Chilled Kiwi's: Coldest October since 1945

From the weather is not climate department, it seems that the USA is not the only country experiencing an October cold snap.

http://www.christchurchnz.com/media/1007616/Bus_mountains_snow.jpg
Bus tour to the mountains. Undated image from: christchurchnz.com

Coldest October in 64 years

LATEST: It will come as little surprise to most New Zealanders that the country shivered through the coldest October in 64 years.

In its climate summary for the month, the Niwa said the average temperature nationwide was 10.6degC _ 1.4degC below average.

Such a cold October has occurred only four times in the past 100 years, the last time in 1945.

It was only fractionally warmer than August, which recorded a warmer-than-normal average temperature of 10.4degC.

Niwa said October was shaped by a series of southerly fronts, all-time record low temperatures in many areas, and unseasonable late snowfalls.

The heaviest October snowfall since 1967 occurred in Hawke’s Bay and the central  North Island on Octobe 4 and 5 stranding hundreds of travellers, closing roads, and resulting in heavy lambing losses.

Not only was it cold, but it was also wet.

Rainfall was near-record (more than 200 percent of normal) in parts of Hawke’s Bay, Gisborne and the Tararua district, and well above normal in the remaining east  of the North Island, as well as Wellington, Marlborough and parts of Canterbury.

It was, however, dry and sunnier than usual on the West Coast of the South Island.

For those pinning their hopes on a quick thaw, Niwa is predicting temperatures over the next three months to be near average for the North Island and top of the South Island, but below average elsewhere.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

47 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
4 billion
November 7, 2009 3:55 pm

Meanwhile Southern Australia is experiencing a record November heat wave.. the weather is going nuts.

November 7, 2009 4:27 pm

4 billion,
No, the weather isn’t ‘going nuts.’ It’s weather. And it’s in a specific location. And it’s well within its geological parameters. So please stop crying “Wolf!!”
Remember that the conjecture which started this whole catastrophic anthropogenic global warming [CAGW] alarmism was the subsequently debunked belief that a change in a tiny trace gas would cause runaway global warming and climate catastrophe.
Recently the climate emerged from one of its cyclic warm spells, and now appears to be cooling. But CO2 has continued to rise [and about 97% of that rise has nothing to do with human activity]. The fact that the planet is cooling at the same time that CO2 is naturally rising blows the CO2=CAGW conjecture out of the water.
So with the CO2 boogeyman gelded, does the alarmist crowd follow the lead of fat Albert, and admit that their culprit is not guilty after all?
No.
Because the “carbon” scare was never about science. It was always about money and control. So the goal posts are being moved again, and another reason to raise taxes by $Trillions will be ginned up by the CAGW scam artists.
If the the AGW contingent was honest, they would at least wait until more evidence comes in, rather than trying to immediately pass their climate bill. But they know that additional empirical evidence will continue to falsify their increasingly ridiculous claim that if CO2 rises from 4 parts in 10,000 to 5 parts in 10,000, climate catastrophe will result.
That’s what happens when political appointees with AGW marching orders masquerade as scientists. The foxes have gotten into the henhouse.

4 billion
November 7, 2009 5:01 pm

Smokey (16:27:37) :
4 billion,
No, the weather isn’t ‘going nuts.’ It’s weather. And it’s in a specific location. And it’s well within its geological parameters. So please stop crying “Wolf!!”
Changing weather patterns represent a changing climate.

November 7, 2009 5:06 pm

‘Changing weather patterns represent a naturally changing climate.’
Fixed.

4 billion
November 7, 2009 5:41 pm

Smokey (17:06:15) :

‘Changing weather patterns represent a naturally changing climate.’
Fixed.

Changing Climate has drivers, it doesn’t occur in isolation. If not the increased Ocean/Land heat content, what is driving the changing climate?
Changes to weather patterns currently seen have not occured in living memory, hence records being broken across the Globe. If this is ‘natural’ Climate change

Mark.R
November 7, 2009 5:57 pm

This is what The New Zealand Climate Science Coalition said back in 2007.
NIWA data confirms that New Zealand is not warming.
New Zealand may be no warmer in 2006 than it was in 1800. According to temperature records from NIWA, New Zealand has not experienced significant warming in the last 50 years.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/SC0701/S00003.htm

Patrick Davis
November 7, 2009 6:10 pm

It’s not too hot on the east coast of Australia either, currently about 21c. That’s quite a few degrees short of usual temperatures for this time of year. Talking of NZ, there is a cafe at the southern tip of the north island just south of Wellington, in a place called Island Bay. It’s called The Brass Monkey Cafe. Doesn’t take much to work out why, even if you’ve not been there.

