Here’s an opportunity for crowd-sourcing a rebuttal to Climate Central’s Top Ten Climate Events of 2010. I think it is mistitled, and should be Climate Central’s Top Ten Weather Events of 2010.
Of course it OK when they do it, because as we all know, weather is not climate except when it fits the AGW narrative, which is CC’s founding mission. The Climate Central effort here with this list seems rather weak and transparent, when you look at the story behind the story for the list they have compiled.
Get a load of this paragraph:
This year also featured plenty of extreme events, from crippling snowstorms in the American Northeast to blazing heat and deadly flooding in Pakistan. Many of these events have already been at least partially linked to natural variations that occur in the Earth’s climate system.
Um, that’s called weather.
Here’s the list with some rebuttals of my own to get started. Readers please add your own in comments, and I’ll add them to this list.
1. Mid-Atlantic Cities Break All-Time Snowfall Records
Last time I checked, it takes two to tango. Cold and weather patterns are a factor also. And, can you tie single weather events to climate?
![namgnld_season1[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/namgnld_season11.gif?resize=600%2C402)
Readers can help fill in this section with more examples.
2. Flooding in Nashville, Tennessee
Gosh, it floods somewhere in the USA almost every year. For example the Great Ohio River flood of 1937. Was that caused by global warming climate change climate disruption back then too?
3. Record-breaking Heat Waves and Droughts in Africa and the Middle East
Gosh, it gets hot there? We have about 100 years of records, some of that natural variation you allude to can’t be in play in such a short slice of the planetary history? Assume AGW is not a factor; is it not unreasonable to expect new records to be set outside of a 100 year data sample?
Readers can help fill in this section with examples.
4. Russian Heat Wave
Gee, even NOAA doesn’t think this has anything to do with global warming climate change climate disruption:
Despite this strong evidence for a warming planet, greenhouse gas forcing fails to explain the 2010 heat wave over western Russia.
I guess Climate Central never got that memo.
5. U.S. Summer Heat Waves
2010 had heat waves, so did other years in the USA. When was it again that we had the most frequency of heat waves? Oh, yeah, the 1930’s.
![image050[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/image0501.jpg?resize=401%2C324&quality=83)
![kunkel_fig3[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/kunkel_fig31.jpg?resize=400%2C331&quality=83)
And yes, I know the graph does not go to 2010, the graphs above were published in 2006, for pre-2000 data, but perhaps readers can locate an update?
6. Pakistan Monsoon and Flooding
Isn’t there a long history of this sort of thing?
From: Khandekar M. K., “2010 Pakistan Floods: Climate Change Or Natural Variability?”
(October 2010), Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (Vol.38, No.5).
As the graph shows, rainfall records for the region prove how floods and droughts have occurred irregularly over a 150-year period and show no discernible significant trend.
Khandekar, also once a research scientist for Environment Canada, and an IPCC reviewer, sums up how Pakistan’s climate record shows no human signal:
“Among other droughts and floods, the monsoon rains were exceptionally heavy in 1917 with extensive floods over many areas of the country, while 1972 was a major drought year resulting in sharply reduced grain yields. The decade of the 1930s experienced in general surplus rains over most of India with three flood years, namely 1933, 1936 and 1938 (Bhalme & Mooley 1980). It is of interest to note that the1930s were part of the dust bowl years on the Canadian/US Prairies. A possible teleconnective link between Indian monsoon flood and Canadian Prairie drought has been speculated by Khandekar (2004).”
His conclusion:
“A rapid transition of the ENSO phase from El Niño to La Niña between spring and summer of 2010 appears to be the key element in triggering a vigorous monsoon of 2010 over the Indian subcontinent…….the 2010 Pakistan floods, although seemingly unprecedented, were well within natural variability of monsoonal climate over the Indian subcontinent.”
7. Third Lowest Arctic Sea Ice Extent
Yes, but here’s what Climate Central won’t show you:
or this:
8. Lake Mead Record Low
Yes, but it has dipped low before, and again, is a 70 year record really enough to claim a long term event outside the bounds of natural variability?
![Draininggraphic1[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/draininggraphic11.jpg?resize=640%2C336&quality=83)

Figure 8. Time series of average monthly Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) (upper, smoothed) and standardized anomaly index (SAI) of cool+warm-season precipitation (lower). Arrows indicate regime shifts of the PDO.
