The 2013 Moore Oklahoma Tornado – a synopsis

By Paul Homewood

Moore_OK_2013_Tornado_track

I have deliberately held off running this post for a day or two, partly because I felt it inappropriate to do so earlier, and also because I wanted to wait until the facts became clearer.

NWS have now officially declared the tornado that hit Moore, Oklahoma on Monday as an EF-5, the highest category, which is given when wind speeds are estimated to be over 200 mph. The current estimate for this tornado is 200-210 mph.

Latest estimates are that 24 people have died, although this figure may rise.

NOAA’s Environmental Visualisation Laboratory gave an ominous warning, earlier that day, of what was to come :-

Converging Air Masses Makes for a Rough Day in the Central Plains

May 20, 2013

Converging Air Masses Makes for a Rough Day in the Central Plains

Cold, dry air sweeping down from Canada mixing with warm, moist air from the Gulf of Mexico and Pacific Ocean are merging in the U.S. Plains today, creating conditions for some very turbulent weather. A tornado outbreak today in the early morning hours caused destruction in Kansas and Oklahoma. This image shows the air temperature at 40,000 Pascals (about 23,000 feet high in the atmosphere) using data outputs from the NOAA North America Model for 2100z on May 20, 2013, combined with an overlay of the winds at the same elevation. Tornadoes typically occur at the convergence of these two different air masses. A distinct boundary of “cold meeting warm” is visible in this temperature data, extending from Texas into Illinois.

http://www.nnvl.noaa.gov/MediaDetail2.php?MediaID=1349&MediaTypeID=1

Unfortunately, EF-5 tornadoes occur only too frequently. This latest is the 59th recorded since 1950, so on average about one every year.

http://www.spc.noaa.gov/faq/tornado/f5torns.html

The full list is in Appendix A, but Figure 1 shows that these strongest tornadoes were more common in the colder climate of 1950-80.

image

Figure 1

Many tornadoes, of course, pass through relatively empty farmland, and don’t lead to the damage and loss of life that this one did. Nevertheless, there have been 27 tornadoes since 1970 that have caused more than 20 fatalities, so, on average, it is, unfortunately, the sort of tragedy we can expect to see nearly every year.

I cannot finish without saying how utterly disgusted I am by those who have chosen to make political capital out of human suffering, such as Senator Boxer. What they have done is pure evil. She and the rest should be ashamed of themselves.