Ian
November 7, 2009 6:18 pm

It’s not just cold in NZ – here in southeast Australia we had the coolest October in over 15 years, with one week early in the month being the coldest October week on record. This included one afternoon with the temperature struggling to get above 10 degrees celsius, a event only seen once every few years in July, our coldest month.

Patrick Davis
November 7, 2009 7:02 pm

“Mark.R (17:57:22) :
This is what The New Zealand Climate Science Coalition said back in 2007.
NIWA data confirms that New Zealand is not warming.
New Zealand may be no warmer in 2006 than it was in 1800. According to temperature records from NIWA, New Zealand has not experienced significant warming in the last 50 years.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/SC0701/S00003.htm
I recall reading an article on stuff.co.nz some years back now, 2002, maybe 2004 I don’t remember but basically a NZ “weather service” (Don’t recall the actual org name) stated that “weather” was no hotter nor cooler since about 1940. The article was pulled from stuff.co.nz within hours of it being published.
I guess with a change of Govn’t in NZ there’s less pressure for the MSM to ignore cooling stories in favour of warming ones.

E.M.Smith
Editor
November 8, 2009 4:55 am

4 billion (17:41:08) : Changing Climate has drivers, it doesn’t occur in isolation.
Well, first off, you have yet to demonstrate that any change of climate is happening. I see Sahara staying a desert climate. I see California still a Mediterranean climate. Brazil is still tropical… I’m sorry, but until you move a mountain range, shift a continent a few thousand km, or do something else similar the geological determiners of climate zones seem pretty well fixed to me. And yes, it is geography and geology that determine climate zones. Not gasses. Not “30 year average weather” that is at best a bad joke when used as a proxy for climate and at worst, well, I can say or I’ll be snippied…
If not the increased Ocean/Land heat content, what is driving the changing climate?
There is no changing climate.
The “30 year average weather” is changing because there are 60 year, 180 year (roughly), and 1500 year cyclical processes in it. (See PDO, AMO, Bond Events and a few others…). Using “30 year average weather” as a proxy for climate is a very broken idea because you will periodically flip and flop between “ice age soon” and “global warming soon” every 30 or so years when the PDO flips and do even worse as the longer cycles flip and flop. And pray, just pray that the present cool flip is not Bond Even Zero ™…
So given that you have a broken premise, the only answer I can give is “mu”.
Changes to weather patterns currently seen have not occured in living memory,
Actually, reminds me a whole lot of the 1960-1970 era (and I was still alive last time I checked 😉
It was way hotter in the ’30s, per my Dad, who is not still alive (though some others his age still are and do remember). It was colder than now in the ’70s but we seem headed back that way. Might I suggest you just have a short memory?…
hence records being broken across the Globe.
And always will be. This is just a mathematical artifact of how short a time we have measured and how limited a geography we have measured. It has been “way hotter” and “way colder” in the recorded historical past. They just didn’t have thermometers all over the place then and did not record the events as “records” with numbers. But rather as frozen seas, or hot droughts. “Those who forget their history are doomed to think it’s different this time. -e.m.smith”…
BTW, once you take some of the computer driven distortions out of the temperature history it’s rather flat… I can provide links to this if you like, but I suggest starting here:
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/ghcn-the-global-analysis/

Chris Schoneveld
November 8, 2009 7:00 am

4 billion, You know very well that when it is very hot in Southern Australia that it is always caused by a particular position of the atmospheric highs and lows causing the wind to blow from the north bringing heat from the desert. It’s just a local phenomenon.

NZ Willy
November 8, 2009 10:19 am

Ron de Haan (15:51:24) :
Well, the government is globally minded, so it’s not necessary for AGW to be observed in NZ specifically. NZers are not good at staking out individualistic positions, in spite of our reputation for resourcefullness. Get along, go along is the way. We have “There is no planet B” posters to keep us mindful of our presumed responsibilities.
My own hobby horse is the integrity of the electrical grid. Ten years ago our biggest city Auckland went dark for two weeks because their electric board just assumed “she’ll be right”. Can’t say we’ve learned from that — the government has zero policies in place to maintain our grid. If we lost overseas parts we’d be down in no time.

November 8, 2009 11:32 am

Is it back to the fifties with this neg PDO? It’s El Nino and we’re supposed to be a prime target for drought on the mid-coast of NSW. Winter was certainly warm and far too dry. (Didn’t some gloating boffin from the Aussie BOM jump on here to expound on that? Or was that some other site?) Now, however, in a cool spring, we’ve got floods up and down the coast. I’ve got acres of bamboo drinking it up.
Expecting guidance on climate, or even weather, from official sources now is a bit like a Cambodian peasant waiting for economic guidance from the Khmer Rouge. You’ll get lots of it, but wish you’d got none.
For these reasons and others, WUWT is now one of the most important places on the net.
By the way, where my tax-funded BOM boffin now?

