Guest Post by David Middleton
More improper activity from the Million Dollar Bureaucrat…
A Scientist’s Misguided Crusade
By JOE NOCERA
Published: March 4, 2013
Last Friday, at 3:40 p.m., the State Department released its “Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement” for the highly contentious Keystone XL pipeline, which Canada hopes to build to move its tar sands oil to refineries in the United States. In effect, the statement said there were no environmental impediments that would prevent President Obama from approving the pipeline.
Two hours and 20 minutes later, I received a blast e-mail containing a statement by James Hansen, the head of the Goddard Institute for Space Studies at NASA — i.e., NASA’s chief climate scientist. “Keystone XL, if the public were to allow our well-oiled government to shepherd it into existence, would be the first step down the wrong road, perpetuating our addiction to dirty fossil fuels, moving to ever dirtier ones,” it began. After claiming that the carbon in the tar sands “exceeds that in all oil burned in human history,” Hansen’s statement concluded: “The public must demand that the government begin serving the public’s interest, not the fossil fuel industry’s interest.”
As a private citizen, Hansen, 71, has the same First Amendment rights as everyone else. He can publicly oppose the Keystone XL pipeline if he so chooses, just as he can be as politically active as he wants to be in the anti-Keystone movement, and even be arrested during protests, something he managed to do recently in front of the White House.
But the blast e-mail didn’t come from James Hansen, private citizen. It specifically identified Hansen as the head of the Goddard Institute…
[…]
Yet what people hear from Hansen today is not so much his science but his broad, unscientific views on, say, the evils of oil companies.
[…]
For a midlevel scientist at the Goddard Institute, what signal is Hansen sending when he takes the day off to get arrested at the White House? Do his colleagues feel unfettered in their own work? There is, in fact, enormous resentment toward Hansen inside NASA, where many officials feel that their solid, analytical work on climate science is being lost in what many of them describe as “the Hansen sideshow.”
[…]
Hansen should be fired and prosecuted for misusing his office and title as a NASA director in an effort to push his political agenda (the Hatch Act).
The Hatch Act grew out of nineteenth-century concerns about the political activities of federal employees. As early as 1801, President Thomas Jefferson issued an Executive Order that said federal workers should neither “influence the votes of others, nor take part in the business of electioneering.” He saw such activities as “inconsistent with the spirit of the Constitution.” Jefferson was primarily concerned with what government employees did while in office; subsequently, concerns developed in another area. Throughout the nineteenth century, appointments to the federal bureaucracy were viewed as the natural spoils of political success. The prevalent awarding of jobs for political loyalty created a so-called spoils system and, ultimately, a reaction against it.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Doug Huffman and Justthinkin,
. . oh yeah, that’s right, now that I hear his name . . so writing him about Hansen would be worthless . . . or less than worthless . . .
Hansen’s credibility has drained all the respect I had for NASA. Just like our federal government; NASA has bloated itself to the point that it’s just another “black hole” for our tax dollars. Facts is facts, and politics is politics. But in our federal government and NASA; politics is facts.
Goes to show how ignorant Hansen must be.
It’s not “tar sands” – tar is a byproduct of coal.
Its called the “oil sands” – he can’t even get what it is he is talking about straight.
Indeed! The nature’s worst and largest environmental oil spill is being cleaned up, one shovel of sand at a time. Hansen should be lauding great praise instead of vitriol.
Sorry Doug but green activism is political activism. Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace and the WWF all receive substantial (FoE Europe almost 6o% of its income) amounts of cash from the European Commission (unelected beaurocrats who dictate European policy) to lobby the European Parliament (federalist rubber-stamp of the Commissions dictates) to approve the tax-grabbing “environmental” taxes that fund the increasing beaurocacy and expansionism of the Commission. One big socialist, money sucking, economy destroying, academia entrenching, media greasing, politics corrupting, green activism merry-go-round.
To paraphrase Thatcher it will only stop when they run out of other peoples money.
He should be sent to the space station or be fired! Better just sent to outer space.
Have fun believing that James Hansen will be fired. The way politics work in this country now is if you are advantageous to the one in power, the ones in power will always look the other way unless the media forces their hand. And since most of the media has a liberal-fetish, not enough of them will cause an outcry to cause this administration to prosecute the man.
Draft – ETHICS AND ASYMMETRY: SKIN IN THE GAME AS A REQUIRED HEURISTIC FOR ACTING UNDER UNCERTAINTY
C. Sandis & N.N. Taleb
Abstract: We propose a global and mandatory heuristic that anyone involved in an action that can possibly generate harm for others, even probabilistically, should be required to be exposed to some damage, regardless of context. We link the rule to various philosophical approaches to ethics and moral luck.
http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/SandisTaleb.pdf
There are certainly very many scientists doing excellent work at NASA and keeping their political opinions to themselves. The same also applies to other organisations like the Royal Society and the AGU.
