Guest essay by Eric Worrall
Bill Gates thinks we need a miracle to solve the world’s energy needs, a safe, reliable, non polluting form of energy which could bring electricity to the rural poor of Africa. The odd thing is, such a “miracle” is within our grasp; but nobody seems to be interested.
From Bill Gates’ Annual Letter;
Africa has made extraordinary progress in recent decades. It is one of the fastest-growing regions of the world with modern cities, hundreds of millions of mobile phone users, growing Internet access, and a vibrant middle class.
But as you can see from the areas without lights, that prosperity has not reached everyone. In fact, of the nearly one billion people in sub-Saharan Africa, 7 out of every 10 of them live in the dark, without electricity. The majority of them live in rural areas. You would see the same problem in Asia. In India alone, more than 300 million people don’t have electricity.
If you could zoom into one of those dark areas in that photograph, you might see a scene like this one. This is a student doing her homework by candlelight.
I’m always a little stunned when I see photographs like this. It’s been well over a century since Thomas Edison demonstrated how an incandescent light bulb could turn night into day. (I’m lucky enough to own one of his sketches of how he planned to improve his light bulb. It’s dated 1885.) And yet, there are parts of the world where people are still waiting to enjoy the benefits of his invention.
If I could have just one wish to help the poorest people, it would be to find a cheap, clean source of energy to power our world.
Read more: https://www.gatesnotes.com/2016-Annual-Letter
Bill Gates is a strange mix. Some of the things he says, his lack of respect for democracy, are very off-putting. But unlike many greens, he is honest with himself and others, that current generation renewables are not a viable replacement for fossil fuels.
How about my claim, that an energy miracle is, or should be, within our grasp?
What if I said it is possible to produce a nuclear battery, which does not emit dangerous radiation, which could be used to build a lightweight, backpack size generator, capable of producing enough continuous electricity, to power a fridge and a few household lights for half a century, without needing a refuel?
How much difference would it make to the world, if such devices could be mass produced, and distributed to poor people who don’t have access to other sources of energy?
There is a nuclear fuel source which fits this description – Plutonium 238.
Plutonium 238 is ridiculously safe. Unlike other isotopes of Plutonium, Pu238 is a prolific alpha emitter, but it emits very little dangerous penetrating radiation. This almost eliminates the need for shielding – a sheet of stainless steel would block all the alpha radiation.
Pu238 is so safe, it used to be used as the core of nuclear pacemakers; people had Plutonium nuclear batteries implanted in their bodies. This procedure was only discontinued, when cheaper, long life chemical batteries became available.
Plutonium 238 is also very energy dense – it emits around half a watt per gram. A kilogram of Plutonium 238 generates 500 watts of energy. With a half life of 87 years, a few kilograms of Pu238 could produce more than enough energy to power a few simple household appliances, for several decades, without needing a refuel.
The big issue with Pu238 is cost, and scarcity – but there is a possible solution. Thorium fuel cycle reactors produce significant quantities of Plutonium 238 as a byproduct. The fuel cycle could likely be designed to optimise Plutonium 238 production.
Clean, cheap, safe Thorium power for rich countries, and an endless supply of nuclear batteries for poor people, to provide them with access to all the modern conveniences we take for granted – internet, refrigeration, electric light.
I hope you read this Bill. If you are looking for an energy miracle, don’t ignore the nuclear option.
Update – David L. Hagen points out that Bill Gates is investing in nuclear power, through his investment in Terrapower.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
I think the problem is that it could be used for dirty bombs.
Uranium ore could be used for dirty bombs, but I don’t hear of terrorists buying any from rock collectors.
Well Eric that’s a silly response to a valid comment. If every family in Malawi had a thorium battery, then it would be much easier to build a dirty bomb than it is now. Wrap a suicide vest in thorium and guess what – no sheet of stainless steel to stop the radiation.
Plutonium is extremely chemically poisonous.
Anyone stealing nuclear home power sources to build dirty bombs that are large enough to do widespread damage is going to be leaving a traceable fingerprint that probably be seen from orbit, but defintely can be seen from an aircraft.
As poisonous as plutonium is, there are far worse. Remember you have members of this society bent on spreading huge quantities of lithium all over the United States and elsewhere as a transportation solution. This is not exactly the element you want to be ingesting in any form.
And while we are dreaming, how about a 400 pound plutonium battery to power small cars for urban transportation. Leasing the battery should make this a doable solution.
Significant damage?
What about Fukushima Daiichi accident? Did it cause significant damage?
(It did kill the business Areva.)
Plutonium 238 is over 50,000 times as radioactive as uranium. You can calculate that from the inverse ratio of the half-lives.
Very difficult to build with Thorium, you can carry a chuck of it the size of your fist in a pocket and suffer no ill effect.
Thorium oxide is available OTC AFAIK, it is used as a catalyst for organic chemistry.
http://www.fischer-tropsch.org/primary_documents/gvt_reports/USNAVY/tech_rpt_248_45/tech_rpt_248_45_sec4.htm
The entire reasoning/argument ignores the elephant in the room:
Fact is that we have had fission based nuclear energy produced in massive quantities for the past 60 years around the world. The Chernobyl meltdown aside [thx to well honed Soviet maintenance protocols… 🙁 ] and the Green hype around Three Mile Island and Fukushima [in both cases nobody got hurt] more energy has been produced by conventional fission at a lower cost in human lives/casualties than with any other form of energy source/ generation method – bar none.
I spend half the year in France which derives 80-85% of its electricity from fission nuclear, a country that developed a fuel “recycling/refining” technology that sees everyday use in the next-gen Phoenix III generating plants. Crucially the country has never witnessed an accident, let alone a fatality.
Anyone who still believes that we have a nuclear waste storage issue has been drinking the Green anti nuclear cool-aid. Long term storage is one of the most clever propaganda straw men ever devised because 95% of all nuclear waste is low level and can be stored without shielding. Only 3% contains high level waste that needs long term safe storage. High level waste of the past 50 years from all operational nuclear plants around the would fit into some 200 Olympic size swimming pools [dimensions: 50m x 25m x 2m = 2500 cubic meters].
If anyone thinks it’s a big problem finding space for that I suggest you book a couple of return flights over Northern Canada or Siberia and watch 6-10 hours of complete emptiness glide by below you.
