AGW=dead lizards? Maybe it's not the heat, but the handbags and herpetology aficionados?

I covered this story Mid May on WUWT.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/05/13/now-its-lizards-going-extinct-due-to-climate-change/

An email today asking if this is real science or just hype prompted me to do some research. First, below, the tragic story from the lizard specialist at BYU, whose rediscovery of some old field notes apparently was enough to touch off a firestorm of press coverage. My rebuttal, with citations, follows. – Anthony

BYU prof co-authors Science paper showing climate-induced lizard decline

Lizard researcher dusts off 30-year-old field notes that formed foundation of the study (note these links to news stories are provided by BYU in their press release, they seem quite happy to have the coverage -A)

PROVO, Utah – When Brigham Young University biology professor Jack Sites spent summers in the late 1970s collecting lizards in Mexico, he had no idea his field notes would one day help form the foundation for a worldwide study that attributes local lizard extinctions to climate change.

Sites is the senior author on the paper published in this week’s issue of Science. Led by Barry Sinervo, professor of ecology and evolutionary biology at the University of California, Santa Cruz, the study reports a global pattern of lizard die-offs in habitats unchanged except for rising temperatures.

The researchers surveyed lizard populations, studied the effects of rising temperatures on lizards, and used their findings to develop a predictive model of extinction risk. Their model accurately predicted specific locations on five continents (North and South America, Europe, Africa, and Australia) where previously studied lizard populations have already gone locally extinct. According to the model, if current trends continue, 20 percent of lizard species could go extinct by 2080.

The disappearance of lizard populations is likely to have repercussions up and down the food chain. Lizards are important prey for many birds, snakes, and other animals, and they are important predators of insects.

The study began when Sinervo noticed local lizard extinctions, one of which was among the lizards studied by Sites between 1977 and 1991.

“I had provided a baseline data set with precise localities where the lizards were common,” Sites explained. “But Mexican ecologists were going back every few years, and pretty soon the lizards were hard to find, and then they weren’t seeing any. These are protected areas, so the habitat’s still there. So you start to think there is something else going on.”

Using Sites’ field notes for comparison, Sinervo and collaborators resurveyed 48 species of spiny lizards (Sceloporus) at 200 sites in Mexico where the lizards had been studied between 1975 and 1995. They found that 12 percent of the local populations had gone extinct.

They later connected the lizards’ decline to climate records and studied the effect of rising temperatures on lizard physiology and behavior. For example, cold-blooded lizards can’t forage for food when their bodies get too hot – they must seek shade because they can’t regulate their own temperature. The researchers found that the hours per day when the temperature allowed foraging dropped significantly.

Sites said that when the temperature increase hits during a critical month of the reproductive cycle, the lizards don’t get enough energy resources to support a clutch of eggs or embryos.

“The heat doesn’t kill them, they just don’t reproduce,” said Sites, who earned BYU’s highest honor for faculty, the Maeser Distinguished Faculty Award, in 2002. “It doesn’t take too much of that and the population starts to crash.”

But for the phenomenon to be linked to climate change, the pattern would need to be seen globally. Sites connected Sinervo with researchers in Chile and Argentina, where Sites has been working for a decade. Sinervo also worked with researchers who documented lizard declines in Africa, Australia, and Europe.

“To get this kind of pattern, on five continents in 34 different groups of lizards, that’s not random, that’s a correlated response to something big,” Sites said, adding that the effect appears to be happening too fast for the lizards to adapt.

Sites finds no joy in being part of such a significant study. “It’s a terrible sinking feeling – when I first saw the data, I thought, ‘Can this really be happening?’ It’s important to point out, but it sure is depressing.”

Sites says the model now needs detailed testing on all five continents, with a standardized protocol on lizard species that are widespread.

Read more about Sites’ exploits with reptiles in this BYU Magazine profile.

Portions of a UC-Santa Cruz news release are used here with permission.

================================================================

OK here’s the money quote from the BYU press release:

Sites explained. “But Mexican ecologists were going back every few years, and pretty soon the lizards were hard to find, and then they weren’t seeing any. These are protected areas, so the habitat’s still there. So you start to think there is something else going on.”

Yes it’s climate change! That must be it! It’s the only thing that fits…or…maybe not.

