Let there be corn! Reality check on the 2012 drought and corn yields in relation to droughts of the past

There’s a lot of hype out there regarding the drought and its potential effects on crops. Predictions range from increased food prices to dustbowlification”, a term coined by “Joe Romm. A complicit media follows. Tom Nelson points out some interesting facts:

Drought to cost $12B, most since 1988 – USATODAY.com

The Kiwis think otherwise though, from radio New Zealand: July 26, 2012 : Worst drought in 50 years driving up US food prices

Food prices in the United States are expected to rise by 3% or 4% next year because of the worst drought in more than 50 years.  Corn, soybean and other commodity prices have all soared in recent weeks as fields dry out and crops wither in the heat. The drought, which is affecting much of the Midwest, is the worst since 1956.

What Drought Did to Crop Yields in the 1930s – Livinghistory.com

In 1930, Nebraska got 22 inches of rain, and the state’s corn crop averaged 25 bushels per acre. In 1934, Nebraska saw the driest year on record with only 14.5 inches of rainfall. The state’s corn crop dropped even more to only 6.2 bushels per acre.

[July 19, 2012]:  2012 Potential Corn Yields Based on July 15 Hybrid-Maize Model Simulations – UNL CropWatch, July

[See table 1 here: For five Nebraska locations, median forecasted yields for rainfed corn are 118-130 bushels per acre; for irrigated corn, the median forecasted yields are 228-245 bushels per acre]

From the University of Nebraska-Lincoln:

Stars indicate the sites for which in-season yield forecasting were performed using the Hybrid-Maize model with actual weather and dominant management practices and soil series at each site. Weather data were retrieved from High Plain Regional Climate Center (HPRCC) and the Water and Atmospheric Resources Monitoring Program (WARM) through the Illinois Climate Network (Illinois State Water Survey [ICWS], Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign).

End-of-Season Yield Potentials as of July 15

Corn Yield Potential (Yp) forecasts, as well as the underpinning data used for the simulations, can be seen in Table 1. The long-term yield potential prediction based on 30 years of weather data (Table 1, fourth column from the right) is compared to the range of predicted 2012 corn yield potential (three columns on the right), which includes the yield potential simulated under the most likely scenario of weather expected for the rest of the season (median) and for relatively favorable and unfavorable scenarios for the rest of the season (75th and 25th percentiles) based on historical weather data.

According to the July 15 simulations, the “most likely” end-of-season dryland corn yield potential in Nebraska, Iowa, and southeastern Illinois (“median” yields, red column in Table 1) is 10% to 26% below the long-term average yield potential (Table 1). Even if weather turns favorable for dryland corn during the rest of the 2012 season, the resulting yields (75th yields, blue column in Table 1) are still likely to be below the long-term average (Table 1). How about if dry and hot conditions persist? Certainly the likehood and magnitude of yield reduction in dryland corn will increase. In fact, Hybrid-Maize predicts dryland corn yield potential to be about 30% to 40% below the long-term average if weather remains hot and dry for the rest of the season (25th yields, green column in Table 1). The only bright spots in this analysis were in Illinois at DeKalb and Monmouth where rainfall during the past two weeks appears to have provided relief. At these sites, current projects indicate that end-of-season yields will be near their long-term averages unless weather once again turns dry and hot at those locations (Table 1). Likewise, recent weather conditions at Brookings, S.D. have been conducive to achieve yields near the long-term average.

What about irrigated corn in Nebraska? Contrary to the projections for dryland corn, irrigated corn yield potential is only two to three bushels below the long-term average at Holdrege, Mead, and Concord (Table 1). High nighttime temperatures during the last two weeks at Clay Center have hastened crop development and increased nighttime respiration costs, leading to a projected yield potential that is 9 bushels below the long-term average. At O’Neill last week’s weather did not depart from historical temperature norms, hence, projected yield potential is still near-average. But it is important to keep in mind that if hot weather persists for the rest of the season, the likehood (and magnitude) of below-average yields will increase for irrigated corn due to more rapid maturation and a shorter grain-filling period.

