One more thing to worry about – fog shortage

UPDATE: Roger Pielke Jr. alerts us to this:

Last summer the San Francisco Chronicle carried a story about research on fog and climate with a different conclusion:

The Bay Area just had its foggiest May in 50 years. And thanks to global warming, it’s about to get even foggier.

That’s the conclusion of several state researchers, whose soon-to-be-published study predicts that even with average temperatures on the rise, the mercury won’t be soaring everywhere.

“There’ll be winners and losers,” says Robert Bornstein, a meteorology professor at San Jose State University. “Global warming is warming the interior part of California, but it leads to a reverse reaction of more fog along the coast.”

The study, which will appear in the journal Climate, is the latest to argue that colder summers are indeed in store for parts of the Bay Area.

More fog is consistent with predictions of climate change. Less fog is consistent with predictions of climate change. I wonder if the same amount of fog is also “consistent with” such predictions? I bet so.

From the University of California – Berkeley via Eurekalert:

Fog has declined in past century along California’s redwood coast

Analysis of hourly airport cloud cover reports leads to surprising finding

California’s coastal fog has decreased significantly over the past 100 years, potentially endangering coast redwood trees dependent on cool, humid summers, according to a new study by University of California, Berkeley, scientists.

It is unclear whether this is part of a natural cycle of the result of human activity, but the change could affect not only the redwoods, but the entire redwood ecosystem, the scientists say.

“Since 1901, the average number of hours of fog along the coast in summer has dropped from 56 percent to 42 percent, which is a loss of about three hours per day,” said study leader James A. Johnstone, who recently received his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley’s Department of Geography before becoming a postdoctoral scholar in the campus’s Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management (ESPM). “A cool coast and warm interior is one of the defining characteristics of California’s coastal climate, but the temperature difference between the coast and interior has declined substantially in the last century, in step with the decline in summer fog.”

The loss of fog and increased temperature mean that “coast redwood and other ecosystems along the U.S. West Coast may be increasingly drought-stressed, with a summer climate of reduced fog frequency and greater evaporative demand,” said coauthor Todd E. Dawson, UC Berkeley professor of integrative biology and of ESPM. “Fog prevents water loss from redwoods in summer, and is really important for both the tree and the forest. If the fog is gone, we might not have the redwood forests we do now.”

Fog in the redwoods

The scientists’ report will be posted online during the week of Feb. 15 in advance of publication in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The surprising result came from analysis of new records recently made available by the National Climate Data Center. The U.S. Surface Airways data come from airports around the country, which have recorded for more than 60 years hourly information such as cloud cover (cloud ceiling height), visibility, wind and temperature.

Johnstone evaluated the data from airports along the northern California coast and found two airports – Arcata and Monterey – that had consistent fog records going back to 1951. With these data, he was able to show that frequent coastal fog is almost always associated with a large temperature difference between the coast and inland areas.

Using a network of 114 temperature stations along the Pacific Coast, Johnstone and Dawson demonstrated that the coast-inland contrast has decreased substantially, not just in Northern California, but along the entire U.S. coastline from Seattle to San Diego. This change is particularly noticeable in the difference between Ukiah, a warm Coast Range site in Northern California, and Berkeley on San Francisco Bay. At the beginning of the 20th century, the daytime temperature difference between the two sites was 17 degrees Fahrenheit; today, it is just 11 degrees Fahrenheit.

The relationship between temperature gradient and fog frequency implies a 33 percent drop in fog along the coast during this time.

Greater fog frequency is connected to cooler than normal ocean waters from Alaska to Mexico and warm water from the central North Pacific to Japan. This temperature flip-flop is a well-known phenomenon called Pacific Decadal Oscillation – an El Niño-like pattern of the north Pacific that affects salmon populations along the US West Coast. The new results show that this pattern may also have substantial effects on the coastal forest landscape.

In addition, the data show that the coast gets foggier when winds blow from the north along the coast, which fits with observations that northerly winds push surface waters offshore and allow the upwelling of deep, cold, nutrient-rich water.

“This is the first data actually illustrating that upwelling along the Pacific coast and fog over the land are linked,” Johnstone said.

