From the hot climate made him do it department comes this report from Donna LaFramboise on the “hacker generated” emails allegedly not from former IPCC head Rajenda Pachauri. You might need a bath after you read some of these.
I sense a sequel to his smutty romance novel “Return to Almora” perhaps penned from prison?Donna LaFramboise has been following the Pachauri/IPCC loose cannon fo years and writes:
An online Indian news source has published a collection of electronic messages allegedly sent by Pachauri to this unnamed 29-year-old woman. They now form part of a police document known as a First Information Report (FIR). The online version of these messages is difficult to read, so I’ve cut-and-pasted the text, added some formatting, and produced a 23-page PDF available here.
Pachauri, the recently resigned chairman of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has PR flaks and a legal team. What is his version of events? Here’s a quote from a Reuters news story:
[Pachauri’s] lawyers have said his computer and mobile phone were hacked and that vested interests were maligning him because of his outspoken stand on global warming.
Shadowy, nefarious interests are out to get him, so they hacked his electronic devices to make him look bad. Nice try, but few people who examine firsthand the text messages and e-mails Pachauri says are fake are likely to believe that.
…
…Pachauri is apparently the kind of boss who not only expresses opinions about whether his subordinates should go to the gym, he’s the sort who tells female employees:
I am yours for life…and will always be yours, even when someone else enters your life.
And you have hurt me so often by being inconsistently cold on so many occasions. Not letting me touch you, even though I have always treated your body with reverence and as sacred. Perhaps, you regard a physical relationship as a matter of expediency and convenience. Well I don’t, and certainly not with your body which I worship, as you should have found out by not. Even when I “grabbed you body” I had my left hand over your right breast. Did I make even the slightest attempt to hold it in my hand or fondle you there? [typos in original, p. 6, line 180+]
He’s a prize, all right. In a few lines, he criticizes her for trying to fend him off, implies that she must be a slut since she objects to his ‘reverent’ embrace, and argues that he’s virtuous because he didn’t take as many liberties as he might have.
As the Shub Niggurath blog observed yesterday, this sordid saga took a vicious turn in December 2014. Not wanting to sit beside him on a plane one more time, this young woman attempted to sit on her own in economy class. Pachauri allegedly responded with an e-mail that reads in part:
you should reflect on the massive insult you heaped on me by indicating that I was so toxic that you would prefer not to sit next to me on the plane. If that be the case there is no room for any interaction between us…To me that act of yours represented the ultimate in haughtiness, arrogance and insulting behaviour. If you had any human sensitivity you would have realised what you have done, and possibly apologised.
You are welcome to remain a paid guest of TERI. I really would not burden you with any work in future. [p.20, line 754+]
I’ve read all of these electronic messages twice. They tell the story of a young woman who, following months of valiant struggle, perseverance, and vast patience effectively loses her job because she won’t let her boss grope her.
At the end of the police document, the complainant sums up her overall experience:
Whenever I had to travel with Dr. Pachauri for work, he would use the opportunity to constantly say vulgar and demeaning things to me. Whenever I sat next to him on the flight, he would try to hold my hand and tell me how much he loved me. If I ever spoke to any other male colleague, he would remark that I was going to sleep with him. I made repeated requests and pleas to Dr. Pachauri to stop this behaviour towards me. I have categorically told him not to touch me in appropriately or to hold me or kiss me, but Dr. Pachauri did not stop…
I feel broken and scarred in body and mind due to Dr. Pachauri’s behavior and actions…I get frequent panic attacks due to the constant harassment and being made to feel like an object of vulgar desire from this man, who is old enough to be my grandfather…
Till date I was extremely scared of going and reporting the behaviour of Dr. Pachauri, as he is the head of the organization for which I work and I did not know who I could turn to for help. I have tried to ignore and brush aside a lot of offensive behaviour from Dr. Pachauri as I was very scared of losing my reputation and employment if I complained to anyone…I request you to register my complaint against Dr. Pachauri and bring him to justice. [pp. 20-21, line 785+]
Donna adds:
“…anyone who goes to the trouble of looking directly at this collection of electronic messages will find it difficult to believe that this matter has anything to do with villainous hackers trying to smear a climate warrior.”
Read the whole thing here: http://nofrakkingconsensus.com/2015/03/02/pachauris-sofa/
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
It seems notables promoting the AGW hypothesis should avoid committing their private thoughts to email.
If I had inappropriate private thoughts like those, I like to think I would not express them at all, much less put them in an email.
Hahaha, clearly email isn’t working for theese people.. Thanks for the laugh.
bh2
It seems notables promoting the AGW hypothesis should avoid committing their private thoughts to email.
+ shedloads.
Especially if using a private email on gubb’mint warmin’ business – or vice versa, too, it seems.
Auto
Patchy and Al Gore are birds of a feather in more ways than one.