If you think that’s no good because Green hand waving has it that radiation might somehow seep up from lead vitrified storage pellets in the 2000ft storage shafts drilled into the Northern Shield earth quake free bedrock and hurt the caribou, consider that 35 years ago Swedish/Swiss ABB and French Framatom developed a high level waste encapsulation technology for storage in sub-ducting tectonic plates. It’s not like the folks who developed the technology somehow forgot about waste storage….
World-wide today there are some 400 reactors in operation, 70 new ones are under construction, 180 are being planned and some 500 proposed. Between them, China and India have some 40 under construction, 100 planned and 150 proposed. Even if a good number of the proposed units never saw the light of day, it should be clear beyond discussion that next-gen fission nuclear is alive and kicking – Green propaganda and German lunacy notwithstanding.
And anyone who continues to argue that fission nuclear is too expensive should take a close look at operational life-span cost structures and compare those to the real [not propaganda] costs of solar and wind – if you added in a putative cost of the very negative environmental impacts of wind and solar [birds and bats and desert ecosystems killed off] that the Greens never want to discuss, it could well come out on top.
Nothing beats a reality check.
+1
Agreed tetris but liquid thorium flouride reactors are cheaper than uranium because no containment vessel required or cooling pumps as the system is self regulating, at least the design I have seen does not need pumps plus pump backup.
+1001
Fission is here now, it works.
Let’s just work on clearing down the mass of regulations that cause it to be so expensive without materially adding to safety, and start looking at waste disposal sanely, instead of emotionally.
In truth we have no other choice, long term. There is a far larger supply of fissionable material around than fossil fuel (in terms of derivable useful energy) .
Fusion may work, but its still decades away.
AS far as nuclear proliferation goes, well almost everybody with any national ambitions already has nuclear weaponry, and so called ‘dirty bombs’ are more psychological than physically injurious. And a campaign to actually explain how un-dangerous low level radiation really is would soon make them pointless.
What we should try to do is raise public awareness of the real facts surrounding nuclear power, as we have done with climate change.
Debunking climate change buys us decades of fossil fuel we are now not afraid to use, debunking radiation myths will buy us millennia.
A breath of fresh air!
@johnmarshall
Reality is that Next-Gen fission is here now and being built. Thorium, while more “intuitive” in many ways, will take at a decade plus to bring on-line. What’s more, the Next-Gen fission reactors are in a completely different overall safety league than for instance the Fukushima I and Three Mile island technology.
The other elephant in the room is of course Gates’ call for s miracle energy source completely overlooks the incontrovertible fact that globally we are up to our collective armpits in natural gas – the cheap, well understood/safe energy source that allows us to neatly tailor electricity output to demand by dialing up or down the gas turbines in power plant.
It is again because many people have been made to swallow the Green cool-aid and been brain washed into believing the climate establishment’s fair tale that man-made CO2 is the main driven of temperatures/climate on earth, that natural gas is held up as a “bad” “polluting” energy source.
Most of that high level waste can be reprocessed and used as fuel.
Tetris,
Thanks for this post. Illuminating.
“And anyone who continues to argue that fission nuclear is too expensive should take a close look at operational life-span cost structures and compare those to the real [not propaganda] costs of solar and wind…”
Agreed. Here is my comparison…
https://climatesanity.wordpress.com/2015/12/09/comparison-of-arizona-nuclear-and-solar-energy/
+1. I’d like to read more. Perhaps you’d do a piece for WUWT?
But while there is still the opportunity to extract income from fossil fuels there will never be a concerted effort to replace them. Perhaps the green blob are forcing the hand TOWARDS nuclear – I wonder if they’ve considered that?
Right on tetris…further; since Barry Commoner people have been fed a lot of xxxx about exposure and dosages from practically everything in the periodic table and derivative compounds. Every news channel reports every event as though it’s the latest in the Andromeda Strain or China syndrome. It has infected everything. Cancer deaths are reported as tobacco related if the deceased EVER used tobacco no matter how long they have been tobacco free. It’s nutso!
100%
Why are you trying to hide 2500 cubic meters of nuclear fuel ?? Put it in a reactor and use it.
g
Actually, France has witness two minor NPP accidents:
– at Saint-Laurent-des-Eaux reactor 1 (CO2-cooled graphite-moderated uranium) in 1969: 47 kg of uranium melted, INES 4
– at Saint-Laurent-des-Eaux reactor 2: lack of cooling, 20 kg of uranium melted (high burnup fuel), INES 4
Some plutonium have been washed in the Saint-Laurent river (estimates: 700 MBq).
As for the nuclear power fatalities:
– a few people burned by steam in a nuclear submarine
– one person burned by melted metal when opening an oven in a recycling facility for low radiation waste
– some people killed by rocks in the Bure long term waste storage facility (last accident: 2016-1-26)
– some construction accidents
“And a campaign to actually explain how un-dangerous low level radiation really is would soon make them pointless.”
You can explain stuff all day long, but please see the reception of the words of Pierre Pellerin: he has been accused of saying “the cloud (of Chernobyl) stopped at the frontier (of France)”; actually he just said that people in France had no need to worry about nuclear radiations from Chernobyl.
It’s difficult to go against the alleged “common sense” of the media establishment.
+more, tetris
one of the green problems with Fukushima is that the constant protests cause power companies to not build newer safer reactors and instead, try to extend the life of older reactors which are not as safe. Fukushima reactors should have been shut down years ago – if we actually built a modern reactor, we know how to create them so they won’t meld down without coolant. Without the greens, there wouldn’t have been a nuke disaster in Fukushima.
The fundamental issue with present-generation nuclear power stations is the use of volatile or inflammable materials in the core. Those are, paradoxically, much more of a hazard than the nuclear reaction itself.
The reason EDF’s Hinkley proposal is so expensive is the need for numerous safety add-ons surrounding a system which itself has inherently poor safety. The cheaper and safer approach is to avoid those features which make the reactor unsafe in the first place. Pressurised water coolant and zirconium (flashbulb metal!) fuel cladding being the two major issues.
Planes have poor safety.
Boats have poor safety.
Oil rigs have poor safety.
Etc.
(and they actually kill people and also create environnemental disasters)
But you don’t see them with a “regulation agency” trying to make the them uneconomical.
(And don’t get me started on the historical safety record of some big dams – including in civilized countries. That’s a killer.)
BTW, the common statement that nuclear waste must be contained for 20k years or so is bogus on 2 counts. First off, low level waste need not decay much to be a non-issue, and high level waste by definition is decaying very fast.
