IPCC on acid – if they are virtually certain about ocean acidification, why does X-prize offer a reward for designing a proper ocean pH meter?

The IPCC writes in the “leaked” SPM

It is very likely that oceanic uptake of anthropogenic CO2 results in acidification of the ocean. The pH 44 (see 7) of seawater has decreased by 0.1 since the beginning of the industrial era, corresponding to a 45 26% increase in hydrogen ion concentration. {3.8.2; Box 3.2; FAQ 3.2}

later they say:

Earth System Models project a worldwide increase in ocean acidification for all RCP scenarios. The 1 corresponding decrease in surface ocean pH by the end of 21st century is 0.065 (0.06 to 0.07)12 for 2 RCP2.6, 0.145 (0.14 to 0.15) for RCP4.5, 0.203 (0.20 to 0.21) for RCP6.0, and 0.31 (0.30 to 0.32) for 3 RCP8.5 (see Figures SPM.6 and SPM.7). {6.4.4}

Here are the figures cited, SPM6C and SPM7D:

IPCC_fig_SPM6C

IPCC_fig_SPM7d

Gosh, just look at all that scary, red, burning, “acid”. What they fail to note is that the oceans still haven’t turned acidic at the end of their model projections. The pH has to be below 7.0, and a drop to 7.75 by 2100 still doesn’t qualify by the way the pH scale works. Note also, like the Richter earthquake scale, the pH scale is logarithmic, not linear, a drop of 1 unit in pH equals a ten-fold increase in acidity. So, there would have to be an acceleration for their model scenarios to become true. Note the normal ranges of for rainwater and streamwater flowing into the oceans are far lower than the model projections:

184phdiagram[1]

Meanwhile, while the IPCC is “virtually certain” a call goes out via the X-prize to design a pH meter actually capable of monitoring the projected change. The X Prize Foundation announced a $2 million competition September 9th to spur innovation in the equipment used to measure “ocean acidification”. Here is the announcement. Note what I highlighted in red.

=============================================================

Overview

The Challenge: Improve Our Understanding of Ocean Acidification

The Wendy Schmidt Ocean Health XPRIZE is a $2 million global competition that challenges teams of engineers, scientists and innovators from all over the world to create pH sensor technology that will affordably, accurately and efficiently measure ocean chemistry from its shallowest waters… to its deepest depths.

There are two prize purses available (teams may compete for, and win, both purses):

A. $1,000,000 Accuracy award – Performance focused ($750,000 First Place, $250,000 Second Place): To the teams that navigate the entire competition to produce the most accurate, stable and precise pH sensors under a variety of tests.

B. $1,000,000 Affordability award – Cost and Use focused ($750,000 First Place, $250,000 Second Place): To the teams that produce the least expensive, easy-to-use, accurate, stable, and precise pH sensors under a variety of tests.

The Need for the Prize

Problem

Our oceans are currently in the midst of a silent crisis. Rising levels of atmospheric carbon are resulting in higher levels of acidity. The potential biological, ecological, biogeochemical and societal implications are staggering. The absorption of human CO2 emissions is already having a profound impact on ocean chemistry, impacting the health of shellfish, fisheries, coral reefs, other ecosystems and our very survival.

The Market Failure

While ocean acidification is well documented in a few temperate ocean waters, little is known in high latitudes, coastal areas and the deep sea, and most current pH sensor technologies are too costly, imprecise, or unstable to allow for sufficient knowledge on the state of ocean acidification.

Solution

Breakthrough sensors are urgently needed for scientists, managers and industry to turn the tide on ocean acidification and begin healing our oceans. A competition to incentivize the creation of these sensors for the study and monitoring of ocean acidification’s impact on marine ecosystems and ocean health will drive industry forward by providing the data needed to take action and produce results.

Impact

Making a broad impact—one that reaches far beyond new sensing technologies—is critical to the success of the prize. It begins with a breakthrough pH sensor that will catalyze our ability to measure—and thus respond to—ocean acidification.

