Friday Funny: "cottoning up" to skeptics with high pressure commentary

pressure-cooker-blows

On Monday, I wrote a very personal piece that describes my personal trials and tribulations over the last 18 months. It was very well received and I had hundreds of comments of support. I sincerely thank everyone who left a comment of support and understanding. Out of 428 comments, almost every comment was this way, almost, save one. Even the normally irascible “Eli Rabbet” provided a thoughtful comment of support.

That one comment (which was never published due to multiple policy violations) is presented below for your amusement, along with a follow up comment.

Of course, the person writing it was a coward, hiding behind a fake name, a fake email, and an IP address on a proxy server. But the m.o. and the content is a dead giveaway, because who else writes high pressure craziness like this hoping to convince somebody you are right by hurling insults? There’s only one person I know of.

I recall Einsteins definition of insanity:

einstein-insanity

So here is the comment I got on the personal thread Monday:


2016/07/25 at 9:52 pm

YourWifeCouldntStandTheStupid

Expieallidocious@hotmail.com

193.90.12.89

Quick, Magic Gais Watts, what’s the name of the law of thermodynamics for solving temperature, and how long was it before your dumb ass discovered ”Green House Gas Effect” is nothing but the compression warming removed from standard gas equations?

LoL Watt a f***g HicK.

I guess if you can steer an entire scientific movement into the trash with the likes of that thermo-billy Eschenbach, you can wreck a woman’s life.

GO FIGURE.

You’re a fraud.

You’re a fake atmospheric chemist.

You’re not even skeptical about a story so simple it involves leaving compression out of the mathematics of atmospheric temperature then claiming MAGIC makes the sky hot.

You’re a f***n’ bum. You never thought or cared about anything

but your self. – and the way you’ve acted, you deserve all the dismissal by those who know you WELL, you get.

You’re a f****g HaCK.

You’re the back door man

for a pseudo science movement so stupid it has you claiming that immersion of a fire warmed rock into frigid fluids,

makes it warmer than when there WAS no bath of frigid fluids,

and the full light of that fire assured maximum surface energy density for the distance.

Your fans and friends are pretty much the K-Mart of Signts and you’re as disgusting as you feel. When you know you’ve been being bad, you can always get ”your public” to run it’s tongue up and down the crack of your sweaty, stupid a*&, and get yourself some kook-kiks.

Typically you’re another Repugnican, and somewhere is a woman who spent years watching you over-eat and act like a vindictive little dilettante.

You’ve been at the HELM – the PUBLIC HELM of the BIGGEST MOWING DOWN of SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY in COMMUNICATIONS in the RECENT HISTORY.

Too STUPID to know MAGIC GAS EFFECT is nothing more than REMOVAL of COMPRESSION from ATMOSPHERIC MECHANICS


Oh, but wait, there’s more!


2016/07/28 at 11:24 am

GasCompressionMathematics

princeofpomegranites@gmail.com

73.12.130.111

If WATTS HADN’T TRIED TO TELL THE WORLD THERE IS A GREEN HOUSE GAS EFFECT HE WOULDN’T HAVE TO HAVE

OTHER FAILED PHYSICISTS

APOLOGIZING FOR HIS/THEIR IGNORANT, ANTI-SCIENTIFIC DRIVEL

AND THEIR BOOKS WOULD SELL.

A BUNCH of F*KG HICKS.

ANTI SCIENTIFIC f*kng HICKS who CAN’T PROPERLY READ & WRITE

the LAW of THERMODYNAMICS

that SOLVES FOR TEMPERATURE of GAS.

*THAT SOLVES TEMPERATURE of GAS*

THAT solves TEMPERATURE of the SIMPLEST PHASE of f*kng MATTER known to MAN.

WATTS IS THE ANTI SCIENCE HICK WHO SET THAT THERMO-BILLY ESCHENBACH ONTO THE WORLD’S SCIENTIFIC SCENE TO LIBEL, INSULT and LIE to REAL SCIENTISTS who TOLD YOU ALL

who TOLD YOU ALL –

THERE IS NO SUCH THING as a GREEN HOUSE GAS EFFECT WARMING.

