Dr. Judith Curry lets an announcement slip in comments.
My understanding of climate is not helped much by climate models. Stay tuned, our big paper on natural internal climate variability just got accepted by Climate Dynamics
Ask yourself why the common sense stuff that I say is regarded as news.
Source: http://judithcurry.com/2013/09/17/consensus-denialism/#comment-381667
I understand also that there’s a meaty essay coming in a major newspaper by Curry, I know which one it is, but I don’t want to give anti-skeptic zealots a head start into pressuring the editor ahead of time. They’ll just have to ask he be fired afterwards like they usually do.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Paul Vaughan:
Your post at September 22, 2013 at 6:16 am says in total
That is merely another unsubstantiated assertion intended to excuse your disgraceful vilifications of Judith Curry.
Now apologise for your behaviour especially your unsubstantiated attacks on Dr Curry.
Richard
Paul, are you related to Bob Beckel?
http://judithcurry.com/2013/09/20/the-ipccs-inconvenient-truth/#comment-385400
Paul Vaughan:
re your post at September 23, 2013 at 7:40 am
I have made two posts at your link. One of them copies to there my expectation of your apology for your for your behaviour especially your egregious attacks on Dr Curry both here and there.
Your apology is still awaited.
Richard
This analysis does not match the information in the NASA sea temperature anomaly plots which clearly shows highly localised hot spots of over five degrees deviation. This is impossible to be cause by global warming by the first and second laws of thermodynamics. More so as the hot spots then revert to normal behaviour once the arrive at the sub Arctic destination.
Richard sees an assertion that 1+1=2 and then demands an apology for its public expression. We’re dealing with some really high caliber people here.