Introducing the WUWT Great Lakes Ice Reference Page

NOAA Great Lakes Surface Environment Analysis (GLSEA) – Click the pic to view full size image

Image Credit: NOAA Great Lakes Surface Environment Analysis (GLSEA)

Great Lakes Ice Cover reached 91.8% yesterday, after Wednesday’s coverage of 91% made 2014 the second highest maximum on record. Great Lakes Ice Cover is well within striking distance of the highest maximum on record of 94.7% set in 1979. Coming on the heels of last week’s second highest Southern Sea Ice Area minimum on record, and The Pause in Earth’s temperature reaching 17 years last year, the signs of Earth’s “Rapidly Accelerating” Global Warming abound…

For those of you who like to watch Global Warming not happening, in real time, we are pleased to introduce WUWT’s newest addition, the WUWT Great Lakes Ice Reference Page. The Great Lakes Ice Page offers real-time graphs and graphics on Great Lakes Ice Cover, Air Temperature, Sea Temperature, Cloud Cover, Wind and Waves, as well as a section of more focused graphs and graphics for each of the individual Great Lakes.

In addition to the WUWT Great Lakes Ice Reference Page. if you have not had the opportunity to review some our other WUWT Reference Pages, they are highly recommended:

Please note that WUWT cannot vouch for the accuracy of the data within the Reference Pages, as WUWT is simply an aggregator. All of the data is linked from third party sources. If you have doubts about the accuracy of any of the graphs on the WUWT Reference Pages, or have any suggested additions or improvements to any of the pages, please let us know in comments below.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

91 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cold in Wisconsin
March 6, 2014 6:30 pm

Jim, thanks for explaining the water on the east edge of Lake Michigan–I see it every morning and wondered why there is a couple hundred yards of open water at the edge of the lake, then solid ice away from shore. The prevailing winds may explain it, but I think it may also have to do with wave action at the edge of the lake breaking up the ice. Like the Arctic winds breaking up the ice there, the waves are more turbulent at the shore due to the wind and the tides. There are also rivers, creeks and storm sewers dumping water in and water treatment and power plants creating flows into and out of the lake near the shoreline. More moving water at the shore.

March 6, 2014 6:50 pm

re: Cold in Wisconsin says March 6, 2014 at 6:30 pm
Cold, I spent the winter of 78-79 on the MI side down by the water -er- ice! Got to witness all that ice as it built up (and the snow that fell) and packed it up near shore as the wind blew that winter!
It was dangerous to climb on that ‘pack ice’ … and not easy either … like climbing a small mountain ridge, with perils in the valleys … I much prefer it in Tejas these day.

RealOldOne2
March 6, 2014 7:09 pm
Dr K.A. Rodgers
March 6, 2014 7:21 pm

Any suggestions from how the Big Freeze might effect the Neana Ice Classic?

Chuck Wiese
March 6, 2014 7:54 pm

Has anyone noticed that the freezing of the Great Lakes does not fit the mantra of a rapidly warming arctic as claimed by AGW? Once the sun sets in the arctic, the sea ice rapidly reforms and the radiational cooling of the surface is every bit as effective as it was in any prior years including the winter of 1978-79, regardless of a higher atmospheric CO2 concentration. That is why the bitter cold can penetrate southerly latitudes this year like it has done and shatter temperature records nearly a century old.
This ought to be a lesson to any with common sense that all of the recent claims made about “arctic amplification” and its implication to anthropogenic global warming are sheer nonsense, just like the claims made recently from two professors that “arctic amplification” was undoing the polar vortex, causing looping jet streams because of claimed weakening westerlies and causing bitter cold to affect mid latitudes which they claim normally doesn’t happen. They tried to bridge that gap by the improper use of Rossby wave theory from which I wrote an article to refute here:
http://blog.heartland.org/2014/02/about-that-persistent-polar-vortex/
“Arctic amplification” is a summer time phenomena that is caused by oceanic and wind currents that transport warmer air and water into this region and cause greater or lesser summer melt depending on the frequency. During the last phase of the PDO which was warm, a greater incidence of the ENSO signal was responsible for a greater northward transport of those Kelvin waves into the arctic sea than during the prior 30 years before 1977 and is no doubt a reason for the increased summer melt off. Now that the cold phase of the PDO is back with a changed solar magnetic I am betting the summer melting amount in the arctic will reverse. It has nothing to do with atmospheric CO2 as claimed by warmers.
Chuck Wiese
Meteorologist

John F. Hultquist
March 6, 2014 9:39 pm

justthefactswuwt says:
March 6, 2014 at 7:53 pm
Jonathan Abbott says: March 6, 2014 at 2:06 pm

I think I am noticing a trend, not about ice, but about commenters such as Jonathan. Sometimes I get a comment in late so this may just be a timing thing in my case, but, after the initial comment such as Jonathan’s, when given a polite response (or 2 or 3) or asked a very reasonable question there is no response. Nothing. Zip. Nada. Zilch.
Is Jonathan (and others like this) a real person with an intellect or a troll, paid on not, or an AI software package honing its skills?
There are other over used (like “cherry-picking”) phrases, for example, “ships passing in the night” and “So long, its been good to know you.”
Anyway, having been born and raised just south of Lake Erie and having relatives and friends now living near all the lakes – This reference page is a great asset – Thanks.

Third Party
March 6, 2014 10:02 pm

Ice “Boats” RULE.