Which interacts with point 2. Note the end point. If stated at all, it is stated as decay to “background” levels. BUT the stuff didn’t start at background, it started at uranium ore levels. The goal post is set artificially far. Set the goal as “decay to U ore levels” and the “waste” is back to that in about 250 years.
So just backfilling a U mine and cement plug, in about 2275 A D it is as safe as before the U was mined…
Though personally I vote for using the high reactive stuff for fuel, it is nice to know that storage is really very easy if you don’t have to improve on nature and can accept natural U ore levels as the goal.
The big problem is a chemical called plutonium citrate, possibly the most poisonous known chemical and potentially a crazy terrorist’s delight.
And there are a lot of those around – the widespread practice amongst most of today’s terrorists of marrying first cousins only adding to the problem.
Being an alpha emitter, it wouldn’t be a very effective dirty bomb.
So how many alpha emitters are there that don’t emit gammas while they are at it ??
g
Quite wrong: Incorporation and the following internal radiation means a much higher risk for cancer than external radiation – that’s the real threat of a dirty bomb or any other radioactive fallout…
And since alpha emitter have a higher biological impact when incorporated, they are more dangerous than gamma and beta emitters in dirty bombs or radio-toxic poisons (see my first answer below).
It would if it were pulverised and you breathe the dust in. In that case, very toxic.
Well it so happens that I spent at least a half hour and it might have been an hour just yesterday afternoon watching Bill Gates as a guest on the Charlie Rose Program. I never watch Charlie Rose; can’t stand his interview style, or most of the persons he interviews, but as I clicked through that station, there was Bill Gates talking about CAGW and global warming and how we had to solve it now.
So Bill is waving his hands about gesticulating, as if he is conducting a symphony orchestra. Very distracting to watch; you see people walking down the street talking to themselves , and waving their finger toys about as if their contact in another galaxy, can actually see their fidgeting.
For the record, I’m very happy for Bill and Melinda Gates, and I don’t begrudge them a brass razoo. It’s wonderful that he got so filthy rich by making Micro$oft.
So this was the first time, I have watched him give a sermon, on everything that ails the world in his view, and how to fix it. He would not answer a direct question as to whether Apple should uncrypt the iphone that the San Bernardino police screwed up, by trying to change the password on it
But bottom line, on Bill Gates. Yes he’s a very successful filthy rich Philanthropist; but other than that he’s a high school dropout.
No the term ‘ high school dropout ‘ carries no negative vibrations baggage for me. it simply describes someone, who did not continue a formal education in the basics, beyond a minimum learning level.
You can’t ever make up for that lack of needed foundation. Being rich in midlife does not mean you can catch back up to the pack.
So Bill understands software, and a lot about business, but he doesn’t have a solid science background of understanding, which is why he signs on to the CAGW mantra.
He did tell Charlie Rose that he has read the Feynman Lectures books, and that it is the ultimate in Physics text books. But his knowledge of Feynman is limited to watching him tell a congressional committee his opinion, of how the Challenger rocket blew up because its O-rings were cold.
Gates is sold on renewable energy (me too), but he doesn’t seem to be putting too much of his own money into it.
He thinks in 40 years artificial intelligence computers will be way more intelligent than humans.
If they are, they likely will sterilize this planet, and eradicate humans and most other animals.
Mother Gaia, has not yet demonstrated that ‘ intelligence ‘ conveys any better survival likelihood. Intelligent machines will find that they can’t either.
G
Gates was a college dropout. He graduated high school, and enrolled at Harvard, but did not finish.
OOoops !
Thanx Bartemis for correcting that.
Sorry Bill, my misteak.
He still doesn’t know much about CAMMGWCC.
g
I lost my awe of Gates when I beheld the woman he chose to marry. Huh? !*$&#%
@EricGisin:
Pu-238 is – as a strong alpha particle emitter – much more radio-toxic than U-238 if incorporated because of its much shorter half-life and the high biological impact of alphas within the human body.
Bad people could easily open the battery encasement, disolve the Pu-238 metall in hydrochloric acid and use the Pu-238 chloride very effectively in all forms of radio-toxic poisons or dirty bombs.
You could e.g. poison great amounts of drinking water with very little Pu-238 chloride…
You could poison even more with readily available heavy metals such as arsenic or alkaloids such as nicotine let alone the botulinus toxin. Radioactive isotopes are by definition dangerous to handle and rather easy to detect so its hardly an effective weapon. In any event there are thousands of barely controlled medical radioisotopes in the third world. The accidental inclusion of cobalt 60 from a Mexican clinic into steel comes to mind.
An article about dim bulbs and Bill Gates – coincidence?
LMAO. Good one!
At totally ruthless and successful businessman but definitely NOT a tech visionary as he is pitched by his followers.
Like Bill Gates, Edison was a totally ruthless and successful businessman; he didn’t invent the incandescent light bulb (that was James Bowman Lindsey. 1835 Dundee, Scotland), Edison bought the 1874 Woodwood & Evans Canadian patent in 1879, which was what Edison successfully marketed.
Although Edison held 1,093 patents they were all the work of others, he used to go & meet the immigrant ships, choose the brightest scientific minds (eg Tesla), employ them at minimum wage & patent all the good ideas as his own.
The ‘inventors hall of fame’ is a manifestation of why mass education has such a damaging effect on the dissemination of knowledge. Teachers want to have ‘soundbites’ that can be preached-at their charges, to then be parroted in exams. Thus, that institution tends to bend the historical truth a little, then eventually a lot, in order to pin the medal on a single individual rather than having to explain the more fragmented real-world process of innovation. Which, would not in any case make for a good exam question.
Strictly speaking, the lightbulbs devised by Swan and Edison were not the modern variety anyway, because they used very dim and inefficient carbon filaments. The tungsten filament was developed in the early 20thC, and again it is difficult to say who developed it first.
+++++ 😉 lol
Bill Gates was a better salesman then Steve Jobs. Steve had the better technical & forward looking vision.
Bill’s crowning achievement was selling Windows to IBM’s upper management in their panic to counter Apple, & get into the PC market. Middle & lower level managers were ignored, because everybody knew Big Blue had the smartest exec’s around.