APPENDIX A – F5/EF5 TORNADOES SINCE 1950

=================================================

NUMBER	DATE                    LOCATION

======	=====================   ===========================

59	May 20, 2013		Moore OK

58	May 24, 2011		El Reno/Piedmont OK

57	May 22, 2011		Joplin MO

56	April 27, 2011		Rainsville/Sylvania AL

55	April 27, 2011		Preston MS

54	April 27, 2011		Hackleburg/Phil Campbell AL

53	April 27, 2011		Smithville MS

52	May 25, 2008		Parkersburg IA

51      May 4, 2007             Greensburg KS

50	May 3, 1999             Bridge Creek/Moore OK

49	April 16, 1998          Waynesboro TN

48	April 8, 1998           Oak Grove/Pleasant Grove AL

47	May 27, 1997            Jarrell TX

46	July 18, 1996           Oakfield WI

45	June 16, 1992           Chandler MN

44	April 26, 1991          Andover KS

43	August 28, 1990         Plainfield IL

42	March 13, 1990          Goessel KS

41	March 13, 1990          Hesston KS

40	May 31, 1985            Niles OH

39	June 7, 1984            Barneveld WI

38	April 2, 1982           Broken Bow OK

37	April 4, 1977           Birmingham AL

36	June 13, 1976           Jordan IA

35	April 19, 1976          Brownwood TX

34	March 26, 1976          Spiro OK

33	April 3, 1974           Guin AL

32	April 3, 1974           Tanner AL

31	April 3, 1974           Mt. Hope AL

30	April 3, 1974           Sayler Park OH

29	April 3, 1974           Brandenburg KY

28	April 3, 1974           Xenia OH

27	April 3, 1974           Daisy Hill IN

26	May 6, 1973             Valley Mills TX

25	February 21, 1971       Delhi LA

24	May 11, 1970            Lubbock TX

23	June 13, 1968           Tracy MN

22	May 15, 1968            Maynard IA

21	May 15, 1968            Charles City IA

20	April 23, 1968          Gallipolis OH

19	October 14, 1966        Belmond IA

18	June 8, 1966            Topeka KS

17	March 3, 1966           Jackson MS

16	May 8, 1965             Gregory SD

15	May 5, 1964             Bradshaw NE

14	April 3, 1964           Wichita Falls TX

13	May 5, 1960             Prague OK

12	June 4, 1958            Menomonie WI

11	December 18, 1957       Murphysboro IL

10	June 20, 1957           Fargo ND

9	May 20, 1957            Ruskin Heights MO

8	April 3, 1956           Grand Rapids MI

7	May 25, 1955            Udall KS

6	May 25, 1955            Blackwell OK

5	December 5, 1953        Vicksburg MS

4	June 27, 1953           Adair IA

3	June 8, 1953            Flint MI

2	May 29, 1953            Ft. Rice ND

1	May 11, 1953            Waco TX

============================================================
The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jack Hydrazine
May 22, 2013 7:48 pm
Jack Hydrazine
May 22, 2013 7:49 pm
Luther Wu
May 22, 2013 7:55 pm

Stephen Rasey says:
May 22, 2013 at 5:08 pm
________________
Stephen,
I live here in the OKC metro area and was guilty of posting the same mistaken info earlier today. For that, I profusely apologize to the bereaved families in Oklahoma and the readers of WUWT.
The cause of loss of six of the children who perished at Plaza Towers Elementary School was misreported, but now corrected. The State Medical Examiner has listed them differently, now.
God bless the families and friends of all those who perished and all members of the community are suffering mightily from grief.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/2-infants-among-10-children-killed-in-okla-tornado-state-positively-identifies-23-of-24-dead/2013/05/22/52379098-c2f6-11e2-9642-a56177f1cdf7_story.html
The EF5 tornado also made a direct hit on Briarwood Elementary School, but all there survived, as did children at a private elementary school, also destroyed.
There were some number of strong tornadoes the day before, May 19 which produced significant damage to several small communities around the greater Oklahoma metropolis and two men perished during an EF4 near Shawnee. Our thoughts and prayers are with those family and friends so sorely affected, as well.

u.k.(us)
May 22, 2013 7:57 pm

Ok, who wants to play……..
…..open ended ……

Larry Ledwick (hotrod)
May 22, 2013 8:36 pm

Whole cities in the Midwest/Northeast have been shut down before or during blizzards, why not do the same ?

Mostly because it would be the worst thing to do short of no warning at all. One of the biggest challenges in emergency management is to warn when it is appropriate (ie the outcome is likely, and protective actions are useful) and to avoid over warning (crying wolf) at every strange sound in the night. The public very quickly suffers warning fatigue if you warn too often and nothing happens, which as pointed out above will be the case for 99.99% of the population in the warning areas. As a result one or both of the following will happen:
The public will start to ignore all warnings
and or
The public will become very angry for the costs and dislocations caused by fruitless warnings.
Major storm warning such as blizzard warnings involve some very real financial impacts to the public in the form of lost wages, lost sales as people lock down, extra expenditures (buying extra food and batteries, etc.) As short sighted as it is, this can literally lead to the destruction of the agency responsible for the warnings if false warnings happen too often. People will put so much pressure on the elected officials that they either shut down or strangle the agency that is causing the false warnings.
We see this in avalanche warnings in the mountains, they only put up high avalanche risk warnings for about 3 days, and even though the conditions still exist they will pull down the warning briefly so they can re-issue the warning again just before the weekend so it gets fresh coverage on the news and people will notice the announcement as they plan their weekend activities.
It sounds good from a pragmatic point of view but in a real world of real people over warning is very bad and can cost a lot of both money and lives in the long run.
Last is that such a warning is physically impossible as the technology simply does not exist yet to predict if a specific storm will generate a strong EF4-EF5 tornado on any given day at any given location. The best we can do is a general warning for an area and then a few minutes warning once the actual circulation begins in the cloud that will eventually form the tornado (maybe).

u.k.(us)
May 22, 2013 8:41 pm

_Jim says:
May 22, 2013 at 4:36 pm
========
I listen.

