This bit of humor is courtesy of Dr. Roy Spencer, who made it a lead in for his recent blog post:
A climate modeler increasing his model’s sensitivity.
read his essay: A Turning Point for the IPCC…and Humanity?
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
![Science-Experiments[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/science-experiments1.jpg?resize=300%2C230&quality=83)
Dr. Spencer is preparing us for the new release from the IPCC – it must be met with a sense of humour I presume.
The stupid, it burns.
Depends on how many politicians wakeup from their co2 hypnotic trance compared to how many politicians have their co2 hypnotic trance deepened by the IPCC.
But depends far more on the MSM. In the UK the politicians vote according to what they read on the front pages of the newspapers, and especially so on climate science / co2.
I read Spencer’s piece earlier today. He thinks the IPCC dial back is “momentous” and that reality is finally here for the Warmists at the IPCC. They had to deal with the elephant in the room i.e. failed temperature forecasts.
Yet last year Ivo De Boer, the UN climate chief during the 2009 Copenhagen talks, was quoted as saying: “That report is going to scare the wits out of everyone,” Forgive me if I’m underwhelmed.
Of some note at this point:
When you get the other side off balance and unsure of your position and they fear an attack , have gone into a defensive position and condition.
It is a very good time to attack.
Buz Saw them with facts, no let up, every day every way, confront, push, engage, counter attack, flank any movement they take, wear them down, use up their reserves.
Win.
All we need now is the Swedish Chef!!
http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100711135421/muppet/images/9/9c/Swedish_poser.jpg
Jimbo- you say-
“Yet last year Ivo De Boer, the UN climate chief during the 2009 Copenhagen talks, was quoted as saying: “That report is going to scare the wits out of everyone,””
Indeed. The question is, was Ivo warning the climate ramorae that the AR5 SPM would scare the wits out of all those whose livelihoods depended on “keeping the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of climate hobgoblins, all of them imaginary.”
whoever got the money won.
we’ll never catch back up to zero.
it’s gone down the vortex with a whoosh and a gurgle.
so no, pollyanna, there is no triumph in losing.
Since when has Dana Nuccitelli been a redhead?
Seriously, the guy has an intriguingly shaped head…very cylindrical, much like the good Professor in the above picture.
That and they’re both puppets.
(Yes, very aware this is all ad hominem. Just riding a high from the recent good news.)
I can hear frank singing….And noow, the end is near………..problem-.how to remove tons of useless
Windmills and concrete.
That and they’re both puppets.
No they are both Muppets and Muppets is a derogatory discription in England, I think.
When Ivo De Boer, the UN climate chief during the 2009 Copenhagen talks, said “That report is going to scare the wits out of everyone,” he didn’t properly say WHO was going to be scared: everyone whose career is based on climate-hysteria. When he said that, he served up the usual horse-apples for the politicians and their media-barge to spread before they had to address the actual IPCC report and accumulating volumes of contradictory data.
There was the 7th Annual World Economic Forum last week in Dalian, China. Invite only and the Chairperson planning the so-called Summer Davos founded the joint US-China Alliance for Clean Energy. AGW is the excuse for the touted collaboration among governments and business and actual temps are a not sufficient reason to abandon to boondoggle for the politically connected.
I glanced at the page and misread the headline “Hump Day Hilarity” as “Hump Day Hillary”.
The juxtaposition of Hump and Hillary made me shudder…
J Martin says: @ur momisugly September 18, 2013 at 12:07 pm
….depends far more on the MSM. In the UK the politicians vote according to what they read on the front pages of the newspapers, and especially so on climate science / co2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The it is a sure loss. The bankers own the media and they want all the nice money they can get from handling the carbon scam.
At least that’s The Muppet Show and not Sesame Street, which has turned to the “education” awaiting us in the Green Liberals’ re-education camps.
The economy sucks. Parents can’t afford to buy their kids even small things right when they want them.
So Cookie Monster is learning about a strange sort of delayed gratification. He could have one cookie now, but if he waits then he gets two cookies. I didn’t hear how long the wait would be. Perhaps until the parental units get their food stamps.
Gee, here in reality if you don’t eat a cookie then someone else thinks no one else wants it and eats it, you get no cookie. Seriously, have you ever found free donuts on the break room table, and thought you could grab one now but it’ll be better to come back later and get two?
Teach the kids economics. If you put one cookie in the bank at the going interest rate of 0.02% per year, will you earn another cookie before you get diabetes and can’t eat the cookies, or at all before you die?
Those kiddies will be so confused when they grow up, thinking they’ll get more if they wait. Their partner will tell them not now, wait until bedtime. They’ll find out that not only does it not mean they’ll be getting it twice, they likely blew their chance at getting it even once.
And even though they showed up ready to play, they won’t get a Participation Award.
I had the same reaction as Mark and two Cats. It’s not a pleasent thought and one might excuse Bill for going ‘off range’. I fear however, as I drive down the road in my motor coach I will still get stuck behind those #%>¥@ur momisugly$& trucks hauling those #%>¥@ur momisugly$& useless windmills.
From Mark and two Cats on September 18, 2013 at 1:13 pm:
Have you ever seen the GEICO Insurance “Happier than a camel on Wednsday” commercial?
I don’t care if he is a camel. There are no offices anywhere in America where it’s permissible to badger female coworkers until they tell you “It’s hump day.” NONE.
I have to disagree with Dr. Roy Spencer on one thing………..CAGW / AGW is not a theory.
Bear in mind the failed IPCC projections from their models. As each month of the standstill goes by the worse it gets.
Sorry, forgot to add the link.
http://www.diffen.com/difference/Hypothesis_vs_Theory
IPCC: Pronounced – IPeCaC /ˈɪpɨkæk/, commonly referred to as ipecac, is derived from the dried rhizome and roots of the ipecacuanha. It is typically used to induce vomiting, which it accomplishes by irritating the lining of the stomach (gastric mucosa) and by stimulating part of the brain called the medullary chemoreceptor trigger zone.
gnomish says:
September 18, 2013 at 12:43 pm
“whoever got the money won.
we’ll never catch back up to zero.”
Hey, that’s not all. These guys are all on the public payroll and are approaching retirement. They will be collecting 2/3 of their salaries for the next 20-30 years – still being paid for antidiluvian CO2 science (without the flood), So we still owe them over $500 billion.
The header and intro caused my mind to conjure the following:
“Two climate modelers walked into a bar…”
Alas, that’s as far as I was able to go. Others will have to carry the banner onward.
Yup, that about does it.
D.J. Hawkins says:
September 18, 2013 at 2:37 pm
The header and intro caused my mind to conjure the following:
“Two climate modelers walked into a bar…”
Alas, that’s as far as I was able to go. Others will have to carry the banner onward.
*
…And asked a third one, “What’s cooking?”…
[Hoping someone else can take it further]. 🙂