Fortunately, for IBM, someone had the foresight to hire outsider Lou Gerstner from biscuit maker Nabisco
Gates didn’t sell Windows to IBM, it was DOS – and of course the genius was that he said MS would not give IBM the rights to the BIOS, which meant MS could sell DOS to other PC makers later on. He initially told IBM that MS did not make operating systems, only development tools. He then told IBM to talk to CPM, which did have an OS. When CPM and IBM could not agree on a deal, they want back to Gates, and he saw an opportunity. Just a smart guy who seized an opportunity.
Steve Jobs had The Woz !
G
The very best version of Windows was M$ DOS 3.2
G
Oh Knock it off!
We have as mush cheap non-polluting energy as we are allowed to have.
Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors (LFTR) could provide extremely cheap energy and as a byproduct masses of fresh water and other desirables.
That these reactors have not been made is a testament to the power of crony politics.
Such chatter around the web about LFTR, but no LFTR… why is that?
Largely because Admiral Rickover killed them off because he wanted conventional reactors to power his submarines and now “Nuclear” is taboo, try getting finance to start a company to develop nuclear power.
See China. They moved their dates up from a 25-30 year project to a 10-12 year one. They’ll have one online before 2025 (IMHO). Then we and the rest of the world can buy them from China as they mass produce them.
Because like any other ‘it could work’ technology, there’s a huge and expensive development program with many potential unknowns springing out on the way to commercial viability.
Back in 1930 if we had had the Internet no doubt we would have been saying ‘why aren’t we building jet engines’ .
Its often the details that totally kill a technology, or put it in abeyance for years. With access to a suitable power source, aircraft could have been built as far back as they 16th century.
Fusion power still lacks the ability to properly contain the plasma. Maybe massive processing power and human built feedback will succeed in doing what a primitive tokamak cannot.
Contrariwise, the Laser appeared years before we knew how much we were going to need it.
Where we go with technology is utterly dependent on what else is around us. Frank Whittle had to experiment and push materials technology way ahead to get his jet turbine built. Initial attempts to purify uranium to weapons grade or even reactor grade were huge engineering projects. Now we HAVE reactors and tons of shorter half life materials lying around, building breeders is not so hard if we need more e.g. plutonium.
The point is no given technology exists in isolation, and the one you tend to use is the one for which you already have the support infrastructure, and right now that’s boring old one pass uranium or MOX reactors.
They are good enough, and the development work is done, and we have the reprocessing plants.
The far larger problem is public perception of nuclear energy, and the over- regulation it has spawned.
Once again I will post a quote from the late Prof Cohen:
(http://www.phyast.pitt.edu/~blc/book/chapter12.html)
I have met the government officials who chose the billion-dollar plan, and have discussed these questions with them. They are intelligent people trying to do their jobs well. But they don’t view saving lives as the relevant question. In their view, their jobs are to respond to public concern and political pressures. A few irrational zealots in the Buffalo area stirred up the public there with the cry “We want that dangerous waste out of our area.” Why should any local people oppose them? Their congressional representatives took that message to Washington — what would they have to gain by doing otherwise? The DOE officials responded to that pressure by asking for the billion-dollar program. It wasn’t hurting them; in fact, having a new billion-dollar program to administer is a feather in their caps. Congress was told that a billion dollars was needed to discharge the government’s responsibility in protecting the public from this dangerous waste — how could it fail to respond?
This illustrates the human process by which enormous sums of public money are spent wrongly, simply because the people who are tasked with the spending of it are not driven by rational cost-benefit analysis, but by public perception of risk, no matter how far that is removed from reality.
Politicians have no incentive to educate people into the inconvenient truths, and every incentive to go along with whatever convenient lies are currently fashionable, if they want to keep their jobs. And what this means is that money spent on marketing BS and lobbying government has a high rate of return. CF Global Warming etc. Which is not an inconvenient truth, but a very convenient and profitable lie, if you can get enough people to believe in it.
And that gentlemen , the crux of the whole matter: There is no incentive anywhere for people in politics to tell the truth. Only what people want to hear.
Once, when politics was the province of wealthy men – landowners responsible for thousands of tenants, there was. They at least could say with some degree of honesty that what was good for the average person would be good for them, and, secure in their private means, they could resist political pressure to go along with what they did not believe in. Today’s Big State, where all politicians are sackable employees, reduces their scope of accountability from the nation at large to their own families, paycheques and careers.
Private wealth is seen by many as an obscenity, but private wealth is what protects its owner from pressure to go along with the crowd. Bill Gates the philanthropist has probably done quite a lot of good, supporting some projects that achieved something, and not too much harm in others that employed people who in the end achieved nothing.
Maybe someone should ask him for 50 billion dollar cheque to build a nuclear power and desalination plant in California.
Sorry to ramble on, but I really wanted to make the point that whilst we think of nuclear power as a technical issue, largely it isn’t. Its a human social political and economic issue, and right down at the bottom an ideological issue.
Fix those, and nuclear of whatever flavour,. will flourish.
Leo Smith
Good comment, so what is the underlying ideological issue?
It seems to have got lost somewhere along the line.
I have a suspicion that some of the scientists and others with influence are on the global warming bandwagon in the hope that the opposition to nuclear power will greatly deminish.
Well actually Leo, fusion power still lacks the ability to provide any power. Doesn’t really matter if they can’t contain the plasma, if it can’t provide any output power.
G
Harry Buttle (not Tuttle!)’s comment that it was Admiral Rickover is right on target.
See my little piece on that subject here: Rickover fact check. Warning: severe tire damage You can also romp through my other energy and LFTR-flavored commentary if you wish
Think of me as the Trix Rabbit of Thorium.
Yet another example of outrageous disingenuity from Gates. He is so ironical that it would be impossible for a sane person to knowingly make such pronouncements. He would know very well that innovation is not the whole picture, particularly as regards the light bulb. Built in obsolence is the real picture ‘illuminated’ by the story of the manufacture of the light bulb. He can’t have forgotten that planned obsolescence is a central strategy of his own industry where the ‘product life cycle’ of hardware and software are artificially limited.
If he has Edison’s sketch it is hard to imagine that he is such a poor student of history that he would not know the ‘industry allegory’ of the light bulb; the symbol for innovation and its threat to business!
Here is an innovative suggestion Bill! How about making and sending ship loads of long lasting light bulbs to the third world instead of containers of obsolete computers from the first.