2006: Al Gore (“The crazed sex-poodle”, according to the massage therapist)
– Accused of Sexual Assault: http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20396495,00.html
2007 – Together with Nobel Peace Prize Awards.
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/01706/ipcc_1706109c.jpg
Is it just me or do the smiles in this photo say a lot? Gore has a repugnant smile of self-satisfied smugness saying to himself, “Sure I can’t win the presidency but I can win the Noble prize, so bite me”. Patchy that of someone saying to himself, “Wow even an idiot like me can win a Noble Prize.”
Pachy and Poochie? Tonight’s forecast:
There will be Pachy fog, followed by a slow-moving train of scandals,
punctuated by clouds of revelations and thunderous judgement…..
Well, if it’s a religion to him…..
I wouldn’t think even all AGW supporters have evil thoughts.
Unlikely indeed and incredibly outstanding news for their potential victims.
The fact, nonetheless, is that Pachauri is a monster that fed on the grief he caused to those he thought he could take advantage of. In other words, he is a textbook abuser which implies many additional vile character traits such as, for example, cowardice and sadism. His emails make this plain and clear.
The power grab that warm-mongers have enjoyed during more than decade is likely to have produced other monsters like Pachauri. Again, it is unlike that there are many. However, those that are still on the loose must be stopped without delay.
It is necessary for those warm-mongers with a conscience to break ranks and denounce the behavior of Pachauri from the rooftops of every one of their outlets and with the force of the billions of dollars they have amassed for propaganda purposes so that these monsters are incarcerated and their victims are freed from torture. There is no alternative course of action on this matter. Speak up or be complicit.
“he is a textbook abuser which implies many additional vile character traits such as, for example, . . . ”
Egotism. That’s been apparent all along.
there must be dozens of serial pervert hackers with unlimited free time and intimate knowledge of Pachauri’s travels, seating arrangements…
Naw. Probably just the one.
Your concern for Pachauri and your disregard for the victims of abuse is noted.
Climb off the high horse. Pachauri claims his account was hacked by climate skeptics. When I point out the scope of that lie, you come off and attack me?
There must be dozens of readers that can look deep inside a two sentence comment and pick out dark and nefarious intents and motives hidden from the view of mere mortals.
FU – < see what you can make of that one.
He was being facetious.
Now that I don’t feel put upon.
The saying “Stress is the confusion caused when ones mind overrides the body’s natural desire to beat the living crap out of someone that desperately needs it.” applies to this lady.
My feeling toward her is gratitude for her restraint. Being that Pachauri is an old man, and she is in the prime of her youth the senario could have been a painful advanced class in manners delivered upside the old man’s head.
Given his age he might have been sent to hospital, then the media would have made him out a victim.
Al Gore would have sent him flowers. “Crazy woman attacks IPCC chairman” headlines.
That would have allowed his quiet unexplained reasonable replacement “for health reasons” and we would be none the wiser.
So thank you young lady. Thank you for your 18 month forbearance.
I know, it must be only one, like probably the NSA.
On the ‘hacking’ by nasty right wing nuts I note that the lady responded to the hacker in the following text.
It looks like Pachauri’s hands and lips were hacked! I further note that he did not read any of the SMS or emails the lady sent to his ‘hacked’ account for OVER 1 YEAR. Or he did read them and thought nothing of the accusations from such a junior. Surely Pachauri has access to computer and mobile phone support. Running such a large organisation and traveling extensively around the world by plane he must use email? No?
His story stinks, because that is what it is, a story. Read the texts between the victim and the ‘hacker’. ;-P
http://www.liveindia.in/Read-Pachauri%E2%80%99s-full-love-text-send-to-the-girl
Here is what another Indian lady thought of the Pachauri.
It is impossible to coordinate a planetary scam without communication. Michael Mann was coordinating his tricks with the temperature record by way of email with HADCRU. I think Pachauri’s email will be a treasure trove of schemes, slanders, and other bad stuff.
Let us read them all.
Let us see what reporters and journalists were getting their marching orders from the IPCC head. Then let us drive the reporters out of business. I am laying a bet that Seth Borenstein was directly coordinating his reports to AP based on inside information from Pachauri’s office. I’d love to see that CC’d list.
I don’t care about partisans. I do care about scientific integrity and unbiased journalism. My beef is that journalists are compromised and scientists cooked the books and they both lied about it.
His email will be made public by virtue of discovery. (that is, if the plaintiff’s attorney is awake)
I don’t know Indian law, but this is a criminal complaint, which means a government prosecutor will subpoena Pachauri’s emails, not the complainant’s attorney (of course there may be a civil action filed as well). The complainant already has all the emails, texts, voice-mails, etc., sent to her and I guess they have been made public by virtue of filing the complaint.
