One more thing to worry about – fog shortage

UPDATE: Roger Pielke Jr. alerts us to this:

Last summer the San Francisco Chronicle carried a story about research on fog and climate with a different conclusion:

The Bay Area just had its foggiest May in 50 years. And thanks to global warming, it’s about to get even foggier.

That’s the conclusion of several state researchers, whose soon-to-be-published study predicts that even with average temperatures on the rise, the mercury won’t be soaring everywhere.

“There’ll be winners and losers,” says Robert Bornstein, a meteorology professor at San Jose State University. “Global warming is warming the interior part of California, but it leads to a reverse reaction of more fog along the coast.”

The study, which will appear in the journal Climate, is the latest to argue that colder summers are indeed in store for parts of the Bay Area.

More fog is consistent with predictions of climate change. Less fog is consistent with predictions of climate change. I wonder if the same amount of fog is also “consistent with” such predictions? I bet so.

From the University of California – Berkeley via Eurekalert:

Fog has declined in past century along California’s redwood coast

Analysis of hourly airport cloud cover reports leads to surprising finding

California’s coastal fog has decreased significantly over the past 100 years, potentially endangering coast redwood trees dependent on cool, humid summers, according to a new study by University of California, Berkeley, scientists.

It is unclear whether this is part of a natural cycle of the result of human activity, but the change could affect not only the redwoods, but the entire redwood ecosystem, the scientists say.

“Since 1901, the average number of hours of fog along the coast in summer has dropped from 56 percent to 42 percent, which is a loss of about three hours per day,” said study leader James A. Johnstone, who recently received his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley’s Department of Geography before becoming a postdoctoral scholar in the campus’s Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management (ESPM). “A cool coast and warm interior is one of the defining characteristics of California’s coastal climate, but the temperature difference between the coast and interior has declined substantially in the last century, in step with the decline in summer fog.”

The loss of fog and increased temperature mean that “coast redwood and other ecosystems along the U.S. West Coast may be increasingly drought-stressed, with a summer climate of reduced fog frequency and greater evaporative demand,” said coauthor Todd E. Dawson, UC Berkeley professor of integrative biology and of ESPM. “Fog prevents water loss from redwoods in summer, and is really important for both the tree and the forest. If the fog is gone, we might not have the redwood forests we do now.”

Fog in the redwoods

The scientists’ report will be posted online during the week of Feb. 15 in advance of publication in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The surprising result came from analysis of new records recently made available by the National Climate Data Center. The U.S. Surface Airways data come from airports around the country, which have recorded for more than 60 years hourly information such as cloud cover (cloud ceiling height), visibility, wind and temperature.

Johnstone evaluated the data from airports along the northern California coast and found two airports – Arcata and Monterey – that had consistent fog records going back to 1951. With these data, he was able to show that frequent coastal fog is almost always associated with a large temperature difference between the coast and inland areas.

Using a network of 114 temperature stations along the Pacific Coast, Johnstone and Dawson demonstrated that the coast-inland contrast has decreased substantially, not just in Northern California, but along the entire U.S. coastline from Seattle to San Diego. This change is particularly noticeable in the difference between Ukiah, a warm Coast Range site in Northern California, and Berkeley on San Francisco Bay. At the beginning of the 20th century, the daytime temperature difference between the two sites was 17 degrees Fahrenheit; today, it is just 11 degrees Fahrenheit.

The relationship between temperature gradient and fog frequency implies a 33 percent drop in fog along the coast during this time.

Greater fog frequency is connected to cooler than normal ocean waters from Alaska to Mexico and warm water from the central North Pacific to Japan. This temperature flip-flop is a well-known phenomenon called Pacific Decadal Oscillation – an El Niño-like pattern of the north Pacific that affects salmon populations along the US West Coast. The new results show that this pattern may also have substantial effects on the coastal forest landscape.