Planned Obsolescence Documentary
Centennial Light
Where your computer goes to die
Whoops! Broken links above: Planned Obsolescence Documentary
Centennial Light
Where your computer goes to die
Read up a little more on LFTR. The reactor part is pretty safe. Its trouble comes from the continuous chemical reprocessing of the core. Next to LFTR reactor will be the equivalent of a small smelter, hermetically sealed to keep oxygen away from the liquid metal salts and highly radioactive fission products.
It isn’t the physics. It isn’t the crony capitalism. It isn’t Rickover wanting Pu. It is the nightmare of operating that high-temp highly radioactive chemical refinery on the site of one or more LFTR reactors.
For my money, this dual zone core in the TAP reactor is more likely to be the profitable route to a Thorium design because it uses two different neutron energy spectra to best deal with the poisons.
What you say is true for any of the liquid fuel (Th/U/Pu) salt reactors with continuous neutron poison removal / chemical cleaning / fuel recycling – but is really just a good Chemical Engineering project that needs no new discoveries and has no real barriers (physics/engineering/material science -wise, not speaking politics here) to implementation. I’m all for trying several designs – may the most cost effective clean machine win!
Personally I’d rather freeze than depend on energy from Plutonium-238 ” glowing red hot under its own heat”. It’s not very nice stuff.
I wouldn’t want to sprinkle it on my cornflakes, but properly sealed in a solid steel container it should be fine.
Actually sprinkled on your cornflakes, its probably still OK.
Its a poisonous heavy metal sure, but we have lots of those around us that we manage not to poison ourselves with.
Remember there was a huge pressure from Agitprop funded by the Eastern bloc to raise a cliamte of fear about all things nuclear, because in a democracy, as I explain elsewhere, what drives policy is not facts, but peoples fears.
Plutonium was like the rest of the nuclear program, deliberately demonised and the ‘useful idiots’ – third rate scientists and so on who saw easy money and fame jumping on scare bandwagons, were only to happy to go along…sound familiar?
..” Plutonium-238 ” glowing red hot under its own heat”. It’s not very nice stuff. ” ??
Do you really believe Pace Makers ” glowed red hot ” ?? LOL
https://www.orau.org/ptp/collection/Miscellaneous/pacemaker.htm
It’s all about the quantity. And the shape…
Jimmy, it’s hot ’cause that’s a pretty big piece. Smaller pieces will be less hot. Still, more heat and you get a more efficient thermocouple-type electric generator.
He doesn’t know whats on the market. For the cost of one failed Green Company we can have higher density power source..
Lugano Test, 2014
On October 8th, 2014, a team of European academics released a report of their testing of an E-Cat device supplied to them by Industrial Heat, LLC which took place at Lugano, Switzerland. The report can be read in full at the following link:
http://www.elforsk.se/Global/Omv%C3%A4rld_system/filer/LuganoReportSubmit.pdf
From your link;
That is not my understanding of how you measure heat produced by a reaction. Heat is measured by sealing the reaction inside a heavily insulated container, with a quantity of water with a thermometer stuck in the water. By taking thermometer readings before and after the experiment, you can calculate precisely how much heat was produced by the reaction you are testing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorimeter
I’m also concerned about the statement on radiation;
No sign of neutron radiation is normally taken as an indication that no nuclear fusion occurred.
“That is not my understanding of how you measure heat produced by a reaction. Heat is measured by sealing the reaction inside a heavily insulated container, with a quantity of water with a thermometer stuck in the water. ”
To which the authors have responed:
“The choice of instruments was warranted both by the straightforwardness of the experimental setup and the precision of the instruments themselves. Designing a calorimetric measurement by means of a cooling fluid would have been more complex, especially in the light of the high temperatures reached by the E-Cat.”
Interestingly enough, the MFMP (an open science group) have very recently claimed a strong replication of the E-Cat and published the recipe. The reaction start is signaled by a burst of 100 keV-range gammas.
see https://animpossibleinvention.com/2016/02/24/breaking-the-e-cat-has-been-replicated-hers-the-recipe/
I don’t buy that explanation Londo.
Creating an large, insulated room is not expensive, all you have to do is line a normal room with cheap polystyrene insulation and repair tape. A few thousand litres of water wouldn’t take up that much space. The room could have been calibrated with an electric heater.
Or the experiment could have been conducted with a miniaturised LENR device, and a desktop calorimeter.
In my opinion there always seems to be that need for a little leap of faith with LENR, that little bit of complexity which weakens the scientific integrity of the “test”.
Moderator, please delete cold fusion trash.
[Your comment is noted. .mod]
Trash that works?
http://www.blacklightpower.com/
Of course there are never any new discoveries. Physics was fixed after you left school.
That Industrial Heat have now completed a one year trial this month of their 1 MW LENR plant that supplied steam to a real customer must be an illusion. They are backed by $59 million dollars from idiots.
See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQ3S3YMH96s&feature=youtu.be
Or maybe don’t, if you want to keep on thinking you know it all.
Na, I’ll use my Steorn Never Die Battery.
http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/05/06/announcement-demonstration-of-steorns-never-die-orbo-power-cube-battery-in-dublin-pub-starting-friday/
Amusing.
To fully fund ITER, the world’s largest and most expensive fusion project, it would only be necessary to halt global expenditure on windturbines for a few days. Sounds preposterous but that is the disparity in funding. When you look at it like that, it’s no surprise that we don’t have fusion but we do have every hillside covered in turbines that are uneconomic to operate without continuing subsidies.
The Green movement often acts as if it is an outgrowth of the old anti-nuke movement, or at least incorporated many of the anit-nuke shibboleths. Witness the behavior of the Greens in Germany. The Greens would freak.
The Green movement is an outgrowth of the old anti-nuke movement!
Which in turn was a child of the soviet agi-prop.
…and still has the goal of putting sand in the gears by forcing the price of energy (the life-blood of modern life and capitalism) ever higher.
I’ve always thought that Gates isn’t the brightest guy in the world, far from it. (No real evidence of this – just an observation). But, rather, a “visionary” and great marketeer with brilliant people around him (and extremely fortunate – as I understand it the preferred folks (name escapes me) blew IBM off). Explains a lot about the man.
CP/M. Digital Research, Inc. Knuckleheads. What could have been but sadly not. Bill and Co saluted the flag, but never did figure out how to make int21 re-entrant, and we live with the legacy even to this day.
Morrow, with his C/PM. My first computer was a Morrow, nice little machine, cost me $3000 with dot-matrix printer thrown in. Sadly, Morrow was killed in a bar fight in Milpitas, CA.
