Expansion of forests in the European Arctic could result in the release of carbon dioxide

From the University of Exeter , terrible news:

Carbon stored in Arctic tundra could be released into the atmosphere by new trees growing in the warmer region, exacerbating climate change, scientists have revealed.

The Arctic is getting greener as plant growth increases in response to a warmer climate. This greater plant growth means more carbon is stored in the increasing biomass, so it was previously thought the greening would result in more carbon dioxide being taken up from the atmosphere, thus helping to reduce the rate of global warming.

However, research published in Nature Climate Change, shows that, by stimulating decomposition rates in soils, the expansion of forest into tundra in arctic Sweden could result in the release of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.

Dr Iain Hartley now based in Geography at the University of Exeter, and lead author of the paper, said: “Determining directly how carbon storage is changing in high-latitude ecosystems is very difficult because the majority of the carbon present is stored below ground in the soils. Our work indicates that greater plant biomass may not always translate into greater carbon storage at the ecosystem level.

“We need to better understand how the anticipated changes in the distribution of different plant communities in the Arctic affects the decomposition of the large carbon stocks in tundra soils if we are to be able to predict how arctic greening will affect carbon dioxide uptake or release in the future.”

By measuring carbon stocks in vegetation and soils between tundra and neighbouring birch forest, it was shown that compared to tundra, the two-fold greater carbon storage in plant biomass in the forest was more than outweighed by the smaller carbon stocks in forest soils.

Furthermore, using a novel methodology based on measuring the radiocarbon content of the carbon dioxide being released, the researchers found that the birch trees appeared to be stimulating the decomposition of soil organic matter. Thus, the research was able to identify a mechanism by which the birch trees can contribute directly to reducing carbon storage in soils.

“Dr Gareth Phoenix, of the University of Sheffield’s Department Animal and Plant Sciences, who collaborated on the research, added:

“It shows that the encroachment of trees onto Arctic tundra caused by the warming may cause large release of carbon to the atmosphere, which would be bad for global warming.

“This is because tundra soil contains a lot of stored organic matter, due to slow decomposition, but the trees stimulate the decomposition of this material. So, where before we thought trees moving onto tundra would increase carbon storage it seems the opposite may be true. So, more bad news for climate change.”

The results of the study are in sharp contrast to the predictions of models which expect total carbon storage to increase with the greater plant growth. Rather, this research suggests that colonisation by productive, high-biomass, plant communities in the Arctic may not always result in greater capture of carbon dioxide, but instead net losses of carbon are possible if the decomposition of the large carbon stocks in Arctic soils are stimulated. This is important as Arctic soils currently store more carbon than is present in the atmosphere as carbon dioxide and thus have considerable potential to affect rates of climate change. It is yet to be seen whether this observed pattern is confined to certain soil conditions and colonising tree species, or whether the carbon stocks in the soils of other arctic or alpine ecosystems may be vulnerable to colonisation by new plant communities as the climate continues to warm.

###

The research took place within the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)-funded Arctic Biosphere Atmosphere Coupling at Multiple Scales project (ABACUS; www.abacus-ipy.org) which was led by the University of Edinburgh. This particular study was carried out by a team from the University of Exeter, University of Stirling, NERC Radiocarbon Facility, James Hutton Institute (Aberdeen), the University of Sheffield, and Heriot-Watt University.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

62 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 18, 2012 3:12 am

More Green nonsense. They do not give up in their alarmism and their hands out for more money (it is possible; we need to better understand etc)

cui bono
June 18, 2012 3:15 am

These people would depress a hyena. Trees, no trees, you can’t win!

June 18, 2012 3:21 am

“could result”, “scientists have revealed”, “may cause”, “we need to better understand how”, “as the climate continues to warm”.
Oh my!

richard
June 18, 2012 3:22 am

i remember a few years back talking to a guy at Reading university about funding, he said scientists would fight like dogs for the little available and they would not be adverse to a bit of back stabbing.
Then along came agw, as long as co2 is mentioned the floodgates open. You need to check out Phil Jones UEA( university of easy access) see what their funding was pre – agw scare and post.

