Titanic Anniversary: Unusual Climate + Extreme Ice Conditions = Tragic Accident

RMS Titanic
RMS Titanic (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Guest Post by Dr. Tim Ball

April 14th is the anniversary of Titanic‘s collision with an iceberg in the North Atlantic. The event occurred at 41° 46′ N and 50° 14′ W, almost the most southerly location on record (Figure 1). One can’t absolve the sailors from lack of vigilance because the accident happened, but it’s important to know their situation and expectations.

Chart showing known locations of ship collisions with icebergs

Red crosses mark collisions, but also outline “Iceberg Alley”. It’s where pieces of ice calve from the west coast of Greenland and drift south with the Labrador Current. Iceberg numbers and extent are determined by changing climate, which affects glacier dynamics, water and air temperatures, and ocean currents. Figure 2 shows the Labrador Current flowing to a confrontation with the North Atlantic Drift. When the Gulf Stream is off the New England coast, it’s driven east by the prevailing westerly winds. The boundary between the cold, dark, bottle-green waters of the Labrador Current and the light blue, almost turquoise of the warm tropical waters is a very sharp visible boundary. I saw it many times while chasing Soviet submarines around the North Atlantic. The diagram show the cold dense water deflecting the warmer water and affecting the trajectory toward western Europe.

Labrador Current and North Atlantic Drift

As far as is known using dead-reckoning navigation, Titanic was on course. Figure 2 shows the point of collision was at the southern limit of the Labrador Current. Icebergs melt as they move south and most are totally melted or very small at this latitude. Therefore it’s an area the crew wouldn’t expect icebergs, especially one large enough to sink them.

Why did such a large iceberg get that far south in 1912? Study of the weather patterns provide explanation. Media reports tell the story and are all summarized in this statement:

The 1912 United States cold wave (also called 1912 cold air outbreak) remains one of the coldest winters yet to occur over the northern United States.

January, 1912 was the coldest on record for Norfolk, NE, at -39°C and Pennsylvania State College weather station recorded -30°C on the night of January 11th. This was reinforced by a comment from a Canadian newspaper,

What made the winter of 1912 a record-breaker was not the absolute cold – 1934 was worse – but that it settled in quickly and stayed put.

So it was a prolonged cold spell, a point confirmed by another source.

It started in December 1911 and continued into late February 1912. February and March continued the unrelenting freeze. Both months were unusually cold, and March was the coldest on record for many states in the Midwest and Northeast. Parts of North Dakota saw their coldest March readings to date. Some cities saw their coldest weather that winter since the Little Ice Age. 1912 itself was a very cold year.

These conditions indicate a very deep prolonged outbreak of cold arctic air across central and eastern North America that became a “blocking” high pressure system. Persistence of the pattern resulted in severe weather or prolonged weather in other regions. All are characteristic of a Meridional Pattern of flow in the Circumpolar Vortex (Jet Stream) in Figure 3.

Rossby wave patterns

In England, the general weather pattern was notable because of cool wet conditions;

The almost complete absence of summer weather and the frequent rains at almost all seasons have rendered 1912 memorable. The bad weather was more noticeable by contrast with the magnificent weather of 1911.

London reported,

Dull and Wet. Mild Winter. Very Cool late Summer and Autumn.

More important,

March was a very changeable month as a series of Atlantic weather systems crossed the country.

In Regina, Saskatchewan, in central Canada the weather was equally significant.

Known as the Regina Cyclone, this storm has been rated an F4 on the Fujita Scale based on reported damage and historical photographs. To date, it is the deadliest tornadic storm in Canadian history, taking 28 lives and leaving more than 200 injured.

All this confirms that a very deep northerly flow of cold arctic air persisted over eastern North America. This would drive cold Labrador Current water further south carrying the icebergs with it. The cold air reduced above water ablation of the icebergs. Confluence of the cold arctic water and warm tropical water make the region south of Newfoundland the foggiest region in the world. Conditions in 1912 enhanced the fog forming potential that further hampered the lookouts. This was the final event in a sequence of weather conditions that resulted in a terrible maritime disaster.

=============================================================

The iceberg suspected of sinking the RMS Titan...
The iceberg suspected of sinking the RMS Titanic; a smudge of red paint much like the Titanic's stripe was seen near the base. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

59 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pull My Finger
April 12, 2012 10:06 am

Read an recent article that stated extremely high, record high, tides were recorded a few months before the Titanic sank which may have sent many icebergs adrift that normally would have been stranded aground on the Canadian coast.

Pull My Finger
April 12, 2012 10:08 am

… and the extreme cold and strong inversion in the area would have made spotting icebergs very, very difficult and would distort images near the horizon, possibly accounting for the poor response time to the sinking.