The popularity of keeping lizards as pets has exploded in the last 30 years. Catch and release programs aren’t the standard for lizards, it’s more like “catch and take home”.   In a poor country like Mexico, selling captured lizards, dead or alive to the gringos = easy money.

Take for example this report about lizard trade in Mexico from American University:

http://www1.american.edu/ted/REPTILE.HTM

Reptile Trade from Mexico:

“The illegal skins trade in Mexico represents millions of dollars annually on the black market.”

Here’s a peer reviewed paper on the lizard skin trade in Mexico:

Here’s a story about the explosion of exotic pets, including lizards, in the UK   http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/the-great-british-pet-the-new-trend-gripping-the-nation-424569.html

“The British Federation of Herpetologists believes there are already more reptiles than dogs in UK homes and while the number of canines began a steady decline 10 years ago, sales of snakes, lizards, spiders and snails continue to rocket with a five-fold increase in the past 10 years.”

Here’s another from Boston.com   http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/magazine/articles/2008/07/13/leaping_lizards/

“The popularity of reptiles as pets is exploding. In 2006, 4.8 million households in the United States owned 13 million reptiles, according to the American Pet Products Manufacturers Association. That’s double the 2.4 million households that owned reptiles in 1996.”

Maybe its not the heat, but the handbags: The “endangered species handbook” says: http://www.endangeredspecieshandbook.org/trade_reptile_lizards.php

“The luxury reptile leather trade has pushed many species toward extinction, and it shows no signs of declining.  Lizard and snakeskin products are now being sold in the volume that turtle and crocodilian leather once were. “

Even the WWF admits the trade is the problem:   http://www.worldwildlife.org/what/globalmarkets/wildlifetrade/faqs-reptile.html

“Scientists recognize some 6,000 species of reptiles in five different groups: turtles and tortoises (order Testudines), tuataras (order Rhynchocephalia), lizards (order Sauria), snakes (order Serpentes), and crocodilians (order Crocodylia). Reptiles are traded live as pets and for their parts, particularly their skins, which are valued for certain leather items such as shoes, wallets, handbags, and watchbands. In addition, some reptiles are used as food and to make traditional medicines.”

I find the choice of lizard used by Dr. Sites in the video and press release hilarious, because it underscores his complete lack of understanding of what’s going on outside his world. He uses an Australian bearded lizard (dragon) in the video, and provide this photo in the BYU PR page:

Click here to download

An Australian bearded dragon.

What’s funny about using a bearded lizard? They aren’t going extinct, they are being bred to meet the popularity demand.

http://www.lakehowellanimalclinic.com/html/bearded_dragon_biology.html

Bearded dragons (Pogona vitticeps) are omnivorous lizards that are native to Central Australia. These squamates have been raised in captivity with great success, with (estimates of) over 250,000 being produced in captivity per year.

Of course, with other lizards disappearing, it HAS to be climate change. There could not be any other explanation. Because, well, there just isn’t.

What a load of plonkers.

=======================

UPDATE: In comments Jimbo writes:

Here are examples of why some Mexicans and other nationals would like to catch lizards:

SHOES

Manolo Blahnik Lizard skin shoes $876.00

Manolo Blahnik black lizard ‘Cicero’ $876.00

Lucchese Womens 1883 Lizard Skin Boots $369.99

Lizard & Crocodile Penny Loafers $199.99

LADIE’S BAGS

Burgundy Lizard Skin Handbag $250

Blumarine Special Edition $749.99 YOU SAVE: 70.00 % !!!

FENDI Vintage Rare Beaded SILK LIZARD $399.00

Fendi evening handbag Neve NOW ONLY $1,113.00

——

BBC

“Customs officers are to work with police forces worldwide to crack down on the smuggling of exotic birds and animals.

The illegal trade rakes in billions of pounds a year, making it the second most lucrative after drug smuggling, according to the intern

========================================

Juraj V. says:

Temperature in Mexico:

http://climexp.knmi.nl/data/icrutem3_hadsst2_250-265E_15-30N_na.png

I can’t imagine the lizard die-off in 1860s or 1940s.

