Seven years ago, we were told the opposite of what the new Matthew England paper says: slower (not faster) trade winds caused 'the pause'

While Matthew England claims in a new paper that fast trade winds caused cooling:

The strongest trade winds have driven more of the heat from global warming into the oceans; but when those winds slow, that heat will rapidly return to the atmosphere causing an abrupt rise in global average temperatures.

Heat stored in the western Pacific Ocean caused by an unprecedented strengthening of the equatorial trade winds appears to be largely responsible for the hiatus in surface warming observed over the past 13 years.

Another paper from 2006 says the exact opposite. This oldie but goodie, that preceded WUWT by a few months, escaped my attention until reader “Alec aka Daffy Duck” pointed me to a news article, and from that I found this original press release which says:

The vast loop of winds that drives climate and ocean behavior across the tropical Pacific has weakened by 3.5% since the mid-1800s, and it may weaken another 10% by 2100, according to a study led by University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) scientist Gabriel Vecchi. The study indicates that the only plausible explanation for the slowdown is human-induced climate change. The findings appear in the May 4 issue of Nature.

So, who to believe? Representatives of The University of the Ship of Fools New South Wales, who seems capable of saying anything to the press depending on the month or year or NCAR/UCAR? Do any of these folks really know with any certainty what is really going on when their excuses for ‘the pause’ don’t even agree?

From NCAR/UCAR:

Slowdown in Tropical Pacific Flow Pinned on Climate Change  

May 3, 2006

BOULDER, Colorado—The vast loop of winds that drives climate and ocean behavior across the tropical Pacific has weakened by 3.5% since the mid-1800s, and it may weaken another 10% by 2100, according to a study led by University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (UCAR) scientist Gabriel Vecchi. The study indicates that the only plausible explanation for the slowdown is human-induced climate change. The findings appear in the May 4 issue of Nature.

The Walker circulation, which spans almost half the circumference of Earth, pushes the Pacific Ocean’s trade winds from east to west, generates massive rains near Indonesia, and nourishes marine life across the equatorial Pacific and off the South American coast. Changes in the circulation, which varies in tandem with El Niño and La Niña events, can have far–reaching effects.

“The Walker circulation is fundamental to climate across the globe,” says Vecchi.

In their paper, “Weakening of Tropical Pacific Atmospheric Circulation Due to Anthropogenic Forcing,” the authors used observations as well as state-of-the-art computer climate model simulations to verify the slowdown and determine whether the cause is human-induced climate change. The work was performed at NOAA’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL), where Vecchi is stationed through the UCAR Visiting Scientist Programs. His coauthors include Brian Soden (University of Miami) and the GFDL team of Andrew Wittenberg, Isaac Held, Ants Leetmaa, and Matthew Harrison.

Walker circulation

This diagram shows the Walker Circulation, a vast loop of air above the equatorial Pacific Ocean. See below for an alternate depiction. Click here or on the image to enlarge. (Illustration by Gabriel Vecchi, UCAR.)

The Walker circulation takes the shape of a loop with rising air in the western tropical Pacific, sinking air in the eastern tropical Pacific, west-to-east winds a few miles high, and east-to-west trade winds at the surface. The trade winds also steer ocean currents. Any drop in winds produces an even larger reduction in wind-forced ocean flow—roughly twice as much in percentage terms for both the observed and projected changes, says Vecchi.

“This could have important effects on ocean ecosystems,” Vecchi says. “The ocean currents driven by the trade winds supply vital nutrients to the near-surface ocean ecosystems across the equatorial Pacific, which is a major fishing region.”

Matching theory and observations

Several theoretical studies have shown that an increase in greenhouse gases should produce a weakening of the Walker circulation. As temperatures rise and more water evaporates from the ocean, water vapor in the lower atmosphere increases rapidly. But physical processes prevent precipitation from increasing as quickly as water vapor. Since the amount of water vapor brought to the upper atmosphere must remain in balance with precipitation, the rate at which moist air is brought from the lower to the upper atmosphere slows down to compensate. This leads to a slowing of the atmospheric circulation.

Based on observations since the mid-1800s, the paper reports a 3.5% slowdown in the Walker circulation, which corresponds closely to the number predicted by theory. To establish whether human-induced climate change is at work, Vecchi and colleagues analyzed 11 simulations using the latest version of the GFDL climate model spanning the period 1861 to 2000. Some of the simulations included the observed increase in greenhouse gases; others included just the natural climate-altering factors of volcanic eruptions and solar variations. Only the simulations that included an increase in greenhouse gases showed the Walker circulation slowing, and they did so at a rate consistent with the observations.