What is likely to come out is there are other recipients of harassing communications who have not come forward on their own and the prosecutor will no doubt contact them to see if they are willing to join the complaint. If so, then those emails would be disclosed, either at the time of signing a complaint or later at trial.
)As an aside, it is an interesting legal question is whether the Indian courts can subpoena emails sent from Pachauri’s IPCC account(s)).
What will not be disclosed is the content of other emails not related this criminal investigation. In other words, don’t expect to read emails detailing Pachauri’s participation in pushing junk research or suppressing scientific debate.
Unless of course Pacuauri has done something to piss off the North Koreans.
Right…. Right… they essentially follow British Common Law. Good Point. I forgot that this wasn’t a civil suit. My bad. I got all excited and irrational…. Maybe there will be a civil suit? I oddly find myself rooting for the North Koreans. What is wrong with me? Must be the vapors.
Dont forget that the Indian system is Corrupt beyond anything we might imagine, so the chances of this charlatan being brought down in public are slim indeed 🙂
Indian system is Corrupt
=========
I work with quite a few Indians and they are all very excited by the new government that recently swept to power on a promise to stamp out corruption. Reportedly one of their first steps was to set up a “tips” line to report corrupt officials. Packy may simply be the first of many.
The cellphone has become the new equalizer in India. Video a corrupt official.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/10/india-anti-corruption_n_6651966.html
India’s Anti-Corruption Party Deals Huge Blow To Modi’s Government
Kejriwal impressed people with tough action against police officers and officials caught accepting bribes. He encouraged people to carry out sting operations and film officials accepting bribes.
“[Pachauri’s] lawyers have said his computer and mobile phone were hacked and that vested interests were maligning him because of his outspoken stand on global warming.”
This isn’t even close to being plausible. There’s no way the message exchange could happen for that long without Pachauri noticing messages he wasn’t sending. If somebody hacked into your email and sent lurid messages to another person and that person asked you to stop it, would that not make you wonder? Over 16 months.
It’s beyond belief of the reasonable man so we can add serial liar to Pachauri’s character as well. And to think a man like this was in charge of an international organization so (apparently) important. I wonder if they can retract Nobel Prizes?
“…vested interests were maligning him because of his outspoken stand on global warming”
Projection much? That sounds oddly similar to something else that’s going on at the moment…
we can add serial liar
=============
that is a mandatory requirement to head the IPCC.
Sorry, I can’t/won’t read anything written by Dr. P
97% of all people who get awarded medals and honours turn out to be unpleasant pervs.
There is a 97% consensus that 97% of environmentalists who make a killing off of gullible followers do demonstrate many of the qualities associated with “crazed sex-poodles”.
I read as much of the emails and letters until my corneas crawled off my eyeballs in disgust.
There are certain jobs that. amongst the great gullible general public, that seem to confer the instant and unquestionable status of sainthood. All charity workers seem to receive this, and all UN workers. I find the gullibility concerning the UN particularly mystifying, considering that most countries of the world are run by thoroughly nasty vicious dictators. For example, off the top of my head, do they really believe that Roberts Mugabe has a special pool of saints that he nominates for various tinpot UN functions when required.
So, how much more of this is happening behind the scenes?
More than expected, less than suspected.
Too much, nonetheless, as the amount that is acceptable is exactly zero.
Don’t forget that UN workers typically don’t pay taxes (or they do, and are later reimbursed).
Didn’t a certain US politician make the same claim when his deviant behavior became known?
Are you referring to BJ?
No, I was referring to Anthony Weiner
BJ – is that short for Bill(iam) Jefferson?
Google Craig Thomson
I,m concerned has anyone confirmed if she is in the pay of big oil..??
Your attempt to further assault a victim of abuse is noted.
enought with you notes, their annoying.
Your annoyance is insignificant and inconsequential in general and, in this specific case, amounts to further support of the monsters that torture others to obtain sexual gratification.
Revise your priorities.
They’re*
He was being facetious!
Count me as a supporter of you and this site. But we should take the high road. Do not attack the man, attack the science. I
agreed
Um, it appears virtually all roads are higher than the one Pachauri is on.
I disagree. The victims of this monster deserve our respect, concern, and solidarity. There is no other “high road”.
Yes like Christian say, “Hate the sin, but not the sinner”. They don’t mention much about non-repentant sinners, which the bible is pretty clear on. Those are all going to hell with an express ticket.
Patchy is certainly not repentant about sexual-harassment nor about the ham-fisted, dishonest way he has handled climate concerns through the IPCC. Due to his transgressions he has been sentenced to blogging hell in the form of a hell a lot of pissed off women, scientists, engineers and others who have suffered due to his hand.
Not sure of the Biblical hell, but am pretty certain Patchy deserves a certain piece of hell on earth.