In addition, the data show that the coast gets foggier when winds blow from the north along the coast, which fits with observations that northerly winds push surface waters offshore and allow the upwelling of deep, cold, nutrient-rich water.

“This is the first data actually illustrating that upwelling along the Pacific coast and fog over the land are linked,” Johnstone said.

By pulling in data on temperature variation with elevation, Johnstone and Dawson also related their fog data with a temperature inversion that each summer traps the fog between the coast and the coastal mountains. The inversion is caused by a warm, dry, high-pressure cell that sits over Northern California in late summer, bringing hot temperatures to inland areas, including the Central Valley. If the inversion is strong, its lower boundary at about 1,200 feet keeps a lid on the cool marine layer and prevents fog from penetrating over the Coast Ranges. When it is weak, the ocean air and clouds move upward and inland, resulting in a cooler interior and a warmer, drier coast.

“The data support the idea that Northern California coastal fog has decreased in connection with a decline in the coast-inland temperature gradient and weakening of the summer temperature inversion,” Johnstone said.

“As fog decreases, the mature redwoods along the coast are not likely to die outright, but there may be less recruitment of new trees; they will look elsewhere for water, high humidity and cooler temperatures,” Dawson said. “What does that mean for the current redwood range and that of the plants and animals with them?”

Eventually, Dawson and Johnstone hope to correlate fog frequency with redwood tree ring data in order to estimate climate trends going back hundreds of years.

“While people have used tree ring data from White Mountain bristlecone pines and stumps in Mono Lake to infer climate change in California, redwoods have always been thought problematic,” Dawson said, mainly because it’s hard to determine whether the width of a tree ring reflects winter rain, summer fog, temperature, nutrient supply or other factors. “Stable isotope analyses of wood cellulose allows you to pull this data out of the tree ring.”

Dawson has established that the isotopes of oxygen in a tree reflect whether the water comes in via the leaves from fog, or via the roots from rainwater. “Redwoods live for more than 2,000 years, so they could be a very important indicator of climate patterns and change along the coast,” he said.

The new fog data will allow Dawson and Johnstone to calibrate their tree ring isotope data with actual coastal fog conditions in the past century, and then extrapolate back for 1,000 years or more to estimate climate conditions.

The work was supported by the Save the Redwoods League and the Berkeley Atmospheric Sciences Center.

================================================

Further reading: Fog in California from UCSB

http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~joel/g110_w08/lecture_notes/california_fog/cal_coastal_fog1_sm.jpg
The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
242 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 16, 2010 4:15 pm

So who is fogging up the climate debate now?

sky
February 16, 2010 4:15 pm

Johnstone’s claim of “first data actually illustrating” the connection between summer fog and upwelling off N. California is way off. I first read (an UC Bulletin, if memory serves) about that connection a few decades ago. And, like Willis, I’m very skeptical about the integrity of the Ukiah data. But I’m confident that, as long as there are climate scientists, there will be plenty of fog!

It's always Marcia, Marcia
February 16, 2010 4:20 pm

one more thing to yawn about

February 16, 2010 4:21 pm

Sorry another one off topic, but may be of interest.
FOI request for emails related to production of faulty Australian ABC Climate Timeline denied. Is this another Climategate in the making?
http://abcnewswatch.blogspot.com/2010/02/foi-request-for-climate-time-line.html

Richard C
February 16, 2010 4:22 pm

Mike (14:33:09) :
Should I be laughing or crying – or both?
How about laughing so hard that you cry?

astonerii
February 16, 2010 4:23 pm

Did I read that correctly that the whole notion is based on climate modeling and not on observation?

