From the producer:
I wanted to reach out and inform you that the film was recently completed and virtually launched on our website, August 24th, 2012.
Every Global Warming prediction, has proven to be science fiction. Uncover the truth as we expose the shepherds of Climate Change in this new controversial
documentary. Introducing first time filmmakers Pete Garcia II (director), Jesse Jones (writer), Deyvis Martinez (dp), Will Rich (sound) in their debut feature length
film. Independently funded, this indie documentary in not associated with any corporate sponsorship or funding whatsoever. No hidden agendas, just the COLD
truth. Support our grassroots campaign through word of mouth.Help spread the word!
Watch “The Boy Who Cried Warming” in full length at the website:
http://www.TheBoyWhoCriedWarming.com/
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Area isn’t mass. If you prefer I don’t have to call it a cherry pick, arguing against a case I’m not making is also a straw man fallacy.
I was there. I saw the stories in Time and Newsweek about the new Ice Age. Take your pick and ….
Look forward to watching this , btw what happened with acid rain ? I seem to remember pictures of dead forests dead fish , stories of lakes turned to battery acid , well maybe vinegar and it was all down to us but now it seems to have just evaporated from memory .
Is that the renowned scientific journals Time and Newsweek? Doesn’t say much for your skepticism. I make it a rule never to take anything I read in the media at face value, especially where science is concerned, they are, unfailingly, looking for a dramatic angle to better shift copy.
Nations acted, the problem was much reduced. Perhaps a lesson to be learned there?
Kevin MacDonald says: {making solid, unrefuted points on many fronts}
======================
Kevin, I’m sure you do consider the character of the site you’re posting on, and the history of the individuals you are interacting with …. understand, tho’, that there observers of your exchanges who chuckle at the futility and weakness-of-argument made by those trying to counter your points. It’s not their minds that will be influenced in any way, rather, those with some semblance of fair open-mindedness who might weigh the relative strength of arguments.
TomT says:
August 30, 2012 at 8:16 am
“These cycles were discovered by scientific research. By the same group of folks that are describing AGW.”
Not true. The “AGW folks” have sought to minimize the works of researchers that have publicized cyclical data. Wikipedia for example was rewritten by 1 author. The IPCC conclusions rewritten by 1 author.
The key word: rapidity.
Humans have gone from using 4% if the earths surface to using 40% over the past 150 years. Our cities alone now use as much land surface as was used for cities and agriculture combined 150 years ago. Yet, the AGW folks seek to minimize the effects this extremely rapid land change is having on local weather and temperatures, in an effort to promote their own policies.
How best to deal with climate change is not Climate Science, it is Economic and Technical policy. By seeking to involve themselves in policy, Climate Scientists are no longer working as scientists. They are working as policy advocates, which brings then into a conflict of interest, which reduces their credibility.
Science is supposed to be policy neutral to eliminate bias. When you seek to advocate one policy over another you have introduced bias in the direction of your policy, and are no longer neutral.
I see there is a copy on ebay.
I see there is a copy on ebay
That link was http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=330792119407