though congress making it a requirement of all aid being the complete and open disclosure of where every cent goes, and into whose pocket.”
I’m betting there will be a lot of $10,000 toilet seats, hammers, etc.

MarkW
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
January 3, 2017 10:30 am

Just because something sounds expensive, doesn’t mean it’s a rip off.
The toilet seat that is often mentioned as an example of fraud, was designed to go into a submarine. It was stainless steel, water tight, came with clamps and had to withstand almost 100 lbs/in sq of pressure. It wasn’t a Wal-mart special.
The coffee pot that is often mentioned was designed to go into a bomber. It had to be able to pressurize itself in order to make coffee, because the atmospheric pressure in the bomber was well below sea level.
The hammer was an example of billing. In older contracts, instead of including the cost of negotiating a contract as a seperate line item, that cost was evenly divided amongst all the separate items listed in the contract.
I’m not saying that there is no waste in military contracts. What I am saying is that you need to understand what you are criticizing if you want to reduce actual waste instead of just sounding like you are whining.

January 1, 2017 1:34 am

As the maintenance won’t be paid for this will soon be a white elephant. Like tractors to Africa.
So why not invest in R&D in Jamaica? They aren’t blessed with fossil fuels so why not try and find a reliable, renewable energy source?
This could be spent setting up a wavepower test bed.
It will still break down but the knowledge gained would be a saleable asset for Jamaica.
No-one needs a few dusty solar panels and squeaky wind turbines.

Reply to  M Courtney
January 1, 2017 1:42 am

From memory, not sure if the waves are big enough for long enough for good wave power.

Bryan A
Reply to  Oldseadog
January 1, 2017 11:22 am

Don’t worry to much about if waves are big enough or long enough to suffice, Since 2000 Jamaica has been visited by no less than 15 hurricanes with at least 3 being cat. 2 or greater and several being direct hits. Several years saw 3 hurricanes in a season. Those SOLAR Panels will become SOLAR Sails quickly enough and wave action will be inconsistent

J McClure
Reply to  Oldseadog
January 1, 2017 11:54 am

It’s an island – desal and hydrogen fuel cells are logical.

Barbara
Reply to  Oldseadog
January 1, 2017 6:46 pm

Wind along with flying debris should take care of the solar panels in short order.

Latitude
Reply to  M Courtney
January 1, 2017 7:16 am

exactly…last year Jamaica almost had to file bankruptcy..debt was ~150% of GDP
They can’t afford this…or afford to maintain it

Javert Chip
Reply to  M Courtney
January 1, 2017 1:30 pm

Why are US taxpayers giving them any money (I mean other than to line the aforementioned pockets)?
Jamaicans look happy; they aren’t starving…and they have lots of ganja.
Did they even ask for $30,000,000?

Chris Riley
Reply to  M Courtney
January 1, 2017 2:58 pm

“No-one needs a few dusty solar panels and squeaky wind turbines.”
Are you aware of the fact that one of the benefits of the new “green” economy is a huge number of rewarding and high paying jobs for solar panel squeegee boys (and girls) and wind mill oilers.

Will Nelson
Reply to  M Courtney
January 1, 2017 4:03 pm

I gather that the $30M will not be building anything. So maintenance shouldn’t be a problem.

MarkW
Reply to  M Courtney
January 3, 2017 10:32 am

I’ve read about experiments trying to take advantage of the temperature differences between surface water and deep water. The most recent was near Hawaii.

Martin A
January 1, 2017 1:35 am

“I say, I say, I say; my wife has gone to the West Indies!”
“Jamaica?”
“No, she went of her own accord”

gnome
Reply to  Martin A
January 1, 2017 1:50 am

Matilda – she take all my money and she run Venezuela.

Reply to  Martin A
January 1, 2017 2:51 am

“My wife has gone to Indonesia.”
“Jakarta?”
“No she went by plane.”

January 1, 2017 1:40 am

” …. will produce some of the lowest cost electricity ….. ”
So why does it need a grant, then?
But a guid new year tae aw wur readers and lang may yer lums reek. (In other words, keep burning the coal.)