When was this?
..Hey Bill, I bet you could supply a lot of energy for them Africans if you cough up some of your billions !
Careful now, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are doing quite a lot in Africa. So they are coughing up some of their billions. I do NOT question his philanthropy.
G
Bill Gates, you are a techie!! Do your homework! CO2 Global Warming Climate Change is not happening. It is not a crisis! The looming Deadly cold IS a crisis, and all energy sources will be necessary to produce food and prevent death by cold, especially for the poor. Verify this by going to paullitely.com
It is my understanding that PU 238 is what has been used to power deep space probes. There is so little left that it is carefully rationed.
@ur momisugly Proud Sceptic, 6:22 pm Feb 23, Aren’t the Americans ( and no doubt a few other countries) using current breeders to continue making PU 238?
Or we could just build reactors in these countries… As a heavy metal Pu is chemically toxic regardless of its radiotoxicity.
Eric
Bill Gates is already investing heavily in such potential energy breakthroughs. See his TED Talk and his investment in TerraPower
See DOE Grant to Southern/TerraPower
Further on: CHLORIDE REACTOR RESEARCH FUNDED BY DOE
Thanks David – I missed that, I thought he was mostly focussing on renewables.
In the short term – and Africa needs lots of cheap energy right now – coal is the cheapest and easiest by far. Pity Obama and the World Bank blocked all coal back in 2013 http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/30/us/us-says-it-wont-back-new-international-coal-fired-power-plants.html?_r=0 The World Bank had a bit of a re-think in 2014 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-08-05/world-bank-may-support-african-coal-power-kim-says I don’t know where they are all up to now, but they have certainly wasted valuable time.
They are getting the money from China now. From the POV of the developing world America and Europe are pretty much inconsequential, nobody cares what they think. 😉
Mike Jonas
Very precise and correct in the assessment. Just as was the case for China, rural people living in subsistence will flock to urban centers once adequate power, clean water, sanitation, medical services, etc., etc., etc. are provided. But these all start with large quantities of reliable electrical power. The people of Africa need this today and not tomorrow. (How ya gonna keep em down on the farm once they’ve seen Paree!)
It is absolutely criminal that the West is blocking financing for critical infrastructure (i.e., coal power plants) to lift sub-Sahara Africa out of subsistence, abandoning menial chores to enjoy the fullness of being human.
Oh, like most people in the West. Chained in economic slavery to their bank. Working all the hours they can to buy expendable crap with built-in obsolescence so they need to go back to work tomorrow.
The fullness of being human, to be sure.
So is it more fulfilling to scrabble in the ground all day for meagre crops, weave your own clothes and wash them in creeks, sit in wattle-and-daub huts breathing in the smoke from dung fires, die young from respiratory infections and water polluted with excrement? Me, I’d rather have good plumbing, electric lights, modern medicine, and the option to buy whatever “expendable crap” I want, including the books and Internet blogs I have the leisure time to read.
/Mr Lynn
A scheme in Peru to provide 500,000 rural homes with solar power is a similar farce. The people of Peru and Africa do not need a feeble reading lamp – they need fossil fuel generation right damn now to get health, refrigeration, industry, and a modicum of modernity into their lives. These token acts are building then crushing dreams.
http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/15/peru-solar-power-program-to-give-electricity-to-2-million-of-poorest-peruvians/ (going on now since at least 2001)
How many Africans and Peruvians must die in the dark before we start rounding up the greens that are imposing a paleo existance on them?
Hear, hear!
Ah come on. A feeble reading lamp — probably an LED — and a radio or TV powered by an old car battery charged from a solar panel is a huge improvement over no reading lamp or radio at all. It took the US and Japan and Europe (and the 20th Century Communists although no one wants to give them credit for anything) to build electric grids that reached a large percentage of their populations. It’s going to take a long time for national grids to reach everyone in the third world. In the meantime, small scale solar is better than nothing. Why not fossil fuels? They’re probably better in most cases. But they are costly and the significant percentage of humanity that is not on the power grids does not, for the most part, have a lot of cash. And in too many cases their governments are more of a liability than an asset. Here a list of countries and electrical access. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.ACCS.ZS
And before we get too smug, look at American Samoa (59.3%) and Puerto Rico (90.9%).
Moron – the difference is in the old days people were trying to move forward. The greens are trying to move backward. Krickey, read, will you? This is not a trivial effort at suppressing modernization. It is a zealotry lead effort to suppress modernity because it is deemed best for Gaia.
If I were a giraffe I would be worried about electricity grids strung out over Africa.
Doesn’t seem to hinder American bison.
Giraffes have longer necks.
Lester C. Hogan, while head of Motorola talked the Chinese into cell phone technology, instead of stringing our old telephone wire junk all over their huge area.
likewise, it is entirely appropriate, to provide small African communities with high efficiency LED lighting; rather than have them waste precious resources on obsolete incandescent and fluorescent lighting. They can use that power wastage savings to get refrigeration for food storage and other more desperate things like medical equipment.
G
Well it might have been Bob Galvin, and not Hogan. But it definitely was Motorola.
G
Why do you consider an led reading lamp to be a civilisational improvement?
Man has been using oil lamps for thousands of years, powered very heaply with animal fat. And they have been using hurricane lampd for hundreds of years, powered by whale and rock oils. And very good an efficient they were too. So why is flooding the Third World with technology they cannot afford or repair, to produce a feeble glow, an improvement on animal fat or rock oil?
R
“””””…..
ralfellis
February 24, 2016 at 2:46 pm
Why do you consider an led reading lamp to be a civilisational improvement? …..”””””
Well actually oil lamps are anything but efficient. And whale oil has not been available on the market for decades.
If you are going to provide compact local PV solar electricity to remote African villages so they can have modern medical care for example, you don’t want to be wasting electricity on inefficient lighting. If you want your brain surgery done under whale oil lamps, don’t impose your choice on others.
LED solid state lighting is the only form of commercially available lighting that is so efficient that its products must conform to international laser safety standards.
And I said nothing about civilization; simply efficient use of resources where modern resources are scarce.
G
LED lamps are far from feeble. I’ve got a couple that match a 100 W incandescent light output.
