When they lie right on the cover, it speaks volumes about the content of the film.
What’s the lie in the cover you ask? I contacted the West Coast press agent to confirm my suspicion.
At first glance, I said to myself “they really wouldn’t be that stupid to make an oil slick for a photo op, would they“? After all, as any boater knows, the US Coast Guard has severe penalties for getting any oil on the water, be it intentionally or accidentally:
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act prohibits the discharge of oil or oily waste into or upon the navigable waters of the United States or the waters of the contiguous zone if such discharge causes a film or sheen upon, or discoloration of, the surface of the water, or causes a sludge or emulsion beneath the surface of the water. Violators are subject to a penalty of $5,000.
I asked the West coast press agent, and got this reply:
I spoke with Craig and This picture was created digitally http://blog.zap2it.com/pop2it/greedy-lying-bastards-review.jpg
Thanks and please let me know if you have any other questions
Alexandra Drapac
MPRM Communications
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Los Angeles, CA 90036
Tel: xxxxxxxxxxxxxx | Fax: xxxxxxxxxxxx
I replied:
OK so that picture is fake, which speaks volumes about the content I suppose.
And got this reply in return:
Yes definitely fake-
Thanks!
Alex
Well and good to know. It reminds me of the famous Ursus Bogus scandal with Science, where fake digital photography was also used to make a point.
To illustrate its item about scientific facts, Science chose this image of a doomed poley bear:

One small problem.
As James Delingpole reveals, that poley bear image is fake. It’s been photoshopped. Science subsequently admitted:
The image associated with this article was selected by the editors. We did not realize that it was not an original photograph but a collage, and it was a mistake to have used it.
As Science says: “There is always some uncertainty associated with scientific conclusions.”
So just like that episode, Greedy Lying Bastards lies to the viewer right on the cover of the DVD. What a great start. It gets even more interesting, so lazy are the producers and contributors, they use erratum recycled language from 2005:
WUWT reader Russell Cook writes in an email:
=============================================================
Our AGW friends are so lazy as to drop in material from 2005.
From this other page, notice how just a couple of words of substitution turns this farce into a spectacular example of sheer projection: http://www.exposethebastards.com/jim_hoggan_clearing_the_pr_pollution_that_clouds_climate_science
Few PR offences have been so obvious, so successful and so despicable as this attack on the science of climate change. It has been a triumph of disinformation – one of the boldest and most extensive PR campaigns in history, primarily financed by the ̶e̶n̶e̶r̶g̶y̶ ̶i̶n̶d̶u̶s̶t̶r̶y̶ enviro-activists’ benefactors and executed by some of the best PR talent in the world.
And right after that, Hoggan says…
…. Ross Gelbspan, in his books, The Heat is On and Boiling Point sets out the whole case, pointing fingers and naming names. PR Watch founder John Stauber has done similarly exemplary work, tracking the bogus campaigns and linking various pseudo scientists to their energy industry funders. ….
That is lifted verbatim from Hoggan’s 2005 WordPress blog, pre-Desmogblog. As I’ve said so many times, all paths in the smear of skeptics lead to Gelbspan.
==============================================================
Heh. Recycled propaganda.
Apparently I don’t rate as a ‘bastard’. Color me disappointed. The list of heroes is equally funny. On the plus side, at least they weren’t stupid enough to put Peter Gleick on the list. They did however, interview Dr. Pieter Tans.
Pieter Tans, keeper of the CO2 records for Mauna Loa, is a self-declared 911 Truther. Here’s a letter to the editor he co-signed in 2006:
World has lost a true, humble friend
The world has lost a true friend in Gilbert White, winner of the 2000 National Medal of Science, natural resource adviser to FDR, ecologist before the word existed, president of Haverford College, social scientist and much else he was too humble to mention.
Gil was a fearless thinker who supported ideas that were before their time, such as the project at Vote.org and ideas that many ridicule or fear, such as evidence that a few people in our government allowed or caused the 9/11 attacks. He’s the eldest in the Oct. 21, 2004, Boulder Weekly photo with us, attending a 9/11 Truth event, although we weren’t identified — see Boulderweekly.com/archive/102104/coverstory.html. At lunch afterward, he expressed surprise and frustration that the media simply refused to make this an issue in the coming presidential election.
Gil was pretty sure that 9/11 was treason partly because, when he was working in the FDR White House, he witnessed the congratulatory atmosphere there the day of Pearl Harbor. He believed the government had invited the attack to get people’s support to enter World War II, and that something similar happened to get Congress’ (not the people’s) support for the Bush wars.
