Readers may have noticed the WUWT ENSO meter is in the neutral zone.
Bob Tisdale asks where it will head next.
Guest post by Bob Tisdale
Last year about this time, the El Niño-Southern Oscillations (ENSO) models from around the globe predicted ENSO-neutral to El Niño conditions for the 2011/12 ENSO season. But the two siblings (El Niño and La Niña) decided that it was La Niña’s turn to alter weather patterns globally. This year, the models are predicting the same as last year: Some are predicting El Niño conditions, while others are leaning to ENSO-neutral.
If it’s an El Niño, it’s possible global surface temperature anomalies would set a new record high next year in some of the products used to display that metric. If it’s not, global surface temperatures are not as likely to present new record highs. Record global surface temperature levels or lack thereof, of course, stimulate claims on both sides of the anthropogenic global warming debate and serve as a basis for discussions.
So, readers, which will it be for the upcoming ENSO season: an El Niño, ENSO-neutral conditions, or a back-to-back-to-back/three-peat/triple-dip La Niña?
Don’t ask me; I don’t make predictions. But I would like to see two possible outcomes that are discussed in the closing.
Here are some visual aids to help you soothsayers with your prognostications.
Figures 1, 2 and 3 show the ENSO model forecasts from April 23, 2012 and May 9, 2011. The 2012 forecasts are from the latest NOAA/CPC ENSO Diagnostic Discussion that I downloaded on Monday April 30th. The 2011 forecasts from May 2011 are from the same website but archived on the Wayback Machine. To save you some time searching, I’ve uploaded and stored the two NOAA pdf documents at my website here (2012) and here (2011). Keep in mind the forecasts blew it last year: there was a La Niña for the 2011/12 season.
Figure 1 (Click to enlarge)
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Figure 2 (Click to enlarge)
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Figure 3 (Click to enlarge)
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Figure 4 shows the 2012 and 2011 subsurface temperature anomalies for the equatorial Pacific. There are elevated subsurface temperature anomalies present at depth in the western equatorial Pacific in both years, while the pocket of warmer-than-normal subsurface waters in the east was larger last year.
Figure 4 (Click to enlarge)
The Australia’s Bureau of Meteorology (BOM) Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) data from Jan 1982 to April 2012 is shown in Figure 5. With the SOI, El Niño events are the sustained negative spikes and the La Niña events are positive ones. The SOI is an ENSO index that represents the difference in sea level pressure between Tahiti and Darwin Australia. The BOM standardizes the data and then multiplies it by 10. The April 2012 value of -7.1 is of interest because as the BOM notes on their Glossary webpage for the SOI:
Sustained negative values of the SOI greater than −8 often indicate El Niño episodes. These negative values are usually accompanied by sustained warming of the central and eastern tropical Pacific Ocean, a decrease in the strength of the Pacific Trade Winds, and a reduction in winter and spring rainfall over much of eastern Australia and the Top End. You can read more about historical El Niño events and their effect on Australia in the Detailed analysis of past El Niño events.
Figure 5
Like the SOI, El Niño events in NOAA’s trade wind index for the western equatorial Pacific (5S-5N, 135E-180)appear as prolonged downward spikes and La Niña events show up as the opposite. This is an important index because the Pacific trade winds push sunlight-warmed water in the tropical Pacific to the west; the trade winds “hold” the warm water in the western Pacific Warm Pool, where it “piles up”; and it’s a relaxation of the trade winds that allows gravity to carry the warm water from the Pacific Warm Pool to the east during an El Niño. Unfortunately, as of today (May 2, 2012) NOAA has not yet released its trade wind index data for April 2012. And as of March 2012, the trade winds in the western equatorial Pacific were still elevated.
Figure 6
Figures 7 and 8 are preliminary April 2012 and weekly satellite-based (Reynolds OI.v2) sea surface temperature anomalies for the NINO3.4 region of the equatorial Pacific (5S-5N, 170W-120W). I’ve borrowed them from my PRELIMINARY April 2012 SST Anomaly Update. NINO3.4 sea surface temperature anomalies are a widely referenced ENSO index and are used in NOAA’s Oceanic NINO Index (ONI) data, though ONI is based on NOAA’s ERSST.v3b sea surface temperature dataset. Unlike the SOI and trade wind data, El Niño events show up as prolonged positive values and La Niña events appear as prolonged negative sea surface temperature anomalies. Both the weekly and monthly NINO3.4 sea surface temperature anomalies show the central equatorial Pacific sea surface temperatures approaching 0.0 deg C. But that also happened last year before the weak La Niña formed.
