UPDATE: It appears NOAA has realized the folly of this survey and has taken it offline. The satirical Question #16 (posted by a commenter) parodies the survey. The responses (which probably aren’t far from that) they got to it from employees might have had something to do with it:
How likely are you to keep your job if the public is informed that climate change will not affect them or their descendents in a negative manner?
=========================================
Dr. Roger Pielke Senior writes on his blog:
I was alerted by Marc Morano to a survey that NOAA is sending out to its employees. The first e-mail is to Marc apparently from a NOAA employee.
Here’s the letter via Morano:
Mr. Morano:
NOAA employees today were asked to participate in a Climate Knowledge Survey. I have included the inviting email below. In order to take the survey, however, you must have a valid NOAA email account, so I have cut and pasted the Survey itself and the key to the ‘correct’ answers below for your reading pleasure. As you can see, there are certainassumptions larded throughout this survey, such as what many climate scientists believe is ‘true.’ Thought you might be interested.
Regards,
Here’s the letter announcing the climate survey sent to NOAA employees:
All,
Climate has connections to many scientific and societal issues. To characterize NOAA’s level of climate literacy and assess interest in climate training materials and other resources, a NOAA climate capacity-building team has been established. The team’s overall goal is to enhance the ability of NOAA staff to effectively communicate about climate science.
As part of this process, I encourage you to consider completing the team’s Climate Knowledge and Needs Assessment Surveys by February 15. The first survey characterizes the current level of climate literacy among respondents, and the second assesses the need for climate-related professional development resources or opportunities. Each survey should take approximately 10 minutes to complete, and your responses will be completely anonymous. You can access the surveys by clicking here:
The capacity-building team will use the survey results to identify and provide opportunities for NOAA staff to become more conversant about NOAA’s climate products, information, and services.
Your participation in these surveys will greatly assist with this NOAA-wide effort. Participation in these surveys and taking advantage of future opportunities is voluntary. If you have any questions or comments about the surveys or the goals of this climate team, please contact Diane Stanitski at 301-427-2465 or diane.stanitski@noaa.gov.
Dr. Pielke has the entire survey Q&A here on his blog and he comments on many of the questions. It is a real eye opener worth reading. He concludes with:
The survey is actually a policy advocacy document, as well as an evaluation of the loyalty of NOAA employees to the perspective of individuals such as Tom Karl and Tom Peterson.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
It has already been taken down – I wonder why!
“… the second assesses the need for climate-related professional development resources or opportunities.”
In other words, re-education.
The survey’s are now offline. Word gets out.
Childish, designed to weed out the intelligent, and ridiculously wrong in some areas? The tree ring answer is particularly striking.
That was quick.
Here’s what I got when I clicked both links
Climate Needs Assessment Survey
We have temporarily removed the survey while we resolve some technical issues.
Thank you
It didn’t take NOAA long to take both their surveys off line.
An action that doesn’t smack of either honesty or integrity to me.
Apparently the links for the suveys have been disabled
Reminds me of the Loyalty Oath narrative in Catch 22
Question #15:
Which “greenhouse gas” has the most direct impact on the climate?
Question #16:
How likely are you to keep your job if the public is informed that climate change will not affect them or their descendents in a negative manner?
Witchhunt!
Heh, circling the wagons.
Not exactly an objective appraisal: it is more an attempt to try and corral the troops and keep them “on message”.
Qu 10….I thought the highest CO2 emitter on a per capita basis was Australia which is not in the list of possible answers?
The surveys have been taken down. Tsk, tsk Roger and Anthony. Look what you made them do.
Hmm… “We have temporarily removed the survey while we resolve some technical issues. “
Looks like they noticed the criticisms.
Your Tax Dollars At Work.
Pity there wasn’t a check-all-that-apply question “Which web sites do you use to further your understanding of climate change?”
The list and the answer would have been far more informative than the rest of this survey. 🙂
They took the survey down. Must not have been going their way.
A bureaucracy protects itself and expands its agenda at all costs. Tax money is thought to be endless. So far they are right.
Und you vill follow zee party line.
Climate Knowledge Survey
We have temporarily removed the survey while we resolve some technical issues.
Thank you
Numbing.
Look for the survey to be blended into NOAA job application form.
This suggests that global temperatures have increased throughout the last century when we all know people had no impact on climate before 1979 or so, when the most recent rise started. (/sarc)
Picky? Perhaps, but if so then there should have been:
6a. Which of the following processes has been identified as the most significant cause of decreasing global temperatures over the last century?
—-
Oh yeah – Go Pats!
Survey has been removed
This is certainly not a credible survey. And to think, US tax dollars went to pay for this rubbish.
That is the slanderous part of all of this.
I got the following message when I clicked on the Climate Knowledge Survey link:
“Climate Knowledge Survey
We have temporarily removed the survey while we resolve some technical issues. Thank you
This survey is not currently accepting responses.”
Maybe the technical issue has something to do with the replies the survey drew.
Sounds like the first step in a largescale purging of undesireable views among the NOAA. Are the questionaires really anonymous?