Ron de Haan
February 16, 2010 4:25 pm

What we don’t read in the Media.
Mongolia, for the second time in three years, has been hit by a Dzud.
After the drought of last summer, the people have run out of food stocks in the middle of this extreme winter. Death and hunger have hit hard.
It’s cold that’s our enemy, not warmth.
The Red Cross estimates that by the end of this winter the life stocks will have been decimated by 20 million animals.
Watch this movie “Frozen Cattle Crises in brutal Mongolia, but I warn you, some of the shots are pretty disturbing.
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/5/20100208/video/vwl-frozen-cattle-crisis-in-brutal-mongo-89eb865.html

tallbloke
February 16, 2010 4:32 pm

Quick, burn some coal and get those particulates nucleating fog.
Get those clunkers back on the road Arnie!

NickB.
February 16, 2010 4:42 pm

Willis Eschenbach (15:01:57):
So in fact, they have not measured the amount of fog along the coast. Instead, they have looked at two airports (Arcata and Monterrey), and related their two fog records to the “temperature difference between the coast and inland areas”
As usual you hit the nail on the head. I thought I had read that in passing but never got around to a 2nd more thorough read to confirm/deny. I guess such is the state of modern climate science that allegations of decreasing fog can be extrapolated by unverified empirical theory.
Observation is, after all, an antiquated scientific method right? 😛

Imran
February 16, 2010 4:51 pm

Unbelievable … its front page news …. not Haiti … not the economy …. the fact that its less foggy in California than it was 100 years ago …. allegedly.
Bla bla bla ….. on the one hand they state that it is uncertain whether man has had any influence …… then they state that the fogginess is driven by the PDO …..
These people are beginning to $#% me off.

Craig Moore
February 16, 2010 4:54 pm

I think we have learned from this blog, that pettifoggery is not defined by the clouds edge.

Jeremy
February 16, 2010 4:54 pm

I’m sure the redwoods will survive just fine, considering how old some of them are. A much bigger concern for us humans is the loss of some great California wines due to the sensitive grapes altering their flavor off in sunnier fields.

CRS, Dr.P.H.
February 16, 2010 4:56 pm

DOE’s accelerator lab Fermilab just posted the video for Richard Lindzen’s colloquium talk “The Peculiar Issue of Global Warming,” delivered on April 10, 2010. Please visit this link for the video:
http://vmsstreamer1.fnal.gov/VMS_Site_03/Lectures/Colloquium/100210Lindzen/index.htm
It was a great presentation to a rather rambunctious group of physicists! Enjoy!

rbateman
February 16, 2010 4:59 pm

paul jackson (15:47:40) :
The 114 stations in California would be great if it weren’t for the drive-by on the data.
Maybe some folks in each of those places could spend some time verifying the ‘official data’ with what is in the newsprint of the times.
You might not be so fond of it after you see the difference between the two datasets.
I’m not.

wayne
February 16, 2010 5:00 pm

Robert:
Since you find it appropriate to pounce on other people like Kim who merely spoke her feelings I have something say about you Robert.
What, do you have to be a specialist in your private world before other people can open their mouth and speak. You are either a control-freak or a government employee, can’t quite tell yet.
For me I’m not employed, love the physical sciences, do mostly know what I am speaking of when I do, do make mistakes, will discredit AGW because every important fact points counter what is said of it and will stick my oar into climate science whenever I want to, specifically for anti-political involvement in AGW political causes.
Who are you? Or are you so dishonest you won’t open your mouth to let the people here really know you, not your mantra, you? Until then, until I can sense some real honesty and humility, you are nothing to me, just a rude man.
Do not expect me to reply until then. If you want more of me, don’t ask me, ask the people here. You are known by you words and actions, but by letting myself be a little peering as fictional Troy, I can read through your words and your motives are crystal clear.

David44
February 16, 2010 5:05 pm

SFO and OAK don’t have fog records back to 1951?
Can someone really claim less fog in Berkeley based on records from Arcata and Monterey while ignoring San Francisco and Oakland airports?

