Too funny! Even Joe Romm's bosses don't think climate is an issue worth mentioning for 2013

ClimateProgress

Romm must be fuming. After disappearing his formerly independent “Climate Progress” blog and merging it with the main Think Progress website, where he’s lucky to get a dozen comments a day. His parent organization, Think Progress, utterly fails to mention The Most Important Issue of All Time as a top issue for 2013. Oooh, that’s gotta hurt.

This morning, 31 December 2012, Think Progress provided 12 Progressive Resolutions for 2013. From better drug policy to immigration reform to enacting gun safety laws, many interesting (if not outright good) items in this list. Again, however, the telling thing is the absence of a critical set of issues.

Amid these 12, no (zero, nada, nilch) reference to climate change, the climate cliff, environment, clean energy, green jobs, energy efficiency, fossil fuel impacts on the political system, …

From Get Energy Smart NOW!  Stunning Think Progress Climate Silence

It is just one more indication that even the people pushing the issue don’t really much believe in it anymore, especially when we’ve had over a decade of no warming.

h/t to Tom Nelson

In related news, Bill McKibben has apparently gone insane with this latest statement:

‘Fossil-Fuel Companies Have Become Outlaws Against The Laws Of Physics’

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
117 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Matt Skaggs
January 1, 2013 7:52 am

As the new year dawns, lets not forget that sustainability is a moral imperative quite independent from CAGW.

Mike Roddy
January 1, 2013 8:15 am

McKibben was too kind. “Criminals” is a much more appropriate term than “outlaws”. The fossil fuel companies are knowingly baking the planet, and are killing people every day. This site just proves the WC Fields adage: “There’s a sucker born every minute!”

mark fraser
January 1, 2013 8:32 am

didn’t some socio-political strategist once utter the words “control the land and you control the people”?

normalnew
January 1, 2013 8:37 am

Romm will have a hard time with climate not beeing on that list, but I think nr.12 will make him go hyper-thermo-nuclear 🙂
12. Invest in infrastructure.
Our roads and bridges are literally crumbling, and analysts say the nation will need to make $2 trillion in immediate investments to update infrastructure. Hurricane Sandy underlined the problem, when 8.1 million people -– in homes, businesses, and hospitals — lost power.

DirkH
January 1, 2013 8:56 am

Mike Roddy says:
January 1, 2013 at 8:15 am
“The fossil fuel companies are knowingly baking the planet, and are killing people every day. ”
No more ambulances, police cars and trucks delivering food in Mike Roddy’s world. Mike, how’s the Hollywood climate movie project going? Hope the good guys win using muscle power (and no handguns, as production of steel is a no-no.)

KPO
January 1, 2013 9:01 am

Mike Roddy says: ‘McKibben was too kind. “Criminals” is a much more appropriate term than “outlaws”.
Yep Mike, gotta identify, form a possy and round up all them “criminals” before its too late hey. Better get working on them re-education camps, no time to lose, because there’s murderers running amok all around us. Now take those meds and calm down, everythings fine.

thallstd
January 1, 2013 9:14 am

I wouldn’t celebrate just yet. Winning the blog wars is certainly better than losing them but not likely to have any/much impact on policy. This admin doesn’t factor evidence into it’s actions and doesn’t restrict it’s actions to constitutional limits. The EPA, whether under the leadership of Lisa Jackson or someone else will likely continue to implement costly and ineffective regulations aimed at CO2 mitigation.

January 1, 2013 9:37 am

Markx wrote on December 31, 2012 at 8:30 pm: “That bit of CAGW preaching by McKibben on the WSJ letters page is nicely countered on the same page by… [and the earlier] very mathematically practical article by Robert Bryce…”
If Markx’s links don’t work, try these:
“Harvard Needs Remedial Energy Math,” by Robert Bryce
December 16, 2012
http://www.globalwarming.org/2012/12/17/harvard-needs-remedial-energy-math-robert-bryce/
= http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324640104578161593492943144.html
= http://pages.citebite.com/m8o7s9t9iydh
Letters in response:
December 25, 2012
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323723104578187623383055986.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_MIDDLEThirdBucket
= http://pages.citebite.com/e8m7e9r8vmyo