Look how the sinusoidal wave starts to go negative again.

http://climexp.knmi.nl/data/icrutem3_hadsst2_250-265E_15-30N_na.png

Well the popularity of keeping lizards as pets has exploded in the last 30 years. Catch and release programs aren’t the standard for lizards, it’s more like “catch and take home”.
In a poor country like Mexico, selling captured lizards – easy money.
Here’s a story about the explosion of exotic pets, including lizards, in the UK
The British Federation of Herpetologists believes there are already more reptiles than dogs in UK homes and while the number of canines began a steady decline 10 years ago, sales of snakes, lizards, spiders and snails continue to rocket with a five-fold increase in the past 10 years.”
Here’s another from Boston.com
The popularity of reptiles as pets is exploding. In 2006, 4.8 million households in the United States owned 13 million reptiles, according to the American Pet Products Manufacturers Association. That’s double the 2.4 million households that owned reptiles in 1996.”
Maybe its not the heat, but the handbags: The “endangered species handbook” says:
“The luxury reptile leather trade has pushed many species toward extinction, and it shows no signs of declining.  Lizard and snakeskin products are now being sold in the volume that turtle and crocodilian leather once were. “
Even the WWF admits the trade is the problem:
“Scientists recognize some 6,000 species of reptiles in five different groups: turtles and tortoises (order Testudines), tuataras (order Rhynchocephalia), lizards (order Sauria), snakes (order Serpentes), and crocodilians (order Crocodylia). Reptiles are traded live as pets and for their parts, particularly their skins, which are valued for certain leather items such as shoes, wallets, handbags, and watchbands. In addition, some reptiles are used as food and to make traditional medicines.”
Of course, it HAS to be climate change. There could not be any other explanation. What a load of plonkers.
0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

133 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steve in SC
June 7, 2010 6:53 pm

There needs to be a trade in Burmese Python skins from Florida.

June 7, 2010 7:03 pm

As I sit here, ruminating about the many inaccuracies (falsehoods?) inherent in this line of “research” I cannot help but wonder when this is going to start affecting us in Texas? I’m writing from my favorite chair, a low federal style which has been in our family since at least 1850, which is in my upstairs office. The reason that this is important to the discussion is that on the window sill there are currently 6 Anoles, a lizard that is familiar to most people from pet stores, which are sold as “chameleons”. Unlike a true chameleon, these lizards change colour according to the temperature, a brilliant green when it’s hot, currently 101 degrees (F) and a dull brown when cold. At night, they may be found under the lip of my roof, which is when the geckos come out.
My small property here actually has representatives of 3 types of lizards and I seem to be overrun with them. I’m not sure of the species of the third type, it’s rather large, about 5 inches without the tail, grey/green/yellowish, lives under my palmeto and has a nasty temper.My long, rambling diatribe does have a salient point; these lizards are sold by the bucket load to pet stores throughout the country, saving only our southern states where they are common, and it’s illegal to catch them in the “wild” for resale purposes. As many others have pointed out, the decline in numbers (if we can even trust that) is probably due to “loose protection” laws; as our climate here is very similar to northern mexico.

Chris1958
June 7, 2010 7:06 pm

Why not AWG and some/all of the alternative expanations combined?

pat
June 7, 2010 7:10 pm

looks like nothing will come out of Bonn:
8 June: AFP: 10 years needed to seal climate cuts, says UN pointman
“I don’t see the process delivering adequate mitigation targets in the next decade,” Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), said in a webcast from Bonn….
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5iz2-vCgzscFjoJP-h97HLvlcgkrA
8 June: Hindustan Times: US, EU differ on future climate change negotiations
At Bonn, however, US officials appear to have softened their stand on Kyoto Protocol, saying they don’t mind it being discussed. “US is not a signatory to Kyoto and, therefore, any discussion on it does not matter to it,” said an Indian negotiator, participating at the 185-nation conference, biggest after the Copenhagen climate summit in December 2009.
The European Union, on the other hand, says there is no future for Kyoto Protocol and wants to discuss the new climate agreement where some responsibility is defined for all nations. The view is opposed by developing nations represented by G-77 plus China. ..
Chief South African delegate Alf Wills said the document put too much burden on developing nations, devoting a whole chapter to emissions curbs by the South but not the North. “It’s completely unbalanced in that respect,” he said.
Other major economies — India and China — have backed South African view…
http://www.hindustantimes.com/US-EU-differ-on-future-climate-change-negotiations/Article1-554576.aspx
8 June: Next: Climate change fund will be a grant
Yvo de Boer, the executive secretary, United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change, said on Monday that only Japan who pledged $15 billion to the proposed fund indicated that certain portion of her pledge would come as loan…
http://234next.com/csp/cms/sites/Next/Home/5577183-146/climate_change_fund_will_be_a.csp

