Two years ago during the scorching summer of 2012, July 1936 lost its place on the leaderboard and July 2012 became the hottest month on record in the United States. Now, as if by magic, and according to NOAA’s own data, July 1936 is now the hottest month on record again. The past, present, and future all seems to be “adjustable” in NOAA’s world. See the examples below.
Josh has been busy again and writes at Bishop Hill with a new cartoon:
The temperature adjustments story has been brewing for weeks principally due to the many posts at ‘RealScience’ but taken up by others, for example, Paul Homewood, see here and here. Judith Curry has a great post about it here, as does Anthony here.
H/t to Real Science/Steven Goddard for suggesting including Toto. Cartoons by Josh
Bruce at Sunshine Hours has been doing some unthreading, er plotting, and at my request, prepared some USHCN maps of Kansas, first May’s high temperatures.
I’ve annotated the plot, to include “zombie” weather station that have been closed for years, but still show “estimated” data from NOAA. Those marked NRF are “no report found”…typically meaning NOAA hasn’t gotten the data from the observer yet, which is often mailed in on paper B91 forms. It is interesting to note how NOAA has been changing the data, in most cases adjusting it higher, though in a couple of cases, lower.
Bruce also plotted some other maps of Kansas, for July 1936, and for July 2012. Note how in July 1936 the Tmax temperature are almost all adjusted cooler, and in 2012, most all Tmax temperatures are adjusted warmer. Click images for larger versions.
Whatever happened to just using actual measured data? There is no justification for this.
And, NOAA can’t even keep their story straight about July 1936 temperatures. From a report I did in 2013:
NCDC’s SOTC July 2012:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/national/2012/07
Screencap of the claim for CONUS Tavg temperature for July 2012 in the SOTC:
Note the 77.4°F value for July 1936. It is actually still in their SOTC for July 2012 today.
Now let’s look at some plots from NOAA’s Climate at a Glance. I just happened to have one from two years ago. It also says 77.4°F on the plot. The numbers match with the SOTC report. The annotations are mine.
Today, I ran the same plot again, and here is the NEW number for July 1936. The annotations are mine.
NOAA helpfully provided the data which I have saved as an Excel file, it has both 1936 and 2012 July data: NOAA_Tavg_Data_July_1895-2013 (.xlsx)
You can’t get any clearer proof of NOAA adjusting past temperatures.
This isn’t just some issue with gridding, or anomalies, or method, it is about NOAA not being able to present historical climate information of the United States accurately. In one report they give one number, and in another they give a different one with no explanation to the public as to why.
This is not acceptable. It is not being honest with the public. It is not scientific. It violates the Data Quality Act.
But wait, there’s more. In January 2013, I ran this story based on an article in the Wall Street Journal: July (2012) Was Hottest Month on Record
My story was: Does NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center (NCDC) keep two separate sets of climate books for the USA?
In that essay, I revised the WSJ graphic. At that time, it looked like this based on new numbers for July 2012 that I found from NOAA:
Now, with the new numbers in the Excel File above, output from NOAA, I had to revise it again. It looks like this now:
Now, once again, July 1936 is the hottest month in the US, even if by the slimmest of margins, all thanks to post-facto adjustments of temperature data by NOAA/NCDC.
I suggest that NOAA/NCDC have another one of those meetings like where they decided to keep long dead weather stations reporting as “zombies”, like I showed with Marysville, yesterday, and work on getting their story straight.
This constant change from year to year of what is or is not the hottest month on record for the USA is not only unprofessional and embarrassing for NOAA, it’s bullshit of the highest order. It can easily be solved by NOAA stopping the unsupportable practice of adjusting temperatures of the past so that the present looks different in context with the adjusted past and stop making data for weather stations that have long since closed.
NOAA has been accused by others of “fabricating” data, and while that is a strong word that I don’t like to use, it looks to be more and more accurate.
That said, I don’t believe this is case where somebody purposely has their hand on a control knob for temperature data, I think all of this is nothing more than artifacts of a convoluted methodology and typical bureaucratic blundering. As I’ve always said, never attribute malice to what can be explained by simple incompetence.