Patrick MJD
January 1, 2017 1:46 am

“Does anyone think this $30 million grant to assist the Jamaican renewables legal process will deliver any value to the Jamaican people, other than a few well connected bureaucrats?”
BINGO! That’s exactly where that $30mil will go.

AndyG55
Reply to  Patrick MJD
January 1, 2017 11:25 am

I wonder if Obama has plans to move to Jamaica…
$10mil (after “local expenses”) would still buy a nice house.

Reply to  AndyG55
January 1, 2017 4:11 pm

Just ensuring the continuation of his supply, Andy.

Robert Warren
Reply to  AndyG55
January 1, 2017 4:19 pm

“I wonder if Obama has plans to move to Jamaica?”
Ah, then it would be worth every penny.

willhaas
January 1, 2017 1:59 am

It is worse than you think because the federal government will have to borrow that $30mil. I estimate that the money the federal government is borrowing today will end up costing the tax payers more than 12 times the amount borrowed to repay over the next 180 years. So to us tax payers it is in excess of $360mil.

Chimp
Reply to  willhaas
January 1, 2017 11:32 am

We don’t even bother to borrow any more. The Fed just invents a trillion bucks a year. Who would lend us money?
Americans will still pay, but through their dollars being worth less. A stealth tax.
The federal government runs a deficit of a trillion a year on a four trillion dollar budget, which isn’t really a budget but a series of continuing resolutions and sequestrations. Taxes cover three trillion of the four trillion. Congress knows that taxpayers wouldn’t vote to fund the whole mess.

willhaas
Reply to  Chimp
January 2, 2017 8:55 pm

The inflation tax is a tax that congress never votes on or approves. It is really stealing value from anyone who holds US currancy and with intrest rates at rock botton it has been forcing money into the stock market and forcing up stock prices. It is my feeling that the founding fathers intended for the federal government to establish a stable monitary system and not what we have now.

MarkW
Reply to  Chimp
January 3, 2017 10:44 am

One of Reagan’s tax changes was to index the tax rates. Prior to Reagan, individuals were being pushed into higher tax brackets just merely because their incomes were keeping up with inflation. The result was that tax revenue would go up every year.
Needless to say, the Democrats, who try to pass themselves off as the protector of the little guy, fought this change tooth and nail.

Jim Hodge
January 1, 2017 2:01 am

It could leverage money to encourage Jamaica to continue to use the long obsolete degrees Fahrenheit so the USA doesn’t become completely alone with their use.
It’d be a lovely world if we all spoke the same language.

TonyL
January 1, 2017 2:29 am

The purpose of the grant is to support selected legal, consulting and engineering costs in late stage project development

I wonder what sort of project will incur $30 M in what amounts to bureaucratic overhead. This grant has all the earmarks of standard Government Issue international pork project spending, set up to grease all the right wheels. But to what end? Actually, to no end at all. There is no overarching policy or diplomatic goals getting advanced here. Just $30 M getting spread around. Any bets on whether the project gets built and goes on line and stays online for (lets say) 60 months?
In a larger sense, it appears to me that a country with a government/bureaucracy/society which supports investment, development and industry does not need such grants. If the country does not have the necessary factors for development, then that development simply will not happen. The money simply gets looted out by corrupt officials and their business and industry cronies.

Stephen Richards
Reply to  TonyL
January 1, 2017 2:44 am

and Who did the ” selected ” bit.
Bon nouvel à tous

TA
Reply to  TonyL
January 1, 2017 4:32 am

They ought to spread some of that $30 million around to the U.S. veterans who can’t get timely health care, or spend it in Chicago to reduce the unbelievable murder of so many people there. It’s like a shooting gallery.
And another poster above is correct in saying the $30 million is borrowed money, or at least half of it is, since it is estimated that the U.S. borrows *half* the money it spends every day (almost $3 billion borrowed daily).
We need someone who knows how to run a business to be in charge. We are going to get that in 20 days! 🙂 I wonder how much more money Obama can waste between now and then. 🙁
I’m going to celebrate my Happy New Year on Jan. 20, 2017. Happy New Year to all!
I think this next year of 2017 is going to be one for the ages. Don’t get discouraged by the constant negativity of the MSM. They are going to attack Trump from every direction for his entire eight years in Office, and Pence for eight years after that, so get used to it and just tune them out because they are only relevant to the sheep, and as Trump succeeds, there will be fewer sheep for the MSM to influence, as the sheep wake up from their Leftist delusions and join the real world.