By pulling in data on temperature variation with elevation, Johnstone and Dawson also related their fog data with a temperature inversion that each summer traps the fog between the coast and the coastal mountains. The inversion is caused by a warm, dry, high-pressure cell that sits over Northern California in late summer, bringing hot temperatures to inland areas, including the Central Valley. If the inversion is strong, its lower boundary at about 1,200 feet keeps a lid on the cool marine layer and prevents fog from penetrating over the Coast Ranges. When it is weak, the ocean air and clouds move upward and inland, resulting in a cooler interior and a warmer, drier coast.

“The data support the idea that Northern California coastal fog has decreased in connection with a decline in the coast-inland temperature gradient and weakening of the summer temperature inversion,” Johnstone said.

“As fog decreases, the mature redwoods along the coast are not likely to die outright, but there may be less recruitment of new trees; they will look elsewhere for water, high humidity and cooler temperatures,” Dawson said. “What does that mean for the current redwood range and that of the plants and animals with them?”

Eventually, Dawson and Johnstone hope to correlate fog frequency with redwood tree ring data in order to estimate climate trends going back hundreds of years.

“While people have used tree ring data from White Mountain bristlecone pines and stumps in Mono Lake to infer climate change in California, redwoods have always been thought problematic,” Dawson said, mainly because it’s hard to determine whether the width of a tree ring reflects winter rain, summer fog, temperature, nutrient supply or other factors. “Stable isotope analyses of wood cellulose allows you to pull this data out of the tree ring.”

Dawson has established that the isotopes of oxygen in a tree reflect whether the water comes in via the leaves from fog, or via the roots from rainwater. “Redwoods live for more than 2,000 years, so they could be a very important indicator of climate patterns and change along the coast,” he said.

The new fog data will allow Dawson and Johnstone to calibrate their tree ring isotope data with actual coastal fog conditions in the past century, and then extrapolate back for 1,000 years or more to estimate climate conditions.

The work was supported by the Save the Redwoods League and the Berkeley Atmospheric Sciences Center.

================================================

Further reading: Fog in California from UCSB

http://www.geog.ucsb.edu/~joel/g110_w08/lecture_notes/california_fog/cal_coastal_fog1_sm.jpg
0 0 votes
Article Rating
242 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 16, 2010 5:39 pm

Sorry, read the above as, “So the warmer the ocean waters from Alaska to Mexico, the MORE frequent the fog.:

John from CA
February 16, 2010 5:45 pm

ROF Neo
“Obviously, to save the redwoods, all of California will have to be evacuated.”

Brute
February 16, 2010 5:46 pm

Hmmmm………we’ve had a few too many clear/sunny days here this month.
I think that something is wrong with the climate.
I suppose it’s time to mail another check to the government to straighten this situation out.

February 16, 2010 5:54 pm

This is great news.
Less fog = less traffic accidents.
Less traffic accidents = less injuries and car repairs.
Less injuries and car repairs = cheaper insurance.
Cheaper insurance = lower insurance company profits.
Lower profits = insurance co’s raise rates to compensate…..
Crap. Never mind.

Marc
February 16, 2010 5:55 pm

I live in Monterey. I am 46 years old.
It is just as foggy here as ever. In fact, between Monterey and Castroville the fog has become so thick after 10pm that driving has become an adventure. I grew up in Carmel, which is on the other side of the Monterey Peninsula, and I can tell you that Carmel gets more fog than Monterey. So even if the Monterey Airport logged a day as “Sunny” that doesn’t mean that Carmel wasn’t socked in with fog. So I doubt that using data from Monterey Airport would be of much use.
Fog moves, and it seems to have a mind of it’s own.
Also, we have Redwoods that extend far east of the fog line. There are Redwoods in Carmel Valley that see 50% less fog than their counterparts in Big Sur, Santa Cruz and Eureka. Those trees are fat and happy.