Summary

Projected 2012 end-of-season yields are well below the long-term yield average for dryland corn in Nebraska, Iowa, and southeastern Illinois and near average in South Dakota and central-west Illinois. Projected yield for irrigated corn in Nebraska is slightly below average at most locations, except for Clay Center, which it’s 9 bushels below average and O’Neill where it’s near average. If hot, dry conditions persist during coming weeks, we expect projected yields will drop substantially under both dryland and irrigated conditions. We will continue to update these projections as the season progresses.

==============================================================

The reality check is: Even with the bad news of reduced yields of regular corn at 22-42 bu/ac below average, and  trrigated corn  at 2-9 bu/ac below average,  2012 Nebraska corn yields are still forecasted to be 20-40 times the  1934 Nebraska corn yields.

Yes it was really so much worse in the 1930’s than the present:

h/t to Steve Goddard and this EPA report for the above graph and points.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

103 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
July 26, 2012 6:08 am

Family members farming in southern IL are reporting ZERO bushels/acre unless significant and immediate rain relief occurs. Soy is also on the ropes.

John Marshall
July 26, 2012 6:26 am

irrigation means that ground water is up, probably due to the high snow levels last winter. We must not forget that ”corn” or maize as we call it, has had much genetic modification to resist drought etc.. Combination of both probably.
So ”the end” recedes yet again.

Fred Bauer
July 26, 2012 6:29 am

How seriously should we take the University Nebraska-Lincoln if they can’t tell Indiana from Ohio?

Latimer Alder
July 26, 2012 6:45 am

Dunno how good their science is but their geography is crap.
Even from as far away as London, England I know that the state due east of Minnesota is Wisconsin. Not Wyoming as labelled on the map.
Bad mistake.

Rms
July 26, 2012 6:46 am

The map says Ohio (OH) and should be Indiana (IN).

SocialBlunder
July 26, 2012 6:53 am

Interesting that one of the key points – “The recent period of increasing heat is distinguished by a rise in extremely high nighttime temperatures.” – is a predicted AGW signature since greenhouse gases trap the heat.

Andrew
July 26, 2012 6:59 am

Best effort yet to compile the whole AGW scam should be published big time
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2012/07/25/history-of-how-this-fraud-was-perpetrated/

Tom
July 26, 2012 7:04 am

Bushels per acre? Really???
Not only has the rest of the world agreed to a single system of units, it’s also agreed to measure yields in weight per area, not volume per area.

Nate_OH
July 26, 2012 7:10 am
Gail Combs
July 26, 2012 7:16 am

To put that statement “In 1930, Nebraska got 22 inches of rain, and the state’s corn crop averaged 25 bushels per acre. In 1934, Nebraska saw the driest year on record with only 14.5 inches of rainfall. The state’s corn crop dropped even more to only 6.2 bushels per acre.” into proper perspective her is information from the Agricultural Extension Service The University of Tennessee

The average yield 55 years ago was about 20 to 25 bushels per acre, which was no better than the yields recorded 100 years ago. Tennessee farmers increased corn yields from 35 bushels per acre in 1955, to about 40 bushels in 1960, to 50 bushels in 1965, to 85 bushels in 1979.
Statewide averages continued to increase from 98 bushels in 1985 to 107 bushels in 1989 and 114 bushels in 2000. The record average yield of 124 bushels per acre was obtained in 1992….

Basics of Corn Production in North Dakota “…Grain yield of corn in the state has increased at a remarkable rate in the recent past, with yields now consistently averaging over 100 bushels per acre….”
GEE, it sure looks like “Global Warming” and CO2 is INCREASING the corn yields and how! even in colder than hades North Dakota

Katherine
July 26, 2012 7:28 am

So that state to the east of Minnesota is now Wysconsin? :p

billc
July 26, 2012 7:30 am

It would be cool to see an animation of the drought development. Anyway in Pittsburgh NOAA’s current outlook (as of 7/19) puts us in a region of drought development, but it has been quite rainy over the past week, enough to erase a small but noticeable portion of the year’s rainfall deficit (which was positive as of June 1 and then it basically didn’t rain for 6 weeks). Next outlook – improvement?

