81 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Midwest Mark
April 18, 2012 9:17 am

How about, “Do you remember any national media outlets overhyping extreme weather events in the past 12 months”?

Ethically Civil
April 18, 2012 9:19 am

Extreme Weather Events — c.f. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summer_of_the_Shark, where the only statistically significant difference was the number of new reports about shark attacks.
“History doesn’t repeat itself, but it does rhyme” — unknown (often mis-attributed to Twain)

TomL
April 18, 2012 9:31 am

60% of Americans have personally experienced “extreme high winds” in the last year? What is “extreme high wind” anyway? Surely hurricane-force at least. Living on the Gulf Coast, the last time I experienced a hurricane-force wind was in 2008. It must be really, really windy where those 60% live.

Duster
April 18, 2012 9:33 am

That time line is a brilliant device for conveying the effect of communications on perceptions.

April 18, 2012 9:38 am

Thou shalt not commit logical fallacies….and this poll is a doozy.
http://www.yourlogicalfallacyis.com/home

Thomas
April 18, 2012 9:39 am

According to the poll 21% of respondents experencie a tornado in the last year. Extrapolating that out to the U.S. population, that would mean that over 60 million Americans were affected by tornadoes in 2011. That strikes me as wildly inaccurate and falls into question whether this poll has any validity at all.

Richard M
April 18, 2012 9:41 am

The item about tornadoes gives away this is a scam. There’s no way 21% of Americans have personally experienced a tornado in the last year.

Nerd
April 18, 2012 9:42 am

Ha. Bigfoot… Russian scientists thought they actually existed. Google Zana bigfoot… Out of boredom, I looked much closer to see what I can find… I came away being convinced that they are real. Go figure. You just have to find the right places for actual stuff, not silly things by MSM. I’ve heard that we could not duplicate the movement of that bigfoot in that grainy video. Also, how to be able to tell real foot prints from fake ones (yes there are actual real foot prints).
Keep it in mind… Panda bears once thought were to be extinct… It took many years to find them because we knew very little about them. Once we found them, we gained much more knowledge on how they function in the wild and were much easier to find them.
That could be said the same thing for bigfoot if they actually existed. The point is that we attack some things that we clearly do not understand or know much. I learned that mistake a long time ago and vowed never to do that and always keep open mind and be skeptical of everything…
I see Wiki did not learn of Göbekli Tepe 10,000-12,000 years ago, the earliest civilization known so far.

Rob Crawford
April 18, 2012 9:47 am

“1942 – Hedy Lamarr …”
That’s Hedl… Oh, no, this time it really is Hedy. Never mind.

Interstellar Bill
April 18, 2012 9:48 am

All I know is that after living in the same So Cal city (Torrance) for 30 years
that the entire temperature range has shifted almost 10F lower.
We used to get four months of nights over 70F, now there’s a handful.
We used to get only two months of nights under 55F, now its six months.
I want my global warming!

highflight56433
April 18, 2012 9:49 am

All in preparation of Earth Day propaganda blitz. More demonizing those who disagree with the “establishment” agenda.

Poor Yorek
April 18, 2012 9:55 am

Just a friendly editorial comment:
“Problem is, the data does not support it.” => ” … the data do not support it.”

pat
April 18, 2012 10:01 am

Simple minded nonsense. Nothing but alarmism with no scientific basis whatsoever. In fact no link exists between weather and such gradual warming as may have occurred. Meanwhile the link between weather and La Nina is firm. As is the link between spring temperatures and tornadoes.
And i don’t know what the Warmists will do if the assertion that water vapor is a negative feedback is verified as claimed in the link below. That would mean that there is actually little to worry about even if CO2 were and important forcing agent, which it is not.
http://clivebest.com/blog/?p=3597

Taphonomic
April 18, 2012 10:12 am

If they had tried this poll in Europe, I’m sure a higher percentage would have responded “yes” to extreme cold weather; after last winter with multiple deaths due to cold weather.
Conclusion: weather ain’t climate.

Rhys Jaggar
April 18, 2012 10:14 am

I think you need to distinguish between opinion polling (which is merely a snapshot of public opinion), scientific concensus and the reality of hard data.
There is little if any correlation between the three of them……

April 18, 2012 10:14 am

The only conclusion to be taken from this poll (or propaganda), is that when it comes to climate, both science and academia are now totally dishonest and corrupt. You can’t do any deals with people like that, because they’ll never keep their word.
Time for a root and branch clear out, tear it down and make a clean start.
Pointman

Pull My Finger
April 18, 2012 10:17 am

OMG that 1972 Radio Shack catalog brings back memories. My dad had a stereo from that year… 8 track and all!

George E. Smith;
April 18, 2012 10:19 am

“””””
…………………………. “””””
Do you recall any noteworthy change in your local climate; from what you remember from 100 years ago ?
Do you recall any noteworthy change in the climate of the USA from what you remember from 100 years ago ?
Do you think your local weather today, may be caused by those changes in climate from what you remember 100 years ago ?
What are you personally doing to correct the changes in your local climate from what you remember from 100 years ago?
How much is it worth to you to return to the climate that you remeber from 100 years ago ?

April 18, 2012 10:19 am

Science by POLLING people to see what they think?
George Orwell would be proud. The Ministry of Truth lives.

TomRude
April 18, 2012 10:31 am

The NYT adds a layer of bull…
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/18/science/earth/americans-link-global-warming-to-extreme-weather-poll-says.html?src=recg
And promote McKibben’s agenda…
In Canada, democracy should be subverted by legal activism as per this article published in the green peddling Globe & Mail, signed by Ecojustice and David Suzuki Foundation CEOs, all bank rolled by Tides:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/opinions/opinion/every-canadians-eco-rights-need-charter-protection/article2405657/
Two sides of the same totalitarian machine…

Sleepalot
April 18, 2012 10:34 am

In propaganda, it doesn’t matter what is true, only what is believed to be true.

Hal
April 18, 2012 10:40 am

With more and more half-assed scientific studies and “polls” originating from Ivy League institutions like Yale, the reading public is also beginning to ‘connect the dots’. These prestigious universities are expensive money pits, adhering to a radically warped political point of view, and have little regard for the proper implementation of the Scientific Method.

nc
April 18, 2012 10:45 am

David Suzuki and Greenpeace protecting their money train in Canada kind of goes along with rigging the polls. Just what happened to science, sad?
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/technology/David+Suzuki+steps+down+from+foundation/6460776/story.html
http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2012/04/18/david-suzukis-smoke-mirrors/

indegar
April 18, 2012 10:45 am

“Most people in the country are looking at everything that’s happened; it just seems to be one disaster after another after another,” said Anthony A. Leiserowitz of Yale University, one of the researchers who commissioned the new poll. “People are starting to connect the dots.”
Funny, I just heard that new “connect the dots” meme yesterday: Bill McKibben’s latest project – “It’s Time to Connect the Dots Between Climate Change and Extreme Weather”:
http://www.350.org/en/node/28148
Get ready to hear that phrase repeated ad nauseum.

kbray in california
April 18, 2012 11:06 am

Here’s something to really worry about…
The Sun just lost 20% of its volume…
http://wattsupwiththat.com/reference-pages/solar/
If that really did happen… we would be in deep kaka.
So don’t sweat this normal weather stuff.
It has always been… And it always will be.
Just hope the Sun keeps on truckin’ within normal variability.
A major change in the Sun… now that would be very problematic.

1 2 3 4