ImranCan
June 7, 2010 7:13 pm

Its the lack of intellectual curiosity that I find so irritating … it has to be climate change … of course …not the kind of questions one might ask like below ..
– is this really possible for a 0.5 degrees C temperature rise ?
– lets do some lab (greenhouse) experiments on lizard reporduction as a function of temperature.
– wouldn’t the lizards just move 50m uphill ? to negate the effect of temperature ?
– what else is changing ?
– how did they surviver the high temps of the 1940’s ?
Its truly pathetic !

June 7, 2010 8:02 pm

ImranCan says:
June 7, 2010 at 7:13 pm
“Its the lack of intellectual curiosity……….”
That stuff is sooo passe. The word “intellectual” doesn’t belong in a CAGW discussion. True, many are educated, but I find intellectual pursuit woefully lacking. Very few have, none as far as I can tell, stated that even if all the doom and gloom the CAGW people have proposed is true, that the cure is still worse than the illness. In my estimation, this is true. To take a quote from a book that many here seem to disdain, regardless of the well-founded logic, “Let us do evil that good may come?” How much harm must we do to our fellow man before we save humanity? Yes, that’s a moral question, but it is also incumbent upon us to intellectually ask the question. The worst case scenario: how much are we willing and able to pay? For me, the answer is, the price is already to high. For us to be forced to deal with trifling studies about lizards which have thrived in much warmer conditions isn’t superfluous, it is a horrible harm to mankind.

rbateman
June 7, 2010 8:12 pm

BYU didn’t watch V. The bad reptiles get it in the end. And Godzilla must be appeased, or he’ll go on a rampage.

June 7, 2010 8:25 pm

aficionado = modest enthusiasm; afficionado = strong enthusiasm; affficionado = really great enthusiasm. apicicionado = softly enthusiastic; appicionado = …

RockyRoad
June 7, 2010 8:29 pm

OT: Congratulations, Mr. Watts, on the selection of WuWT as the #1 Science Blog! (Maybe that’s what set off your “uninvited guest”? I truly hope so.)

pat
June 7, 2010 8:31 pm

surprised any MSM reporting on this:
7 June: LA Times: Andrew Malcolm: The ties that bind. Remember Rahm Emanuel’s rent-free D.C. apartment? The owner: A BP adviser
Greenberg’s consulting firm was a prime architect of BP’s recent rebranding drive as a green petroleum company, down to green signs and the slogan “Beyond Petroleum.”
Greenberg’s company is also closely tied to a sister Democratic outfit — GCS, named for the last initials of Greenberg, James Carville, another Clinton advisor, and Bob Shrum, John Kerry’s 2004 campaign manager.
According to published reports, GCS received hundreds of thousands of dollars in political polling contracts in recent years from the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
Probably just a crazy coincidence. But you’ll never guess who was the chairman of that Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee dispensing those huge polling contracts to his kindly rent-free landlord.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2010/06/rahm-emanuel-bp-gul-oil-spill.html

Michael
June 7, 2010 8:48 pm

OT
“A note about boundaries”
Agreed Anthony 100%.
That being said,
The Radio Sun
10.7 cm flux: 68 sfu
Updated 06 Jun 2010
The absolute lowest reading is like 67. Should this be something to look at?

June 7, 2010 8:57 pm

alan says:
June 7, 2010 at 6:29 pm
Species go extinct all the time, and new species are evolving all the time. Get used to it. It’s called EVOLUTION. I thought the science behind that concept was settled!