Bryan A
Reply to  TA
January 1, 2017 11:28 am

I just hope he doesn’t get it in his mind to start handing out presidential pardons and sentence commutation to people like Charles Manson or Richard Davis.

MarkW
Reply to  TA
January 3, 2017 10:48 am

Crime control is a state issue. Crime in Chicago won’t go down until the people who live there want it to go down. Until that happens, no amount of federal money will make a difference.

Hivemind
Reply to  TonyL
January 1, 2017 4:43 am

I think it’s quite simple… Obama needed to buy somebody. Their price was $30m.

Bryan A
Reply to  Hivemind
January 3, 2017 2:22 pm

Now that is truly High Proced Prostitution

Reply to  TonyL
January 1, 2017 5:22 am

The plant cost should be about $74 million, as per this source
http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy15osti/64746.pdf
A $30 million award for engineering and miscellaneous costs is pure pork barrel and smells like there’s some sort of corrupt deal going on. This really needs to be checked by a congressional investigation committee.

Ann Banisher
Reply to  TonyL
January 1, 2017 5:53 am

That is the irritating part. The $30M does not even go toward building or installing the panels. I worked on a project for the City of San Diego installing prefab toilets in local parks and we had to allot 40% of construction cost for ‘City project management’. The contractor only charged 15% for project management, overhead, AND profit. So the next time someone tells you the state is more efficient because they don’t make a profit, call them on it.
Also, how long do you think a solar facility will last in hurricane alley?

Reply to  TonyL
January 1, 2017 10:32 am

“I wonder what sort of project will incur $30 M in what amounts to bureaucratic overhead. “
I still can’t see where the $30 M figure comes from. I couldn’t see it in the linked article. How do we know – $30 M?

Chimp
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 1, 2017 10:40 am

Nick,
Three grants, each of $10 M, “to pay for legal, consultancy and engineering costs for a new renewables project”.

TonyL
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 1, 2017 10:41 am

Can’t say. I see that you asked earlier, below.
Perhaps you should direct your query to the post author, Eric Worrall.
Thanks.

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 1, 2017 11:02 am

“Perhaps you should direct your query to the post author, Eric Worrall.”
I did, below, but no response yet.

Mike the Morlock
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 1, 2017 12:41 pm

“The purpose of the grant is to support selected legal, consulting and engineering costs in late stage project development, it said.”
“The overall CEFF-CCA grant pool ceiling for USAID is US$10 million. Within this ceiling, there is no limit to the number of applications or awards. Responses will be reviewed on a rolling basis.”
Nick the above are from the link that Eric Worrall. provided.
Odd If it is a late stage project why the need for eng. and legal costs? Should not those be done first?
Also by the wording people can make claims for grant moneys until March 31. WTF They don’t even know who is going to call dibs on the grant money.
I thought that there were set procedures for issuing grants one of which the exact recipient is listed along with the exact sums required. Silly me…
“The funding opportunity will remain open until March 31, 2017 or until funds have been completely allocated, whichever occurs first.”
michael

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 1, 2017 1:23 pm

“WTF They don’t even know who is going to call dibs on the grant money. “
As I read it, that just says that the scheme overall is taking grant applications up till March 2017. And it’s for late stage project development. It’s not clear to me whether the $10M is the total funding for the scheme, or for each grant. But I still can’t see $30M anywhere. Was it just made up?

Mike the Morlock
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 1, 2017 1:58 pm

Nick Stokes January 1, 2017 at 1:23 pm
Nick I can not find it ether. Maybe Eric will add a bit later.
At a time when the country is so in debt I see no reason to fund projects in places like Jamaica. They have a huge tourist industry so they should be able to pay or finance their own infrastructure.
michael

Nick Stokes
Reply to  Nick Stokes
January 1, 2017 2:58 pm

“Maybe Eric will add a bit later.”
$35M?