The USGS says in Precipitation History of the Mojave Desert Region, 1893–2001:
Precipitation in the desert region is modestly but significantly correlated with the average PDO (computed from October to September) in the year preceding (lag 1) and the year of the cool+warm (lag 0) season (fig. 7). The three regime shifts of the PDO are largely in-phase with the annual and seasonal precipitation time series, particularly since the mid-1940s (fig. 8). The mid-century dry conditions show this in phase relation, which coincides with a period of low indices and a prolonged cool phase of the PDO. The early neutral to positive phase of the PDO is associated, although in a complicated manner, with the relatively wet conditions during the early half of the century. The strong warm phase of the PDO beginning around 1977 is readily associated with the wet climate beginning in 1978. Of particular interest is the downward shift in the PDO beginning in 1999 with concomitant decreased precipitation that has continued through the winter of 2002 with only slight relief in winter 2003. The unusually dry climate in the Mojave Desert region since 1998 is likely associated with a nearly continuous belt of high pressure in the northern mid-latitudes that produced drought conditions elsewhere in the United States, the Mediterranean region, southern Europe, and central Asia. This global-scale drying was evidently related to unusually cool and persistent SST in the eastern Pacific Ocean (Hoerling and Kumar, 2003). The weather, SST, and surface-pressure patterns of the past several years suggest that a transition to another PDO regime is presently underway (Gedalof and Smith, 2001). This transition could affect the climate of the Mojave Desert region.
Well, that’s inconvenient.
9. Amazon Drought
Wide open for readers.
10. Final Annual Temperature Ranking
Um, no, it’s not final yet. Final is the word you use when all the data is in, we still await December. But, it seems there’s been a lot of pressure to make 2010 the “hottest year ever” in advance of the year end.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

![S_timeseries[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/s_timeseries1.png?resize=640%2C512&quality=75)
![global.daily.ice.area.withtrend[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/12/global-daily-ice-area-withtrend1.jpg?resize=640%2C246&quality=83)
Mark and Merejen Borders says:
December 17, 2010 at 11:15 am
Oh and, what will happen to the weather and climate if the Gulf Stream is stopped and no warm water enters the Atlantic Current?
What would happen in the earth stopped rotating? This is a question similar to yours, and requires no answer, except, at least, a chuckle.
“Mid-Atlantic Cities Break All-Time Snowfall Records”
Mid-Atlantic? As in half way between the USA and Europe?
The actual claim states:
Anthony says: “Um, no, it’s not final yet. Final is the word you use when all the data is in, we still await December.”
Um, no one but you said that these were final results. They are just projecting that it will be one of the warmest.
Anthony says: “But, it seems there’s been a lot of pressure to make 2010 the “hottest year ever” in advance of the year end.”
Who seems to be applying pressure to whom to make 2010 anything other than what the data indicate?
They ought to call themselves Comedy Central.
/Carl
It is only the FREQUENCY of severe events that could be traced to global warming.
This looks like a good thread. Some people here are claiming that the small amount of warming from CO2 causes global increases in severe weather which is otherwise known as cooling or negative feedback. The nice thing is that even if they are wrong, it means that Greenland will melt enough to raise sea levels a few feet which we can easily deal with.
If they are correct, it means that CO2 warming has negative feedback from weather which means we have to prepare for a higher frequency of extreme weather which we should prepare for anyway (even a lower frequency requires preparation). But no sea level rise or other long term effects.
A history of drought in Australia – a good read for Tim Flannery
http://home.iprimus.com.au/foo7/droughthistory.html
For the warmest year on planet Earth, there sure was a lot of snow in 2010. Almost as much as that famously cold Warmists’ anchor year, the legendary 1979. The difference is in 1979 the snow was caused by cold. In 2010 it is caused by global warming. Darn, this weather stuff is complex.
Let’s see . . some real climate events last year . . .
1. No Warmistas died of hypothermia after passing out on a cold Cancun beach after a tequila bender.
2. Climate realists have been appointed to take over keep leadership roles in the impending Congress
3. Frozen Orange juice is currently being grown on the trees in Florida
. . . there must be others 🙂
When engineers design a new plant on a greenfields site, they always have to make allowance for a 100, 200, or 500 year weather event.
Occasional extreme weather occurs all over the world from time to time, to say these extreme weather events is proof of AGW is complete BS.
We shouldn’t forget the limitations; here is just a part of te “records disclosure/uncertainties:
“A related question involves whether climatic
proxy records can be used to establish an extreme
weather record. For instance, Crowley (2000)
concluded that recent reconstructions of Northern
Hemisphere temperatures and climate forcing
over the past 1000 years indicate the very large
late-twentieth-century warming is unparalleled
over the past millennium. Others have disagreed
(e.g., Knappenberger et al. 2001). Can secular and
reconstructed climate records, especially those
devised across disparate data sources, time scales,
or analytical methodologies, be reconciled with regard
to establishing climate extremes? And, what
are specifi c categories for which records of weather
elements should be kept? Although “most intense”
or “hottest” are frequent weather characteristics to
which records are applied, many other categories
are also possible.”
