Friday Funny: "cottoning up" to skeptics with high pressure commentary

pressure-cooker-blows

On Monday, I wrote a very personal piece that describes my personal trials and tribulations over the last 18 months. It was very well received and I had hundreds of comments of support. I sincerely thank everyone who left a comment of support and understanding. Out of 428 comments, almost every comment was this way, almost, save one. Even the normally irascible “Eli Rabbet” provided a thoughtful comment of support.

That one comment (which was never published due to multiple policy violations) is presented below for your amusement, along with a follow up comment.

Of course, the person writing it was a coward, hiding behind a fake name, a fake email, and an IP address on a proxy server. But the m.o. and the content is a dead giveaway, because who else writes high pressure craziness like this hoping to convince somebody you are right by hurling insults? There’s only one person I know of.

I recall Einsteins definition of insanity:

einstein-insanity

So here is the comment I got on the personal thread Monday:


2016/07/25 at 9:52 pm

YourWifeCouldntStandTheStupid

Expieallidocious@hotmail.com

193.90.12.89

Quick, Magic Gais Watts, what’s the name of the law of thermodynamics for solving temperature, and how long was it before your dumb ass discovered ”Green House Gas Effect” is nothing but the compression warming removed from standard gas equations?

LoL Watt a f***g HicK.

I guess if you can steer an entire scientific movement into the trash with the likes of that thermo-billy Eschenbach, you can wreck a woman’s life.

GO FIGURE.

You’re a fraud.

You’re a fake atmospheric chemist.

You’re not even skeptical about a story so simple it involves leaving compression out of the mathematics of atmospheric temperature then claiming MAGIC makes the sky hot.

You’re a f***n’ bum. You never thought or cared about anything

but your self. – and the way you’ve acted, you deserve all the dismissal by those who know you WELL, you get.

You’re a f****g HaCK.

You’re the back door man

for a pseudo science movement so stupid it has you claiming that immersion of a fire warmed rock into frigid fluids,

makes it warmer than when there WAS no bath of frigid fluids,

and the full light of that fire assured maximum surface energy density for the distance.

Your fans and friends are pretty much the K-Mart of Signts and you’re as disgusting as you feel. When you know you’ve been being bad, you can always get ”your public” to run it’s tongue up and down the crack of your sweaty, stupid a*&, and get yourself some kook-kiks.

Typically you’re another Repugnican, and somewhere is a woman who spent years watching you over-eat and act like a vindictive little dilettante.

You’ve been at the HELM – the PUBLIC HELM of the BIGGEST MOWING DOWN of SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY in COMMUNICATIONS in the RECENT HISTORY.

Too STUPID to know MAGIC GAS EFFECT is nothing more than REMOVAL of COMPRESSION from ATMOSPHERIC MECHANICS


Oh, but wait, there’s more!


2016/07/28 at 11:24 am

GasCompressionMathematics

princeofpomegranites@gmail.com

73.12.130.111

If WATTS HADN’T TRIED TO TELL THE WORLD THERE IS A GREEN HOUSE GAS EFFECT HE WOULDN’T HAVE TO HAVE

OTHER FAILED PHYSICISTS

APOLOGIZING FOR HIS/THEIR IGNORANT, ANTI-SCIENTIFIC DRIVEL

AND THEIR BOOKS WOULD SELL.

A BUNCH of F*KG HICKS.

ANTI SCIENTIFIC f*kng HICKS who CAN’T PROPERLY READ & WRITE

the LAW of THERMODYNAMICS

that SOLVES FOR TEMPERATURE of GAS.

*THAT SOLVES TEMPERATURE of GAS*

THAT solves TEMPERATURE of the SIMPLEST PHASE of f*kng MATTER known to MAN.

WATTS IS THE ANTI SCIENCE HICK WHO SET THAT THERMO-BILLY ESCHENBACH ONTO THE WORLD’S SCIENTIFIC SCENE TO LIBEL, INSULT and LIE to REAL SCIENTISTS who TOLD YOU ALL

who TOLD YOU ALL –

THERE IS NO SUCH THING as a GREEN HOUSE GAS EFFECT WARMING.