Couldn’t agree more. This article should not be here, period.
Your attempts to divert attention from this flagrant violation of human rights is the kind of behavior that makes possible monsters like Pachauri to commit these vile acts.
I’m guilty of plenty of sins and mistakes, but not what you’ve alleged.
When (if) he does science, he’ll get attacked for it. Why shouldn’t he be attacked for groping and sexual harassment when he’s doing that (allegedly ;-)?
Attacking the science is one thing, attacking the person for alleged misdeeds is another.
The CGW bin of apples?
Well, except instead of one bad apple we search the bin for one good one.
Pachauri comes from a culture that does not traditionally respect women or believes in equality of the sexes. Should we really judge him by our standards?
/sarc
In a way, not. Not until he stepped into our culture.
Where is Nick Stokes when we need him?
Patchy is Nick’s hero, someone to be admired and praised, we need Nick’s balanced input on this.
He, like he always does, will give us the level headed, official,climatespeak point of view.
Yes disappointed that he didn’t make the first comment, putting these remarks in their correct context.
I will have to say from the E-mails that he is quite the ‘love’ poet. I see his obsession referred to as “Mari Jaan”, I wonder if it is because he identifies with this ‘Meri Jaan’ rejectee:
Perhaps someone was smoking too much “Mari Jaan a”?
In amongst all the really creepy twaddle from Patchy, I noticed in the transcript that the lady says:
“I don’t judge you from the kind of stuff I get to hear”
What kind of stuff did she get to hear about him? Enquiring minds want to know. From the context it seems she’s heard some bad stuff about Dr P. Let’s hope we found out.
Yes, he’s a creep. Now can we get back to science again please?
Right.
Not on this thread. It’s all about exposing the creep Socialist, who uses his position to pressure young women under him into sexual favors…oh was this thread on Bill Clinton?? Al Gore? Anthony Weiner? Or John Edwards??? Or IPCC Chairman Pachauri??
It’s a 2 way street with “greenies” and a weenie … Just ask Ex. Gov. Kitzhaber of Oregon …
I live in the Pacific NW and am watching the Kitzhaber situation quite closely. His relationship to the grifter “first lady,” Cylvia Hayes, is relevant because she had a role in state government. The details of Pachauri’s sex life, whatever they might be, don’t belong here.
Nobody gives two hoots about Packy’s sex life.
We are talking about the manipulative and abusive approach demonstrated in the emails and texts, apparently over many months, trying to use a position of authority to gain sexual favors by making the victim feel guilty for not reciprocating, because it talks directly to character and trust-worthiness, and perhaps quite a bit more. And then to top it off, the claim of a hacker to try and excuse the behavior.
It is illustrative of the morality of the people pushing the AGW lies. A fish rots by its head.
Donna Laframboise and Joanne Nova are two true journalists doing the lion’s share of actual, old-school reporting in the arena of “climate science” from the politics/motivation side of things.
They both deserve our support, congratulations, enthusiasm, and respect for the tough, detailed work they do. Gail Combs does amazing work as well, though mostly as a commenter.
That’s not to diminish the work by Watts, Tisdale, Goddard/Heller, McIntyre-McKitrick, Monckton, Ball, Montford, Gosselin, and many others on the “facts and analysis” side.
Nor Josh on the “wicked humor” side.
Buy their books, comment on their blogs, drop some money in the tip jars. This is the people’s Counter-Revolution against the pseudo-science of Anthropogenic Catastrophic Climate Change/
Global Warming, or whatever they are shilling it as today.
Well said Jim.
Wow this is a tough one.
Which is more offensive, self-aggrandizing, and harassing, Pachauri emails or Michael Mann press releases?
Hmmm thats a tough one, but I’ll have to give Pachauri the nod for sexually harassing women in the workplace.
Note they both do get a runner-up award for ill-concealed, ill-gotten personal gain in climate politics and science.
Pachauri brings dishonor to the IPCC.
Mann brings dishonor to science, climate science in particular.
Take your pick which is worse. Both are diseased. The severity depends on where one sits.
For those who think this posting doesn’t belong here, remember that the train engineer is a public figure, living off public funds, and is subject to all the same rules for public figures.
When this story broke, I thought it was a shame that he wasn’t going due to ‘climate change’, then he hoisted himself with his own hubris in his resignation letter, what was it he said?
“Climate change is my religion and my dharma”.
As ‘dharma’ also has religious connotations and no direct English translation I would suggest that in this context “dogma” may be appropriate.
How embarrassing for warmists, he has confirmed in his resignation letter what sceptics have been saying all along that they belong to some sort of climate change religious order.
Perhaps it is a requirement in the job description for head of the IPCC to be a dogmatic member of some sort of ‘climate change’ religion.
Time for an unlikely spike in the number of car accidents of witnesses.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Silkwood