Andy Wilkins
January 1, 2013 9:46 am

I’m afraid I couldn’t resist, and posted the following comment at Joe Romm’s latest little screed at http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/01/01/1381111/new-year-open-thread-whats-your-climate-resolution/#comment-634711
“My new year’s resolution (target?) is to not get my comments removed by ThinkProgress just because my view on global warming/climate change/climate disruption/extreme weather/call-it-what-you-will is not the same as Joe Romm’s.
A seventeen year long warming plateau is very hard to reconcile with the exponentially increasing ‘Hockey Stick’ temperature curve created by Michael Mann and waved around by Al Gore in his famous film.
So Joe, are you going to rise to the challenge and let my comment stand? Because, let’s face it, you’re getting so few people posting comments on your blog that I’d imagine you must be desperate for any comment you can get, no matter how critical it is of the CAGW hypothesis.
Happy New Year!”
I’d say to everyone here at WUWT to go and have a look in about 30 mins, but I doubt it’ll be there as I think I might be black-listed by Joltin’ Joe ever since I got into a hilarious e-mail conversation with him and he managed to work himself into a frenzy of spittle-flecked rage just because I wouldn’t believe that Man and his evil see-oh-toos wasn’t about to bring about Thermageddon.
Happy New Year to all of us here at WUWT (a ‘slightly’ more wider-read blog than Joe’s ;))

John West
January 1, 2013 9:47 am

Matt Skaggs
No, progress toward expansion off this planet is the moral imperative. Otherwise all of Earth’s ecology will be extinguished eventually. To this end we need the driving force that is population increase. So from my POV all you low entropy, sustainable, low population advocates are being short sided and endangering all known life in the long run.

January 1, 2013 10:01 am

Matt Skaggs
Please define “sustainability”.

TRM
January 1, 2013 10:04 am

Ah the rude rock of reality that the bad ship CAGW has run into …..
A very good start to the new year!
Cheers everyone. Here’s hoping you didn’t overdo it last night.

MAC
January 1, 2013 10:08 am

I saw that comment about CO2 gas trapped in a corked bottle. Maybe we should have a massive protest with everyone carrying bottled CO2 (from their own breath) and then threaten the public on releasing the gas in a city. Probably get arrested for releasing a pollutant (per the EPA). I’m sure a bunch of CAGW apologists will sure start jawing about this threat of releasing CO2 unbeknownst to them that they’ve just released many more times the amount of CO2 expelling their own hot air publicly.

January 1, 2013 10:15 am

My daughter just mentioned – I had completely forgotten – that in our New Jersey winters we always used to have huge icicles all around the roofline of the house. When the kids were little and they were outside playing in the snow, they used to break them off like they were giant popsicles. I haven’t seen them in years. You really don’t need a physicist to tell you that the world is warming, and that the weather has become terrifyingly violent. It’s obvious. Somebody up in the thread toasted CO2 as the giver of green life. Indeed it is – it traps heat from the sun, otherwise, we’d be as cold as the moon. But just like water is essential to life, too much will drown you. Excessive CO2 such as we are adding by burning fuel, and the earth will become too hot to be habitable – by people, and a lot of what we like to eat.

Kev-in-Uk
January 1, 2013 10:18 am

Andy Wilkins says:
January 1, 2013 at 9:46 am
Am annoyed with you now! 😉
I went to see if you comment was there – it wasn’t – but I was ‘forced’ to read through several comments of complete crapola whilst looking…..
urgh, I feel all ‘contaminated’, like someone has just clogged up my BS filters to overload!
Have never been to that site before – and will never go again!

MAC
January 1, 2013 10:21 am

Instead of answering in Climate Progress on the new year’s resolution in regard to climate change I’ll put it in here.
My resolution is to burn more gasoline without the ethanol additive so that there would be more corn available for cows and pigs as a feedstock as well as food for people. Got to keep the BBQing culture alive.
Expel more natural CO2 (i.e more exercising) from my own body into the surrounding air.
Recognize the fact that those who use the term “deniers” are people who think ad hominems make valid arguments. And that’s red flag on their own knowledge of the subject.
Tell global warmists to talk less so as not to expel dangerous CO2 gas into the surrounding air.

