A strange thing happened in the stratosphere – a reversal

From the NASA/GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER and the “how long until global warming is blamed” department.

A 60-year pattern in the stratosphere changes up

This disruption to the wind pattern – called the “quasi-biennial oscillation” – did not have any immediate impact on weather or climate as we experience it on Earth’s surface. But it does raise interesting questions for the NASA scientists who observed it: If a pattern holds for six decades and then suddenly changes, what caused that to happen? Will it happen again? What effects might it have?

“The quasi-biennial oscillation is the stratosphere’s Old Faithful,” said Paul Newman, Chief Scientist for Earth Sciences at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, and lead author on a new paper about the event published online in Geophysical Research Letters. “If Old Faithful stopped for a day, you’d begin to wonder about what was happening under the ground.”

Winds in the tropical stratosphere, an atmospheric layer that extends from about 10 to 30 miles above Earth’s surface, circulate the planet in alternating easterly and westerly directions over roughly a two-year period. Westerly winds develop at the top of the stratosphere, and gradually descend to the bottom, about 10 miles above the surface while at the same time being replaced by a layer of easterly winds above them. In turn, the easterlies descend and are replaced by westerlies.

This pattern repeats every 28 months. In the 1960s scientists coined it the “quasi-biennial oscillation.” The record of these measurements, made by weather balloons released in the tropics at various points around the globe, dates to 1953.

 

The pattern never changed – until late 2015. As the year came to a close, winds from the west neared the end of their typical descent. The regular pattern held that weaker easterly winds would soon replace them. But then the westerlies appeared to move upwards and block the downward movement of the easterlies. This new pattern held for nearly half a year, and by July 2016 the old regime seemed to resume.

“It’s really interesting when nature throws us a curveball,” Newman said.

The quasi-biennial oscillation has a wide influence on stratospheric conditions. The amount of ozone at the equator changes by 10 percent between the peaks of the easterly and westerly phases, while the oscillation also has an impact on levels of polar ozone depletion.

With this disruption now documented, Newman and colleagues are currently focused on studying both its causes and potential implications. They have two hypotheses for what could have triggered it – the particularly strong El Niño in 2015-16 or the long-term trend of rising global temperatures. Newman said the scientists are conducting further research now to figure out if the event was a “black swan,” a once-in-a-generation event, or a “canary in the coal mine,” a shift with unforeseen circumstances, caused by climate change.

###

The EOS article on the strange pattern:

https://eos.org/research-spotlights/mysterious-anomaly-interrupts-stratospheric-wind-pattern

The paper is available at:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2016GL070373/abstract

Video:

The prevailing winds in the atmosphere near the equator above about 17 km are known to undergo a slightly irregular oscillation from strong westerlies to strong easterlies roughly every other year. This Quasi-biennial Oscillation (QBO) has been observed to dominate the winds in this region of the atmosphere for at least the last 6 decades and is characterized by a downward propagation of the westerly and easterly jets that form. This video allows a 3D vizualization of the behavior of the QBO jets. Specifically what is shown are regions of strong westerlies/easterlies outlined by the red/blue surfaces. The long term mean seasonal cycle are subtracted from the data and surfaces are plotted only equatorward of 30 degrees. The height range plotted is about 17-36 km. Results are shown for 1980-2000.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
141 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stephen Wilde
September 2, 2016 1:59 pm

Hey Guys, I’ve been on about this stratospheric issue for some time so it’s nice to see someone focusing on it.
Sure there’s a quasi biennial oscillation but over multidecadal periods of time the balance shifts towards more westerlies (zonal) or more easterlies (meridional) at the surface and I keep telling those willing to listen that the cause is the sun altering the balance of the stratospheric ozone creation / destruction process differently above equator and poles so as to change the gradient of tropopause height between equator and poles as described in detail here:
http://www.newclimatemodel.com/is-the-sun-driving-ozone-and-changing-the-climate/
This hypothesis deserves proper investigation.