Van Grungy
February 16, 2010 5:56 pm

What if CO2 increases ‘just’ change things?… What if a trace gas doesn’t affect temperature? What if CO2 increases just makes things a little different?
“In his 80s, Freeman has seen the Samoan controversy settled decisively in his favour. At a meeting of the American Association of Anthropologists in December 1998, his new book was on display. Its significance will take time to digest. It concludes with a call for anthropologists to abandon pre-scientific, anti-evolutionary ideologies, and recognise the rapidly accumulating evidence of evolutionary biology. This shows that “all humans, belonging as they do to the same species, have the same phylogenetically given human nature, with their differing cultures having come into being during quite recent times, through the varying exercise of choice. Our biologically given capacity for choice is then of enormous human significance.” Nature and nurture interact, but we should never disregard our biological heritage, which is becoming more and more fully understood.”
http://www.newsweekly.com.au/books/0813336937.html
Since I am not an anthropologist, I ask… Why do the people pushing the anti-human AGW agenda believe humans are static? I know they think the Climate should be static… That’s a whole other mind boggler….
This is important because changes ‘force’ adaptation… Are AGW proponents just nihilists at heart?
How did we allow ourselves to become so pessimistic?
If AGW acolytes believe humans can’t adapt, surely the whole world is a static DNA strand that will wither and die at the slightest whisper of a hush of warm wind…

AWatcher
February 16, 2010 6:02 pm

More fog on the California coast = global warming
Less fog on the California coast = global warming
Covered in many places, but IMHO best coverage so far is here:
http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.com/2010/02/consistent-with-being-in-deep-fog.html

pat
February 16, 2010 6:02 pm

the big problem with this “foggy” story is it’s already all over the MSM (u can easily find the links if u want them):
Fog decline threatens US redwoods
BBC News – Doreen Walton
Giant Redwoods May Dry Out; Warming to Blame?
National Geographic – Rachel Kaufman
Climate change threatens fog and redwoods -study
Reuters
Around the Redwoods, the Fog Is Dissipating
New York Times – Henry Fountain
Fog decrease harming California redwoods
USA Today – Doyle Rice
California redwoods dread sunny, fogless summers
Nature.com
Decrease in fog threatens California’s sequoias: study
AFP
California’s Fog Is Clearing, and That’s Bad News for Redwoods
Discover Magazine
Fog decline threat to redwoods
Herald de Paris – Doreen Walton
Fog loss affects California’s s sequoias
Channel Nine, Australia
it’s even in russia’s pravda:
Giant Redwoods of California May Soon Fade Out as Fog (sic)
http://english.pravda.ru/news/science/earth/16-02-2010/112241-giant_redwoods_california_fog-0
by the end of the day, it will have no doubt circled the MSM globe….and that is the problem we face.

David Corcoran
February 16, 2010 6:05 pm

Let’s panic about the fog. Immediately.

Andrew30
February 16, 2010 6:12 pm

Bulldust (17:24:10) :
The Nuclear lobby has been funding the Climate Research Unit tune for a long time. It’s just payback.
Greenpeace and the World Wildlife Fund must be very pleased that the president has fully endorsed the zero CO2 solution, after all they helped write the IPCC report that was used to support the decision.

February 16, 2010 1:45 p.m. EST:
President Obama announced $8.3 billion in loan guarantees Tuesday for two nuclear reactors to be built in Burke County, Georgia.
Obama’s proposed fiscal year 2011 budget triples loan guarantees for nuclear power plants to over $54 billion, the White House noted.

In a while we should all expect some announcement about off-shore LNG facilities on the East and West coasts of the US. That would complete the rollout of Food-to-Ethanol, Nuclear Power and Liquefied Natural Gas.

John Blake
February 16, 2010 6:18 pm

As California’s northern coastal fog dissipates by a third to become mere haze, redwood dryads will adjust their charges’ metabolisms accordingly. Meantime, one does not “extrapolate” backwards, but interpolates between previous and current periods. Of course, since Earth’s atmosphere is a complex dynamic system exhibiting sensitive dependence on initial conditions (Lorenz, 1964), linear extrapolations forward are mathematically impossible.
The real danger lies in the fact that, as solar irradiation increases 33%, lightly clad trekkers may find themselves prey to local Fanggen, archaic tree-spirits who have been waiting over millennia for perambulating short-shorts to burn away. Beware– these entities are very old and very powerful, and they bulge with sap.