We already showed yesterday that NOAA can’t get their output data files correct, and we are waiting on a statement and a possible correction for that. But I think the problem is even larger than that, and will require an investigation from an unbiased outside source to get to the root of the problem.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.









Re the MSM. It is not just global warming that is being misrepresented, Some stuff is ignored. This is captured by Ramirez who is my favorite political cartoonist on investors.com.
http://www.investors.com/image/RAMclr-062914-press-IBD-COLOR-FINAL.gif.cms
The MSM will ignore the correction except possibly Fox.
Mark Stoval (@MarkStoval) says:
June 29, 2014 at 4:30 pm
This is absolutely true. How could all the people working on the data set not know what is going on? Each month the past cools and the trend line is therefore made to look better for the alarmists. No one will ever be able to say “we just did not know this was going on!!” There is just no credible way to explain this situation without invoking malice and on a grand scale at that since every single employee knows what is going on. (unless they have some blind people working there of course)
Every day the data changes as it turns out, not just at the end of the month.
================
Mark, you almost got there…..you just didn’t go far enough
It’s absolutely impossible for the guys running the climate models….by the time they plug in their numbers……the numbers have changed…it’s impossible for them to have not noticed
Someone could have invented the perfect climate model…and they will never know it
I don’t know if you guys realize it……this invalidates every climate model ever made or run
Anthony (just checking, wanted you to see this)
milodonharlani says:
June 29, 2014 at 2:23 pm
Felflames says:
June 29, 2014 at 2:12 pm
Senator from Kansas’ southern neighbor:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Inhofe
_____________________
Senator Inhofe just won his June Primary race against all challengers by an incredible 87+% margin of victory.
So “all time” is only since 1895? Who knew?
Bill Illis–you’re my favorite commenter here.
A congressman (House member–where the GOP has a majority) would be more influential now.
In the prior thread (yesterday) on this topic, someone nominated “Zombiegate” for this affair, which I seconded. It’s going to need some concise handle, so why don’t we get behind this one? (Maybe Anthony could run a poll?)
This isn’t just some issue with gridding, or anomalies, or method, it is about NOAA not being able to present historical climate information of the United States accurately. In one report they give one number, and in another they give a different one with no explanation to the public as to why.
=====
That is exactly what Goddard has been saying all along……
…..and you had a fit over “fabricating”, it’s not so far fetched after all, is it?
Do you guys realize what this means?
It invalidated everyone’s work, it invalidates every climate computer program…
Every single thing that has anything to do with temperature reconstructions.
….let the fireworks begin
As I’ve always said, never attribute malice to what can be explained by simple incompetence.
What about Power, Greed, Security, Status, and Fame?
Peter B
Think the famous quote is from Napoleon.
“Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.”
Napoleon Bonaparte
Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/n/napoleonbo130787.html#KV2yPP7qJoTw255t.99
Could this downward rearrangement of recent temperature peaks be something to do with much awaited release of climate reference network data?
It was rather surprising that, by the time they finally released some numbers, the USHCN was almost identical.
Seems that there’s some horse trading been going on in data ‘adjustments’ to ensure the the USHCN did not look badly biased by the time they released CRN.
“If you like your temperature, you can keep your temperature. Period.” Oh… wait…
You said it well Latitude!
Sh*t has hit the fan and it smells quite odiferous;-)
Attacking the MSM along with humiliating the criminals must be Job #1.
Chewer says:
June 29, 2014 at 7:00 pm
You said it well Latitude!
===
LOL…the entire world order just changed
Goddard is/was right all along……left alone, they could have probably beat him down
Making a huge deal about it by saying how wrong he was all over the internet….
…and then having to eat it, made it entirely too big a deal to ever go away
…things work out for the best
The entire world order just changed today people…..I’m still stunned
Years of work, based on temperature reconstructions modeled after “whack a mole”…
…years of work, just turned into garbage
Oh the irony of it all…
So it seems that the science is settled, but the temperatures are not?
Well, this comes from the love of models. They were not satisfied with modeling the future temperatures, they wanted to model past temperatures too!
So that’s what they mean by “hindcasting”…
Just goes to show that we should never worry about today’s temperatures.
After all, in fifteen or twenty years or so we can always adjust today’s temps downward in order to make those future temps warmer.