GREEN HOUSE GASES are the COOLING FLUIDS of the PLANETARY SYSTEM.

YOU can not WARM a ROCK with a FIRE in VACUUM

then WARM it through IMMERSION in a SHALLOW FIELD of FRIGID FLUIDS you HICK – that’s YOU

WATTS.

That’s YOU STEELE.

YOU CAN NOT RAISE SURFACE ENERGY DENSITY you IGNORANT HICKS,

THROUGH IMMERSION of a LIGHT WARMED OBJECT

into a LIGHT BLOCKING FRIGID BATH of TURBULENT FLUIDS

and YOUR LEGACY

is BRANDED WITH THE FACT YOU CLAIMED YOU THINK THAT CAN HAPPEN.

GREEN HOUSE GAS

GARBAGE

is NOTHING BUT

THE STRIPPING OF COMPRESSION MATHEMATICS

from STANDARD GAS EQUATIONS

and FILLING IN that 30 + DEGREES with WATTS/STEELE/MANN/HANSEN/TRENBERTH CLASS

THERMODYNAMIC

G A R B A G E.


Gosh, I didn’t realize I’m in the same league with Mann, Hansen, and Trenberth. With my elevated status, it seems critical mass has been reached again.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

308 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
TonyL
July 29, 2016 10:41 am

Let me take a guess here.
Some form of paranoid schizophrenia?
It may be easier to laugh at this kind of stuff now, but it must be pretty awful to see when it first comes in over the transom.
My best wishes to Anthony, and I hope your world continues to brighten up.

Reply to  TonyL
July 31, 2016 9:30 am

This site and Axthony are amazing. Reading the diatribe, I can only assume the writer is calling out for help. Perhaps I am being overly considerate, but while I have a few rants hidden away in my drafts folders, I was taught a long time ago to put them aside for a day or two before sending. Most never leave the drafts folder although one or two have when my meds were off. Maybe that is what happened here – benefit of the doubt. One bad post can taint a life. But I do believe we have seen this person posting his ideas before without the vitriol.
This person must be very hurt and angry … and inconsiderate given the difficult time A has gone through.
Maybe publishing this will help this individual deal with his isolation and think about pausing before hitting send – not that we all haven’t done it.
Not being an apologist, just sad that this kind of thing has to happen as it hurts everyone and the discussion.
Good wishes and good health to all.

Duncan
July 29, 2016 10:41 am

To music:
I was gonna remember thermodynamics, until I got High,
I was gonna throw some insults, then I got High.
Can’t even type coherently and I know why,
Because I got High,
Because I got High,
Because I got High

Bryan A
July 29, 2016 10:42 am

definitely the same person in both e-mails.
Syntax is similar
Word hybridization is similar
Asterisking style of profanity is similar (Once heard that “the person that needs to use profanity most is the person with the least quality education”)
Insult verbiage is identical (probably a lexicographer with a 3 page tome)
Both contained apparent Half Formed Sentences indicating a highly scattered thought process is inherent and coherent thoughts almost impossible.
Tis likely that he was just wound so tight that the Rubber Band between his ears simply snapped and he is trying to make sense of the complex reverberation resonating inside his vacuous cranium. He is fortunate though that the snapping of the latex in that confined space didn’t totally destroy his brain cell.

MarkW
Reply to  Bryan A
July 29, 2016 11:07 am

Best cussing I ever heard was from “The Brother’s O’Toole”. John Astin spent 3 or 4 minutes ripping the good people of Molybdenum up one side and down the other. Without a single word needing to be bleeped.
Gotta find out if it is on Netflix, I need to watch it again.