Richard M
February 16, 2010 5:06 pm

I wonder where Tom P and Nick S are? Why aren’t they here telling us what a poor study this is? I guess they must be out cashing their checks from Big Green.
Robert, I just got got my $10,000 check from big oil for my posts this week. The $5,000 I got from big coal was also nice. Don’t know where I will spend all the money.

imapopulist
February 16, 2010 5:13 pm

Not to mention all that is left is “rotten fog”.
(Hey you knew someone was going to say it…….)

Daniel H
February 16, 2010 5:19 pm

This fog alarmism is utter BS. As someone who grew up in Sonoma County I was surprised to read that the authors focused their study on redwood trees when local vineyards are much more sensitive to seasonal fog changes. The fog is crucial for the proper growth and health of Chardonay, Pinot Noir, and Sauvignon Blanc grape varieties because it moderates the temperature during the hot dry summer months by cooling and re-hydrating the grapes. Too little fog and the grapes dry and shrivel into raisins; too much fog/moisture and you get all kinds of nasty fungi which leads to “bunch rot”.
Fortunately, the unique micro-climates of the Northern California wine country have remained remarkably stable over the years and the wine industry has expanded substantially. That’s how I know this study is flawed. There are new vineyards popping up everywhere! The area around Mount Taylor where I grew up used to be cattle and sheep country but now it’s covered with vineyards and fancy Mediterranean style chateaus. None of it would have been possible without the stable and consistent fog cover that blankets the region.
Anyway, these Berkeley professors should drive up north on 101 for a change and interview some real life viticulturists instead of inferring conclusions based on computer models and questionable airport records. These data are obviously tainted by land use changes and, at the very least, the Ukiah records were probably influenced by logging and clear cutting activities. Lumber was a HUGE industry in Mendocino County from the 1940s up until the mid-80s when the spotted owl thing became an issue. Now their main industry seems to be related to the growing medicinal marijuana market. That’s a land-use transition that Berkeley residents are intimately familiar with.

February 16, 2010 5:19 pm

I get a stomach cramp whenever climate geeks opine about forests, something they know NOTHING about. But then I rise above it, because that’s what my mother taught me to do. “Rise above it, Mike,” she would say.
For an interesting paper on historical human influences in the redwoods (people have been living there for 10,000+ years), see Norman, Steven P. 2007. A 500-year record of fire from a humid coast redwood forest. A report to Save the Redwoods League, here:
http://westinstenv.org/histwl/2009/09/08/a-500-year-record-of-fire-from-a-humid-coast-redwood-forest/

Bulldust
February 16, 2010 5:24 pm

Wow! Obama making courageous deceisions and promoting nuclear – even reported in The West Australian newspaper, which is normally a month behind on most stories:
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/world/6815463/obama-ups-nuclear-investment-for-climate-fight/
I presume this is old news?

wayne
February 16, 2010 5:26 pm

paul jackson (15:47:40) :
Yeah, and it’s rather telling since GISS is only uses something like three or four stations for all of California. I had a gut feeling there were more stations but were merely dropped from global temperature calculations. Really adds to your confidence in that data, doesn’t it.

kuhnkat
February 16, 2010 5:28 pm

Since there are no graphs to show the distribution of the temp and fog change by year, they could have simply found that positive PDO equals less fog and warmer coastal temps.
Let’s wait for the full paper before going nuts.

February 16, 2010 5:28 pm

Billyquiz (12:18:32) :
It’s a little like the east coast snows – if it doesnt snow, it’s global warming; if it does snow, it’s global warming or in this case, if its foggy, its global warming or if its not foggy, it global warming
That is not what we would call solid science

February 16, 2010 5:38 pm

“Greater fog frequency is connected to cooler than normal ocean waters from Alaska to Mexico.” So the warmer the ocean waters from Alaska to Mexico, the less frequent the fog.
Clearly, Man is responsible for the warmer ocean temperatures along the coast. Too many West Coast swimmers peeing in the ocean (actually, percentage-wise isn’t it about equivalent to the amount of CO2 we pump into the air?).

1 3 4 5 6 7 10