May 22, 2013 8:49 pm

philjourdan says May 22, 2013 at 6:40 pm
The reports I have heard said the residents had 16 minute advanced warning.

Can you please state the ‘benchmark’, Phil, in regards to making this claim?
-First signs of convection taking place (white, puffy cumulus building along the dryline)?
-First T-storm to occur that afternoon? (it would be assumed that ANYTHING appearing would go to severe levels in a SHORT period of time given conditions, the ‘cap’ etc.)
-First appearance of a wall cloud (this is your lowered cloud ‘base’ in the SW quadrant that will exhibit rotation prior to ‘dropping a funnel’)?
-First appearance of a funnel?
-First appearance of a funnel with a debris (dust etc) kicked up on the ground?
-First appearance of a tornado (a ‘funnel’ all the way to the ground; should also be exhibiting a debris ‘cloud’ as well)?
-First appearance of a the stove-pipe shaped tornado (lotsa debris now)?
-First appearance of a (low to the ground ‘grinder’) wedge-shaped tornado (F3 to F5 at this stage)?
Bear this in mind, Phil there were MANY sets of trained eyes watching the skies and various instruments that morning into afternoon, along with multiple radiosonde (met balloons) ‘soundings’ sampling the air mass from ground level up to 50 – 60, 000 ft from which Skew-T diagrams (showing winds, dew points, how much ‘cap’ remained, etc) allowing a trained met to make solid ‘judgement calls’ as to how explosive the situation would be …
And some of those eye-sets were in several different helicopters owned by the TV stations as well, bringing back live imagery for the mets in the studio to observe and interspersed with RADAR imagery overlaid with street-detail-level position. This was a well-observed event by many trained observers and mets as well …
.

May 22, 2013 9:11 pm

Larry Ledwick (hotrod) says May 22, 2013 at 8:36 pm

Last is that such a warning is physically impossible as the technology simply does not exist yet to predict if a specific storm will generate a strong EF4-EF5 tornado on any given day at any given location. The best we can do is a general warning for an area and then a few minutes warning once the actual circulation begins in the cloud that will eventually form the tornado (maybe).

Some of this is applicable to (can I use the term?) milder tornadoes occurring from T-storm cells embedded in squall lines where the interaction of winds and supercell growth are a little harder to ascertain, observe and predict, but the *storms* both in OK on Sunday (most ppl have ignored or are unaware of the tornado events on Sunday incl the Shanwee/Edmond tornado) and Monday were individual supercells which developed alone and went tornadic within half an hour (give or take) of T-storm genesis … it was simply then a matter of observing these for the usual signs (wall cloud in the SW quadrant).
Anybody who bothered to tune in KOCO or KFOR on the internet had an arm-chair view of the blow-by-blow ‘happenings’ (complete with almost-full-motion video from spotter’s ‘chase’ cars and good video from the choppers!) from the first wall-cloud formation through to the dissipation of Monday’s EF5 twister via an unexpected transition to the ‘rope’ stage before simply ceasing to exist.
Had these simply ‘sprung’ up from mild, afternoon thundershowers, I would have had to agree with you, but, Larry, such was not the case.
.

Luther Wu
May 22, 2013 9:25 pm

Larry Ledwick (hotrod) says:
May 22, 2013 at 8:36 pm
_____________
No lie.
There’s one of those obnoxious warning sirens within two blocks of my home and you don’t want to be outside when they pull the trigger on it, which they do, with every event anywhere in the Metro, which might be for a storm 30 miles away and headed for Kansas. They save lives, but they need to re- think when they blow that damned horn… the “boy who cried wolf” comes to mind.
_Jim says:
May 22, 2013 at 8:49 pm
_____________
The whole thing happened really fast- something like bluesky to final lift in 45 minutes.

u.k.(us)
May 22, 2013 9:36 pm

Larry Ledwick (hotrod) says:
May 22, 2013 at 8:36 pm
=====
Nice comment.
I’m 50 years old, been there done that, I’ve heard all the stories.
Just a bit miffed, at the current direction of things, so don’t take it personal.