SMC
Reply to  MarkW
July 29, 2016 12:03 pm

Is this the scene?
Michael O’Toole: I have, in my time, visited three political conventions, four sessions of congress, and two homes for the criminally insane. I have known army generals, steam doctors, vegetarians, prohibitionists, and a female suffragette. But never, even in an Orangeman’s Day parade, have I seen such pure and stainless brainlessness as I now behold in you. The Almighty, in His infinite wisdom and mercy, has given the worm enough sense to turn with, and the barnacle can grasp whatever happens to be standing by. But you are equipped with a mental capacity smaller than you were born with. Here we are, benighted in the middle of a nowhere named Molly-Be-Damn – a dreary little rookery, Timothy, a squalid sty, a festering pustule on the face of the western slope. Bless the town and bless the people! Look at them – the rabble of this cantankerous community! Knaves and fools, louts and lardheads, the least of all God’s creatures, without enough push to pick the fleas off each other, abiding in putrefaction and inertia, curled up comfy in it like hogs in a mud hole! And while I, of all people, fret and sweat for a way to pull these Simple Simons out of the bog, you stand around making flatulent noises for the titillation of the vulgar mob. And while he’s bubbling himself, what are you doing, you pusillanimous pack of popcorn pickers? You clattered clutch of clucks? The town dilapidating around you, coasting downhill in a handcart to Hell while you stand about gaping for flies and going patty-cake with your hands!
Mayor: There now! Now just one minute you!
Michael O’Toole: All right, all right, all right! Fine! Keep it, and treasure it the way it is! For when all this trash has collapsed into one pile, and the howling wilderness has claimed its own again, I want you hicks to be happy, belching and spitting, laughing and singing, swinging from tree to tree, with your friend Soapy Sam here, the Uriah Heep of the hookworm belt, standing around below waiting to steal anything that falls to the ground. If a nut should drop and fall – leave it lying there. It’s probably my little brother Timothy.

Reply to  MarkW
July 29, 2016 5:22 pm

Being a Dublin North guy, almost every sentence contains expletives 😀

Donna K. Becker
Reply to  Bobby Davis
July 29, 2016 11:08 am

No; this seems to be evidence of psychosis, as was mentioned in the comment above concerning paranoid schizophrenia. I’d say that at least a welfare check on this individual would be prudent.

SMC
Reply to  Donna K. Becker
July 29, 2016 11:23 am

Only if the ‘welfare check’ included an attitude adjustment. Mr. Cotton needs to get a clue, with an ugly stick, about proper conversational deportment… Then his meds need to be adjusted.

Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 29, 2016 2:19 pm

I think I know who this is,but can’t remember the name he use. He is a member of the “Slaying the Sky dragon” school of thought?

Pamela Gray
Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 29, 2016 4:27 pm

4 marks

David Ball
Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 29, 2016 4:49 pm

As much as I detest what that sick person posted to Anthony, what I am seeing here is nearly as bad.
Disgusted all around.
Pamela, you do not get to dole out points. Your hubris is appalling.

David Ball
Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 29, 2016 4:51 pm

Like schoolchildren.

Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 29, 2016 5:23 pm

Old dough lol, again reminds me of that one discus poster, was going at both sides, alarmist and objective, with the same thermoNonsense

Mike SIngleton
July 29, 2016 10:43 am

It is clear that he/she needs an adjustment in their medication type and dosage. Hope their doctor is on top of this.

Duster
July 29, 2016 10:55 am

It’s interesting. Blank out the tell-tale elements and you can alter the rants into CAGW rants with very small changes in content. One could conclude that what might seem to be holders of extremely opposed views have a great deal in common psychologically – or maybe “diagnostically.”

hunter
July 29, 2016 10:56 am

This guy (I am pretty sure of who it is, but won’t give him even a bit of promotion) is rather pathetic. This is a new point in his downward spiral. Fortunately if it who I think it is, he is far, far away. I hope he receives the mental health treatments he desperately needs.
Anthony,
Keep up your journey. Thanks for the humorous interlude.

RWturner
July 29, 2016 10:57 am

If brain eating amoebas could talk, it would sound a little something like…

Bryan A
Reply to  RWturner
July 29, 2016 12:30 pm

[snip – a bit over the top -mod]

Bryan A
Reply to  Bryan A
July 29, 2016 2:09 pm

Apologies…I’ll try to tome it down a little

Reply to  Bryan A
July 29, 2016 5:24 pm

tome it down a little, oxymoron alert :p

John Harmsworth
Reply to  Bryan A
July 29, 2016 6:42 pm

Way longer-but more polite?