Scott Covert
April 12, 2012 10:10 am

Very entertaining article, Thanks.

Rick Morcom
April 12, 2012 10:21 am

Fascinating, thank you.

mojo
April 12, 2012 10:26 am

YAY! Somebody fixed the CSS!

suissebob
April 12, 2012 10:32 am

Sorry if this is off topic but Dana1981 of Skeptical Science has an article up rebutting the NASA ex employee letter if anyone is interested:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/apr/12/attacks-climate-science-nasa-staff

April 12, 2012 10:39 am

Thanks Dr. Ball!

Bloke down the pub
April 12, 2012 10:40 am

Even in the modern era, plane crashes tend to be the result of a combination of failings, both human and mechanical. Perhaps that’s why disasters like this take on such a significance, it would have taken only a minor change in any one of a dozen factors to have avoided it.

climatereason
Editor
April 12, 2012 10:49 am

Tim
Nice article thank you. Coincidentally my house overlooks the home of one of those who died on the Titanic
http://www.encyclopedia-titanica.org/titanic-victim/henry-forbes-julian.html
tonyb

April 12, 2012 11:05 am

suissebob says:
April 12, 2012 at 10:32 am
Sorry if this is off topic but Dana1981 of Skeptical Science has an article up rebutting the NASA ex employee letter if anyone is interested:

That’s not a rebuttal — it’s a lame rehash of AGW claims from the ’90s mixed with a liberal sprinkling of bullshit — such as the statement “They include James Hansen, who created one of the earliest global climate models in the 1980s, which has turned out to be remarkably accurate.”
Dana1981 appears to be stuck in 1998…

Matthew Holbrook
April 12, 2012 11:06 am

This is a great post, further expanding our understanding of what happened to the Titanic. A few years ago, I had seen a documentary that pointed blame for the disaster in part to the shoddy steel from which the Titanic was constructed. It seems that the same steel was used to build the celebrated battlecruiser HMS Hood, which was obliterated by the Bismarck with one salvo in 1941, not very far north of where the Titanic sank.

April 12, 2012 11:14 am

I have a theory: If you make enough bad decisions, Speeding, at night, in the the largest manmade moving object ever made at the time, ignore warnings, make it out of substandard materials, with too small a rudder, poorly equiped lookouts, no safety drills, not enough lifeboats, limited shakedown cruise… something bad is going to happen , without regard to weather, climate, phase of the moon and sun, or most any other natural phenomenon

Gary
April 12, 2012 11:15 am

Multiple eyewitness reports indicate the night was very clear. If fog is to blame it must have been very localized around the iceberg. A more likely explanation is visual distortion in front of the ship due to the temperature differential between air over the Labrador current and the Gulf Stream waters — essentially a mirage that obscured the view of the lookouts.

u.k.(us)
April 12, 2012 11:20 am

Here is a good article from my local newspaper.
https://www.dailyherald.com/article/20120412/discuss/704129979/
I liked this, (excerpt):
BELFAST, Northern Ireland — Here, where Titanic, the massive White Star Line luxury liner, was built — the joke for years has been, “It was fine when it left here.” ………..

artwest
April 12, 2012 11:20 am

On the UK National Geographic channel last night there was a programme called Titanic: Case Closed. Despite the title it presented what seemed to this layman like a plausible theory that the look outs (and the captain of the Californian) were deceived by cold water mirages where the major difference between the water temperature and air temperature caused optical illusions, especially near the horizon. On the face of it historian Tim Maltin did at least some of the right things by examining the archives, including the logs of ships passing through the same area at the time and talking to present day sailors who sail the same waters now.
It was certainly intriguing.
I am sure that the programme will be repeated endlessly on this channel and no doubt in other countries.
http://natgeotv.com/uk/titanic-case-closed

Robertvdl
April 12, 2012 11:40 am

“January, 1912 was the coldest on record for Norfolk, NE, at -39°C and Pennsylvania State College weather station recorded -30°C on the night of January 11th. This was reinforced by a comment from a Canadian newspaper,”
“All are characteristic of a Meridional Pattern of flow in the Circumpolar Vortex ”
This means that Reykjavik must have been warmer than normal in January. If cold air goes so far south warm air must go north.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/work/gistemp/STATIONS//tmp.620040300000.1.1/station.txt
January 1912 with 1,9 ºC was indeed a mild month.
I love your interviews with Kim Greenhouse Too bad that the last time Kim was a bit hard on you. Maybe she had a headache.

John Blake
April 12, 2012 12:06 pm

J. Bruce Ismay, Chairman and Managing Director of the White Star Line, could never bear to look at picures of that
red-tinctured iceberg. Prudent mariners hove-to ten miles away but Capt. Smith forged on, full-speed ahead. “It was sad, when that great ship went down.”