Luther Wu
May 22, 2013 9:52 pm

Larry Ledwick (hotrod) says:
May 22, 2013 at 8:36 pm
_________________
Here’s a timeline-
http://www.weather.com/news/tornado-central/moore-oklahoma-tornado-timeline-20130520

Luther Wu
May 22, 2013 9:57 pm
Kajajuk
May 22, 2013 10:09 pm

Jim south london says:
May 22, 2013 at 1:11 pm
————————————-
Wizard of Oz is about monetary reform wrapped up in a child’s story. Not so much about tornadoes per se, unless you extend financial collapses as tornadoes…
http://www.themoneymasters.com/mm/the-wonderful-wizard-of-oz/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_interpretations_of_The_Wonderful_Wizard_of_Oz

Luther Wu
May 22, 2013 10:15 pm

_Jim says:
May 22, 2013 at 9:11 pm
________________
You’ve had some very insightful things to say and it’s really appreciated. It’s likely that there are also other people from the metro running through these threads just trying to make sense of it all- needing to talk our way out of our sorrow.

Janice Moore
May 22, 2013 10:26 pm

You keep safe, Luther Wu. All the above calm, cool, post-disaster analysis is useful (and also a way to cope with such a terrible tragedy), but your tender heart comes shining through. You were the first blogger on WUWT (during the Nenana ice classic thread discussion, I believe) who looked out the window of our little WUWT world and cried out, “Oh, … [a terrible thing is happening. Everyone, stop and look!]… .”
I’m so glad you are in the world!

Luther Wu
May 22, 2013 10:42 pm

Thanks Janice, ever so much.

AndyG55
May 22, 2013 10:42 pm

According to map, 22 square mile affected.. Not to minimalise it , but how darn unlucky do you have to be to be in its path. Just very unfortunate that it hit a major urban area.
Condolences to all who have suffered

Janice Moore
May 22, 2013 10:48 pm

“It’s likely that there are also other people from the metro running through these threads just trying to make sense of it all- needing to talk our way out of our sorrow.” [Luther Wu of Oklahoma City]
Then, I’d like to say that I am praying for you all. You will get through this. God will bring good out of this tragedy (Romans 8:28). Not one thing happened on Monday that God didn’t already know was going to happen. God is, even now, IN CONTROL. This fact will not take away your pain, but it will, if you keep on trusting in Him, give you strength and peace.
“Be still my soul, the Lord is on thy side … be still my soul, the waves and winds still know His voice who ruled them while he dwelt below.” [Hymn “Be Still, My Soul” – tune, Finlandia]
**************
Hey, Andy G! How’s it going? I’m still as silly as ever (perpetual 10-year-old in a disguise that gets better every year!). Hope your school year is going well.

Janice Moore
May 22, 2013 10:56 pm

You are so welcome, Luther (a “mighty fortress is [your] God”!) Your soul is “… safe and secure from all alarms. Leaning, leaning, leaning on the everlasting arms.”

mavbraselton@gmail.com
May 22, 2013 11:33 pm

hi there wizzards can stop tornados witn magic

May 23, 2013 1:38 am

Brian [May 22, 2013 at 7:30 pm] says:
“Alexander F is a toolbox.”

Alexander F is absolutely correct.
You could learn a lot from folks like him.

johnmarshall
May 23, 2013 3:05 am

I quite agree about Boxer et al and their political self serving on other people’s tragedy.
Boxer should stand down.

May 23, 2013 5:15 am

_Jim says: May 22, 2013 at 8:49 pm
Nothing scientific about it. That was when the Tornado sirens went off. As I do not live there, nor do I (nor did I state I know) what is the criteria that is used to sound the sirens, I suggest you might want to talk to those who run the system.
But that is just what I would do.

May 23, 2013 6:30 am

Luther Wu says May 22, 2013 at 9:25 pm
_____________
The whole thing happened really fast- something like bluesky to final lift in 45 minutes.