You’re right, alan. Species go extinct all the time. In paleobiology we have learned that the only way a species radiates is through the extinction of another avatar. Exempli gratia, an avatar 2 living in a given region survives a climate change and an avatar 1 living in the same biotic patch starts succumbing to that climate change. Until this moment, this is the sole mechanism by which a species radiates, evolutionary talking. The other mechanisms are highly vague. In other words, climate changes are ideal for biodiversity. Those guys on the AGW side have turned the science up down.

June 7, 2010 9:04 pm

thelastdemocrat says:
June 7, 2010 at 8:25 pm
“aficionado = modest enthusiasm; afficionado = strong enthusiasm; affficionado = really great enthusiasm. apicicionado = softly enthusiastic; appicionado = …”
That slayed me. And I thought worth repeating, apparently.

DesertYote
June 7, 2010 9:31 pm

Chances are the the studies are flawed. There are some significant signs that this is propaganda and not science. There is no such thing as extinction of local populations. The “12% of the local populations had gone extinct” line is a weasel sentence. Most specie of Sceloporus are pretty damn easy to breed and most of the animals in the pet trade are captive breed. The “Evil pet trade causing extinction” line is just propaganda. I am also a bit sceptical of the definition of species being employed. Herpetology has been pretty much be taken over by radical moonbats who are always “splitters”, i.e. those who try to define every population of an animal as a separate species, e.g. Ambistoma californium which really is Ambistoma tigrinum californium.

Al Gored
June 7, 2010 9:34 pm

latitude says:
June 7, 2010 at 4:15 pm
“”Dave Springer says:
June 7, 2010 at 4:09 pm
So when you hear about species going extinct take it with a huge grain of salt because it’s highly likely it’s only a sub-species going extinct and no genetic diversity is actually being forever lost.”‘
100% spot on Dave, thank you
———-
Indeed. It gets worse. They also define ‘distinct geographic populations’ which they can’t even muster enough ‘evidence’ to call supposed ‘subspecies’… and call them ‘species’ too. And add them to list totals of course.
Then, about the word ‘extinction.’ They are ALWAYS accidentally mixing that up with ‘extirpation’ (local extinction) for maximum fear effect.
Then there are political boundaries. A recent classic example of this trick came from the Canadian eco-hysterian David Suzuki… screaming about the extinction of the Northern Spotted Owl based on an apparent decline in the British Columbia population. Not mentioned, of course, is that B.C. is on the extreme northern fringe of that population and 99.9% of them have always been in the U.S.
A huge proportion of the ‘species’ listed in Canada are the tiny marginal populations on the northern extreme of their range, with much larger and often very healthy populations in the U.S. For the most part this relates to the fact that certain habitats just barely make it north into Canada.

Roger Knights
June 7, 2010 9:48 pm

“So just looking at their original locations doesn’t tell the whole story.”
Is it possible that attractants were placed in the initial study, or that locations with recent indications of lizards’ presence were chosen? If so, a subsequent visit to the same location would be less fruitful.

Roger Knights
June 7, 2010 10:05 pm

PS: And maybe lizards subsequently avoided locations where captures occurred?

Jeff M
June 7, 2010 10:14 pm

Uh oh, or heh. Waiting to find out. I am acquainted with Jack Sites as he lives a couple miles from me, and we share an interest in reptiles. I’ve not talked to him in since the late 80s, so I’m not up to date on his research. When he was working in Mexico, the lizards he was studying were not the kinds used for skins or pets. They were small common ones and he was studying them because some of them were showing signs of being in the process of differentiation into distinct genetic types. You might want to check on the kinds of lizards cited in the study. And his notes.
That being said, I’m somewhat skeptical of the claims in the study since temperatures were warmer than now during the medieval warm period. So I don’t think temperature is responsible. I’d more suspect disease. There may be other factors such as other parts of the food chain being disrupted for reasons other than temperatures.
I can’t tell you if he’s just an AGW tool since I haven’t worked closely with him. But when I knew him, he seemed to be a reasonable guy. So I think it would be nice and wait until we’ve seen the data and the alternate explanations before making fun of or mocking him. This is the first time on this blog I actually know the person being talked about, and it feels, um, awkward watching all the put downs before we’ve examined the data and methodologies.