Reply to  TonyL
January 1, 2017 1:55 pm

Rekamniar Capital Limited is a management consultancy company whose registered address is in London. Now this is clearly stated as money for legal, consulting, and engineering purposes. That leaves me thinking that few if any Jamaicans will get any of it. Building a power plant, if that ever happens, will require a whole lot more money, and then a few Jamaicans might be graciously granted labouring jobs.
Neoen are French: http://www.neoen.fr/en/ They will presumably use the engineering share of the money on site evaluation and preliminary design.
I’m not suggesting any wrong-doing on the part of any person or company; if you’re going to build a power plant, management, legal, and engineering work HAS to be done first, and it’s not cheap. I just note that the major beneficiaries are an English company and a French company.

Reply to  Richard A. O'Keefe
January 2, 2017 8:37 am

Richard,
Just curious if you or anyone else noticed that “Rekamniar” is “Rainmaker” spelled backwards. Rainmaker Capital, just thought it was funny.

Dodgy Geezer
January 1, 2017 2:54 am

What I want to know is why President Obama is interfering in the affairs of a British Commonwealth country?
Surely this is calculated to affect the outcome of elections in Jamaica? I think Jamaica should immediately place sanctions on the USA…P

Taphonomic
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer
January 1, 2017 8:59 am

Small potatoes.
Remember when Obama interfered in the UK referendum for BREXIT by threatening that the UK would be at the “back of the queue” in any trade deal with the US if the country voted for BREXIT?

Javert Chip
Reply to  Taphonomic
January 1, 2017 1:34 pm

I think that was after he tried to influence the Israeli election (before selling them down the river)

Gareth Phillips
Reply to  Taphonomic
January 1, 2017 8:04 pm

It’s a good thing Farage and Putin did not try to influence the US Presidential election eh!

MarkW
Reply to  Taphonomic
January 3, 2017 10:53 am

Where’s the evidence that Putin tried to influence the US election and so what if he did?
Obama’s showing himself for the whinny cry baby that everyone intelligent knew him to be, when he complains about others interfering in our elections after he has spent 8 years poking his nose into the elections of other countries.

MarkW
Reply to  Taphonomic
January 3, 2017 10:55 am

PS: The so called interference amounted to nothing more than releasing embarrassing e-mails from Hillary and her pals. Had Hillary et. al. not spent the last 8 years finding new and inventive ways to bend the rules and outright ignore the law, there never would have been anything worth releasing.

Nigel S
January 1, 2017 2:56 am

Wouldn’t it be more effective to combine solar energy and CO2 in ganja and then burn that in the power plant instead of diesel?
You could listen to this excellent station if you had the good fortune to be downwind.
http://one-hundread-locks.playtheradio.com/

indefatigablefrog
January 1, 2017 3:53 am

Obama is brilliant at picking the winners in the marketplace – and delivering vast quantities of other people’s money to them shortly before they go into liquidation.
Here he is explaining the reasoning behind his decision to bet on Abengoa (currently verging on becoming the largest bankruptcy in Spanish history) and Abound Solar (a total catastrophe and now bankrupt). What a genius he turned out to be: (all sarc). At least he had himself filmed being an an utter imbecile, so that we can deliver the proof as a warning for future generations:

Joe Crawford
Reply to  indefatigablefrog
January 1, 2017 7:28 am

Would you expect anything more from a community organizer who’s only managerial experience, in his own words, was running his campaign for President.

Chimp
Reply to  indefatigablefrog
January 1, 2017 10:43 am

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/specialreports/solyndra-scandal/
Solyndra scandal cost taxpayers $535 M, but, hey, they contributed to Obama’s campaign, so it’s all good.

Reply to  Chimp
January 1, 2017 2:04 pm

Solyndra went bankrupt and the taxpayers were out $535,000,000 … but the Democratic/Obama supporters who ran Solyndra didn’t go bankrupt. They just ran to the bank with the taxpayers money.
(Imagine how prosperous “The Clinton Foundation” would have become if she had won?)