Gilbert could have been a member of almost any elite, but he preferred non-elitists. He believed in giving power to the people rather than keeping it in the hands of any elite. He hoped that when people learned that the government was complicit in 9/11 that they’d demand the kind of participatory government you can help realize at Vote.org. That’s why we risk accusations of sullying the dead by writing this.
Steven Jones, BYU Physics professor suspended for his work with Physics911.net, and Kevin Ryan, fired from Underwriters Laboratories for speaking out, will speak Oct. 29 from 2 to 6 p.m. in CU’s Math 100, along with the founder of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth, Kevin Barrett, Ph.D.
EVAN RAVITZ, ROBERT McFARLAND,
PIETER TANS and MARTIN WALTER
Boulder
And here he is in a photo, he appears to be the one in the middle holding the banner:
Source of the photo: http://archive.boulderweekly.com/102104/coverstory.html
Here’s Tan’s NOAA page: http://cires.colorado.edu/people/tans/
I wonder if Dr. Tans has ever heard of the Hatch act?
Watching the trailer and reading the synopsis, it seems to be the same old stuff, skeptics are (take your pick):
In the employ of big oil, recycled tobacco lobbyists, not scientists, ruthlessly greedy industrialists, don’t care about your children or your grandchildren, only out for profit, blah blah, blah.
We’ve heard it all before.
[ UPDATE:
I get this via one of my sources, Paul Dreissen, via email:
In case you don’t recall the name, GLB director Craig Rosebraugh used to be the mouthpiece for Earth Liberation Front and Animal Liberation Front anarchists and terrorists, who liked to brag about their firebombing of homes, cars and research labs. Nick Nichols and I discussed him and his exploits in some depth in Nick’s Rules for Corporate Warriors, pages 46, 47, 50, 217 and 306. He was investigated, and his computer hard drive was searched, but I don’t think the authorities were ever able to link him directly to the terrorists he assisted, and don’t believe he was ever successfully prosecuted.
When called to testify before a congressional committee that was investigating eco-terrorism, he took the Fifth on every question he was asked.
I confirmed this via Wikipedia and the citations here
From 1997 to 2001, Rosebraugh served as a spokesperson for the Earth Liberation Front receiving anonymous communiques from the ELF and forwarding them on to news media internationally. In 1999, Rosebraugh co-formed the North American Earth Liberation Front Press Office (NAELFPO) with Leslie James Pickering, where he continued to forward communiques, conduct international press interviews, and nationwide informational lectures on the ideology of the ELF movement.[10] Between 1997 and 2006, Rosebraugh received eight subpoenas to appear before federal grand juries to discuss his sources, but he has said he has no knowledge of them and refused to cooperate with the proceedings.
end update]
Only the weak minded will pay much attention to this movie, but then again, isn’t that the purpose of propaganda? Here is the movie trailer and the producer’s synopisis from the press kit:
“GREEDY LYING BASTARDS” SYNOPSIS
Hurricane Sandy. Wildfires in the West. “Brown-Outs” in the East. Farmers losing crops to the worst drought since the Dust Bowl. Climate change is no longer a prediction for the future, but a startling reality of today. The U.S. Pentagon believes it to be a matter of national and international security. Yet, as the evidence of our changing climate mounts and the scientific consensus proves a human causation, there continues to be no political action to thwart the warming of our planet.
“Greedy Lying Bastards” investigates the reason behind stalled efforts to tackle climate change despite consensus in the scientific community that it is not only a reality but also a growing problem that is placing us on the brink of disaster. The film details the people and organizations casting doubt on climate science and claims that greenhouse gases are not affected by human behavior. Filmmaker and political activist Craig Rosebraugh, in association with Executive Producer Daryl Hannah, documents the impact of an industry that has continually put profits before people, waged a campaign of lies designed to thwart measures to combat climate change, used its clout to minimize infringing regulations and undermined the political process in the U.S. and abroad.
Millions are spent each year by oil and related interests to fund the think tanks, groups, scientists and politicians waging what the film deems a campaign of deceit regarding the science of climate change and its dire impact on the planet. Between 1998 and 2012, “Greedy Lying Bastards” reports ExxonMobil spent over $27 million to dispel claims of global warming. The Koch brothers, who run the conglomerate Koch Industries, also provide significant funding. From 1997 through 2012, they spent over $67 million.