Figure 7
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Figure 8
HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
CLOSING
So what will it be?
Personally, I would prefer either a La Niña or a Super El Niño like the one that occurred in 1997/98. Why? I’d like to see what happens to North Atlantic sea surface temperature anomalies if there was a three-peat La Niña. Will that contribute to a downturn in the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation?
And with all of those ARGO buoys bobbing around in the Pacific, they would provide new insight into the multiyear aftereffects of a Super El Niño. Researchers could track the huge volume of leftover warm water that returns to the western tropical Pacific via a Rossby wave (at about 10N) . Where does all of that warm subsurface water go after it slams into Indonesia? Does it, as I suspect, reappear as secondary, central Pacific, El Niño Modoki events over the next 8 to 10 years? If so, what paths does it take? After the warm water has been returned to the west and carried poleward, how long does it release heat in the Kuroshio-Oyashio Extension and South Pacific Convergence Zone, as secondary effects of the super El Niño? How much of the warm water makes its way into the tropical Indian Ocean to influence climate there? Little questions.
INTERESTED IN LEARNING MORE ABOUT THE EL NIÑO-SOUTHERN OSCILLATION?
About one-quarter of my book If the IPCC was Selling Manmade Global Warming as a Product, Would the FTC Stop their deceptive Ads?, Section 6, is about the processes that are part of El Niño and La Niña events. Many of the discussions are rewordings (expansions and simplifications) of my posts here at Climate Observations, so you could save a few bucks and read dozens of posts. But the book provides a single resource and reference for you and includes a very basic, well-illustrated introduction to El Niño, La Niña, and ENSO-neutral conditions written in simple terms. Included in the ENSO section are discussions of how La Niña events are not the opposite of El Niño events and how and why certain parts of the global oceans warm in response to certain El Niño AND to the La Niña events that follow them. The El Niño-Southern Oscillation is a marvelous process Mother Nature has devised to enhance or slow the distribution of heat from the tropics to the poles. It is process that naturally varies in intensity, and due to those variations, it is capable of warming or cooling global temperatures over multiyear and multidecadal periods. The individual chapter titles of Section 6 will give you an idea of the topics discussed. See pages 9 and 10 of the introduction, table of contents, and closing of my book in pdf form here.
SOURCES
All but the source of the sea surface temperature data are linked in the text of the post. The Reynolds (OI.v2) SST anomaly data is available through the NOAA NOMADS website:
http://nomad1.ncep.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/pdisp_sst.sh
or:
http://nomad3.ncep.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/pdisp_sst.sh?lite=
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
soryy to texans, but as an aussie I would love another nina year, this time maybe My area will get some decent rains too.. I am amazed at how fast the enso meter can go from near one to half to 0
I keep wanting to nudge it to the -1 or more:-)
Not if you properly exploit the correct intermediate step: Projections!
Here’s how it works:
1) Select the kind of projection you project for your preferred project.
2) Program some models that thrash about a lot but actually respond to a few key tweaks.
3) Run lots of major tweaks of ineffective fudge-factors, keeping key tweaks fairly steady.
4) Average the output of the model runs, scientifi-tisticaly.
5) You now have a scientifical data base!
6) Perdick to your heart’s content.
7) In case of wide discrepancy with observations, note that you were actually just studying model behaviour, not reality.
8) Then make some new data!
From the segment on Bob’s book [ http://bobtisdale.wordpress.com/2012/03/16/if-the-ipcc-was-selling-manmade-global-warming-as-a-product-now-available-in-kindle-and-pdf-editions/ ]:
“The El Niño-Southern Oscillation is a marvelous process Mother Nature has devised to enhance or slow the distribution of heat from the tropics to the poles. It is process that naturally varies in intensity, and due to those variations, it is capable of warming or cooling global temperatures over multiyear and multidecadal periods.”