Are Mark and Marejen (Mary Jane?) partaking of too many tropical botanicals?
I’m sorry but the title is where you should start and stop – Top ten climate events of 2010 – we are now measuring climate events in days now?
Smells of desparation to me.
Tim Folkerts,
You do know that NOAA “adjusts” the temperature record, right? And their adjustments always show hotter temps. Just like GISS.
You can’t trust them.
OK I’ll play! It’s so easy though, just cherry pick cold or hot.
25,000 excess winter deaths in UK last winter
Winter deaths around the world
Snow in Brazil – 2010
Snow blankets city in SW Saudi Arabia – 2010
6 million tropical fish dead due to cold in Bolivia – 2010
Argentina’s beaches whitened by snow – 2010
Blizzards hit the French Mediterranean – 2010
Hundreds of penguins dead of cold in Brazil – 2010
6 million head of cattle dead in brutal Mongolian winter
Mark and Merejen Borders
I admire the way that you cast the scientific discipline of doubt aside and ‘blow past’ your boundaries. You say what you feel, not what you can prove. well done
Here is another.
droughts
http://science.jrank.org/pages/2165/Drought-History.html
Neil Jones says:
December 17, 2010 at 2:01 pm
Mid-Atlantic? As in half way between the USA and Europe?
I hope not, I live there.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mid-Atlantic_states
Flooding in Nashville according to :
http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/gallery?Avis=DN&Dato=20100512&Kategori=NEWS01&Lopenr=512003&Ref=PH
There was flooding recorded in the great state of Tennessee in 1927, 1947, 1950, 1955, 1958, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1979, 1984, 1986, and likely other years as the state is part of the Mississippi flood plane. Flooding can occur on a regular basis when you build in areas prone to flooding.
Slightly off-topic………….
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/snowfalls-are-now-just-a-thing-of-the-past-724017.html
4: Russian Heat Wave
Coldest winter expected in northern Europe and Russia in 1000 years.
Note: heat wave temperatures indicated by sattelite over an area of intense regional fires at the time. Could the temps be skewed by the fires?
Beware not the usual extremes of weather,
beware those who covet its power.
5) US summer heat,
US record cold. 17″ of snow in 18 hours in Minnesota collapses roof of metrodome
http://www.newser.com/story/107387/vikings-dome-collapses-in-blizzard.html
Barry Day says:
December 17, 2010 at 1:50 pm
AS PAUL HOGAN WOULD PUT IT,NO MANN”(flashes out HUGE graph)THIS IS CLIMATE!”
Right on que,right on time and just what the doctor ordered!!
Warm periods icecap
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Warm_periods.jpg
You want to explain this? What is that chart, did anyone else look carefully at it? Look at the numbers on the right side. A little diversion there, what’s up. Don’t ya have any better than that?
LONGEST THERMOMETER RECORD IN THE WORLD
http://i49.tinypic.com/rc93fa.jpg
2010 – 1660 = 350 years Is that enough time to make any conclusions about something as diverse as climate, or weather.
BEST GRAPH AND INFORMATION
http://www.sustainableoregon.com/temphist.html
Same as first chart, what is this representing? The numbers on the right the numbers are smaller at the top of the chart larger at the bottom. But the info the the right of the chart says warm to the top, warm should be higher numbers, right? So what are the numbers on the chart?
Beyond that I noticed that the chart does not follow the bell curve of statics even accounting for the outliers, what’s up with that? Is statistic a lie? Maybe the earth really is flat.
Smokey says: December 17, 2010 at 2:37 pm
You do know that NOAA “adjusts” the temperature record, right? And their adjustments always show hotter temps. Just like GISS.
You can’t trust them.
Yes, I have heard that. But simply because they adjust the values, that does not a priori mean they cannot be trusted. The question is how and why did they adjust the temperatures.
For example, NOAA says “The most important bias in the U.S. temperature record occurred with the systematic change in observing times from the afternoon, when it is warm, to morning, when it is cooler. This shift has resulted in a well documented increasing cool bias over the last several decades and is addressed by applying a correction to the data.”
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cmb-faq/temperature-monitoring.html
Do you doubt this change occurred? Do you think this change in measurement should NOT be considered? That current morning readings should indeed be compared with earlier afternoon readings?
And no, I do not have personal knowledge of the details or of the other potential biases that they may have been adjusting for. But if you want to claim the adjustment are in some way suspect, then please provide your specific evidence of how specific adjustments are incorrect so I can learn what those problems are.