Reply to  Bryan A
July 30, 2016 5:30 am

I like that “tome it down a little” 😀

Sunderlandsteve
July 29, 2016 10:57 am

Wow, this guy’s got some seriously unresolved childhood issues!

jvcstone
Reply to  Sunderlandsteve
July 29, 2016 11:13 am

and way too much time on his hands

u.k(us)
July 29, 2016 10:59 am

I come to this site to be educated/enlightened, if at any time I need a “safe space” away from the scary grown up world of ideas presented here, all I need to do is click my mouse.
I mean, who blames the director of a horror movie for their nightmares ?
Grow up.

Michael C. Roberts
July 29, 2016 10:59 am

About the best that I was able to glean from that chaff, was the acknowledgement that Anthony and Willis (as well as other contributors) have, through their own efforts through this website – shattered the illusions of the integrity of the CAGW cabal! (Yes, that was a Rush/Neil Peart quotation I used right there…)
As for the rest of the content of those two posts? Straight jacket, anyone???? Ranting lunatic, much?
regards,
MCR

Raven
Reply to  Michael C. Roberts
July 29, 2016 5:14 pm

It’s odd isn’t it.
A decent vocabulary but can’t string a coherent sentence together.

July 29, 2016 10:59 am

Oh I know EXACTLY who this is. None of the guesses upthread are correct, not even close.
He’s a nasty piece of work who manages to slide cleverly disguised comments into threads with links to his many baloney claims. The mods get the vast majority of them, but every once in a while he sneaks one through. I take a certain amount of pleasure in notifying the mods by posting the guy’s initials with the word “Alert” after them. Post usually gone shortly after that.
I’ve debated this guy on other blogs and he’s worse than the alarmists when it comes to discussing science and GHE. Sad as his rant is, his frustration and anger clearly show through. He truly believes his own drivel, and simply cannot fathom why no one from either side of the debate thinks he is anything but a complete cook.

MarkW
Reply to  davidmhoffer
July 29, 2016 11:11 am

Kooks?
Bobby Flay never wrote anything like that.

Vlad the Impaler
Reply to  davidmhoffer
July 29, 2016 11:14 am

“… cook. ” = kook?

Reply to  Vlad the Impaler
July 29, 2016 11:20 am

yeah, kook.
still on heavy duty pain meds from surgery, sorry. I kept looking at it knowing that it was wrong and couldn’t figure out why. Back to bed for me….

jorgekafkazar
Reply to  Vlad the Impaler
July 29, 2016 12:55 pm

Those who know the history of the word know it was originally spelled “cook.” Pronounced “kook.” Still works.

Richard M
Reply to  Vlad the Impaler
July 29, 2016 12:57 pm

Probably confused by the other kook … Cook .

John Harmsworth
Reply to  Vlad the Impaler
July 29, 2016 6:44 pm

My mum sure was a helluva kook!

Taphonomic
Reply to  davidmhoffer
July 29, 2016 11:37 am

While it isn’t John Cook; some of the stuff Cook has written gives a interesting light to your phrase “a complete cook”

Felflames
Reply to  Taphonomic
July 29, 2016 3:15 pm

Cooking the books ?
An accountant doing that would be in serious trouble.

Hugs
Reply to  Taphonomic
July 30, 2016 5:39 am

Thanks for a laugh. Of course, this cook is no Cook or Cokton.

Eugene WR Gallun
Reply to  davidmhoffer
July 29, 2016 6:14 pm

davidmhoffer —
A complete cook? One guesses “complete cook” means the same as “totally fried”. I did see this phrase used somewhere long long ago — used about an electronics device that was burned out — beyond repair. It was a “complete cook”. You are referencing our man’s brain — his brain is a complete cook.
Eugene WR Gallun

Terry Gednalske
Reply to  davidmhoffer
July 31, 2016 9:42 am

How could you possibly debate this guy? You can’t reason with crazy!