Based on the theoretical considerations, and extrapolating from their 1861–2000 analysis as well as from other simulations for the 21st century, the authors conclude that by 2100 the Walker circulation could slow by an additional 10%. This means the steering of ocean flow by trade winds could decrease by close to 20%.

Simulation results depend on the assumptions and conditions within different models. However, the agreement of theory, observations, and models for the past 150 years lends support to this outlook, say the authors.

What about El Niño?

The study sends mixed signals on the future of the El Niño–Southern Oscillation—the system of ocean-atmosphere linkages that produces the worldwide weather of El Niño and its counterpart, La Niña.

“The circulation has been tending to a more El Niño-like state since the 1860s,” says Vecchi. “However, the dynamics involved here are distinct from those of El Niño.”

Walker circulation

This diagram and the one at top show two different views of the Walker Circulation, a vast loop of air above the equatorial Pacific Ocean. Click here or on the image to enlarge. (Illustration by Gabriel Vecchi, UCAR.)

Source: http://www.ucar.edu/news/releases/2006/walker.shtml

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

114 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Editor
February 10, 2014 12:18 pm

Thanks, Alec aka Daffy Duck. Good memory.

M. Hastings
February 10, 2014 12:26 pm

Great post!

February 10, 2014 12:28 pm

Trade wind speeds cause global warming – except when they don’t! It fits the AGW meme.

Les Johnson
February 10, 2014 12:31 pm
Les Johnson
February 10, 2014 12:38 pm

A little later paper (2012) also suggests that warming has slowed the trade winds.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v491/n7424/full/nature11576.html
So, which is it? The trade winds have slowed or sped up? The literature is conflicted…

Henry Clark
February 10, 2014 12:43 pm

Text descriptions of percentage changes in the trade winds don’t do justice, so this is a case where a picture is worth a thousand words.
Such as the plot of trade wind history posted in the prior thread, http://s16.postimg.org/vtt28xi6t/Trade_Winds_1871_to_2014.png , implies it doesn’t have a pattern fitting the overall decade by decade temperature change over the past century (which would be a double peak appearance, for unadjusted temperature data).
What far more matches, what really explains history, from millennium-scale (e.g. the MWP, the Little Ice Age, the modern warm period) to the past century (warm 1930s-1950s, global cooling scare of the 1960s-1970s, global warming scare, and the recent “pause”) is this, far too inconvenient to the CAGW movement for them to properly depict: http://img213.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=62356_expanded_overview3_122_1094lo.jpg

February 10, 2014 12:44 pm

According to NOAA, Nature Geoscience :

Under the influence of global warming, the mean climate of the Pacific region will probably undergo significant changes. The tropical easterly trade winds are expected to weaken;:

That was back in 2010.

Matt G
February 10, 2014 12:47 pm

“unprecedented strengthening of the equatorial trade winds appears to be largely responsible for the hiatus in surface warming observed over the past 13 years.”
This happened during the 1940s and 1970s when there was a negative PDO. So recently continue blaming a negative PDO on the non warming period, yet ignore when energy build up near the surface due to solar warming when the trade winds become weaker. Sorry chaps but blaming AGW on the PDO variation is at best desperate and worst ignorant. Scientists have been telling you for years that the PDO influences warming in the tropics by coinciding with change in trade winds.
A positive PDO occurs with weak trade winds and negative PDO with strong trade winds. What is happening now is exactly how it should with a natural variation of the PDO. Some scientists forecast this years ago, but your ignorant lot do anything you can to avoid natural variation. Only shows the alarmists types are not interested in science, but only the agenda.

Tim
February 10, 2014 12:48 pm

What i don’t get is they say that mixing of the top layer of the Ocean is trapping the heat. Yet we all know that if you want to cool hot soup faster you stir it so that heat is released more quickly. As far as i can tell there is no evidence to suggest any significant warming of the sub 100m ocean so i don’t understand this physical process.

Alec aka Daffy Duck
February 10, 2014 12:48 pm

To me it seems that mr. English pick his start date to ‘hide’ when trade winds were stronger in the past!
La Nina’s dominated the latter 1800s:
Extended Multivariate ENSO Index (MEI.ext)
http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/enso/mei.ext/

February 10, 2014 12:49 pm

The NCAR report claims that in a warming world, trade winds will weaken. England’s study says that recent warming has not happened because of increased trade winds. That’s consistent.
Maybe I’m missing something here.

