Tail wagging the dog – IPCC to rework AR5 to be 'consistent with the SPM'

The IPCC is the anti-Science!
The anti-Christ is supposed to fox the gullible into disbelieving God so as to turn humanity against itself and thereby end civilization. The anti-Science IPCC is foxing the gullible into disbelieving Nature.
The IPCC even works in an anti-science way. Scientists work to disprove theories but IPCC only accepts work that proves its theory. This is despite Nature making it patently obvious that the IPCC theory is wrong.
But perhaps I am only half right. What if the IPCC is really the anti-Christ doing the devil’s work to turn humanity against itself during Nature’s latest little ice-age?

In the AGW fanatic world, the facts are tailored to meet the summary.
Which shows that both the summary and the report have little to do with climate science and everything to do with marketing AGW. The sciencey stuff is for show prop and and sales efforts.
In fact we skeptics have been used to help the political hacks come up with the actual final sciencey parts. Our reaction and analysis to their report has guided the political editors on what needs to be changes and cut to fit the pre-selected outcomes.
I suggest for skeptics to take lots and lots of screen shots. The political rent seekers whose position and fortunes ride on cliamte catastrophe do not hesitate to lie cheat and fabricate to push their money train down the tracks.
AGW true believers and rent seekers are *not* going to just come out and apologize for conning the world out of billions of dollars.
They feel they should be entitled to our money to support their meetings, tenures, research grants, trips, email accounts, etc.
But we should never ever actually see anything but what they want us to see, and will emphatically curse out if we demand otherwise.
Schneider’s advice to lie and cheat to sell science is taken to heart indeed.

Changes to the Underlying Scientific – Technical Assessment to ensure consistency with the approved Summary for Policymakers proposed on September 26th 2013: http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/uploads/P36Doc4_WGI-12_Changes-Underlying-Assessment.pdf

In academic circles, and those of you that have trodden the hallowed halls of disbelief, like me will testify? It is common particularly in the Arts and archaeology fields, that corrupting the data to suit the hypothesis, all too often is used. Academics have to publish, doesn’t matter if their papers are a load of make belief and manipulation, Of course in someways data is not complete, and as time goes by more scientific evidence comes to light that changes the original hypothesis. The only ones who can spot these problems are those who are experts in the same field. Back in 2003 to complete by BA majoring in archaeology and palaeoanthropology I took a 100 level unit externally ‘The Earth in Crisis?” The coordinator told us that droughts and water shortage were going to be a problem for some cities, because of solar activity. Temperatures in cities will be higher because of the Urban Heat Islands they create. Large areas of rainforest in South America being cut down and converted to agriculture shift precipitation patterns. And the affect on local and regional landscapes through damming large rivers such as the Nile and Asswan Lake Nasser. This destroyed the Delta fishing industry for thirty years, increased stagnated water areas and malaria and that snail infestation. They developed a vaccine for the latter. Pollution in cities like Bangkok. Uncontrolled surface coal fires cause not only pollution but also the Indonesian Bush fires that raged for 4 years. The prime areas were Indonesia, India and China. But CO2 was not a problem, but pollution was. This was a first year 100 level First year!
Then along came Al Gore and the IPCC. The principal was to make money out of green energy and carbon credits. So the story goes on. There is non so blind that those who can not see!