A far different story about climate change is told by the residents of Kivalina, a small Alaskan island above the Arctic Circle. Over the last fifty years, winter temperatures have risen nearly seven degrees and the ice that once protected the land is not forming properly leading to increasing erosion. As one tribal administrator notes: “The debate is over, we are dealing with the realities of climate change.”
“Greedy Lying Bastards” also presents a shocking analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court decision, Citizens United. According to the film, not only did this 2010 ruling pave the way for unlimited corporate contributions to political campaigns, but additionally it highlighted the blatant corruption of the country’s highest Court and its cozy relationship with top corporate interests.
Filmed in the US, Tuvalu, Peru, England, Uganda, Kenya, Belgium, Denmark and Germany, “Greedy Lying Bastards” includes interviews with scientists, industry experts, international political delegates, and people impacted by the changing climate as well as deniers. Among them: UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon; Rep. Henry Waxman (CA); former EPA head Christine Todd Whitman; top U.S. climate scientists Dr. Pieter Tans (NOAA), Dr. Mark Serreze (NOAA), Dr. Kevin Trenberth (NCAR), former President of Copenhagen Climate Summit
COP15 Connie Hedegaard, UN Environmental Program Executive Director Achim Steiner, leading climate science skeptics Myron Ebell, Christopher Monckton, and Jay Lehr, and victims of the 2012 wildfires and drought in the U.S.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
![Greedy-Lying-Bastards-Movie-Review[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/greedy-lying-bastards-movie-review1.jpg?resize=400%2C593&quality=83)
![coverstory1[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/coverstory11.jpg?resize=296%2C233&quality=83)
Did they include an address I can send my “I hate the earth” invoice to?
The trailer for this mocumentary mentions climategate. Seems rather odd that the producers would highlight the climategate evidence of their heroes own efforts to manipulate the circumstances to their advantage. Ah well, artistic license, I guess. ;->
[snip]
According to his bio he served in the FDR WH from age 23 to 29 I am absolutely positive he set policy and implemented all of these ( As far as I remember these lads were called mail boys in those days, me thinks he quaked a little to long no insult intended just a physical observation )
Is this the follow up to Dirty Rotten Scoundrels? Must be because that does look like Ruprecht sitting in the chair.
The “Victims” of the 2012 wildfires can also blame the lack of a real coherent policy for
fewer than 12 total USFS/BLM Airtankers nationwide.. from 44 in 2005 hmmm..
Well, what can I say?
We all know An Inconvenient Truth was a lie, and then the REAL Inconvenient Truth came along.
We already know who who the Greedy Lying Bastards are.
It’s amazing how they so persistently get things exactly backwards.
Projected projection ??
Do I recognize that kid on the cover – the kid who was the banjo player in Deliverance?
Well, maybe not …
.
Desperation breeds idiocy.
Should expect more of this kind of stuff from the Believers. As their faith is ever more tested as the gap between what they had hoped for, what they had expected and what is actually happening grows larger, they will get even crazier.
Because cognitive dissonance, no matter how fanatical, has bounds.
In my Notes From Skull Island I list 22 things that we climate contrarians (“skeptic” is too mild a term) would be doing differently if we were in fact well organized and well funded:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/12/16/notes-from-skull-island-why-skeptics-arent-well-funded-and-well-organized/
==========
Incidentally, I wish Our Side would devise a counter to the insinuation / smear that skeptical scientists’ “affiliations” with various think tanks indicates that they’re in their pockets. If a scientist is on a think tank’s advisory board, or some such position, is he getting paid? If so, how much? Are the insinuators counting only membership in such organizations as affiliations? Are they counting appearances at think tank events for which a fee was paid, or article publications in think tank journals as affiliations? If a think tank is the publisher of a scientist’s book, does that count?
If so, those are pretty weak reeds to hang an insinuation of corruption on. They certainly aren’t comparable to the large salaries or consulting fees the tobacco industry paid its scientists.
Our side should put its cards on the table and then demand that the other side do the same. How much of the same sort of thing is being done by the other side? Awards, honorariums, consulting fees, positions on various boards, revolving doors with gov’t. bigshots, backdoor gov’t. funding for enviro-savior organizations, etc.?
On what? If it was total donations to right-of-center think tanks that spent only 10% of their revenue on climate change–as is the likely situation–then only 10% of the Koch’s spending can honestly be counted as being spent “to dispel claims of global warming.”
“Between 1998 and 2012, “Greedy Lying Bastards” reports ExxonMobil spent over $27 million to dispel claims of global warming. The Koch brothers, who run the conglomerate Koch Industries, also provide significant funding. From 1997 through 2012, they spent over $67 million.”