GREEN HOUSE GASES are the COOLING FLUIDS of the PLANETARY SYSTEM.

YOU can not WARM a ROCK with a FIRE in VACUUM

then WARM it through IMMERSION in a SHALLOW FIELD of FRIGID FLUIDS you HICK – that’s YOU

WATTS.

That’s YOU STEELE.

YOU CAN NOT RAISE SURFACE ENERGY DENSITY you IGNORANT HICKS,

THROUGH IMMERSION of a LIGHT WARMED OBJECT

into a LIGHT BLOCKING FRIGID BATH of TURBULENT FLUIDS

and YOUR LEGACY

is BRANDED WITH THE FACT YOU CLAIMED YOU THINK THAT CAN HAPPEN.

GREEN HOUSE GAS

GARBAGE

is NOTHING BUT

THE STRIPPING OF COMPRESSION MATHEMATICS

from STANDARD GAS EQUATIONS

and FILLING IN that 30 + DEGREES with WATTS/STEELE/MANN/HANSEN/TRENBERTH CLASS

THERMODYNAMIC

G A R B A G E.


Gosh, I didn’t realize I’m in the same league with Mann, Hansen, and Trenberth. With my elevated status, it seems critical mass has been reached again.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
308 Comments
John M. Ware
July 29, 2016 11:43 am

I think you should feel honored that this person expended so much work, thought (!), and energy on you. Writing such a message required a great deal of diligence and time. It is, of course, of no practical utility whatever, which shows the selfless devotion with which he writes. (Does he not know that the original F-word, which I will not write here, actually meant to plow the ground, i.e., to make it fertile?) I’m glad there were so many good responses to balance this one.

Resourceguy
July 29, 2016 11:43 am

So that’s what it looks like when a troll goes off the standard formula script attack mode to the ad hoc version. You must be special.

July 29, 2016 11:48 am

Wow. Traveling the back-roads I’ve been in a few low-life bars where I witnessed some mighty vile verbal abuse (to others), but this person’s ugly rant makes the mindless meth addicts in those places look high class.
Curious I got mentioned with “WATTS/STEELE/MANN/HANSEN/TRENBERTH CLASS”. I guess didn’t like my support for WUWT. I’m honored to be lumped with Anthony.
But lumping me with Mann Hansen and Trenberth was just hitting below the belt. LOL

u.k(us)
Reply to  jim steele
July 29, 2016 3:06 pm

I grew up in, and spent most of my life in “low-life bars”, no better place to learn equity.

David
July 29, 2016 12:00 pm

Pretty hard to take him seriously given the abysmal lack of underlining.

Resourceguy
Reply to  David
July 29, 2016 12:09 pm

+1

Reply to  David
July 29, 2016 12:18 pm

thread winner !
got it in the right place this time.

Latitude
Reply to  David
July 29, 2016 12:21 pm

LOL……(at David not davidmhoffer)

Resourceguy
July 29, 2016 12:12 pm

I’m sure there is a special personality type that this fits into.

dgp
July 29, 2016 12:15 pm

Fun Fact: All caps is also know as Internet Moron Font.

Victoria
July 29, 2016 12:22 pm

I still wish Anthony would give us a clue on who this person is, but either way this person expends an awful lot of energy for nothing.

ab
Reply to  Victoria
July 29, 2016 12:29 pm

Victoria,
He did, just peruse the title of the article.

TonyL
Reply to  Victoria
July 29, 2016 1:11 pm

*sigh*
click the link at the end of the article.
“critical mass”

TA
Reply to  Victoria
July 29, 2016 4:01 pm

Victoria, just look for a peson who uses “hick” a lot in their post.

July 29, 2016 12:26 pm

Dragonslayer twaddle.

Fred Van der Velden
July 29, 2016 12:28 pm

This guy has the IQ of a pea….

indefatigablefrog
Reply to  Fred Van der Velden
July 29, 2016 12:31 pm

And what did peas ever do to deserve this humiliating comparison?

