UPDATE: There are so many respondents (thank you) and since it is clear that about 97% of WUWT readers hadn’t seen/participated in 2010 Lewandowsky survey, that we’ve added a second thread to get the most important part of the data.
You can still record your participation/non-participation below in the question form, but if you DID PARTICPATE in 2010 please also see this new thread:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/14/the-lewandowsky-participation-census-re-booted/
People who previously answered that they DID participate in 2010 are encourage to drop a note in comments at that new thread.
At the suggestion of Steve McIntyre, I’m posting this request because we know that both AGW proponents and skeptics alike read WUWT daily. It therefore is the most broad reaching venue to ask this simple question:
Did you participate in the Lewandowsky conspiracy opinions survey anywhere in the year 2010 on any blog? (if you are unfamiliar with it and don’t know if you did/did not, read Lewandowsky’s paper here)
There are two steps: First I ask you to do the poll below, then leave a comment with your usual handle in the comment section signifying your answering the question.
Note that unlike the Lewandowsky poll, safeguards are in place to prevent vote stuffing.
Step 1: Answer the question below
Step2: Leave a comment in your usual handle/name below stating your answer in Step 1 (note Steve’s re-boot at the top of WUWT to leave a comment in the other thread if you did participate).
This will be a sticky top post for a few days. Please ONLY LEAVE COMMENTS ABOUT YOUR PARTICIPATION YES/NO. Most others will be deleted. Thanks for your consideration – Anthony
Skeptic/realist, did not participate
skeptic – I DID NOT participate in the Lewandowsky Survey in 2010
(Note: for the record, my ‘usual handle/name’ has been “Russell C” here, but my signup with WordPress late last year forced me to choose “therussellcook”under my primary email address, which I have also used here on a few occasions. I have recently left comments here using the slightly more convenient Twitter sign-in procedure, “Russell Cook (@questionAGW)”, too.
Skeptic, did not participate
Polling, it seems, can get complicated 🙂
God help the neophyte !!
I am a truth seeker and I did not cooperate with Professor Lewandowsky and his vile and nonsensical, so-called “survey”.
It has now been 6 hours since the first reply on this thread. There are now over 648 responses. Over 100 per hour.
I am a GW skeptic, an AGW skeptic and a CAGW skeptic. I never saw and did not participate in the above-mentioned survey.
RTF
Sceptic, did not participate.
Skeptic; no.
I do not remember seeing the survey and I am sure I did not participate. If I would of I would of not taken it seriously because the questions are so ridiculous.
Was not invited to participate and so being in blissful ignorance did not do so.Can’t imagine what good it would have done if I did. Which I didn’t;
Kindest Regards
Skeptic, did not participate
I’m a skeptic and I never saw the survey –and I’m around enough on these blogs that I “should” have seen it.
I’ve been a sceptic since 2008 when I found Climate Audit, WUWT, Bishop Hill and the Air Vent et al. I started professionallyas science graduate and while I’m a sceptic, I also have all my senses and intellect in good order. I look at the above sites several times a day – every day and read many news sites as often. I did not see or know of this questionnaire.
Summary: sceptic ; no.
Voted option 2. Know the truth. CO2 is good for the environment, and can’t even come close to having as great an influence in regulating the planet’s energy stores as plain old water. Never saw the poll on any site.
Skeptic, did NOT participate in lew poll
did not participate
No, Snake Oil Baron, I’M Spartacus – and therefore question authority. Really a lukewarmer, but because I’ sceptical of climate (and any science). But I did not have sex with than survey – Mr Lewan(dow)sky. Apologies for the humour in poor taste, but one can only laugh or cry at this episode, and there are too many things to weep over!
skeptic – did not participate
Sceptic. Did not participate nor was I aware it existed.
Having seen the questions I wouldn’t have responded if I did know about the poll.
Skeptical and did not do the original Lew. survey
tertius
Skeptic, did not participate.
I did not participate. Skeptical.
Skeptic, i.e., scientist (not “scientist”) – did not participate in 2010 survey.
Skeptic, did not participate or even know about it.