The Ghost Of Big Jim Cooley
June 7, 2010 11:34 pm

I did once get annoyed with this, but now I find it really funny – the amount of time it takes a newspapert or the BBC to link ANYTHING with climate change. To give you an example; here in England we’ve just had a very sad incident in which a fox walked into a house in London and attacked two babies while they were in their cots. The babies are both in hospital and obviously we all wish them the best. This is unprecedented, as foxes are usually very wary of humans, and not only will they rarely enter a home, they just don’t attack humans. Apparently this fox showed no fear when the mother came to the babies’ aid.
Now ask yourself, just how long will it be before the BBC or a newspaper says this is because of climate change? I know it sounds unlikely, but trust me, EVERYTHING gets blamed on climate change here!

Pete Hayes
June 8, 2010 12:18 am

Cue picture of a lizard on a melting ice floe………Good grief! I cannot even get mad at these con merchants anymore. Are they trying to bore us into agreement?

Geoff Sherrington
June 8, 2010 12:36 am

Ron House: “the local lizards’ main cause of death is being run over by cars.”
Same with cane toads, especially in a heavy rain after a dry spell.
Question: “Why did the cane toad cross the road?”
Answer: “To see his flat mate”.

Rabe
June 8, 2010 12:51 am

I don’t know why you focus on lizards. There are much more serious threats against us humans. The Vikings went extinct because of climate change.

Geoff Sherrington
June 8, 2010 12:52 am

Stan Buffel says:
June 7, 2010 at 4:13 pm “Perhaps the problem is not AGW but chemicals in the environment that affect the reproductive cycle”
Stan, I go feral when I read generalisations like this. I’m a professional chemist and I have some understanding of chemical toxicity and its comparative rarity.
The world is still in the grip of chemophobia, but it is so passse, because that was the theme of the next Global Apocalypse about 40 years ago. The hypothesis was that chemists were making so many new chemicals that the human race was endangered by a coming wave of cancers induced by the chemicals. Thousands of substances were labelled carcinogenic or teratogenic, mainly from huge doses given to animals, especially mice. Despite all the effort, it is exceptionally difficult to extrapolate mice experiments to human reactions for nominated chemicals.
If you are worried about lizards not breeding because of the temperature, think of the millions of people whowere not born because of the pill. There, I will accept a chemical(s) that interefere with the life cycle, chemicals about which much is known.
But, please resist armwaving and chemophobia. We already have a runaway silliness called “organic farming” which would result in mass starvation if applied to the whole agricultural world. We actually have farmers who put dung into cows horns under a full moon, bury it, dig it up again, dilute it in water with a prescribed number of stirs clockwise and anti-clock, then spread it highly diluted on their fields. This hocus pocus is supposed to be better than synthetic fertilizers designed by chemists with decades of experience and measurements.
Chemophobia sucks. Don’t connect it with Global Warming.

Grumbler
June 8, 2010 1:21 am

Joe says:
June 7, 2010 at 5:06 pm
Living in the UK I can vouch that I have never seen a lizard in the countryside. I think it’s because the UK has miserable cold weather. When I visit a hot country, they’re everywhere. I’m no expert, but I think lizards like it hot.”
Lots down here in Dorset UK. It’s a function of being slightly warmer than rest of UK but mainly because of habitat, sand and heath.
I can’t believe that ‘science’ paper. Lizards dying from heat? If it was that bad a lot more creatures would have died first surely? Lizards can’t be that sensitive. They’re having a larf!
Regarding extinctions I read in a science paper that a species was 90% extinct – either it is or it isn’t? Can you be 90% pregnant?
cheers David

RockyRoad
June 8, 2010 3:27 am

Rabe says:
June 8, 2010 at 12:51 am
I don’t know why you focus on lizards. There are much more serious threats against us humans. The Vikings went extinct because of climate change.
—————–Reply:
You’ve hit the nail on the head, Rabe. Except you overgeneralize–the extinction of the Vikings was because it got COLDER. Look up any of the warmer periods (and contrary to Mann et al, there were indeed several) and you’ll see they correspond to an expansion of civilization and better times for mankind. Don’t be fooled by the “sky if falling” crowd simply because the earth is on a warming trend–it has happended many times before and will do so many times again. Enjoy the warmth before the next Ice Age sets in, at which point life for humans will be much like that experienced by those Vikings.