The problem is that the upper echelons of these groups have been infiltrated by radical red/green environmental fanatics, who misrepresent the organisations they lead as being wholly in agreement with their distorted worldview. That’s how it’s made to look as though the majority of scientists worldwide are worried about man-made climate change, which I’m convinced is not the case.
I’m sure Hansen is despised by many NASA scientists for his behaviour, and it seems clear to me he is probably violating every clause in his employment contract by using his position in the way that he has, but he’s been doing it for years now and nothing has happened to him.
NASA is a government agency; it’s controlled by the present Democratic Obama administration, who also control the EPA.
For this reason NASA, as an organisation, is no longer the epitome of scientific integrity it used to be, despite the continued outstanding work of its individual scientists. It is tainted with the ‘new-Left’ politics of climate alarmism and all the appalling prostitution of science that goes with it.
Hansen is safe as long as this travesty continues, and he knows it.
And America has just voted for another four years of it.
It’s just wrong for a climate scientist to speak out about the effect of digging up oil sands on climate. They should keep quiet and stick to writing papers. It won’t hurt for a few years in any case, even if what he says is true. By then we’ll have figured out how to get the CO2 back out of the air.
Although I agree that scientists shouldn’t communicate with the public on their science findings (not about climate science anyway, maybe it’s okay in some areas), I’m not sure that when they do it can be classed as “electioneering”.
“Electioneering” would be touting votes for a particular candidate or party, wouldn’t it?
Even saying that “The public must demand that the government begin serving the public’s interest, not the fossil fuel industry’s interest” isn’t ‘electioneering. So I think David Middleton is misguided there.
Do I know you Jimbo?
But the blast e-mail didn’t come from James Hansen, private citizen. It specifically identified Hansen as the head of the Goddard Institute…
———————————————————————–
The warmunists were seeing red (pun intended) when the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine ran their Global Warming Petition because the cover letter looked similar to National Academy of Sciences publications, but it’s no problemo when their guy preaches from the steps of the Goddard Institute.
@albertalad
Well said, your description of the oil sands project. It is without doubt the largest cleanup in history and one day people will be able to farm there.
What really bothers the greens is that there is just so much oil so easily accessible. If only they could find a way to blame humans for the original spill!
Odd that Mr. Hansen hasn’t commented on all that fracking going on around Williston, North Dakota and having oil shipped in Warren Buffets CO2 free train tank cars. Guess they are cleaning up those oily shales and not using a “dirty” pipeline to ship it. Maybe it is too close for Hansen’s myopic vision to see. /sarc off
A few weeks ago I posted a short rhyme about James Hansen and ever since have been beating myself up for writing something so trite about such an “epic” person. I have felt compelled to replace that poem with a poem of a more epic grade of trite.
Old Death Train Hansen —
Always Good For A Laugh
More holy-than-thou
He warns us of Venus
The only thing now
That hardens his penis
He rants at the crowds
A coot with the hypers
His mind in the clouds
A load in his diapers
He quotes from the Greens
— We work for the many —
(Diversity means
The colors of money)
He quotes from the Reds
— Consensus is dictum —
(God socialist heads
Are all up one rectum)
His ego is vast
He’s all global swarming
He moment won’t last
There’s no global warming
Eugene WR Gallun
AH!!!!!!!! Good socialist heads — please please change it for me !!!
Technically he appears to be violating C.F.R. § 2635.807…
It really doesn’t matter what rules or regulations Hansen is violating – NASA has said (in so many words) that they are just going to look the other way. NASA GSFC in Maryland is responsible for the controversial NASA GISS – take your complaints to them and see what they say.
Did you know Hansen makes close to $200,000 a year in his “job”? This is why he doesn’t care about destroying thousands of jobs in the energy sector…he has made his money using the SAME energy sources he now seeks to destroy…
Does anyone know how GISS heats their buildings in expen$ive downtown NYC? Do they use solar panels, wind turbines, and switchgrass??
Frank K.,
Did you know that Hansen makes many hundreds of thousands more than his pay by accepting awards? The number is now over a million….
Hansen is to GISS as the Wizard is to Oz.
John
Martin says:
March 5, 2013 at 5:50 pm
It’s just wrong for a climate scientist to speak out about the effect of digging up oil sands on climate. They should keep quiet and stick to writing papers. It won’t hurt for a few years in any case, even if what he says is true. By then we’ll have figured out how to get the CO2 back out of the air.
************************************************************************************************
Why would we spend billions removing a beneficial trace gas from the air? If some people think it’s worth it, maybe it could be arranged on a donation basis.
Steve T
He seems to have a case ethical Hansen’s disease. The disease seems to be quite contagious. It seems to be quite prevalent in the Washington D.C. area. My latest theory is that it is somehow transmitted by the handling of money.