And for those with sound conceptual understanding of aggregation criteria:
It’s a trivial exercise (can be done in a spreadsheet in a few minutes) to refocus across ENSO:
http://i43.tinypic.com/o52jbd.png
http://www.billhowell.ca/Paul%20L%20Vaughan/Vaughan%20120324%20The%20Solar%20Cycle%27s%20Footprint%20on%20Terrestrial%20Climate.PDF
Those who deny this result might as well declare:
a) Up is down.
b) Black is white.
c) 1+1=3.
d) Ignorance &/or deception rule.
I absolutely guarantee you the critics are wrong. Their only hopes of looking right in the long run: data destruction &/or sustained data vandalism of an unconscionable nature.
Sincerely.
Actually, el ninos don’t result in high global temps. too much humidity.
Yes the trades indeed appear to be holding steady and not weakening, as is needed for a significant el Nino.
Although warmth is gathering slowly in the south east Pacific, if you look at the animated Pacific temps from the Navy / NCOM, there is a small but persistent tongue of cooler water at the Peruvian coast:
http://www7320.nrlssc.navy.mil/global_ncom/glb8_3b/html/anims/eqp/sst30d.gif
This possibly spells incipient upwelling which would really spoil the party of those who are “Waiting for el Ninot”.
phlogiston says:
…
This possibly spells incipient upwelling which would really spoil the party of those who are “Waiting for el Ninot”.
========================================================
LOL! How fitting, phlogiston! “Nothing to be done.”
http://samuel-beckett.net/Waiting_for_Godot_Part1.html
A closing couple of notes: NOAA has furnished the Western Equatorial Pacific Trade Wind Index data for April. It’s about where we’d expect it for the current NINO3.4 SST anomalies:
http://i49.tinypic.com/2ltn0k9.jpg
It was nice not having to argue with someone. I purposely avoided reminding those who insisted on bringing up the PDO that it’s an aftereffect of ENSO for just that reason.
Thanks, Anthony.
Solar-Terrestrial-Climate Weave
http://i49.tinypic.com/219q848.png
(details on computation another day — up to about 20 different ways to isolate the pattern now)
Thanks to Bob Tisdale for so many interesting articles.
Best Regards.
Past climate history shows that when we have periods of extended low solar activity , the number of EL Ninos drops off significantly , especially climate warming strong El Ninos .Consequently in the light of the current low solar activity for cycle # 24 and the same being projected for the next 2, I see mostly neutral conditions with very few El Ninos especially strong El Nios for as long as possibly the next 5-10 years.
Matt v., I am really glad you stated your prediction model. It begs the question, what do you think of the computer generated models touted by AGWers? In comparison to yours?
Pamela Gray
There is nothing wrong with climate scientists trying to model our climate . In my opimion ,the problem comes when unvalidated, prematue and incomplete models are urged prematurely on the politicians and are then are used to frame drastic chages to public policy in the field of public health, energy and environment.In my judgement ,it is like releasing insufficently tested drugs out on the market place where the true side affects could be worse than the cure and the drug may possibly kill you rather than cure you.
I don’t have an overall model per say and base much of my judgement on researching climte history , observing current variables and how they differ from the past and then doing my own back checks and research of any data wherever possible . I don’t think our long term climate can be accurately modelled yet , personally . There are too many variables that we do not have a proper handle on yet.
Randall G. says:
May 4, 2012 at 5:51 am
phlogiston says:
…
This possibly spells incipient upwelling which would really spoil the party of those who are “Waiting for el Ninot”.
========================================================
LOL! How fitting, phlogiston! “Nothing to be done.”
http://samuel-beckett.net/Waiting_for_Godot_Part1.html
Thanks for the link!
Pamela;
http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/begging-the-question.html
I know “suggest the question” isn’t as punchy, but at least it says what you mean.
It’s worse than drugs which may harm a few patients. The Mitigation Cures necessarily involve ramping back the entire world’s energy budget and economy. Very few would not suffer the effects, which would likely include rapid de-population, given our heavy dependence on plentiful fossil fuels and electric power.