From Yale University and the University of British Columbia, an important step forward in being able to forecast explosive volcanic events.
Before the explosion — volcano’s warning tremors explained

New Haven, Ct. – No matter their size or shape, explosive volcanoes produce tremors at similar frequencies for minutes, days or weeks before they erupt. In the Feb. 24 issue of the journal Nature, researchers at Yale University and the University of British Columbia (UBC) describe a model that explains this strange phenomenon – and may help forecast deadly eruptions.
When such volcanoes erupt they can shoot hot ash up to 40 kilometers into the atmosphere and cause devastating destruction when the ash column collapses and spreads as “pyroclastic flows.” Prior to most of these explosive eruptions the volcanoes shake slightly but measurably, and the shaking becomes more dramatic during the eruption itself. This tremor is one of the primary precursors and warnings used by volcanologists for forecasting an eruption.
“Tremor is very mysterious, most notably because it shakes at pretty much the same frequency in almost every explosive volcano, whether it’s in Alaska, the Caribbean, New Zealand, or Central America,” said David Bercovici, professor and chair of the Department of Geology and Geophysics at Yale, and co-author of the research. “That it’s so universal is very weird because volcanoes are so different in size and character. It would be like blowing on five different musical wind instruments and having them all sound the same.”
For minutes to weeks before eruptions, tremors in nearly all volcanoes stay in a narrow band of frequencies from about 0.5 to 2 HZ. Just before and during the eruption, the frequency climbs to a higher pitch, and the range spreads out to between 0.5 and 7 HZ. This similarity in tremors has been hard to explain because each volcano differs in many variables such as physical structure, magma composition or gas content.
The mathematical model developed by Bercovici and his colleague Mark Jellinek at UBC suggests these similarities can be explained by “magma wagging” – or the rattling that occurs from the interaction of rising magma and the foamy jacket of gas that surrounds it. The factors that control this rattling or wagging vary little between volcanoes, which explains why the same tremors occur in very different volcanoes.
“Explosive eruptions are some of the most spectacular and destructive phenomena in nature, and tremor is both a warning of the event and a vital clue about what is going on in the belly of the beast,” Bercovici said. “This model will provide a much-needed framework for understanding the physics of tremors, and this can only help with the prediction and forecasting of destructive eruptions.”
Here’s the UBC Press release (thanks to WUWT reader “clipe”):
Oscillating “plug” of magma causes tremors that forecast volcanic eruptions: UBC research
- The UBC model illustrates how, as the center ‘plug’ of dense magma rises, it simply oscillates, or ‘wags,’ against the cushion of gas bubbles, generating tremors at a consistent range of frequencies observed around the world. Credit: Mark Jellinek, UBC.
University of British Columbia geophysicists are offering a new explanation for seismic tremors accompanying volcanic eruptions that could advance forecasting of explosive eruptions such as recent events at Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines, Chaiten Volcano in Chile, and Mount St. Helens in Washington State.
All explosive volcanic eruptions are preceded and accompanied by tremors that last from hours to weeks, and a remarkably consistent range of tremor frequencies has been observed by scientists before and during volcanic eruptions around the world.
However, the underlying mechanism for these long-lived volcanic earthquakes has never been determined. Most proposed explanations are dependent upon the shape of the volcanic conduit – the ‘vent’ or ‘pipe’ through which lava passes through – or the gas content of the erupting magma, characteristics that vary greatly from volcano to volcano and are impossible to determine during or after volcanic activity.
Published this week in the journal Nature, the new model developed by UBC researchers is based on physical properties that most experts agree are common to all explosive volcanic systems, and applies to all shapes and sizes of volcanoes.
“All volcanoes feature a viscous column of dense magma surrounded by a compressible and permeable sheath of magma, composed mostly of stretched gas bubbles,” says lead author Mark Jellinek, an associate professor in the UBC Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences.
“In our model, we show that as the center ‘plug’ of dense magma rises, it simply oscillates, or ‘wags,’ against the cushion of gas bubbles, generating tremors at the observed frequencies.”