Reply to  indefatigablefrog
July 30, 2016 3:57 pm

Well… they’re green.

indefatigablefrog
Reply to  A.D. Everard
July 31, 2016 4:09 pm

At least they’re also green on the inside.
i.e. true to their colours!!!

Reply to  indefatigablefrog
July 31, 2016 5:33 pm

Very true! Peas are honest! 🙂

indefatigablefrog
July 29, 2016 12:30 pm

Here’s the basic flaw in reasoning which might be detected even by a person who has no interest in climate or atmospheric physics.
Thoughtform 1: “Nobody will take my views on atmospheric physics seriously”.
Thoughtform 2: “Perhaps I can rectify that situation by launching attacks upon individuals complete with an explanation of my ideas in barely comprehensible gibberish written mainly in CAPS.
Yes – erm…good luck with winning people over using that strategy.

David Ball
Reply to  indefatigablefrog
July 29, 2016 4:17 pm

Again, doesn’t mean he is wrong, just easier for you to dismiss.

John Harmsworth
Reply to  David Ball
July 29, 2016 7:02 pm

Yeah! Einstein used capitals! E=MC2. Can’t do exponents on my stupid media box.

Gary Hladik
Reply to  David Ball
July 29, 2016 7:04 pm

Right, his style doesn’t make him wrong.
His content does. 🙂

AndyG55
Reply to  David Ball
July 30, 2016 12:51 am

E = MC²

indefatigablefrog
Reply to  David Ball
July 31, 2016 4:07 pm

You are quite correct.
He could be a modern day Semmelweis experiencing a descent into madness following rejection of his apparently simple insights. And now I am to blame for contributing further with my complete ignorance:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignaz_Semmelweis

Th3o Moore
July 29, 2016 12:32 pm

You should feel fortunate that you attracted the attention of a gelding who is mad at the world because he could not pass remedial english. Zit (not a personal pronoun, but a physical description) lashes out at the world hoping someone will care. Alas zit failed at that as well.

Neo
Reply to  Th3o Moore
July 29, 2016 1:10 pm

I feel this scene from “Good Will Hunting” all over this …
Will: Of course that’s your contention. You’re a first-year grad student; you just got finished reading some Marxian historian, Pete Garrison probably. You’re gonna be convinced of that ’till next month when you get to James Lemon. Then you’re going to be talking about how the economies of Virginia and Pennsylvania were entrepreneurial and capitalist way back in 1740. That’s gonna last until next year; you’re gonna be in here regurgitating Gordon Wood, talkin’ about, you know, the pre-revolutionary utopia and the capital-forming effects of military mobilization.
Clark: Well, as a matter of fact, I won’t, because Wood drastically underestimates the impact of social…
Will: “Wood drastically underestimates the impact of social distinctions predicated upon wealth, especially inherited wealth”? You got that from Vickers’ “Work in Essex County,” page 98, right? Yeah, I read that too. Were you gonna plagiarize the whole thing for us? Do you have any thoughts of your own on this matter? Or do you, is that your thing, you come into a bar, read some obscure passage and then pretend – you pawn it off as your own, as your own idea just to impress some girls, embarrass my friend?

July 29, 2016 12:50 pm
Reply to  Hans Erren
July 30, 2016 11:23 am

Hans you get 5 points for citing a phd in the California higher educations system.

Joel Snider
July 29, 2016 12:51 pm

Lots of intimidating capital letters there.
But I live outside of Portland, Oregon. These guys are a dime a dozen.

Mike the Morlock
July 29, 2016 12:58 pm

Hi Anthony
Thanks for the bread crumbs, i followed them -critical mass, then the bottom link on that page, to his video, can’t say I cottoned to his views though. The Pizza play was funny, thanks still laughing.
michael

AndyG55
July 29, 2016 12:59 pm

See, Roy isn’t the only one to face this guy’s wrath at being excluded for his utter petulance and pestilence.