Unfortunately, they spike at 440 nm then down convert with phosphors. This leaks a lot of blue that causes insomnia…
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2012/07/22/superchiasmatic-led-light-insomnia/
A gas lantern is really a kW heater that gives you 100 W of incandescent light for free and can be replaced with a 10 W LED bulb. Far better to use that kW of fuel to generate electricity for 100 hours of LED than that one hour in the lantern .. unless you need the heat.
Pretty much any campground today sparkles with blue LED for just that reason. I run an LED in a reflective socket from a dinky inverter in the car to provide lots of light anywhere…
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2011/02/17/minimalist-emergency-power/
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2012/06/07/changing-preparedness-lights/
“How many Africans and Peruvians must die in the dark before we start rounding up the greens that are imposing a paleo existance on them?”
you’re seriously asking?
all of them because if one african or peruvian child can read at night, the sacrifice of all your money is worth it
because you aren’t going to do anything but whine about why somebody else won’t do what you won’t do and because nobody is going to be rounding up anybody.
you are not your brother’s keeper – that’s called slavery
you are an agonist whining for the love of whining- how do we know this? because any day you can be found doing that – it’s not accidental or innocent. you’re a crybaby, sensitive, 21st century guy- shallow to the bone.
if you want to exhort people- how about this: zort yourself – in private, please- and in silence.
Ok – that was weird. Do you not realize the value of tokenism vs the value of real progress? Maybe a mental picture can help. It is the difference between living in a modern American city and living on a modern American Indian tribal reservation. Two worlds separated by a common dream and common need and no common resources.
gnomish, showing how hypocrisy is to be properly done, writes:
“if one african or peruvian child can read at night, the sacrifice of all your money is worth it”
Obviously you have not sacrificed all of your money. You seem to have a computer. So maybe it wasn’t actually “worth it”.
“because you aren’t going to do anything but whine about why somebody else won’t do what you won’t do and because nobody is going to be rounding up anybody.”
While that didn’t exactly make sense, you have not declared what you have done to help peruvian children to read at night.
“you are not your brother’s keeper – that’s called slavery”
I call it “brother’s keeper” and it speaks to assisting my brother. The phrase comes from the story of Cain and Abel, and they were apparently actual biological brothers.
“And Cain talked with Abel his brother: and it came to pass, when they were in the field, that Cain rose up against Abel his brother, and slew him.
And the Lord said unto Cain, Where is Abel thy brother? And he said, I know not: Am I my brother’s keeper?
And he said, What hast thou done? the voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.”
michael- i’m not going to do without the cream in my coffee for any peruvian or african child.
more importantly – you can’t make me.
and most importantly – you have no right to try.
also, avoid satire – you’ll get ulcers from your histrionics.
(yeah- i bet that went over your head, too, eh?)
so there ya go, you valiant social justice warriors- you’ll have to swallow your own ballistic colostrum.
“We” aren’t gonna do anything for them. But if they ever get themselves into a position of strength, the hatred this modern colonialism breeds will come out. In many ways the old style colonialism was better for them. Keeping modernity from an entire continent the way we are doing it in Africa today is beyond criminal – the West has a religion that demands strict energy austerity, but since we are unable to deny ourselves much of anything we force the poor nations to do our penance for us. Africa suffers because America and Europe sinned. Sort of like buying indulgences, except the payment is the suffering of millions of innocents. You just have to see a woman in a hut, cooking thin gruel in a stove fuelled by nothing more than actual bullshit, no chimney on the hut and her baby sucking on her teat in that smoky room once. Apparently Gates has been in that room many times, and all he can do is make speeches and investments, then coming home to his palace and feeling bad for the poor people – on a schedule.
The issue in Africa is distribution, which most people are unaware of or ignore. It’s a massive continent with a still quite rural population. Centralized large power plants do not solve the issue of power distribution.
And Tsetse flies that prohibit ordinary domestic cattle for example.
g
Africa is also missing out on geothermal in spite of some very promising fields.
Kenya has about 700mw of geotheramal and is building more. However most countries in africa don’t have arift valley to support large scale geothermal power. Moraco has completed the first of 4 solar therma plants with molten salt storage. Allong with wind and other renewables moraco is expecting 40% of all electricity will be produced from renewables by 2020.
Considering that the country only generates 6.6 Gigawatts this isn’t hard. While this is expected to climb to 20 Gigawatts by 2020, Hydro already accounts for 20% of the power mix. People keep thinking of renewables as wind and solar, they forget the honking big dams. 😉 The other point is that dams provide water for agriculture, drinking and sanitation, wind and solar give none of these. (I’m a big hydro fan. )
Most countries dont have oil or coal. Your point is “give up”?
It’s not just Africa. The US could probably do a lot better with grid-scale geothermal than it does. The US actually generates more grid-scale electrical geothermal power than any other country although the percentage of total US power from geothermal is only 0.3%
Sadly, John B, hydro doesn’t produce 20% of world energy, it’s much less. And by the standards of nuclear, it is hellishly dangerous. Just one incident in Italy in 1963 killed 2000+ people, which represents 50x as many as Chernobyl. I think the figure is more like 300 fatalities per annum, whereas Chernobyl divided by 60 comes to less than 1 (nuclear has been around since 1956). Nuclear typically generates the 20% or so you mentioned and hydro more like 8%, so using a further multiplier of 2.5, then nuclear is something like 1000x safer than hydro. The rest is green excrement.
I’m NOT a fan of hydro!
Worst ever hydro death toll was Banqiao. Maybe quarter of a million dead.
Makes Chernobyl look like a picnic.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banqiao_Dam
IN my lifetime I can think of many many major death tolls. Aberfan (coal) Bhopal (doixin IIRC) Banqiaou (hydro) Japanese tsunami (natural) 911 (oil funded terrorism?)
Not to mention wars of one sort or another.
Contrast nuclear power where the official death toll is less than 100.
Even organic beansprouts have killed nearly as many people as nuclear power
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Germany_E._coli_O104:H4_outbreak
If those beansprouts had been irradiated as is done with many vegetables in supermarkets, those deaths would not have occurred..;-)
John’s point still stands. Hydro provides water and irrigation. In addition it has prevented many floods as well in a developed system of reservoirs and provides an effective means of sustaining the water table. And of course there is value in lakes and fish stock and decades of economic structure built around reservoirs. Not all are advisable (Hetch-hetchy) could and should have been built elsewhere) of well engineered. But they have many benefits besides power generation.
Seems like Africa has a lot of wide open spaces. Why not build French-design (or US Navy design) reactors way out in the middle of nowhere and grid the power in to where it’s needed?