“Forecasters have traditionally seen tremors as an important – if somewhat mysterious – part of a complicated cocktail of observations indicative of an imminent explosive eruption,” says Jellinek, an expert in Geological Fluid Mechanics. “Our model shows that in systems that tend to erupt explosively, the emergence and evolution of the tremor signal before and during an eruption is based on physics that are uniform from one volcano to another.”
“The role of tremors in eruption forecasting has become tricky over the past decade, in part because understanding processes underlying their origin and evolution prior to eruption has been increasingly problematic,” says Jellinek. “Because our model is so universal, it may have significant predictive power for the onset of eruptions that are dangerous to humans.”
The research co-led by Prof. David Bercovici of Yale University and was supported by the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and the U.S. National Science Foundation.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Hmmmm…………. Chaiten erupted out of nowhere. Hadn’t erupted for over 9000 years. Wasn’t even monitored.
Does it also produce “false positives”?
I know you can tunafish…
….I didn’t know you could tunavolcano
I give it 6 months and someone comes out with a paper saying this is garbage………
For minutes to weeks before eruptions, tremors in nearly all volcanoes stay in a narrow band of frequencies from about 0.5 to 2 HZ. Just before and during the eruption, the frequency climbs to a higher pitch, and the range spreads out to between 0.5 and 7 HZ. This similarity in tremors has been hard to explain because each volcano differs in many variables such as physical structure, magma composition or gas content.
The early warning system using VLF is not that mysterious, and there is no reason to invoke a new theory such as “magma wagging.” I am saying this because the same very low frequency readings are used to detect above volcanos which have erupted.
From World Wide Lightning Location Network:
University of Washington in Seattle operating a network of lightning location sensors at VLF (3-30 kHz). Most ground-based observations in the VLF band are dominated by impulsive signals from lightning discharges called “sferics”. Significant radiated electromagnetic power exists from a few hertz to several hundred megahertz, with the bulk of the energy radiated at VLF. http://wwlln.net/
No new physics are needed. Volcanos are electrical in nature.
As these frequencies are in the infra-sound range (just below the human level) it would be interesting to test if there is any reaction amongst animals when the frequency is ramped up from the 0.5 pitch level.
The same frequency is used to detect lightning above volcanoes after they have erupted, that is.
It would also be interesting to know if other non-volcanic earthquakes display any similar type of pitch shift or whether this shift is unique to volcanic quakes.
“The role of tremors in eruption forecasting has become tricky over the past decade, in part because understanding processes underlying their origin and evolution prior to eruption has been increasingly problematic,”
=========
Nothing like data to blow-up a theory.
But, data is good.
So, these signals have been observed for decades, but now we have a ‘model’ that explains the uniformity in the signature shape? Since the frequencies are independent of the size and shape of the volcano, how would one falsify such a model?
It should also be pointed out that the lightning above volcanos is not well explained by simply evoking static charge separation in ash clouds. Not only that, when Mount St. Augustine in Alaska erupted, a second kind of lightning was discovered, “which the authors called “a newly identified explosive phase.” [It] came as a surprise, says Thomas. As magma, ash and rocks spewed from Augustine carrying great electrical charge, they created continuous, chaotic sparks near the mouth of the volcano.”
The VLF underground and above ground, and the powerful lightning events accompanying volcanic activity all point to the possibility that volcanos are a result of electrical discharge in the earth’s crust. It is more plausible, fits more of the observations, and simpler that “magma wagging,” at any rate.
Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/augustine.html#ixzz1Epc0W89v
I think the VLF signals for lightning and tremors are not related to the same physical processes.
The VLF signal for lightning would be an EM frequency, while that for the volcanoes would be a seismic (rock vibration) frequency. The only similarity of the two signals would be their occurrence during an eruption.
I wasn’t aware that ANY of those named volcano eruptions had been predicted; most of them were postdicted, by the frequencies they put out while they were blowing their tops up to 40 km.