John Greenfraud
July 29, 2016 1:00 pm

I believe the sky dragon just breathed his fire on your rocks.

Robert of Ottawa
July 29, 2016 1:01 pm

Is there an annual Godwin competition/

Joe Crawford
July 29, 2016 1:01 pm

Bobby Davis suggested ‘narcissistic-personality-disorder’ and EternalOptimist suggested ‘Tourette Syndrome’. Guess I would just call it ‘internet socialized’ like many of the young folks today that spend way too much time on the social networks (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat, etc.) without having to accept the consequences of their comments if said face-to-face.
But, there may be a light in the tunnel. Yesterday, at the doctors office, we ran into a more liberal acquaintance of ours whom we hadn’t seen in several months. In our conversation she complained about loosing a long time friend the day before because of a discussion they had gotten into on one of the social networks. She admitted she had said several things she never would have said in person, and that because of her comments her now ex friend had terminated any-and-all future contact.
For some time both she and her husband have been known for being quit vitriolic in their interactions on the net. She is a smart lady, but I was still surprised that she had apparently learned a lesson. I hope the lesson takes and maybe, just maybe there is hope for the rest of their type. Even your commenter, Anthony.

Joe Crawford
Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 29, 2016 3:49 pm

I agree that for at least some people the anonymity of the internet does breed contempt, but it can also lead to an ingrained habit of vitriolic response that they may eventually consider ‘normal’ social interaction. With some it can even bleed into face-to-face communications. I have run into a couple of these cases of ‘internet socialization’ where I have come very close to applying an ‘attitude adjustment’ procedure to the problem.

stan stendera
Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 30, 2016 1:32 am

I considerate one of my finest hours when due to some slight to Charles the Moderator I began to post here under my real name.

stan stendera
Reply to  Anthony Watts
July 30, 2016 1:37 am

I count the day I began to post here under my real name one of my finest hours. I was standing in solidary with Charles the Moderator.

John Silver
July 29, 2016 1:08 pm

So that’s why Albert Einstein sucked at violin playing.
He thought that practice was insanity.
Well, listening to it may drive you insane.

Resourceguy
Reply to  John Silver
July 29, 2016 1:10 pm

He was after the girls.

PaulID
July 29, 2016 1:35 pm

I am thinking this guy has several generations of ancestors who were just a little bit more closely related than first cousin.

July 29, 2016 1:47 pm

Speaking from ignorance (as is my wont!) I wonder if I am closer to the clown’s identity by suggesting his initials could be G L.
Whoever it, is as others have said, he should be in a sanatorium. And I’m sorry, Anthony, that you even received one such disgusting comment.

r murphy
July 29, 2016 1:50 pm

Sou?

climatereason
Editor
Reply to  r murphy
July 29, 2016 2:14 pm

Rmurphy
Definitely not. It is not remotely her style.
Tonyb

graphicconception
July 29, 2016 2:19 pm

What a sad and insecure, small-minded little person …
He is not too well up on the science, either. The compression theory works on the day they flew in the atmosphere from outer space but after a few billion years it will have equilibriated. As heat can only escape by radiation the greenhouse gases will indeed have emitted much of it back to space.

David Ball
Reply to  graphicconception
July 29, 2016 4:14 pm

You do know what a Chinook is, don’t you? Venus?

July 29, 2016 2:36 pm

Anyone who takes that much time and effort to berate, disparage and insult someone, has some serious personal confidence and esteem issues. Sadly he is attempting to compensate for his own pathetic insignificant existence ,and obvious physical shortcomings. .

July 29, 2016 3:03 pm

Hard to know what to say because this is trolling in the extreme. Maybe this is a teenager or younger who needs to grow up, or get out more often or get help. Sounds similar to any of the conspiracists out there ranting about JFK Jnr being murdered or 9/11 cover up or chem trails or even dare I say it a Holocaust Denier. I can’t say I recognize any scientific kind of thinking in this rant as I can’t imagine Neils Bohr, Pasteur, Einstein, Mendeleev, Watt or anyone similar speaking in this way.