Richard111
March 6, 2014 10:24 pm

Ice is an insulator. Ice reduces energy loss to space when it is dark. Of course, if the sun is up, ice then reflects more energy than it absorbs. Ice alone does not tell us everything about global climate.

ren
March 7, 2014 12:37 am

Richard111 says:
Ice is an insulator. Ice reduces energy loss to space when it is dark. Of course, if the sun is up, ice then reflects more energy than it absorbs. Ice alone does not tell us everything about global climate.
Yes, but whether it means the local cooling of?

March 7, 2014 12:43 am

In reply to justthefactswuwt, I understand that you want WUWT to cover as much climatic data as possible. The point I was making is that as a regular visitor I don’t remember any previous coverage of Great Lakes ice coverage (it’s not a topic that particularly interests me, so shoot me if I’m wrong). Then you have an article about record highs, followed swiftly by adding the data to the Reference pages. If the ice coverage was solidly average, would you have bothered? My comment was just intended as a friendly word to the wise, nothing more.
John F. Hultquist says:
March 6, 2014 at 9:39 pm
“Is Jonathan (and others like this) a real person with an intellect or a troll, paid on not, or an AI software package honing its skills?”
I post up one very mildly critical comment and your conspiracy alarm starts ringing? Seriously? Did you know that where a commenter’s name is underlined you can click on it and it will take you through to their web site, in my case my blog? Why don’t you try that, and then come back and tell me if I’m real or not.
(By the way, I’m in the UK, so my ‘silence’ was due to me being asleep.)

ren
March 7, 2014 4:10 am

This recent Washington Post article “Confronting the exploitation of extreme weather events in global warming reporting”;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp/2014/02/28/confronting-the-exploitation-of-extreme-weather-events-in-global-warming-reporting/
Justthefactswuwt if you can explain to me why no mention in this article (comments) that the jet stream is the result of the state of the polar vortex, which accelerates in winter in the STRATOSPHERE. Do people not know about this?

Steve from Rockwood
March 7, 2014 5:44 am

Jonathan Abbott says:
March 7, 2014 at 12:43 am
——————————————-
Jonathan, if you follow global warming at all you are familiar with the tendency of the alarmist side to attribute anything “hot” to global warming and either ignore anything “cold” or (worse) to also attribute extreme cold events to global warming.
Your point on not relying on one year’s extreme ice-over of the Great Lakes as a refutation of global warming is taken. But please also understand that the “wise” know that a business as usual climate is REAL evidence that catastrophic global warming is a FRAUD. Also, let us skeptics have some fun. Doesn’t it bring a smile to your face that while the alarmists beg for a carbon tax in the facing of a ever melting world we are faced with the coldest winter in over 40 years?

March 7, 2014 6:29 am

Jonathan Abbott says:
March 7, 2014 at 12:43 am
——————————————
There is significance with this level of change in the Great Lakes region. I have been watching sst anomalies for over a year now and saving the daily picture. I now have a record of the last 16 months for sst anomalies, so I can compare year to year changes at a glance. Last year at this time the lake waters were either average or showing a warm anomaly. Most of last year all of the lakes, except Superior at times, were showing warm anomalies of +1 to +2 above normal. Now they are all close to -2 on the sst anomaly. That is a dramatic shift.
Also dramatic is the sst change in the northern oceans from last year. The ‘hot’ anomalies are now subdued warm spots with strong cooling advancing in large regions of the oceans. The North Atlantic in particular now has a strong patch of cold surface water that stretches from Nova Scotia all the way to Europe In a wide swath. I can’t help but think that the polar vortex cold sweeping eastward has initiated this shift. This is also where the Great Lakes influence should have a continued cooler effect that will drift eastward for many months to come.

ren
March 7, 2014 6:56 am

[SNIP waayyy waaayy off topic -mod]

Bruce Cobb
March 7, 2014 10:33 am

Here in New Hampshire, we have a “Great Lake” of our own, Lake Winnipesaukee, and while extent of ice cover to my knowledge has never been tracked, for 126 years (since 1887) the “ice-out” date has been tracked. Ice-out is declared when the M/S Mount Washington would be able to reach all 5 of its ports of call. The latest date recorded, in 1888 was May 12, and the earliest, in 2012 was March 23. Year-to-year fluctuations are typically 2-3 weeks, and sometime 4 weeks. Last year was solidly in the middle, at April 17. This year, due to the extreme cold extending well into this month, I’m guessing ice-out could be around May 1. The last May ice-out was in 2001, May 2, and the time before that was in 1972, also on May 2 (it was on May 6 the previous year).

ES
March 7, 2014 10:45 am

They are forecasting winds over lake Ontario for the next few days .
http://weather.gc.ca/marine/forecast_e.html?mapID=11&siteID=08207

eVince
March 7, 2014 11:36 am

I would like to know what is meant by “ice concentration.” Thanks in advance.

March 7, 2014 1:22 pm

Jonathan Abbott says:
March 6, 2014 at 2:06 pm

I am sure this is all of great interest to North American readers, but be wary of accusations of cherry-picking which events you cover. What would you write if SkS started regular updates on a particular heatwave somewhere in the world?

I’m sure everyone would be devastated if a site like SkepticalScience, or timecube.com, or Garfield.com started talking about a heatwave somewhere. I mean, cartoons and crude, autofellative nazi pictures are pretty important.

RealOldOne2
March 7, 2014 2:13 pm

Canadian Ice Service has today’s (Mar. 7) ice cover images out, showing more ice than yesterday. Lake Michigan went solid. The only Lake with open water is Ontario.
http://ice-glaces.ec.gc.ca/prods/NAIS25WC/20140307180000_NAIS25WC_0007553056.pdf
http://ice-glaces.ec.gc.ca/prods/NAIS25EC/20140307180000_NAIS25EC_0007553047.pdf