Source: http://oceanhealth.xprize.org/competition-details/overview

==============================================================

In the NBC News story I cited about the announcement there was this:

“It is only in the last decade where scientists have begun to study ocean acidification, so our knowledge is really limited still,” Paul Bunje, a senior director with the X Prize Foundation who is the lead scientist behind the ocean health competition, told NBC News.

“But we do know that we don’t know enough, and we don’t have the tools needed to even begin to measure it sufficiently — much less to begin to respond, to adapt to it, to implement local policies that might allow ocean acidification to be less harmful,” he said.

The open ocean is acidifying at about .02 pH units per decade, according to according to Richard Feeley, a marine scientist and leading researcher on ocean acidification at NOAA’s Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory in Seattle. “That means that you have to have an instrument that you can rely on to be both precise and accurate for a very, very long period of time, so that you can actually see that signal,” he told NBC News.

So, are the IPCC models based on uncertain measurements and an assumed trend? It sure seems so.

It’s like a bad acid trip.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

197 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Itsteapot
September 25, 2013 9:38 am

More gravy train money

September 25, 2013 9:41 am

Shifting the goalposts again. “Well, gosh, we were wrong about CO2 causing global warming. But CO2 does cause ocean acidification. So we still need to tax carbon and de-industrialize the world.” This is part of step-down from AGW while at the same time maintaining the same goals.
Notice the same imprecise scare language: “silent crisis”, “profound impact”, “healing our oceans”.

theOtherJohninCalif
September 25, 2013 9:44 am

I find their logic fun. To use it in a slightly different example, when a cup of water changes in temperature from 90 degrees to 85 degrees, it is freezing. It is not frozen (as the deniers would point out), but it is freezing.
I love it!

lemiere jacques
September 25, 2013 9:44 am

Just as the are sure heat went in deep ocean even it is very frustrating they can t mesasurere it yet.
I am not certain we agree on the meaning of being certain.

September 25, 2013 9:45 am

“Earth System Models project…” Doesn’t that say it all? The tiny decrease in alkalinity is …modeled. Are there
Even if the Ph decrease was real isn’t there a big difference, since it’s a log scale, between 0.065 and 0.1?
“While ocean acidification is well documented in a few temperate ocean waters,…” Is it? Where? And is the measurement a real signal or buried in noise and they hope it’s real?

MIke (UK)
September 25, 2013 9:48 am

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, it’s not Acidification it’s Neutralization, its go to go past ph7 first!

Pamela Gray
September 25, 2013 9:50 am

So I take it Arctic Ice research fund spigots got frozen in the ice?

pat
September 25, 2013 9:52 am

Another hoax by manipulation of emotions and exaggeration. Frankly it is dangerous because it detracts from very real problems caused by runoff, chemical bleaching, erosion and herbicides.

Marcos
September 25, 2013 9:54 am

i’ve gotten into arguments on other science sites about the ‘acidification’ terminology. i was taught that a base can be more or less alkaline and an acid more or less acidic. for some reason, the science community has decided that everything will be described in terms of acidity…even bases. imo, its because it sounds more dramatic than saying the oceans are slightly less alkaline

Rud Istvan
September 25, 2013 9:55 am

Feely is the Hansen of ocean acidification, and has published some seriously misleading stuff. A post will be up sometime over at Judy’s. Been accepted. For him to make this admission is huge.
And surface pH is not the whole story, not is PMEL’s site north of Mauna Loa necessarily representative. It was chosen because it is relatively biologically barren, so has little seasonal variation. By contrast, NOAA and the Nation Park service report the pH in thriving Florida Bay ( between the mouth of the Everglades and Key West) ranges from a low of 5.8 in winter to a high of 9.8 on sunny summer days. Estuaries vary seasonally by a pH of 1 from around 7.4 to 8.4 ( specifically citing the Elkhorn Slough on Monterey Bay, California. The IPCC 7.8 projection is a linear extrapolation from Henry’s law. But ocean pH doesn’t only follow Henry’s law. There are major biological nonlinear feedbacks, as Florida Bay and Elkhorn Slough illustrate.