stumpy
November 8, 2009 1:46 pm

In Canterbury, NZ it was the coldest in something like 120 years, with one of the heaviest snow falls in 50 years over the alps. The west coast of the south Island experianced more sun due to increased southerly weather patterns, which also resulted in the cooler and wetter weather over the rest of the country.
For those interested, NIWA temperature data shows very little warming trend for the country with near zero in the south island, whilst longer term paleo-reconstructions show a strong MWP with declining temperatures since (see Wilson et. al.; 1979, or Williams et al for example) and only a small upturn in recent times, no hockey sticks here!

magicfingers4
November 8, 2009 3:57 pm

This kiwi is pleased to see so many kiwi mates commenting on these pages. A name though that is missing from the debate these days is our own much loved Rodney Hide. (Yes, I know he has several other distractions.) But it was Rodney after all, who as a Minister of the Crown declared “global warming” to be a scam.
As I have mentioned on my blog, was that statement just intended to remove a rostrum away from Winston Peters, or was it sincere ?
http://mickysmuses.blogspot.com/

Richard
November 8, 2009 5:28 pm

Rodney got a bit of a hiding recently. What is he doing about Global Warming though since then?

George E. Smith
November 8, 2009 5:59 pm

“”” Shihad (11:44:45) :
Who moved my Global Warming 🙂
But seriously what is the ‘ for in Kiwi’s “””
Don’t worry about the (‘), what you should be worried about is the (s).
There is no (s) in the Maori Language; therefore there is no such word as Kiwis or even Kiwi’s.
The plural of Kiwi, is Kiwi, same as the plural of ALL Maori words.

George E. Smith
November 8, 2009 6:11 pm

WhEEee ! the bottom just fell out of the DMI polar temperature, as it dived down to 250 K after one of those crazy upticks last week.
Can’t tell from JAXA whether we are back down to the 2007 ice line for this date; but all these delays in the temperature down elevator are sure slowing down the ice growth.
Maybe it is all of those touring icebergs coming up to NZ from Antarctica that are cooling the place down.
If you can tow one of those big suckers up here to California, we could sure use the water.

Ian Cooper
November 8, 2009 6:15 pm

Stumpy,
where abouts on the NIWA site do they show the paleo record stuff?
Coops

4 billion
November 8, 2009 7:59 pm

E.M.Smith (04:55:04) :
Well, first off, you have yet to demonstrate that any change of climate is happening.
Expansion of Tropical zone is evidence of changing climate.
http://www.sciencealert.com.au/news/20090607-19385.html
There is no changing climate.
The “30 year average weather” is changing because there are 60 year, 180 year (roughly), and 1500 year cyclical processes in it. (See PDO, AMO, Bond Events and a few others…).

The unusual current weather events ie Snow occuring at unheard of times, heat waves at unheard of times ie Adelaide South Aus. is under a November heat wave, are ‘outside’ the cyclical fluctuations of the PDO and AMO, as the weather record extends back over a hundred years thus it is fair to say there is a extra effect driving these unusual weather patters.
The PDO has been weakening since 1989 and warming has still been occuring, the AMO has been strengthening since 1979 and seems to have reached its highest point. http://digitaldiatribes.wordpress.com/2008/12/04/pacific-decadal-oscillation-pdo-index-back-into-the-negative/#more-764, and warming has still been occuring
As the AMO drops off cooling may occur, maybe not, I tend to think not as bore hole temperature reconstruction for the last 400 years,http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/globalwarming/pollack.html shows that current temperatures are at their highest for the period, thus if current temperature is solely due to AMO and PDO fluctuations then current temperature should have been reached repeatedly in the last 400 years, as this time frame allows for a large number of cyclical fluctuations.
As a Bond event involves cooling, don’t quite see how it is aplicable to current situation.
It was way hotter in the ’30s, per my Dad, who is not still alive (though some others his age still are and do remember). It was colder than now in the ’70s but we seem headed back that way. Might I suggest you just have a short memory?…
Globally it is hotter now than in the 1930’s.
What is your evidence to say that cooling is beginning?

4 billion
November 8, 2009 8:51 pm

Chris Schoneveld (07:00:24) :
4 billion, You know very well that when it is very hot in Southern Australia that it is always caused by a particular position of the atmospheric highs and lows causing the wind to blow from the north bringing heat from the desert. It’s just a local phenomenon.
Sure, but the fact we have not has such a heatwave for 130 years, since records began, means that these Highs and Lows have never aligned in such a way over the period. On its own, no big thing, but taken in the context of other unprecedented alignments ie Snow in NZ and US at unheard of times, one gets the picture of Global changes occuring in the Atmospheric system.

Geoff Sherrington
November 8, 2009 9:37 pm

In local NZ units 1,000 heavy lambing losses = 1 Mega Ba.