Reply to  Chimp
January 1, 2017 2:21 pm

As follow up to my last comment:
I did a search “Bill Clinton Lippo Group Coal”.
Does this kind of thing sound like anything Obama is doing?
http://www.laissez-fairerepublic.com/indocoal.htm
(This was the simplest summation I found.)

January 1, 2017 4:04 am

The purpose of the grant is to support selected legal, consulting and engineering costs in late stage project development, it said.

Especially the “selected legal and consulting”. lmao.

Ivor Ward
January 1, 2017 4:11 am

It would not be so bad if it went into the pockets of the bureaucrats in Jamaica as that would then leak into the Jamaican economy and do some good on the ground. In actuality it will go to International lawyers and accountants who will filter it off into Swiss/Bermudan/Monaco bank accounts and it will never be seen again until it reappears as a new wing on Cherie Blair’s London Mansion or Amal Clooney’s Lake Garda Palagio.

ClimateOtter
Reply to  Ivor Ward
January 1, 2017 5:34 am

Hopefully a right wing.

Paul belanger
Reply to  Ivor Ward
January 1, 2017 2:03 pm

Or amnother Obama mansion, this time on prime Jamaican beachfront propert.

Mark from the Midwest
January 1, 2017 4:29 am

I really don’t think that cancelling the grant will “impede” any drug interdiction effort. The cops in Jamaica are absolutely corrupt, so working with them simply provides a back channel for information to the drug lords.
Second issue, I doubt Jamaica has the infrastructure to distribute 37 meg from a single source, their grid is really a bunch 12 gauge extension cords.

Reply to  Mark from the Midwest
January 1, 2017 5:29 am

I make Jamaica my case study for energy solutions in an isolated island. Their system should be about 700 MW, and they do distribute this fairly well (for developing country standards). The problem with the 37 MW solar plant will be its intermittency. But since the country has a large set of liquid petroleum fueled generators, having some solar power in industrial scale with USA paying bribes and covering some costs, then it’s not a bad idea as far as Jamaicans are concerned. The USA tax payer is getting screwed. The better alternative would be to do the engineering to install an LNG de gasification plant and a 400 MW combined cycle gas turbine power generation plant.

Peta from Cumbria
January 1, 2017 4:40 am

‘we’ recently seem to be painting a picture of Obama as little more than a petulant child.
Please tell me this is not true – surely not the president/leader of such a large economy, group of people and military might. Please say its not so.
Why not make every taxi driver in New York swig an entire bottle of Jim Beam before they start work each day – much safer.

David Chappell
Reply to  Peta from Cumbria
January 1, 2017 5:43 am

Unhappily it seems to be so. I was going to describe his current behaviour as infantile but petulant is a much better descriptor.

January 1, 2017 4:53 am

“Does anyone think this $30 million grant to assist the Jamaican renewables legal process will deliver any value to the Jamaican people, other than a few well connected bureaucrats? But cancelling the grant will stir up diplomatic trouble for President Trump. Diplomatic trouble with Jamaica could impede joint efforts to stamp out drug smuggling into the USA.”
The 30 million will not help the Jamaican people in any way, and your question makes clear that you know that as well as most readers of this site. The money will go to help some of the Democrat’s cronies — but I don’t know exactly which ones.
The biggest problem is that the American political/economic system since WW2 is essentially corporatism (some call it crony-capitalism). The government spending is now completely out of control and the evil of inflation is getting worse all the time.
The USA has no business or right to be giving money away to other countries or to NGOs as that money is taken by force from the America people via taxes. We need to stop all give-a-way programs at all levels.
As a side note; I am a little bitter that my uncle receives such poor care as a crippled Vietnam veteran while the government tosses money around to other countries. First take care of your own.