Auto
April 12, 2012 12:56 pm

Highlights the commercial pressure on a Ship Master.
Maiden Voyage. Need to be in New York to get the blatts, and meet the schedule . . . .
Still happens today. This year I have had ‘full and frank discussions’ with a charterer who wanted to pressure a Master into berthing when the wind was [far] in excess of that permitted at that port. $200,000,000 ship, too – and, more importantly the lives at risk.
Titanic – as
Bloke down the pub says:
April 12, 2012 at 10:40 am
many things usually go wrong for an accident to happen.
DocWat says:
April 12, 2012 at 11:14 am
DocWat, too, has it right.
If a shipping line [or airline or railway [railroad] etc.] says it’s never late, they might just be cutting corners.

Paul Westhaver
April 12, 2012 12:59 pm

Dr Ball.
FYI Halifax Harbour was filled with pack ice in April 1987.
Here is a facinating link with a slide show.
http://chronicleproject.com/stories_242.html
Here is is represented on a Children’s Program, Theodore Tugboat.
[ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4hUqtCHFPG4 ]
I don’t know if the pack ice was arctic or from the Gulf of Saint Lawrence.
http://researchers.imd.nrc.ca/~hillb/icedb/st_lawrence/G1907May.htm
Thanks Dr Ball.

April 12, 2012 1:24 pm

Ice Patrol is probably an interesting source of historical climate records.
This is a report of historical iceberb counts since 1900 estimated by IIC. (Wouldn’t it be interesting to examine the basis for the estimates?) since WWII, the counts are probably spot on. Before WWII, what are the uncertainty bands. Before Titanic, who knows? http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/?pageName=IIPIcebergCounts
There are some annual reports on-line, which hint at by month iceberg counts by lat-long 1×1 degree bins. Wouldn’t that the interesting to visualize in 4D (lat,Long,year, Month) http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pdf/iip/2011_IIP_Annual_Report.pdf

Tom J
April 12, 2012 1:25 pm

I have a book at home (unfortunately I’m not at home right now) about the power plants of the great ocean crossing passenger steamers. The author stated that many of the captains underestimated the power at their disposal. He used the captain of the Titanic as one example, and stated it was simply reckless to order the great ship to steam full speed through a known iceberg field at night, and after iceberg sightings had been issued through radio contacts and before retiring for the evening. It also appears his 1st Officer may have panicked when he tried to maneuver around it. Since he had put the engines in full reverse the response of the rudder was diminished. He would’ve been far better off to have rammed it. Almost all passenger ships of that era had collision bulkheads.

Crispin in Johannesburg
April 12, 2012 1:44 pm

@Matthew H
“I had seen a documentary that pointed blame for the disaster in part to the shoddy steel from which the Titanic was constructed.”
+++++
Wasn’t it the rivets that were made from slag that was the problem? They were ordinarily very strong but became brittle at 4 deg C. The ‘berg ripped open the side like a zipper flooding more than the maximum number of sealable compartments that had to be compromised to sink it. An original rivet was on someone’s desk for decades and analysis of it proved the theory.

Ben U.
April 12, 2012 2:00 pm

On April 8, 2012, the NY Post published “Forgotten journal reveals how man survived 1912 disaster,” most of it consisting in an excerpt from survivor John B. Thayer III’s account which is going to be published. In the excerpt Thayer wrote as to earier in the evening:

It had become very much colder. It was a brilliant, starry night. There was no moon and I have never seen the stars shine brighter; they appeared to stand right out of the sky, sparkling like cut diamonds. A very light haze, hardly noticeable, hung low over the water. I have spent much time on the ocean, yet I have never seen the sea smoother than it was that night; it was like a mill pond, and just as innocent looking, as the great ship quietly rippled through it.

T. Harnden
April 12, 2012 2:24 pm

As reported on CBC the ship may have been traveling so fast because there was a coal fire in one of the holds and was attempting to get to port before the fire got out of control.

u.k.(us)
April 12, 2012 2:44 pm

Crispin in Johannesburg says:
April 12, 2012 at 1:44 pm
Wasn’t it the rivets that were made from slag that was the problem? They were ordinarily very strong but became brittle at 4 deg C. The ‘berg ripped open the side like a zipper flooding more than the maximum number of sealable compartments that had to be compromised to sink it. An original rivet was on someone’s desk for decades and analysis of it proved the theory.
===================
The rivet has yet to be designed, that can pierce an iceberg 🙂
Must have been quite a show of force, driving that steel eggshell at speed, and giving that “immovable” object a glancing blow.

1 2 3
Verified by MonsterInsights