TRM
January 1, 2013 10:23 am

“Matt Skaggs says: January 1, 2013 at 7:52 am
As the new year dawns, lets not forget that sustainability is a moral imperative quite independent from CAGW.”
I agree we need to take better care of our home but the biggest problem is a trillion dollar a year global arms race. Name me a problem you can’t solve with a trillion dollars a year thrown at it. You can’t because it doesn’t exist. No I’m not a bleary eyed unilateral disarm type but do you remember the boom in the 1990s? I sure do. It was the biggest growth in the world economy with more people getting a higher standard of living than at any time in human history. That my friend was due to a 10% cut in the global arms race. Imagine a 15 or 20 percent redirection of resources. Good times for all baby, good times for all.
I’ve always been a fan of efficiency just because it is a smarter way to do things (IMHO). Sustainability is a buzzword that has yet to be done. Nobody has done it yet. Great goal but being more efficient in resource utilization is the first step.
A reliable, cheap, efficient and clean source of energy is the foundation of any serious long term plan. Right now it is natural gas which nothing else can touch. As I said a few years ago that is the new baseline that alternatives (all other energy sources, not just wind and solar but coal, nuclear, hydro etc) will have to be competitive with.

Liberal Skeptic
January 1, 2013 10:37 am

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/01/01/1381111/new-year-open-thread-whats-your-climate-resolution/
What a bunch of luddites this lot are, if our ancestors accepted the proposition that when you identify problems with technology you abandon technology, full nutrition etc we wouldn’t be where we are today.
Human endeavour will find solutions to whatever challenges we face through innovation and adaptation. Not by abandoning that which allows our society to function.

Roger Knights
January 1, 2013 10:45 am

McKibben
‘they spend hundreds of millions of dollars daily looking for more. If their business plan is carried out, the planet tanks.’
========
arthur4563 says:
January 1, 2013 at 7:03 am
Understanding the almost total lack of coherent logic amongst those desperately searching for something, anything, that will frighten the public requires the services of a good psychotherapist (none exist). They don’t search for truth – they manufacture their own version, and it is
totally at odds with both logic and the scientific method.

Here’s their motto: “Moderation is in defense of Gaia is no virtue; Alarmism in defense of Gaia is no vice.”

KPO
January 1, 2013 10:50 am

Mike Roddy says: January 1, 2013 at 8:15 am ‘
Better yet Mike, give us a sneak preview of the new world order you and your ilk have envisioned for us. You know the one where everybody works in a perpetual state of euphoria making everything from fairy dust using only sun beams and happy thoughts, sorta like the Bakers biscuit factory, or in your case the “sucker factory” where you’ve figured out perpetual motion and can summon objects into existence, like a bad/or good 60’s acid trip. Wow, into the Hollywood climate movie business then, Mike? Remember though if you make it big, no grand exits from the Limo, no bright lights, no expansive sound stages, and no tearful homage to Gaia – Ah well, too bad, small sacrifice for the planet hey? Come on Mike, there’s a lot of smart folks figuring out how to come up with workable solutions, even most of your “criminals”. And you want to put them all away, because that’s what you do to “criminals” don’t you Mike?

Mike McMillan
January 1, 2013 10:58 am

Happy and Prosperous New Year, gang.
Or at least may our happiness anomaly slide into positive range. Thanks again to all the experts who’ve shared their insights with us climate tourists.

January 1, 2013 11:00 am

TRM said:
January 1, 2013 at 10:04 am
Ah the rude rock of reality that the bad ship CAGW has run into …..
——————————————-
Rude rock? Intransigent iceberg! 🙂

Mike McMillan
January 1, 2013 11:00 am

archonix says: January 1, 2013 at 10:01 am
Matt Skaggs
Please define “sustainability”.

Getting more out of something than you put into it, i.e., Profitable.

January 1, 2013 11:10 am

Meanwhile..the grass keeps growing, the sun still rises every day and the animals are quite happy frolicking in the paddocks and life continues.
It does appear that those people who have wished the worst, fail to comprehend the obvious and prefer their own generated hysterics and assumptions to reality. These same culprits will unfortunately never admit they were wrong as former communist members in the USSR have demonstrated with their remembrance of that last anniversary, wishing for the “Good Ole Days”. They only look at the changing situations and circumstance and say they lost, in reality, they were just completely wrong but their ego would suffer way too much by that confession.
Happy New Year.

January 1, 2013 11:12 am

There is a perfect new job oportunity for JoeR at the PooPowerCo.
http://inhabitat.com/spiffy-backpack-traps-bovine-gas/