That’s like the chap who visited the observatory and asked if he could look at the moon through the teslecope. They told him no, because the moon had not yet risen.
Oh well, he said, after it is risen, I can see it without the Telescope.
When its a gizmo on Anthony’s little logo list on the right, I’ll start to take it seriously.
The electrical and acoustical vibrations could be connected. Magma is highly ionized, thus its flow is effectively an electrical current. If the mechanical flow is modulated by the ‘slapping’, the current would also be modulated, transferring charge to the surface in a vibratory way.
http://www.universetoday.com/28774/new-array-captures-redoubt-volcano-lightning/
Correction, the infrasound frequency (less than 20 Hz) range is used to monitor volcanos, earthquakes, lightning (upper and lower atmosphere), auroras, and bolides.
The VLF frequency range (3 kHz to 30 kHz) is being used by the vocano global monitor, WWLLN, which announces over 1,500 volcanos for ash cloud lightning, updated every minute, which I cited. Sorry about that. However, my mistake in mixing kHz and Hz in my post is not nearly as bad as the fact that electrical sources for volcanic tremors were not even considered in this article at all when it is clearly a known signature of electrical discharge. And there is a great deal of unexplained electrical activity accompanying volcanic eruptions. So I am still way ahead. Zeke
Show me the proof. I don’t believe this for a moment. I also believe you will be questioned by much better educated people in this field than myself.
Is a minute’s warning enough for people living near an explosive volcano?
Thanks for posting this story. My interest is self serving and biased. That said, I have puzzled about this phenomena for years now but never had opportunity to study it. What we see here is the proper use of models in science, specifically earth science. Climatology is after all an earth science, perhaps those folks with read this a understand. Then maybe not, understand that is. Another puzzle piece found. We may some day even get it completed.
If you have static, something is moving against something else. I could see that happening in a volcano.
There must be some powerful magnetic Shtuff going on there.
George E Smith says:
Started a big grin when I saw your post. Then, broke out into a big laugh when I re-read it. Can’t wait to see Anthony’s gizmo!
Don’t know about volcanoes, but I did hear the 1975 Oroville,CA earthquake while dredging. I has my head submerged in the river, and it sounded like very low drums in the far distance. Perhaps the volcano is simply making very low noise in a common fluid: water. Before it hits the air, it’s hot water, afterwards it’s steam.
Would this also apply to a megavolcano such as Yellowstone Caldera. Its coming around to its 600,000 year cycle and has shown increased swelling and other activity recently. Predicting its next eruption will be critical to the survival of America.
as a sound engineer,,,,i must say the corrolation between the soundwaves behaviour is very simular to what you get in recording music—–i am wondering if there is also a nyquest frequency to be observed in vulcanic activity…(same wave behaviour in lightwaves also….)…
Animals are very sensitive to tone change…..
I’ll take Volcanic Ash for $200 Alex …
*ding* … What is “the triboelectric effect”? (1) (2)
(1) http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~scdiroff/lds/ElectricityMagnetism/TriboelectricEffects/TriboelectricEffects.html
(2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triboelectric_effect
Practical examples are rubbing your cat’s fur in the winter (usually when the humidity is low) or taking off a sweater; do this with low light and small sparks can actually be seen! Do this with an AM-band radio tuned to a free and nearly clear frequency and you can actually hear the RF (Radio Frequency) noise of the ‘ticks’ the static discharges create!
.
I wonder what song their model reckons this choir is humming? Maybe they’re just tuning up.
Be advised Zeke, right there on the web page cited, the following header: “WWLLN announces a new global monitor of over 1,500 volcanos for ash cloud lightning, … ”
They are monitoring for occurrences of lightning and reporting same when it happens. The eruption must occur first, however and produce the lightning; not quite an early warning system (post detection does not equal early warning) …
I kinda get the impression that you may be thinking that the WWLN was monitoring for low frequencies of some sort, but the WWLLN only monitors for lightning (not any low-frequency vibrations or currents produced in the earth.)
.