Thank you for that confirmation ;^) I was ‘observing’ real-time via the good folks (Gary England and crew including on-the-ground storm observers/’chasers’ w their near real-time mobile video and their helicopter with live TV-quality video) at KOCO and the weather.rap.ucar.edu website for the various meteorological conditions (incl satellite imagery e.g. IR, WV etc, upper-air condx incl individual Skew-T diagrams for each Radiosonde balloon-launch site, and surface condx: dewpoint and temperature).
It’s just that I’m getting the impression from some posters who may be thinking that Oklahomans were totally unaware of the possibilities that day (the Day 1 Convective Outlook from NOAA’s NWS SPC of course detailed the prognosis and synopsis for the ‘set up’ that day), that no one was ‘watching’ for the development of severe storms or weather that day (also including Sunday, which most ppl gloss over too I think).
Unlike the broadcast ‘media’ seen (perhaps) in most areas, the broadcasters in the OKC area have their act together, so maybe posters are basing their ‘experience’ with TV coverage from the (possibly) inadequate coverage from broadcasters in their own markets.
To that end, perhaps ppl don’t realize the broadcasters go with wall-to-wall coverage of this stuff (even here in the DFW area!) in the broadcast media when severe weather is present. It helps to *know* where the heavy stuff is in order to take the necessary action to survive!
In the case of Oklahoma City, several radio stations tie-in with coverage TV station KOCO provides (they may also tying in with another TV station or two given inferences I saw/heard that day but can’t swear to it) and provide *excellent* real-time coverage to the public.
Perhaps ppl don’t realize the conditions under which these particularly strong Twisters formed; It’s a little different when the only ‘player’ on stage (the 1st storm that afternoon) ‘blossoms-up’, hurling out prodigious amounts of lightning (WHICH I might add is easily observable/hear-able in the DFW area on a loopstick-antenna based radio tuned to longwave, ~250 kHz *) with accompanying thunder and then goes tornadic in a relatively short time.
.
* This is the means by which I know that somewhere along the dryline something has popped up and the ‘show’ has begun; thunderstorm genesis has been successful and it’s ‘game on’ for severe weather.

May 23, 2013 6:58 am

philjourdan says May 23, 2013 at 5:15 am

Nothing scientific about it. That was when the Tornado sirens went off.

That is really a very poor means of notification; a holdover from the cold war days when those were termed air-raid sirens (and many were, verily, first installed via grant monies for “Civil Defense” infrastructure construction including fallout shelters!)
‘City fathers’ have been known to ‘pull’ the actuation of those sirens out of fear that ‘something’ was happening out there in their city and they feared getting caught with their pants down … this is as juxtaposed against the observing of a tornado, or the NWS issuance of a ‘warning’.
Also figure in the ‘propagation delay’ through the ‘official’ system for siren activation:
1) Storm spotter, law enforcement or ‘the public’ generates a ‘phoned-in’ report (nowadays the NWS forecast offices have ‘chat’ sessions active between the local NWS office mets and TV mets as well as select in-the-field storm spotters)
2) NWS Office personnel receive report, the report is ‘screened’ for validity (weed out false reports, esp. from the public)
3) The report info is formatted into a format suitable for dissemination via teletype (olddays), the internet (today) usually via EMWIN * (the ‘official’ info channel from the NWS that cities should be using: this is the direct line from the NWS, but it’s not always timely) for dissemination to ‘using’ authorities.
4) City pulls switch to activate sirens (IF the siren still has power available; some have battery plants as backup). The city can also pull the switch for any reason under the sun as well, and, in the case of Shanwee 2013 (Sunday) and Moore 2013 (Monday) they may have been viewing the actual ‘live’ coverage of the tornado on KOCO TV and acted to ‘sound’ the sirens ….
.
* EMWIN page:
“Emergency Managers Weather Information Network”
http://www.nws.noaa.gov/emwin/index.htm

Reply to  _Jim
May 23, 2013 7:07 am

@_Jim – then take it up with the local officials. For some unknown reason you take pride in attacking the messenger. I reported. I did not analyze. If you do not like their system, I am sure they would love to hear from you on a better one.
But retro or not, effective or not, the system is still widely used. Even in non-Tornado prone areas as a means to warn nearby residents of issues affecting them. As I do not work for the EMS at any government level, you are wasting your time trying to convince me that you have a superior system.