Eyal Porat
June 18, 2012 3:26 am

Yes, it is defintely worse than we thought.

GabrielHBay
June 18, 2012 3:32 am

Well, we all know what the answer is… have a team on standby and the moment a tree rears its ugly little head in the arctic, cut the m****rf*****r down!
/sarc
Impossible to make a reasonable comment to this nonsense. May be true, but who cares? Irrelevant in the total scheme of things.

Saaad
June 18, 2012 3:34 am

Oh quick, let’s chop down the rest of the amazon rainforest to compensate…..oh wait…..(sarc off)

Peter Miller
June 18, 2012 3:35 am

Why on Earth would anyone ever study this unless there was an already pre-determined conclusion?
Presumably the new birch and other trees contain no carbon – sarc.

Mike M
June 18, 2012 3:47 am

This proves what I have always said, the green movement has absolutely nothing to do with the color of trees.

garymount
June 18, 2012 3:48 am

Solution found:

h/t SDA http://www.smalldeadanimals.com/

Christopher Hanley
June 18, 2012 3:52 am

How interesting.
From the breathless tone, you wouldn’t think that we have the good fortune to be living in one of those interglacials that have briefly punctuated the past few million years — but not quite as agreeable as it could be if it was about a degree or two warmer and the CO2 level was around, say, 900 ppm.

June 18, 2012 4:06 am

Just in time for Rio…..

Richard Briscoe
June 18, 2012 4:06 am

“We need to better understand how the anticipated changes in the distribution of different plant communities in the Arctic affects the decomposition of the large carbon stocks in tundra soils if we are to be able to predict how arctic greening will affect carbon dioxide uptake or release in the future.”
Translation for the layman:
“Give me more money”

June 18, 2012 4:09 am

Damned if we do and damned if we don’t; and scammed if we will and scammed if we won’t. Nothing matters anymore.

Lawrie Ayres
June 18, 2012 4:10 am

More rubbish science. Must be a UN party somewhere soon. I wasn’t aware there was warming in the tundra regions or else where either yet these “scientists” always start with “due to warming…..”. Must be good money in prostituting one’s principles.

Bruce Cobb
June 18, 2012 4:17 am

Yessirree, looks like a tipping point. It’s Serreze’s “Arctic Death Spiral” for sure. The end is nigh. Seriously? They get paid to produce such bilge?

AndyG55
June 18, 2012 4:21 am

Good, the darn carbon has been locked up for too long.
Plants LUV CO2 !!

tango
June 18, 2012 4:26 am

the water melon heads will not get into there heads that more C02 the better off we will be

June 18, 2012 4:27 am

Bad trees for encroaching into the Arctic. That ASV Mulcher would do the trick, great machine.

Stephen Richards
June 18, 2012 4:32 am

Just look at the alarmist connections here. Exeter (met off), Edinburgh, Boldin? It goes on and on.

RoyFOMR
June 18, 2012 4:32 am

Simples. Just dig up the carbon-rich soil and move it north using fleets of solar powered bulldozers.

Richdo
June 18, 2012 4:32 am

“…the researchers found that the birch trees appeared to be stimulating the decomposition of soil organic matter.”
Well of course they do. co2 is their primary food; more is better. Not surprising that they’d have evolved mechanisms to stimulate it’s release into a useable form. Seems the trees are smarter than the “climate scientists” studying them.

Nerd
June 18, 2012 4:37 am

You need heat to compost leaves, wood chips, grass clippings, etc.
Makes sense.
/sarc

cui bono
June 18, 2012 4:37 am

There’s only one way to deal with those pesky planet-destroying trees:

R Barker
June 18, 2012 4:57 am

So, George Orwell, what do you think of that?

1 2 3