Government report: Canadian climate data quality 'disturbing'

From the “we told you so time and again department”, Canadian weather data is a mess. It took an FOIA to get the “fess up” out in the open. Anybody got a copy of the EC report? So far all we have is press reports.

See our WUWT report below, it isn’t just Canada that is in the red with poor data. Though you can see a vast swath of red and lots of missing grey area in Canada.

GISS & METAR – dial “M” for missing minus signs: it’s worse than we thought

http://climateaudit.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/ghcn_giss_hr2sst_250km_anom03_2010_2010_1971_2000.gif?w=520&h=307&h=307

From the Financial Post

Sustained cuts to Environment Canada weather-service programs have compromised the government’s ability to assess climate change and left it with a “profoundly disturbing” quality of information in its data network, says a newly released internal government report.

“The common assumption among users is that the data has been observed accurately, checked for mistakes and stored properly,” said the report, printed in June 2008. “It is profoundly disturbing to discover the true state of our climate data network and the data we offer to ourselves and the real world.”

The stinging assessment, obtained through an access-to-information request, suggests that Canada’s climate network infrastructure is getting progressively worse and no longer meets international guidelines.

Key findings in the report:

• Automatic precipitation sensors are subject to significant and well-known errors, which have significantly compromised the integrity of Canada’s precipitation data;

• National coverage of certain climate elements, such as hours of bright sunshine, have been effectively terminated;

• Human quality control of climate data ceased as of April 1, 2008. Automated quality control is essentially non-existent. There is no program in place to prevent erroneous data from entering the national climate archive;

• Climate data, which could be gathered at minimal additional cost, is not being gathered due to lack of funds;

• Climate data, which could be gathered with minimal additional effort, is not being gathered due to lack of personnel;

• Some existing data, which needs to be interpreted and processed before being placed into the national archive, is being ignored due to lack of resources;

• A significant portion of the volunteer climate network will likely be lost due to a decision on the part of the Meteorological Service of Canada to discontinue processing paper forms and to emphasize electronic input;

• Clients of Environment Canada (both internal and external) cannot obtain the information they need. This has significant implications for programs carried out by all levels of government, the private sector and the international scientific community; and

• Lack of resources and delayed quality control of climate data have resulted in updates of Intensity/Duration/Frequency curves that proceed in fits and starts. Systematic and regular updates are desired by the engineering community in order to design public infrastructure (roads, buildings, sewers) that will be able to cope with severe storms and phenomena associated with changing climate.

• These issues are widely recognized by staff within the department, and are becoming increasingly obvious to outside partners and clients, damaging morale within and credibility outside the department.

Source: Degradation in Environment Canada’s Climate Network, Quality Control and Data Storage Practices: A Call to Repair the Damage. June 2008.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
1 1 vote
Article Rating
104 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Stu
August 25, 2010 11:07 pm

Anthony, I’m just reading over your METAR post again. There seems to be a few spacing/spelling/missing quotes? issues in a few passages which maybe you could attend to when you are not busy?
The relevant ones are-
“This, in my opinion, is a huge mistake because in addition to those issues
E.M. Smith aka “Chiefio” reports that in GISS (which uses GHCN) worldwide, there has been a wholesale migration towards airport weather data as a climatic data source. In an email sent to me on Jan 20, 2010 he says that
Look at:
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/agw-gistemp-measure-jet-age-airport-growth/
which as a fairly good descriptions of the problems in the data, we have a global report for GHCN as of that August data. There is more deail in the link, but I think you care about “now”:”
Detail for instance is ‘deail’, and is there a missing E.M. Smith quote?
Just a suggestion,

TomRude
August 26, 2010 5:26 pm

“Toronto — The Canadian Press
Published on Thursday, Aug. 26, 2010 12:05PM EDT
Canada is on track to have the warmest year on record — if La Nina doesn’t blow it.
The record was set in 1998 when temperatures were almost 2.5 degrees higher than normal for the whole year.
Environment Canada’s David Phillips says this year has been hotter than usual, and the trend will continue in early fall — at least in the eastern half of the country.
The senior climatologist says from January to July it’s been 3.5 degrees warmer than normal.
Phillips says the stretch from Manitoba to Newfoundland, and most of the north, will be warmer than usual in September.
But in the West it will be either normal or cooler than what’s usually seen in September, and cooler than usual into October and November because of La Nina.”
The rest of this garbage at:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/environment-canada-predicts-2010-may-end-as-warmest-year-on-record/article1686134/

JRR Canada
August 26, 2010 8:58 pm

If its all down to ideology on Harpers part, try this. Harper is helping clean up Gods Oil Spill in Alberta. Whats the matter? You against cleaning up oil spills?The relevations of satillite decay &cover-up are just another, its worst than I thought. The promotion of sciency studies and solutions is crashing and burning as it meets reality.Computer modelling on garbage data will produce garbage, EC has spent billions to not figure this out yet. An the conservatives are to blame? Crack reportedly produces that kind of wisdom, so does natural stupidity. Govt= lazy,crazy&stupid. But they’ are here to help you. JRR

Regg_upnorth
August 27, 2010 7:39 pm

JRR, that’s the point… I’m paying for the mess done by the oil industry in that area. Where i live, if i create a mess in the local river – i’ll be sued for it and will have to pay for it. But for the good old Harper’s friend and club, don’t worry there’s 30 millions (minus one) stupid tax payer ready to pay the bill.
That’s the point.

1 3 4 5