Rob JM
Reply to  Stephen Wilde
September 2, 2016 2:54 pm

Hi Stephen, Check out UAH temp of lower stratosphere (atmospheric maps page) and you will see that the only temp changes are associated with volcanic injection of SO2. The interesting thing is the drop in temp that occurs after the SO2 is cleared from the stratosphere that persists over decades. My hypothesis is that the SO2 chemically alters the stratosphere either by stripping out water vapour as the SO2 forms H2SO4 that is rained out leaving the stratosphere depleted of H2O, or the ozone is lost due to it reacting with SO2. I have seen papers that show Zonal meridional forcing in the guise of effects on Arctic Oscillation, with equatorial eruptions producing a positive AO (zonal) and high Lat eruptions vis versa. It should be noted that the step decrease in clouds of 5% from early 1990s to early 2000s that correlates with step increase in global temps fits with a zonal/meridional regime change. Volcanic driven global warming due to chemical alteration of the stratosphere definitely needs to be considered! 🙂

Reply to  Stephen Wilde
September 2, 2016 4:15 pm

I have been waiting for a signal that the atmosphere is undergoing some change in reorganization. Perhaps this is it. Solar events of the 2400 yr Bray cycle, like the LIA, are characterized by an atmospheric reorganization that manifests in the expansion of polar circulation and the contraction of Hadley cells, while warming recovery is characterized by the opposite, an expansion of Hadley cells, much as Jeanne Haigh described in her 2010 paper. Since Hadley cells appear to have been expanding since at least 1958, and GHGs appear not to be the cause, this could be a signal that natural warming has not ended. Perhaps this change in QBO anticipates that we have reached the end of natural warming. We should know if the Hadley cells have stopped expanding. Then the atmosphere would exit warming mode, and the post-LIA recovery would be finished.

Reply to  Stephen Wilde
September 4, 2016 5:14 am

remember, it is not only ozone, but also peroxides [from H-O] and N-oxides being formed TOA
ozone is being monitored more intensely though
it is going up from 1995, both NH and SH

Will Nelson
September 2, 2016 2:00 pm

I wonder if the transition to easterlies is made rougher by a countering Coriolis Effect in descending air.

Stephen Wilde
September 2, 2016 2:14 pm

The paper says:
“The amount of ozone at the equator changes by 10 percent between the peaks of the easterly and westerly phases, while the oscillation also has an impact on levels of polar ozone depletion.”
Which ks bound to involve changes in the gradient of tropopause height between equator and poles.
Like I said, the effects are different above equator and above poles and it is solar induced with the tropospheric circulation changes following on and the important consequence is the effect on global albedo.
There are more clouds when the circulation is more meridional and less clouds when the circulation is more zonal.

son of mulder
September 2, 2016 2:18 pm

Dare I say chaos, Navier-Stokes is in there somewhere.

September 2, 2016 2:19 pm

Can we replace the canary in the coal mine with an eagle sliced to pieces by a windmill?

don penman
September 2, 2016 2:33 pm

I have wondered what statistical patterns in the atmosphere we would see if we were transported a few hundred years into the future would our present patterns have evolved into totally different statistical patterns that we would no longer recognise.

bobfj
September 2, 2016 2:38 pm

The upward blip may be related to a blip in the NINO3.4 & 3 indexes allowing for lag? Since June it is falling away rapidly. (Weekly data to Aug 28)
http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/enso/indices.shtml?bookmark=nino3.4

Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy
September 2, 2016 5:17 pm

A paper of mine published in Indian J. Met. Hydrol. Geophys. [1977], 28:113-114 “Forecasting the onset of southwest monsoon over Kerala” — I tried to relate the Singapore 50 mb wind direction [westerly or easterly] to onset [early or late]. When the winds were easterlies at 50 mb in the month of May, the onset will be late [on or after May 31st] in that year; and when the winds are westerly the onset will be early [before 31st May] in that year.
The onset dates show a 52 year cycle similar to Fortaleza in northeast Brazil precipitation — which has a component of QBO.
Dr. S. Jeevananda Reddy

September 2, 2016 8:25 pm

Okay, I have better things to do with my time than have my thought’s ‘n opinion moderated. bye!!

