Highlights of Lord Christopher Monckton’s Melbourne Presentation at the Sofitel Melbourne. Recorded 1st February 2010. There are two parts below.
Part 1
Part2
Slides used in his presentation:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8057274@N05/sets/72157623339675684/
Photos for use in blogs and articles:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/8057274@N05/sets/72157623340036206/
I havent found an aussie that doesnt like him! he calls it as it is,
Bulls**t!!
and we tend to do the same,
Abbotts a bit disappointing in his slight recognition instead of outright rebuttal of AGW if he came out and flatly refused to support ANY ETS he would have a massive landslide victory.
I am hoping we aussies are the first ones to tell the UN and the IPCC to Jam it!
Truly a world first we could be proud of:-)
and once again thanks Anthony and team for enabling access to info I can use to better inform the brainwashed:-)
I & 600 plus other South Australians saw Lord Monckton in action in Adelaide & was greatly impressed with his presentation of the facts. I appreciated his sense of humour. I am a layman/bookkeeper & I sat next to two retired scientists. I found it amazing that myself, the layman/bookkeeper & the two academic/scientists were of one mind concerning this great lie about CO2 being the cause of man-made global warming. The audience gave him a standing ovation. He said that he did have a talk with Tony Abbott & believed that the Opposition leader was aware of the shifting mood of the Australian people against this climate hoax.
Christopher Monckton may not be a “scientist,” but he is a brilliant man who understands the science, and more importantly understands the politics. He believes that AGW, for whatever its scientific worth (which he obviously and correctly believes is minimal), is dangerous because of its adherents’ political intentions. He’s got the science right and he’s got the politicis right.
Some don’t think he has the dramatics right. Sorry to disagree, but he is great theater in the best tradition of the Bard: seeing into the heart of men’s souls telling us how to save ourselves. To whit: off with those whose melancholy is a blight on humanity.
Mick (Down Under) (19:23:59) :
This is true for now. However, it is only true as long as the US does not cave in to pressure from European allies to cede greater and greater control of the IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) to an international body, such as the UN.
So far, it does not look good:
Of course, countries like China and Iran are the most enthusiastic about internationalizing control of the internet. And, I think, the UN is no fan of WUWT.
read more at:
http://www.internationalfreepresssociety.org/2009/05/who-controls-the-internet/
http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/obama-internet-iana-united/2010/01/31/id/348514
I’m a 21 year old Aussie girl. I saw Lord Monckton in Newcastle, New South Wales. In Newcastle, climate change politics are a huge deal, considering our local economy is built on coal mining.
The majority of the audience were middle aged apart from me, my boyfriend and a few greeny/university activists. His presentation was met with appreciation (apart from the activists, who had a ‘who cares if thousands of people become unemployed’ stance).
I thought that he was entertaining and well spoken. The part I liked most about his presentation was that he emphasised how the UN and IPCC have lied, exaggerated and told half truths, using dodgy science and scientists. This is unacceptable. I don’t care if they think that they are ‘saving us’, fraud is fraud.
goldnsilver (19:10:15)
‘I’m a 21 year old Aussie girl. I saw Lord Monckton in Newcastle, New South Wales. In Newcastle, climate change politics are a huge deal, considering our local economy is built on coal mining. —-
His presentation was met with appreciation (apart from the activists, who had a ‘who cares if thousands of people become unemployed’ stance).’
It is great to see that such a young person as you have got your head around the priorities and not carried away by the ‘idealism’ of saving the world. It gives me hope for the future just to read your comments.
Thanks
Mick in N.Z,
Zeke the Sneak (16:44:10) :
This is true for now. However, it is only true as long as the US does not cave in to pressure from European allies to cede greater and greater control of the IANA (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority) to an international body, such as the UN.
Thanks Zeke
But you frighten me. I am paranoid enough about the European mandarins who have usurped democracies in that part of the world like a malicious cancer. I see their shadows in the UN and bodies like the IPCC. Freedom of speech is so precious and so easily taken away.
Lord Monckton is a brave and valiant man. I watched some of his speach in Melbourne on the internet. He is so lucid and articulate and his sense of humour is so refreshing. The attacks upon him are because he is a champion seeking and defending the truth. They who opppose him are attacking the man and not the arguments that he provides. This is simply because that cannot defeat him on those grounds.
His tour of Australia is a triumph.
Well done Lord Monckton.
Mick in N.Z.
Smokey (19:45:04) :
Interesting link you provide to that interview with Panchauri. At 5:50 in Lord Monckton is mentioned, the answer is garbled but is, essentially, “LM is a joke, he can’t gather 10 people except those……..”. We can fill in the rest, but he could not imagine that Monckton could gather a large crowd from people other than his supporters. Well, wasn’t he proved wrong !. The next breath brought in the Tobacco lobby again, get it, Tobacco, deniers, both undesirable!. Actually the IPCC and Tobacco are both lobby groups, advocating a particular agenda, and have more in common with each other than Panchauri can imagine. From the interview it is clear that he does not possess the intellectual gravitas to even understand that scientific debate is based on empirical data discussed openly.
Can you imagine how one sided a debate between Panchauri and Lord Monckton would be!
I’ve put up the audio from Ian Plimer’s leadin talk at the Brisbane event here:
http://http://peacelegacy.org/articles/lord-monckton-brisbane
He makes a succinct summary in half an hour of his big book.
How many AGW alarmists does it take to change a light bulb after 2012?
Ans: None. After 2012, thanks to them, there is no such thing as a light bulb.
How many USA AGW alarmists does it take to change a light bulb after 2012?
Ans: None. After 2012, thanks to them, there is no such thing as a light bulb.
I am glad that you linked to the slides, but I would have appreciated some attribution, or a link back to my youtube video where I listed the links. The slides and the poor quality photos were my own, not “Photos for use in blogs and articles”.
Cheers,
Sam