The Ghost Of Big Jim Cooley
February 10, 2014 12:51 pm

Great, isn’t it? I mean, it’s just great to sit on the sidelines and watch some warmists make just complete prats of themselves. Then of course, you have that other one, Grant Foster (Tamino), saying that there ISN’T a hiatus. I think it’s great to sit and watch the parade go by – with ever-more silly ideas on what might be causing the hiatus. Wonder how long it will be before one warmist/scientist says, ‘Hold up, we may of got the sensitivity wrong’. It won’t be Grant Foster, that’s for sure – he won’t ever be able to admit it, even when the temp anomaly is on the slide! Of course, you could say the slide has started. But then that would be cherry-picking a date to suit. Now that’s something Mr Foster knows all about. Back to the parade.

JimS
February 10, 2014 12:53 pm

It’s more confusing that we thought.

Ian Holton
February 10, 2014 12:53 pm

Yes, you are missing something there MPC!

Lew Skannen
February 10, 2014 12:55 pm

Nice. These fools are caught out every single time. Once we finally shake off this menace it is going to make Piltdown look tiny.

Jimbo
February 10, 2014 12:57 pm

I think I may have spotted that earlier today in a ‘Letter to Nature’ from Gabriel A. Vecchi et. al.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/02/10/the-reason-for-the-pause-in-global-warming-excuse-37-in-a-series-trade-winds/#comment-1563730

Letter To Nature – 2006
22 March 2006
Weakening of tropical Pacific atmospheric circulation due to anthropogenic forcing
……….Observed Indo-Pacific sea level pressure reveals a weakening of the Walker circulation. The size of this trend is consistent with theoretical predictions, is accurately reproduced by climate model simulations and, within the climate models, is largely due to anthropogenic forcing. The climate model indicates that the weakened surface winds have altered the thermal structure and circulation of the tropical Pacific Ocean. These results support model projections of further weakening of tropical atmospheric circulation during the twenty-first century4, 5, 7.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v441/n7089/abs/nature04744.html

REPLY: with the firehose of information I deal with every day, sometimes its just a matter of who gets my attention first. Sorry, Anthony

Jim S
February 10, 2014 12:59 pm

What you are missing mpcraig is that the AGW crowd says that the world IS warming (due to the continued increase in CO2 levels) and that the “pause” is not a pause.

Latitude
February 10, 2014 12:59 pm

Slowdown on Climate Change Pinned on Tropical Pacific Flow……….

Goracle
February 10, 2014 1:00 pm

An Inconvenient Prediction… LOL!!!

Les Johnson
February 10, 2014 1:00 pm

Hard to believe, but England does not cite the 3 papers I have seen on a weakening trade wind with warming. There is no mention of Collins, Vecchi or Tokinaga.

Don B
February 10, 2014 1:00 pm

William Kininmonth, chief of Australia‘s National Climate Centre at the Bureau of Meteorology from 1986 to 1998:
“……If, as claimed, natural variation has dominated the warming effect of increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration over recent decades then surely natural variation has also been important in determining the 20th century temperature rise. The science of climate change and the role of carbon dioxide are far from settled.”
http://joannenova.com.au/2014/02/do-winds-control-the-climate-or-does-the-ocean-control-the-wind-kininmonth-on-england-2014/

Man Bearpig
February 10, 2014 1:02 pm

Isn’t it wonderful.. Alarmists say one thing but forget what they said only a few years ago. As soon as they say ‘global warming causes one thing’ just search for ‘global warming causes exactly the opposite’ and they will get had almost every time.

February 10, 2014 1:05 pm

Perhaps the most devastating rebuttal to advocate scientists who claim that natural variability is ‘just noise and is of no consequence’ to long term human induced climate change:
If short term cycles are meaningless, then WHY DO THEY EXIST?
(Oh, I don’t know! Earth just having a little fun?)
It’s possible they are meaningless in the context of long term climate, however, unless there is a scientific basis which determines why they are just noise and of no consequence, the only terminology I can think of which adequately describes the advocates position is “extreme arrogance”.
Good Luck (pseudo scientists).

Pamela Gray
February 10, 2014 1:06 pm

This is why many papers put the opposite case in parenthesis when describing their results and consigning it to global warming. Thus, when it is warm (cold) the Walker Circulation decreases (increases) due to anthropogenic global climate war…wei…cata…cha…extre…THINGS…I SAID THINGS GODDAMIT!!!.

Jimbo
February 10, 2014 1:07 pm

So they blamed the “Slowdown in Tropical Pacific Flow” “on Climate Change” and next they will blame the speed up on……………..DRUM ROLL…………………………..climate change. They are in a sticky situation. To blame the speed up on global warming would be to blame global warming on global temperature standstill. We can’t have that kind of bat droppings now can we.

1 2 3 5
Verified by MonsterInsights