Joe Crawford
Reply to  markstoval
January 1, 2017 7:44 am

“… and the evil of inflation is getting worse all the time.” My better half talked to her broker/financial advisor a couple of days ago. His office is now estimating the actual inflation at approximately 7% per annum where the government is claiming only 1.7% as of December 15th of last year. I can guarantee that they (i.e., the government) don’t shop at the same food store we do.

tom s
Reply to  Joe Crawford
January 2, 2017 10:31 am

Well a Cricket Lighter in the 1970s went for $1.49 and I can find them much cheaper today. 🙂

TA
January 1, 2017 4:53 am

Obama is not only sending $30 million to Jamaica, he is sending even more to Asian cities:
http://www.wnd.com/2016/12/millions-more-for-global-climate-change-in-obamas-final-months/?cat_orig=politics
Obama sneaking in [One] final global-warming spending orgy
“The Obama administration is attempting to slip in another pricey climate-change initiative before Donald Trump takes office, potentially costing U.S. taxpayers another $90 million if it survives its unveiling – in Asia – next month. . .”
“USAID Resilient Cities Asia, as the initiative is known, would add yet another layer to the many dozens of U.S.-funded climate-related programs already under way in nearly 50 nations.
The new initiative will complement existing efforts in urban areas across Asia, according to a draft Statement of Work, or SOW, which WND discovered through routine database research.
The program’s particular angle is to provide assistance and services to secondary, rather than primary, Asian cities. Secondary cities typically cannot afford to prepare for and recover from catastrophic events purportedly caused by climate change, the agency says.”
end excerpts
No problem. The U.S. has plenty of money to throw around.

January 1, 2017 4:57 am

$30 MILLION DOLLARS will be eaten up in administrative cost before the sun shines

Stephen
January 1, 2017 5:19 am

Never mind you are well shot of him, think of the damage he could have done if he or his democrats were still in. Only 19 days to go.
He was known to me as the windbag of Washington how very apt.

TA
Reply to  Stephen
January 1, 2017 8:43 am

“Never mind you are well shot of him, think of the damage he could have done if he or his democrats were still in.”
I think about that just about every day. The U.S. got very lucky by rejecting Hillary Clinton. She would have been a continuation of Barack Obama.
Hillary would have been an English-speaking “Angela Merkel” who would turn the U.S. into the EU with insane immigration policies and attacks on the freedom of speech. We have been spared that thanks to this election.

Andrew
January 1, 2017 5:35 am

From the article:
“Once completed, the Eight Rivers facility will generate some of the lowest cost electricity on the island, the release said.”
Yes yes, once completed solar is low cost. Fancy that, the fuel is free and the entire cost is capital. So apart from the capital and land expended, its ch aped than Da Coal.
$1m per MW just in pre project engineering? A property USC coal plant wouldn’t need $750m in studies – in fact, the engineering and BFS for a project in familiar with in the general area is about $40m. It will produce 20x the power, and run around the clock (this thing will average 7MW if ever built, but require the cabling for 37MW. 5x the infrastructure support cost.

Joe Crawford
Reply to  Andrew
January 1, 2017 7:51 am

“… once completed solar is low cost.” Really? In Hurricane Alley? I guess occasional ‘full replacement’ need not be included in ‘annual maintenance costs.’

Curious George
Reply to  Joe Crawford
January 1, 2017 1:02 pm

Remember our friends in the insurance industry. That’s where a part of legal costs goes.

Reply to  Joe Crawford
January 1, 2017 4:23 pm

Of course, as we know, the tropics has extremely low year round cloud cover /sarc 😉

January 1, 2017 6:06 am

They could burn sugar cane. A fresh stick of raw sugar cane contains 40 calories and 10 grams of sugar.

MarkW
Reply to  vukcevic
January 3, 2017 10:59 am

but no fat

Ron Konkoma
January 1, 2017 6:24 am

legal, consultancy and engineering costs

What do you bet there are no competitive bids, no defined outputs and a very loose schedule.
This is most likely simply money stolen from the taxpayers and directed to cronies.

PaulH
Reply to  Ron Konkoma
January 1, 2017 6:39 am

Man, I can think of worse ways to make a living than to be a consultant in, say, Montego Bay for a few years. 🙂
Happy New Year, all! I just switched to my new 2017 Josh wall calendar!

RichDo
Reply to  Ron Konkoma
January 1, 2017 9:44 am

A 2013 interview with the director of Rekamniar and Eight Rivers Energy, Angella Rainford-Heath:
http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/lifestyle/Cocktails-with—Angella-Rainford-Heath_14702957
Getting your hair done can cost a lot of $$!

1 2 3