GH05T
September 25, 2013 9:56 am

Well, to be fair, it’s REALLY hard to get people to give you 2 million dollars if you tell them you’re just curious and it’d really help you finish your thesis.

timspence10
September 25, 2013 10:00 am

It’s another hoax, quite frankly they’re just playing games, this isn’t science.

ZootCadillac
September 25, 2013 10:02 am

This is one of my greatest bugbears. When will somebody stand up and say that slightly less alkalinity does not in any way, shape or form equate to acidification?

Jimbo
September 25, 2013 10:02 am

What you measure in PH in on part of the ocean maybe different from one a few miles away. Some parts of the world have co2 bubbling through coral with fish swimming around in a rather blasé fashion.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/12/28/the-fishes-and-the-coral-live-happily-in-the-co2-bubble-plume/

David L.
September 25, 2013 10:02 am

Which theory of acids/bases does the IPCC prefer? The Arrhenius theory, the Bronsted-Lowry theory, or the Lewis theory?

Richard Day
September 25, 2013 10:03 am

I’m submitting a computer model to the X Prize Foundation. I will accept a cashier’s cheque, money order, bitcoin or cash.

Pamela Gray
September 25, 2013 10:03 am

An infant fresh from the womb is becoming geriatric by age 5. An apple freshly picked from the tree is becoming rotten seconds later. Both true. And both utterly stupid statements to make. Yet we give scientists a pass on this kind of semantic crap?

chris y
September 25, 2013 10:05 am

I think the X prize announcement is cheering news. Every time sensor spatial-temporal coverage is improved, the concomitant climate catastrophe seems to vanish in a cloud of blue steam. Argo is a perfect example.
If a low cost, stable, accurate, reliable pH sensor for ocean water can be developed that requires little or no maintenance (I think this highly unlikely, given the extreme environment of the ocean), then the ocean pH scare will drop off the climateer’s list of talking points.

nutso fasst
September 25, 2013 10:07 am

It should be fairly easy to design an inexpensive meter with internal clock/calendar and non-volatile memory that allows us to “see that signal” of precisely .02 pH units per decade.

Antagon
September 25, 2013 10:10 am

As our oceans become more neutral due I propose the term “Oceanic Swissification.”

September 25, 2013 10:11 am

Oceanographers that I have talked with have great difficulty getting stable pH readings largely because there are so many transient factors that affect pH from hour to hour, season to season. H ions can come from many sources and different molecules act as buffers. Changes in productivity, evaporation, rainfall and river outflow change the H+ concentrations. There is a sharp pH gradient in the vertical profile. Changes in upwelling of deep waters dramatically alter local pH in many ways in addition to mixing the vertical concentrations. Upwelling brings nutrients to the surface allow burst of productivity and photosynthesis that absorbs CO2, followed by zooplankton respiration increases that release CO2. Upwelling brings up ancient carbon. UPwelling is greatly affected by cycles such as El Nino and Pacific Decadal Oscillation There are so many confounding factors affecting pH, reliable estimates will be far more difficult than measuring temperature.

September 25, 2013 10:12 am

Friends:
The Wendy Schmidt Ocean Health XPRIZE says

Breakthrough sensors are urgently needed for scientists, managers and industry to turn the tide on ocean acidification and begin healing our oceans.

OK. So which is it
(a) Do we know “our oceans” need “healing”?
or
(b) Do we lack instruments to discern if the oceans need to be “healed”?
It cannot be both.
Richard

September 25, 2013 10:12 am

Been hearing about that alarming “30% increase in ocean acidity” for several years now. Maybe this new meter will finally help them come up with a more alarming number.

Dr K.A. Rodgers
September 25, 2013 10:13 am

“This is one of my greatest bugbears” also. Do these clowns understand buffers? Clearly they don’t. Buffers are part of hard science and seawater is a massive, complex and naturally buffered system. I suspect I also referred them to the opening chapters of K.B. Krauskopf’s “Principles of Geochemistry”.

Latitude
September 25, 2013 10:15 am

the pH has not changed….
Biological processes that make the ocean work….create millions of magnitudes more acid

1 2 3 8