Transmission losses.
The longer the supply lines, the more power gets lost along the way due to resistance in the cabling.
Not just transmission losses. Cable losses are a big problem in some countries.
No cooling.
Transmission costs a bomb
Politically unstable
So not viable. Best place to build em is northern temperate coast, like Britain,Finland, Norway and the like. Bags of cold water, politically stable, near demand centres, technically sophisticated work force.
Technically illiterate electorate is the main problem.
“Technically illiterate electorate is the main problem.”
& Technically illiterate politicians.
If a byproduct of Thorium with (90 protons) is plutonium (94 protons), does that not imply fusion which I thought we could not sustain yet?
Beta radiation is the emission of an electron from the nucleus, converting a neutron into a proton.
The US government restarted production of PU238 for NASA space probe use. The first 50 grams of it cost 15 Million. PU 238 cannot compete on price when compared to batteries recharged with solar or wind. This production also relies on Neptunium 237 produced as a byproduct of nuclear weapons productions right after WWII. Currently none of the production equipment and nuclear reactors used to make the Neptunium exists. It has all been scrapped or permanently shut down.
Its the same story for tritium a radio active form of hydrogen that also safely produce energy. It is used commercially and cost $30,000 per gram and you would probably need a kilogram to produce any significant amount of power. Current production is only 400grams per year.
http://www.gizmag.com/ornl-plutonium-238-production-space/41041/
In shocking news, things made in tiny quantities cost a lot.
I once worked for a chip company. If you bought the chips from us when we were mass producing them, they would typically cost around $20. If you came back five years later and asked for more, and we had to do a special run of one or two wafers through the fab to make them for you, they’d cost $2,000.
True greens don’t want anything like cheap affordable electric power because it will improve the lives of billions and that is billions extreme green would rather not see at all .
When your heat and light comes from cow dung (when you can get it ) a nuclear plant has far less risk than sucking in particulate from fires while you cook insect soup .
Why not ask the people that have to scratch out a living each day what they want and screw what the people wearing green masks think living in their cosy homes, flying around defacing other countries treasures in their MC gear .
Bill Gates is right but he isn’t singing from the same song sheet as the extreme green industry who
goose step around with furrowed brows trashing nuclear and harbouring a desire for mass population
reductions .
They are hypocrites and a bad joke . Nobody is buying computers if they can’t operate them and food is just a tiny bit more important .
When the leaders of the extreme green crowd start living in clay huts and make their steak and lobster from cow dung fires we will see how long before they start singing a different tune . Don’t hold your breath .
“steak and lobster ”
More likely tofu and soy milk; animals are worshiped and cried over; people can go to the devil.
So, how good of a dirty bomb does PU-238 make?
Powdered, it’s probably pretty nasty. Probably shouldn’t ship these to third world countries.
Anthrax is just as dangerous, and not difficult to obtain in the third world. The spores can persist for decades once released into the environment.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthrax
Not really: There are vaccines available against Anthrax, but there is no comparable protection against strong incorporated radio-toxins…
Alpha emitters can have all sorts of potential applications.
Especially in the field of creating cheap radioactive “dirty bombs” and poisoning inconvenient dissidents.
I can see no possible problem with providing everyone on planet earth with easy access to such materials…
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/12111319/Litvinenko-Inquiry-What-is-Polonium-210.html
Of for gosh sakes. Look into the “dark places” on earth and you’ll find the exact same thing in every one of them. A corrupt, dysfunctional government. No new technology is going to fix that. And if you did fix that, you wouldn’t NEED a new technology, the ones we have already solve the problem all over the world.
Exactly. The problems are not technological. The last thing emerging territories need is to be used as Guinea pigs for new technologies.
Corrupt, dysfunctional governments run nearly the whole world. The centralization of power in government, thus in the hands of people whose skills resemble expert lying, explains virtually all problems. Without government and taxes and regulation and litigation inventors would create solutions in years, not centuries.
Government is the enemy of the citizen. A big, rich, powerful government has always led to a small, poor, weak citizenry. From Pharoes to Obama the story has remained the same.
We already have an energy miracle: Hydrocarbons.
Mr Gates says those are killing the earth.
Hydrocarbons are bad.
They are dirty and you would the earth when you extract them from her.
Are you a hydrocarbon pusher ?
You must live in one of those carbon dioxide dens of iniquity.
You are selfish.
No more hydrocarbons for you.
By Order of the High Priest of the Royal Order of Carbonites
Imagine somebody in a white coat announces they have discovered the cure for brain cancer . At the press conference and amid much celebration the last investigative reporter on the planet summons her courage and asks .. How do you know you have found the cure for brain cancer Dr. White Coat ? Dr. White Coat
looks earnestly at the crowd and tells them he has constructed a model that tells him so . A model you say ??? Yes yes and a very fine model it is too . I am quite certain of about 10% of the variables
and the other 90% of the variables are uncertain but I have estimated those .
The room empties and that is exactly what should happen with the failed scary global warming hypothesis .
As an engineer in the nuclear power industry for close to 40 years I can say that the folks who blithely talk about ‘next generation nuclear technologies’ (e.g., traveling wave, molten salt, or even small modular) as the ‘solution’ to clean, sustainable energy have never worked in nuclear power and certainly have never tried to license even an existing technology, let alone a new technology.
From 1943 to 1963 was the golden age of nuclear power research will lots of government $$$ and very little government constraint. It seemed that every conceivable rector type and form factor was designed, built, and operated in short order.
Today is the polar opposite. Just to license a new light water reactor fuel type with minor design changes is estimated to take more than one billion dollars and more than a decade. To license a new technology would take two decades. I can’t image an operating prototype before 2036. Commercial rollout would require another couple of decades to ramp up to even a relatively small contribution.
We have light water technology which is a known quantity and can contribute. Discussion of new technologies in the context of ‘cheap energy’ is just a distraction. (And don’t even bother commenting on the (non-)problem with high level waste).
Robert, what an interesting background. Nuclear technology comes up a lot on WUWT. I’d love to hear more about your experiences with different reactor technologies, and how the nuclear industry has changed over the years.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/submit-a-story/
+10001
Just to license a new light water reactor fuel type with minor design changes is estimated to take more than one billion dollars and more than a decade. To license a new technology would take two decades.
As I said, not technical issues, human social ideological and economic issues.