I note that they say nothing about the amounts received by the warmists between 1998 and 2012.
IanM
ELF – is this the same affiliated group?
“Arsonists or Terrorists? Film Details Rise, Fall of Earth Liberation Front (ELF) Cell”
In “If a Tree Falls: A Story of the Earth Liberation Front,” filmmaker Marshal Curry looks at radical environmentalists who were named a top domestic terrorist threat by the FBI. …
The webpage linked below has the embedded video for the title above:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/environment/july-dec11/efp_09-01.html
.
Did anybody notice that the pictures of the ‘heros’ and the bastards are set to different backgrounds? The ‘heros’ all have what looks to be their original backgrounds while the bastard’s backgrounds are white. I wonder why they did this, could it be some kind of marketing thing…?
Slightly off topic:
Gil was pretty sure that 9/11 was treason partly because, when he was working in the FDR White House, he witnessed the congratulatory atmosphere there the day of Pearl Harbor. He believed the government had invited the attack to get people’s support to enter World War II,
Yeah, I read the book ‘Day of Deceit’ and am almost certain that not only did we provoke them into attacking us, we had broke their code and we knew we were going to get hit. This statement by Tans bolsters the book.
I watched the video clip:
Never saw it before (of course?).
Wow, he/they/we can and should do better than that on our worst day.
But, there it is, on WUWT.
[snip – per blog policy, we don’t get involved in the discussion of that – mod]
Pathetic.
(More OT -just a smidge <grin> okay mods?)
Hmmm … like the JFK assassination stuff, lotsa made-up stuff, little to actually support those ‘theories’ though (read more via Gerald Posner’s book “Case Closed”, search the web and read the affidavit of ear-witnesses on the 6th floor who heard the brass hitting the floor after each shot, etc.) …
The real design of these ‘folk’ is to sell books and videos, speak on-tour, etc.
.
[snip – not going there – mod]
“Filmed in the US, Tuvalu, Peru, England, Uganda, Kenya, Belgium, Denmark and Germany…”
Sweet gig. Walked?
kramer says:
March 7, 2013 at 6:12 pm
Yeah, I read the book ‘Day of Deceit’ and am almost certain that not only did we provoke them into attacking us,
=========
Lusitania – WWI
Gulf of Tonkin – Vietnam
WMD – Iraq
911 – Tower 7 collapse. Financial transactions never traced. 911 Hijacker passport found on ground.
Kennedy bullet found on stretcher. Oswald makes miracle shot on moving target with poor quality weapon and no sniper scope. Killed same day in police custody. Nixon in Dallas day before, was head of CIA under Nixon administration. Upset Kennedy beat him for Presidency. CIA used previously in political assassinations. Was Dallas CIA snipers also Watergate burglar?
James Earl Ray sentenced without trial for murder of Martin Luther King. Recants guilty plea. Finally wins right to trial but dies in prison after court date is announced.
I thank WUWT for noting my input about the recycled James Hoggan material. I may have to correct Mr Hoggan himself on one point, where in his blog page for the movie he says in paragraph 5 ( http://www.exposethebastards.com/jim_hoggan_clearing_the_pr_pollution_that_clouds_climate_science ) “DeSmogBlog.com, the website I co-founded in 2006 … ”
Well, a confirmation look at his earliest blog pieces ( http://www.desmogblog.com/blog/jim-hoggan?page=41 ) shows he posted three on October 31st, 2005, and his next were on Dec 1 2005, which basically makes me wrong about saying his WordPress blog was “pre-Desmogblog”.
Or…… wait a minute….. Try this little exercise: plop the phrase “The DeSmogBlog, founded in January 2006” into an internet search and see if you don’t see the same result here https://www.google.com/search?q=The+DeSmogBlog%2C+founded+in+January+2006 . Then try substituting the words December or October and the date 2005.
At least I see where my error came from, but instead of a nice tidy answer on its startup date, we have something of a hazy mess here………..
Pieter Tans has guts.
(Benign) psychological experiments have shown that when a person gets on an elevator with all the other people (stupidly) facing the back, the new entrant will also do so, simply to be part of the “herd.”
It is quite easy to dispel truth, simply by demonizing it and repeating the “big” lie over and over and over and over, until the “herd” accepts the untruth. ….Lady in Red
If he worked for FDR He must be over 100
No armchairs were harmed in the filming of this movie; viewers, though, will be ‘armed by the sharing of it.
==================