Bill Illis
July 26, 2012 7:34 am

Monthly US wheat and corn prices going back to 1784 – Nominal first.
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/7066/cornwheatprices1784.png
Real terms – adjusted for estimated CPI inflation.
http://img855.imageshack.us/img855/5601/realcornwheat1784.png

BillD
July 26, 2012 7:34 am

The good news is that Northern Indiana where I live has gotten good rain in the last 10 days. That will help the crops but the very stunted 3-4 feet tall corn will yield only 20-35% of normal yields even with the recent rain. Soybeans will probably recover better. Farming in the midwest will probably become a difficult proposition when we start getting severe droughts much more frequently. The new hybrids give much better yields with less water, but almost no rain from early May to mid-July was a disaster. In the future we can probably rely on Canada for corn as well as wheat.

July 26, 2012 7:38 am

Yeah, Tom, bushels per acre. Welcome to the democracy of the agricultural dead. Makes it kind of hard to sell our agricultural database services abroad when we’re locked into Imperial standards, but that’s the industry standards in the US.
(Unless you’re talking about cotton – lbs/Ac or bales/Ac, or potatoes in hundredweight per acre. At least I haven’t seen anyone citing rice in barrels per acre since the late Oughts, everybody seems to have standardized on bushels per acre in rice, finally.)

BillD
July 26, 2012 7:38 am

Note that Figure 1 in this article only goes to 2008. Rain has been fine over recent years up until this year. How can we talk about the current drought and “up until the present” with data that only goes to 2008?

G. Karst
July 26, 2012 7:46 am

I was just about to write off, a fine stand of corn, due to 2 months of drought. Got 1.6 inches of rain last night. This will completely turn around this 7-8′ high stand. Corn is amazing when it gets what it needs – heat plus moisture. Well… it is grass, after all. GK

Vince Causey
July 26, 2012 7:51 am

It sure was a double whammy, to have the worst drought that devastated agriculture, right in the middle of the Great Depression.

David L. Hagen
July 26, 2012 7:54 am

PS For all geographically challenged persons,
don’t be confused by OH being east of IL.
From living in Indiana, IN should be east of IL (NOT OH).

more soylent green!
July 26, 2012 8:02 am

There was history before somebody clued me in to global warming? Seriously?

Jim G
July 26, 2012 8:15 am

Tom says:
July 26, 2012 at 7:04 am
Bushels per acre? Really???
“Not only has the rest of the world agreed to a single system of units, it’s also agreed to measure yields in weight per area, not volume per area.”
Not to argue what’s been agreed upon, but grain moisture content would bugger the numbers worse using weight rather than volume.

Gail Combs
July 26, 2012 8:19 am

Fred Bauer says:
July 26, 2012 at 6:29 am
How seriously should we take the University Nebraska-Lincoln if they can’t tell Indiana from Ohio?
___________________________
Yeah,
If this is what a college puts out, it looks like it is time to pull the plug on funding. And here I thought my opinion of US academia had already hit bottom.

Kelvin Vaughan
July 26, 2012 8:24 am

Looks like the earth moved for Americans! I would have thought it would have been to hot for that sort of thing in a heatwave, especially with the hot nights!

highflight56433
July 26, 2012 8:39 am

“Interesting that one of the key points – “The recent period of increasing heat is distinguished by a rise in extremely high nighttime temperatures.” – is a predicted AGW signature since greenhouse gases trap the heat.”
Really? Try atmosphereic compression due to desending air a result of high pressure.

Taphonomic
July 26, 2012 8:41 am

Fred Bauer says:
“How seriously should we take the University Nebraska-Lincoln if they can’t tell Indiana from Ohio?”
Latimer Alder says:
“Even from as far away as London, England I know that the state due east of Minnesota is Wisconsin. Not Wyoming as labelled on the map.”
Come on. It’s model output. What do you want, accuracy?

1 2 3 5