Reply to  Anthony Watts
September 3, 2016 4:11 pm

I see, Thanks Anthony I appreciate that you would take take the time to explain where I went wrong, Apologies to Carla if my childish behaviour caused offence, that was not my intention, and I apologise for breaching site policy.
I’m not sure what the “other things” are lol but I’ll hold my hands up and apologize, I have been a bit overboard lately.

Sparks
Reply to  Anthony Watts
September 5, 2016 4:38 pm

Just a further note,
Sparks August 28, 2016 at 8:43 pm.
“The thought of him holding me down, so that so and so could slap my ass was not well received on my end.
That is not a quote from me, I didn’t say this.

[Noted. We have had imposters (false posters) before. .mod]

Jim Hodgen
September 2, 2016 10:10 pm

Something around 60 years… and we are just over the top off the PDO… what is the trigger for the PDO? Does it have anything to do with the QBO anomaly? We don’t know much about the PDO because we didn’t have the high-res data for the beginning of it.
Just assuming that since we can see the temp record we can see the mechanisms doesn’t seem to be a very analytical outlook.
Just saying…

September 2, 2016 11:47 pm

Its natural that the warmistas trouser this wobble in the QBO as yet another omen of carbon doom, coincidentally perfect for their political agenda. Based on zero understanding of the process needless to say.
If I had to guess I would say the AMO just turned over. It could be an interesting omen of cooling, not warming. The climate data editors will have to redouble their efforts. NASA bosses should prepare for an uptick in overtime claims.

ren
September 3, 2016 12:54 am

Conclusions
The results of this study allow to make the following
conclusions:
1)The links between cloud cover anomalies and GCR
fluxes observed on the decadal time scale are not
direct. At middle latitudes they are realized through
GCR effects on the development of extratropical
baric systems (cyclones and troughs) which form
cloud fields.
2)A high positive correlation between low cloud
anomalies and GCRs in the period 1983-2000 results
from a high positive correlation between cyclonic
activity and GCRs which takes place under the
conditions of a strong stratospheric polar vortex.
3)The violation of a positive correlation LCA-GCR in
the early 2000s seems to be due to the transition of
the polar vortex to its weak state which resulted in
the reversal of GCR effects on the troposphere
dynamics.
4)The polar vortex evolution is of significant
importance for solar-atmospheric links. Its
modulating effect should be taken into account
when interpreting correlations between lower
atmosphere characteristics and solar activity
phenomena.
http://newserver.stil.bas.bg/SUNGEO/00SGArhiv/SG_v10_No1_2015-pp-51-58.pdf

RoHa
September 3, 2016 1:01 am

I don’t know what caused it, or what it will do to the climate, but I know that it means we’re doomed.

September 3, 2016 2:37 am

Take a poorly understood phenomenon, treat it like a reliable mechanism, then shriek when the mechanism malfunctions.
More sound-bite science in the age of Publish-then-Perish.

ulriclyons
September 3, 2016 3:47 am

The QBO entered its westerly phase June 2015, and would be expected to change to easterly later this year, not later in 2015.
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/correlation/qbo.data

Hugs
September 3, 2016 4:11 am

The prevailing winds in the atmosphere near the equator above about 17 km

The scale in the video is broken; it does not visualize winds in 10-50 km above ground, the red and blue shapes are largely in space and have much an exaggerated vertical scale.

Hugs
Reply to  Hugs
September 3, 2016 4:12 am

Meh, in above, and add the the.

DoubtWeKnow
September 3, 2016 8:17 am

I think this is caused by the new alien theory. They are coming to mess with our weather, taking our natural cycles and disrupting them, so they can bring their ships in through the stop in wind pattern, to harvest the meat. We will then need to fight this enemy on a global effort, say a one world government, and they will need our hard earned money to do this. We will gladly give it to them now, as we could all see though their flimsy climate change scare caused by US humans, and those in power will now have all the money and full control of the sheople. The weather will go back to what weather does, change all the time, but now we won’t have to worry about that because now we have a new problem, which those in power will now fix for us and keep us all safe. It’s an easy conclusion to come to after seeing the video with the nice blue and red swirls. /sarc

ulriclyons
September 3, 2016 9:57 am

The jump back up to a higher westerly QBO value this August could be connected with the high tropical stratosphere cooling event that took place in August:
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/correlation/qbo.data
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/temperature/02mb2525.png

dp
September 3, 2016 10:24 am

Lunar influence.