It’s starting to feel cooler already.
Latitude says:
June 29, 2014 at 6:45 pm
“Do you guys realize what this means? It invalidated everyone’s work, it invalidates every climate computer program…”
Unless, of course, Zeke Hausfather is correct and it “doesn’t” make any difference. I think I’ll wait to see how this plays out before jumping to a conclusion that may be premature.
Anthony, just my note of thanks for sticking to the truth wherever it leads.
I completely understand that real science is quantitative and we don’t ask or demand answers to simple questions of “is it hotter or colder?”. Science demands quanitation (how much) and are differences significant using accepted statistical tests. Anecdotal evidence and experential bias is not science to be trusted.
That being said, I can remember as a boy freezing my butt off on camping and late-fall hunting trips with my dad and uncles. Those were cold times sitting and waiting for whitetail deer. In the last 20 years, as an adult, those same hunting trips are usually cool but not cold.
If we are indeed just seeing the beginning of a multi-decade cooldown in the climate, many Americans and Europeans will be none too keen on the Democrat’s and Greens Liberal anti-carbon crusade that is already starting to seriously jackup winter heating bills. The whole Climate Change meme could collapse on the Environmentalists within the next 6 years as we head to a solar minimum. The US enviro-Libs have to be worried about a coming decadal cooldown even if the millenial trend is upward, since most people vote with their pocketbook.
Apologies if this has been seen before, but I found this intriguing. My reaction was “has anyone proved the opposite” viz that there is incontrovertible proof that “climate change” caused by humans is real?
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/06/25/want-to-disprove-man-made-climate-change-a-scientist-will-give-you-10000-if-you-can/comment-page-3/
Peter Brinkley says:
June 29, 2014 at 6:46 pm
“Peter B
Think the famous quote is from Napoleon.
“Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence.””
A wonderful excuse for the malicious.
They adjust it practically monthly. Here is the adjustment history of two temperatures since 2008. The more recent one gets adjusted generally upward and the older one gets adjusted generally downward over time.
http://climate4you.com/images/NCDC%20Jan1915%20and%20Jan2000.gif
More info here:
http://climate4you.com/GlobalTemperatures.htm#NCDC MaturityDiagram
This information has been posted there for years, by the way. It isn’t like people hadn’t noticed.
Anthony,
The before and after shots you have provided show that you missunderstood what was being said in the “before” page and that is understandable because, in isolation, it is a little ambiguous. Having seen the ambiguity based on your response, Steven then clarified the language as you see in the “after” page, but it does not change the meaning of what has been said.
Having followed Steve’s blog for a while now I had enough background information to know what was meant in the “before” page, but it was badly expressed. However going postal as you did was not a flattering response and your apology, such as it is, is less than it should be as you continue to misquote and misunderstand other things Steve has said in the past and say he has a “history of being wrong”.
Yes I have every right to be as offended as I want and you have every right to ignore my opinion.
That works both ways.
As Roy Spencer Said in April 2012:
“Given the amount of work NOAA has put into the USHCN dataset to increase the agreement between neighboring stations, I don’t have an explanation for this result. I have to wonder whether their adjustment procedures added more spurious effects than they removed, at least as far as their impact on temperature trends goes.
And I must admit that those adjustments constituting virtually all of the warming signal in the last 40 years is disconcerting. When “global warming” only shows up after the data are adjusted, one can understand why so many people are suspicious of the adjustments.”
http://www.drroyspencer.com/2012/04/ushcn-surface-temperatures-1973-2012-dramatic-warming-adjustments-noisy-trends/
It ain’t warming … its adjusting.
Don’t presume to judge me until you’ve walked a mile in my shoes. – Anthony
I’m not friend just saying after reading through the back stuff on here don’t see the station adjustments from drop off just the sitting problems ;>) I still think this blog is the best for science and respect you in every way SIR .!!!!
So having had the best temperature recording technology available in history NOAA, one of the world’s leading governmental authorities on determining average regional temperature, admits it’s July 2012 USA temperature determination was almost a full degree wrong….yet has the hubris to ask us and scientists to believe it has reliably and accurately determined the USA temperature100 years ago to the tenth of a degree…