CarlNC
February 16, 2010 6:26 pm

I would be curious how the researchers will account for, among other things:
a. Changes in vegetated areas around the airports, esp. houses, roads, longer runways. De-forestation has been a big issue in that area, I believe. Monterey, if I have the correct airport, is in a dry area, so I question the appropriateness.
b. Changes in the way cloud cover is measured. The method of measurement, and the way of reporting, has changed over the years, from human eyeball to several types of instrumentation. Now, clouds over 12K ft. are not reported at all (and visibility over 10 mi. is reported as 10 miles). The instrument that measures cloud cover looks at one spot and takes a time weighted average. My experience has been that it is not very true to real conditions. It could be looking at the only hole, or the only cloud.
This may be another case of information being collected for one purpose and misused for another. What a pilot needs to fly has little to do with water droplet formation on tall trees. Any results they get should be questioned.
The trees are amazing. We were there late last year. It was wet, and cold. No signs of drying out yet.

nonein2008
February 16, 2010 6:27 pm

By 2035 the redwoods will be gone.

Michael Jankowski
February 16, 2010 6:29 pm

There’s fog recovery in the works, but it’s “baby fog.”

wayne
February 16, 2010 6:29 pm

Daniel H (17:19:22) :
Thank you for some real facts in a real world!
Have only visited CA four or five times in the past but seems the coast line environment would have even lower plant forms, as moss on rocky surfaces, that would be more telling. Seems if fog conditions were getting to some critical point, they would disappear first, not being able to draw moisture from the soil as trees or vines. Do you know the local environment well enough to shed some light there? Seen any moss lately?

Grant
February 16, 2010 6:33 pm

Missing Californian fog pops up in Britain….
“I am Geoffrey Boulton – Professor of Geology at Edinburgh University. My research has been in glaciology and in climate change in the geological past . In essence that means that I understand a lot of the underlying science that relates to more recent and current climate change and I think that’s probably my principal contribution. I should stress that I am not involved in recent and the issues of recent and current climate nor am I part of that community.”

Bobcat
February 16, 2010 6:43 pm

Global warming is the most mercurial force in nature. Last year it was blamed for too much fog in N.Calif.

wayne
February 16, 2010 6:53 pm

John Blake (18:18:47) :
I caught that too. Thought they were just a little foggy after ‘extrapolating’ on some of that Califoria wine and just couldn’t remember the last 1000 years. Quality science! Wish I had a job like that!

Bulldust
February 16, 2010 6:59 pm
rbateman
February 16, 2010 7:02 pm

Yeah, that Fog Monster problem is so bad:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/16/major-firms-pull-climate-change-alliance/
Three Major Firms Pull Out of Climate Change Alliance
FOXNews.com
ConocoPhillips, BP America and Caterpillar pulled out of a leading alliance of businesses and environmental groups pushing for climate change legislation on Tuesday, citing complaints that the bills under consideration are unfair to American industry.

Pamela Gray
February 16, 2010 7:03 pm

Oh for the love of Pete!!!!!!

John McDonald
February 16, 2010 7:03 pm

Great Posts All!
The researchers has not figured out anything about fog and redwoods, rather … he has figured out that airports are larger and hotter than they were 100 years ago. I wonder if he got his PhD for this and if a small part of our Chinese and Saudi funded government paid for it.

rbateman
February 16, 2010 7:03 pm

Bobcat (18:43:27) :
Global warming is the most mercurial force in nature. Last year it was blamed for too much fog in N.Calif.

That bad ol’ puddy-tat.

Van Grungy
February 16, 2010 7:13 pm

25-30 years of ‘expert’ Climatology….
What a joke…
For climatologists, human scripture is irrelevant.
If only we as ‘modern’ humans could understand the imperative to influence future human development…
Oh Wait…
Being based on static human DNA and intellectual rigidity… Humans are at the end, stuck in a morass of filth and misery…. The only way to move forward is to eliminate the flotsam and jetsam while the cream rises to the top….
How does the LibLeft figure the best way to eliminate the waste humans?

Larry
February 16, 2010 7:20 pm

Unless that press release contains a typo, who would have been keeping fog data back in 1901?

1 4 5 6 7 8 10