Introducing the WUWT Great Lakes Ice Reference Page

NOAA Great Lakes Surface Environment Analysis (GLSEA) – Click the pic to view full size image

Image Credit: NOAA Great Lakes Surface Environment Analysis (GLSEA)

Great Lakes Ice Cover reached 91.8% yesterday, after Wednesday’s coverage of 91% made 2014 the second highest maximum on record. Great Lakes Ice Cover is well within striking distance of the highest maximum on record of 94.7% set in 1979. Coming on the heels of last week’s second highest Southern Sea Ice Area minimum on record, and The Pause in Earth’s temperature reaching 17 years last year, the signs of Earth’s “Rapidly Accelerating” Global Warming abound…

For those of you who like to watch Global Warming not happening, in real time, we are pleased to introduce WUWT’s newest addition, the WUWT Great Lakes Ice Reference Page. The Great Lakes Ice Page offers real-time graphs and graphics on Great Lakes Ice Cover, Air Temperature, Sea Temperature, Cloud Cover, Wind and Waves, as well as a section of more focused graphs and graphics for each of the individual Great Lakes.

In addition to the WUWT Great Lakes Ice Reference Page. if you have not had the opportunity to review some our other WUWT Reference Pages, they are highly recommended:

Please note that WUWT cannot vouch for the accuracy of the data within the Reference Pages, as WUWT is simply an aggregator. All of the data is linked from third party sources. If you have doubts about the accuracy of any of the graphs on the WUWT Reference Pages, or have any suggested additions or improvements to any of the pages, please let us know in comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

91 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul Westhaver
March 7, 2014 3:31 pm

Lake E H M O S Total sqm
Area sqm 9,910 23,000 22,300 7,340 31,700 94,250
% Ice Cover 18:00 GMT
5-Mar 95.5, 95.5, 91.7, 39.8, 94.7,
6-Mar 95.8, 95.8, 92.4, 49.9, 95.0,
7-Mar 95.9, 95.9, 91.4, 58.4, 93.7,
Ice area sqm 9464.05, 21965, 20449.1, 2921.32, 30019.9, 84819.37 90.0
Ice area sqm 9493.78, 22034, 20605.2, 3662.66, 30115, 85910.64 91.2
Ice area sqm 9503.69, 22057, 20382.2, 4286.56, 29702.9, 85932.35 91.2
My Calcs Mar 5 90.0 (91.7 GLCFS)
Mar 6 91.2 (92.2 GLCFS)
Mar 7 91.2 ??? need to wait 2 hrs
So my areas for the lakes are not correct I’m sure but, due to Superiors size,
the fact that Ontario is 58.4% frozen is mitigated by superior’s loss of ICE.
Not sure if the tabulation will hold together…Sorry Mods.

Paul Westhaver
March 7, 2014 3:32 pm

Nope… lost the tables… Oh well.

asbot
March 7, 2014 4:14 pm

Is it me or is the left had temp scale (coloured one) upside down?

Paul Coppin
March 7, 2014 6:27 pm

“Is Lake Ontario on the wrong side of the Niagara Peninsula?” Huh? The Niagara Escarpment wraps around the western end of Lake Ontario, and runs along the Niagara Peninsula to the Niagara River. Lake Ontario is north of the Niagara Peninsula… ???

Paul Coppin
March 7, 2014 6:38 pm

Some Great Lakes trivia: The boys who brought the Matthew, the replica of John Cabot’s ship down the Great Lakes a bunch of years ago, said the trip down Lake Ontario was the roughest of the entire crossing, including riding out a transatlantic storm in the north Atlantic. Ontario is known for its short steep wave trains that pile up on a steady easterly (or westerly). A 3 metre sea on Ontario is extremely uncomfortable in a small yacht and a b*tch to come about in.

RACookPE1978
Editor
March 7, 2014 7:18 pm

The elevations matter: Lower elevation means a (slightly) warmer general temperatures year-round.
Lake Ontario has the lowest mean surface elevation of the lakes at 243 feet (74 m) above sea level is the second deepest but is closest to the (somewhat modifying Atlantic Ocean; Lake Superior is the highest in elevation, deepest, most northern average area and is furthest from other moderating influences. Lake Eire is closest to Ontario, but is the shallowest (easiest to freeze up water mass) but is higher up: Lake Erie has a mean elevation of 571 feet (174 m) above sea … The elevation difference is the rapids in the Niagara River above the falls, the falls themselves, and the rapids and river downriver of the falls before the canyon opens out into Lake Ontario.
But, it is what it is. Live with it.

ren
March 7, 2014 9:51 pm

Justthefactswuwt
Yes ozone in the stratosphere directing traffic.
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/stratosphere/strat_a_f/gif_files/gfs_t50_nh_f00.gif
The height of about 20 km.

ren
March 7, 2014 10:06 pm

[snip -off topic- mod]

Paul R. Johnson
March 8, 2014 5:31 am

Nice to have this reference, but it needs to be added to the Reference Pages drop-down menu.

cookie monster
March 8, 2014 9:35 am

Mar 7th ice coverage is greater than Mar 6th, but percent ice coverage went down from 92% to 90%. Wattsupwiththat?

clipe
March 8, 2014 12:36 pm

Paul Coppin says:
March 7, 2014 at 6:27 pm
“Is Lake Ontario on the wrong side of the Niagara Peninsula?” Huh? The Niagara Escarpment wraps around the western end of Lake Ontario, and runs along the Niagara Peninsula to the Niagara River. Lake Ontario is north of the Niagara Peninsula… ???
I guess you missed the correction.

clipe says:
March 6, 2014 at 4:12 pm
clipe says:
March 6, 2014 at 4:07 pm
Is Lake Ontario on the wrong side of the Niagara Peninsula?
Escarpment not Peninsula

If you want to photograph funnel clouds in the summertime Toronto, then you need to head WNW to higher ground, before the storm cells “fall of the cliff”.

Michael McCullough
March 12, 2014 11:41 am

Anthony, I don’t see all of your reference pages listed in the header “Reference Pages” where I would expect to find them. Not a huge problem – I understand that it’s difficult to maintain a website in addition to writing most of its content. Just thought I would let you know.