Christopher Paino
July 29, 2016 11:03 am

I’m a bit confused after reading this thread. Is there a greenhouse effect or not? Maybe I’m confusing what I read here about CO2 not warming anything and the greenhouse effect. Can somebody straighten me out?
Thank ya!

Reply to  Christopher Paino
July 29, 2016 11:15 am

There is most definitely a GHE. The ranter is a nutty sky dragon. But because of uncertainties in feedbacks (especially water vapor and clouds), the GHE magnitude is uncertain. All the recent observational energy budget studies say the effective sensitivity is about 1.5-1.8, about half of what the IPCC and the CMIP5 climate models say. In which case there is nothing to be alarmed about.

Christopher Paino
Reply to  ristvan
July 29, 2016 11:26 am

Thanks ristvan, that helps.
[Homer voice] Mmmmmmm… nutty sky dragon….

Steve (Paris)
July 29, 2016 11:04 am

“K-Mart of Signts” – don’t know why but that’s great! Is it an insult? Who cares.

SMC
Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 29, 2016 11:26 am

For some reason, I don’t think that’s what he means…

John Harmsworth
Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 29, 2016 6:47 pm

I thought that was SIGINT. No?
[SIGINT in milspeak is Signals Intelligence. Whether SIGINT is intercepted properly, interpreted properly, and analyzed properly and in a intelligent and timely manner is always open to debate. .mod]

pkatt
July 29, 2016 11:08 am

Honestly the posters reveal a rather juvenile mind set. When I used to moderate a website the most venomous posters usually fell between the ages of 10 to 17. Thats the age range when they still believe that shock value trumps actual conversation and information exchange. Usually it comes as a cry for attention… look at me look at me. Now you can choose to reward this behavior and reply or you can ignore it. The latter works better. If you do choose to reply keep in mind you may just be battling a child. Even if they aren’t a child, when they act like one treat them accordingly.

Latitude
July 29, 2016 11:16 am

…by any chance is this person allergic to MSG? (Monosodium glutamate)

Taphonomic
July 29, 2016 11:18 am

A google search on “Magic gas effect” (with quotes) is enlightening.

July 29, 2016 11:19 am

Ah, your good friend Douglas J. Cotton. The title says it all ! 🙂
When I read the first few lines, I thought it would be your personal stalker, Hot Sue from Down Under, but no, it’s the inventor of the “heat creep process”. Speaking of “creeps”, this one really belongs in the Looney bin.

Reply to  Johan
July 29, 2016 11:35 am

What I continually wonder is: how do some people obtain, or retain, the resources that let them do what they do? (given the apparent/obvious limitations that they are burdened with).

Louis
Reply to  Johan
July 29, 2016 11:36 am

Johan, until your comment, I was beginning to wonder if anyone reads titles anymore.

climatereason
Editor
Reply to  Johan
July 29, 2016 11:48 am

I dismissed the idea of it being sou immediately. It’s not her style. I would not have thought it was Doug Cottons either. He rants but I have never heard him rant like this
Tonyb

Taphonomic
Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 29, 2016 1:42 pm

Richard Vara? Or is that just a sock puppet for someone else?

Gregory
Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 29, 2016 1:58 pm
Gregory
Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 29, 2016 2:04 pm

And what appears to be the same person under a different name…
https://climateofsophistry.com/2013/06/16/another-greenhouse-idiot/#comment-2674

Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 29, 2016 3:03 pm

Good find Gregory! It does fit in with his disjointed style of writing I have read before.

EternalOptimist
July 29, 2016 11:24 am

Paging Dr Tourette. Your patient has arrived in reception

Joe Crawford
Reply to  EternalOptimist
July 29, 2016 12:11 pm

+10

George McFly......I'm your density
Reply to  EternalOptimist
July 29, 2016 4:07 pm

Anthony, I agree with EternalOptimist here. My initial thought was bipolar but I think Tourette fits better.
This person has a serious disorder.