September 3, 2016 2:05 pm

Fascinating isn’t it. People look at changes in the atmosphere, in this case high up in the atmosphere and draw the conclusion that these changes must somehow be related to the release of CO2 from human activity. Strange, especially while the CO2 molecule is heavier than both oxygen and nitrogen molecules, which suggests that the fraction of CO2 high in the atmosphere is even lower than at the lower part of the atmosphere.
I haven’t analyzed QBO, but I’ve analyzed ENSO, its drivers and I make ENSO forecasts. I think QBO variations is driven by the same factors. I’m going to make a presentations of the findings I’ve made on ENSO in a few days at the climate conference in London https://geoethic.com/london-conference-2016/
The driving factors driving QBO, I think is caused by gravitational pulses of the Moon when it is at its closest position to Earth, called Perigee. The gravitational push from one Perigee to the next vary greatly based on its force and its latitude. What we get during each Perigee is a gravitational pulse of an almost global scale.
The rotation of orientation of the axis of Moon’s elliptical orbit makes a complete orbit in about 8.85 years and the points of when the Moon is crossing the ecliptic is about 18.6 years. 8.85 years is almost half the time of 18.6, but not exact.
So let’s make a quick calculation. 28 months as mention in the article is about 2.33 years. If we add 4 times that we get 9.33 which is close to 8.85. And if we double that time we get 18.666 years which is very close to 18.6 years.
I think these pulses are the cause for QBO variation as it’s based on real mechanical forcing.

Scott
Reply to  Per Strandberg (@LittleIceAge)
September 3, 2016 5:25 pm

We just witnessed the end of the Holocene….click….now what?

Reply to  Scott
September 4, 2016 6:48 am

Actually, it is the change of wind announcing the droughts coming to the great plains of America….
it is even written in the bible, Gen. 41:27

Reply to  Scott
September 4, 2016 7:08 am

go south, young man
go south
because south is where there will be more water!

September 4, 2016 3:20 am

We can determine with absolute certainty the following:
1) Not one model has ever predicted that CO2 could cause the QBO to end before the event
2) Dozens of papers will hindcast this event after the event, when paid by the US and EUSSR Govts to do so.
3) Not one of the hundreds of claimed sequelae will be positive for the world. All will be either benign curiosities, or catastrophically negative. (Extinctions, drought, ozone, warming except where warming would be good except where a cold area warming to a less uncomfortable temperature releases methane, confusing migrating birds are likely.)

ren
September 4, 2016 12:34 pm

The daily geopotential height anomalies at 17 pressure levels are shown for the previous 120 days as indicated, and they are normalized by standard deviation using 1979-2000 base period. The anomalies are calculated by subtracting 1979-2000 daily climatology, and then averaged over the polar cap poleward of 65°N.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/daily_ao_index/hgt.ao.cdas.gif
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/blocking/real_time_nh/500gz_anomalies_nh.gif

Migton
September 5, 2016 12:39 am

Interesting that this study uses data from weather balloons.
Presumably these are the same balloons – or similar – that have been recording temperatures over many years and decades. So why are the temperature records ignored by the CliSci community? Would it be [something] to do with those records not showing any significant warming, in line with the satellite data?

September 5, 2016 1:11 pm

Prop (propagation) has been wild on 160 meters (1.836 MHz) this past week. Using a tool called “WSPR” many transcontinental spots have been possible on a band that generally grants very few such spots.
tags: ham radio, amateur radio, ionosphere, WSPR, propagation, medium wave

Mardler
September 16, 2016 3:38 am