John Harmsworth
Reply to  EternalOptimist
July 29, 2016 6:54 pm

Poorly controlled anger, incoherent rambling, loss of focus, no recognition of obvious facts, loss of connection with reality. Everyday Warmist!

John Bills
July 29, 2016 11:25 am

D. C.

HalfEmpty
July 29, 2016 11:25 am

Just your basic kook.
Joe Mendiola would take =============> him in 3.

BFL
July 29, 2016 11:26 am

These types of outbursts (for which there is a name: “Intermittent Explosive Disorder”) used to bother me some but anymore I consider them humorous (in a dark way) because they are obviously from a person that has a seriously malfunctioning neurological system and deserve pity without any return action. So unless they are physically nearby, in which case it is best to quickly leave the area if possible, the correct action is to unemotionally ignore what is obviously an unimportant psychological rant that has no basis for rational discussion.
http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/intermittent-explosive-disorder/basics/definition/con-20024309

SteveC
July 29, 2016 11:28 am

Anthony, sometimes it’s more important to know who your friends are NOT!

July 29, 2016 11:32 am

Wow . Reminds me of a eKo neighbor who when I spoke at our local Intermountain Rural Electric Association annual meeting here lauding the virtues of CO2 and pointing out that all the woodlands around us giving us the name Woodland Park are mainly made of CO2 married to H2O in equal molar amounts . He challenged me to meet him by the nearby Red Rocks formation to teach me science with his fists .
The guy’s as inarticulate as a suicide bomber .
It’s the gap between the computation of radiative balance for a sphere for any arbitrary spectra plus the constraint imposed by the divergence theorem , and planetary surface temperatures which drives me to conclude that gravity is the force which must be included in the balance but somehow is excluded from the nearly universal paradigm . Equations exist for gravity ; none so far as I have ever seen for a spectral GHG explanation .

commieBob
Reply to  Bob Armstrong
July 29, 2016 12:34 pm

… gravity is the force which must be included in the balance …

The gravity on Venus is a bit less than that on Earth. Venus is much hotter because its atmosphere is much denser. Here’s an explanation. You can’t ignore gravity but it’s only one thing.

Equations exist for gravity ; none so far as I have ever seen for a spectral GHG explanation .

There have been equations but most physicists ignored them because there were serious theoretical objections. It wasn’t until the advent of computer modeling that CO2 as an important GHG really took off. link

Reply to  commieBob
July 29, 2016 6:29 pm

I scrolled down the whole https://www.aip.org/history/climate/co2.htm and didn’t see an equation anywhere .
WRT : Heller’s piece , I think the effect of gravity is often discussed as “lapse rate” or similar measures . But the elementary force in which the equations must be written is gravity .
I have put off working thru the equations I have seen presented until I can express them in my 4th.CoSy ( Finally available : CoSy on a stick )
Anybody in the nbd , ie : along the Front Range , make it to this year’s CoSy Midsummer Party for some interesting conversation :
http://cosy.com/y16/CoSyMSMM2016printInvite.jpg

commieBob
Reply to  commieBob
July 29, 2016 8:00 pm

Bob Armstrong says: July 29, 2016 at 6:29 pm
I scrolled down the whole link and didn’t see an equation anywhere .

It’s true. There are no equations but they are referred to. Here’s an example.

In 1896 Arrhenius completed a laborious numerical computation which suggested that cutting the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere by half could lower the temperature in Europe some 4-5°C

For the equations Callendar used see “Joel O’Bryan says: November 14, 2014 at 7:00 am” at this post.
So, equations exist … for what they are worth.

ripshin
Editor
July 29, 2016 11:32 am

Oh man, that’s fantastic. Thanks for sharing Anthony. Can’t imagine having to deal with crap like that on a recurring basis. Sheesh!
rip

Reply to  ripshin
July 29, 2016 12:16 pm

thread winner!

Reply to  davidmhoffer
July 29, 2016 12:17 pm

way too many pain meds, that was meant for down thread.

Joel Snider
Reply to  ripshin
July 29, 2016 12:53 pm

That’s why I give guys like Anthony props for having the courage to be out front and take all those slings and arrows.