It seems that the Serreze “death spiral” might be on hold. From UCAR/NCAR:
Arctic ice melt could pause in near future, then resume again
BOULDER—Although Arctic sea ice appears fated to melt away as the climate continues to warm, the ice may temporarily stabilize or somewhat expand at times over the next few decades, new research indicates.
The computer modeling study, by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, reinforces previous findings by other research teams that the level of Arctic sea ice loss observed in recent decades cannot be explained by natural causes alone, and that the ice will eventually disappear during summer if climate change continues.
But in an unexpected new result, the NCAR research team found that Arctic ice under current climate conditions is as likely to expand as it is to contract for periods of up to about a decade.
“One of the results that surprised us all was the number of computer simulations that indicated a temporary halt to the loss of the ice,” says NCAR scientist Jennifer Kay, the lead author. “The computer simulations suggest that we could see a 10-year period of stable ice or even a slight increase in the extent of the ice. Even though the observed ice loss has accelerated over the last decade, the fate of sea ice over the next decade depends not only on human activity but also on climate variability that cannot be predicted.”
Kay explains that variations in atmospheric conditions such as wind patterns could, for example, temporarily halt the sea ice loss. Still, the ultimate fate of the ice in a warming world is clear.
“When you start looking at longer-term trends, 50 or 60 years, there’s no escaping the loss of ice in the summer,” Kay says.
Kay and her colleagues also ran computer simulations to answer a fundamental question: why did Arctic sea ice melt far more rapidly in the late 20th century than projected by computer models? By analyzing multiple realizations of the 20th century from a single climate model, they attribute approximately half the observed decline to human emissions of greenhouse gases, and the other half to climate variability.
These findings point to climate change and variability working together equally to accelerate the observed sea ice loss during the late 20th century.
The study appears this week in Geophysical Research Letters. It was funded by the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s sponsor.
Rapid melt
Since accurate satellite measurements became available in 1979, the extent of summertime Arctic sea ice has shrunk by about one third. The ice returns each winter, but the extent shrank to a record low in September 2007 and is again extremely low this year, already setting a monthly record low for July. Whereas scientists warned just a few years ago that the Arctic could lose its summertime ice cover by the end of the century, some research has indicated that Arctic summers could be largely ice-free within the next several decades.
To simulate what is happening with the ice, the NCAR team used a newly updated version of one of the world’s most powerful computer climate models. The software, known as the Community Climate System Model, was developed at NCAR in collaboration with scientists at multiple organizations and with funding by NSF and the Department of Energy.
The research team first evaluated whether the model was a credible tool for the study. By comparing the computer results with Arctic observations, they verified that, though the model has certain biases, it can capture observed late 20th century sea ice trends and the observed thickness and seasonal variations in the extent of the ice.
Kay and her colleagues then conducted a series of future simulations that looked at how Arctic sea ice was affected both by natural conditions and by the increased level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. The computer studies indicated that the year-to-year and decade-to-decade trends in the extent of sea ice are likely to fluctuate increasingly as temperatures warm and the ice thins.
“Over periods up to a decade, both positive and negative trends become more pronounced in a warming world,” says NCAR scientist Marika Holland, a co-author of the study.
The simulations also indicated that Arctic sea ice is equally likely to expand or contract over short time periods under the climate conditions of the late 20th and early 21st century.
Although the Community Climate System Model simulations provide new insights, the paper cautions that more modeling studies and longer-term observations are needed to better understand the impacts of climate change and weather variability on Arctic ice.
The authors note that it is also difficult to disentangle the variability of weather systems and sea ice patterns from the ongoing impacts of human emissions of greenhouse gases.
“The changing Arctic climate is complicating matters,” Kay says. “We can’t measure natural variability now because, when temperatures warm and the ice thins, the ice variability changes and is not entirely natural.”
About the article
Title: Interannual to multidecadal Arctic sea ice extent trends in a warming world
Authors: Jennifer Kay, Marika Holland, and Alexandra Jahn
Publication: Geophysical Research Letters
Link to the paper is here
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
![20100428-melting-arctic20ice1[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/20100428-melting-arctic20ice11.jpg?resize=428%2C389&quality=83)
Oh, come on. They’re just padding their bets now. No matter what happens with sea ice, they’ll be able to say “See we told you so global warming will still kill us all!”
Ice cycles.
Now that we are beginning to see probable cooling (apparently) from a reduction in solar activity. expect to see more and more of the models predict a pause in warming in order to claim they saw this coming and not to worry, warming is still going to occur, it’s just delayed.
Handy way for them to try to keep the climate change money flowing in for another 10 years…
Some of the Warmista have reached the bargaining stage.
….In other words, research indicates that arctic ice could do anything, and we’ve got a weasel clause that will allow us to blame it all on anthropogenic forcing, right?
If you can’t measure natural variability now, then you can’t make any definitive claims at all, because you can’t attribute specific anthropogenic, non-quantifiable influences. The mere claim that “…the ice variability changes and is not entirely natural” is a manifest statement that you don’t know what you’re dealing with.
Girls, why don’t you go do something productive, and just go shopping. At least that’ll stimulate the economy, something the IPCC says we need, something you CAN quantify.
‘the paper cautions that more modeling studies and longer-term observations are needed ‘
A call for more grants well there is a shock , meanwhile that they saying when you get down to the bottom line is . We don’t know what is behind changes in Ice levels for sure and we can’t tell you if they will decrease or increases with any accuracy worth a dam. But anyway its AGW to blame , doom oh doom .
“Computer model” is just another way to say “untestable hypothesis”.
Ah, the old A.C.M.E. simulation trick again. You know they’re too far gone in their heads when they make statement prediction based on their models that has yet to be correct on even simpler stuff.
At least religious people believe in an entity that can only be tested by faith. Belief in buggy climate machinery simplified and derived from buggy weather machinery doesn’t really have the same ominous connotation. :p
The conclusions of the study sounds to me something aimed to reassure the warmists. “Even if you see a stop or even a recovery in the ice extent, be faithful that eventually the ice will disappear!” Al Gore docet.
Everyone with half brain can compare AMO natural cycle, closely related to Arctic temperatures and sea ice extent and come to conclusion, that since AMO has switched recently back to negative mode, gradual decrease in Arctic ocean /and air/ temperatures resulting in increase of the ice extent are about to be expected. Oh, and put your stinkin’ models somewhere!
Isn’t that what a lot of us have been saying all along?
PlayStation “science.” Of course they need more funding to keep playing their games.
Oh fer cryin’ out loud what claptrap. No matter where you turn, there’s someone hedging their bets and covering all the horses in this rigged race.
By analyzing multiple realizations of the 20th century from a single climate model, they attribute approximately half the observed decline to human emissions of greenhouse gases, and the other half to climate variability.
When did human emissions of GHGs go down?
Notice how they conviently stopped at 2007 ,which was lowest year on record .But then that fits thier agenda to a T.
REPLY: The photo choice was mine, not theirs – Anthony
warmcold, wetdry, droughtflood, snowrain……………………….
So, CO2 hasn’t changed the physical world so much that water won’t freeze? Man, i thought it could do anything.
The latest version of Climate Scientology . . . we have covered all our bases for the next ten years so our models MUST be working.
Please send a few hundred million more research $dollars so we can continue to run the con and grift the taxpayer.
There is no escape to the folly of the “all knowing” scientists of doom.
Wheeee…this is fun. I’m waiting for the next model to tell us all Arctic sea ice will be gone by the year 2250…or depending extraneous conditions it will cover 1/3 of the globe. Either way it will definitely be caused by anthropogenic global warming.
DJ says:
August 11, 2011 at 12:38 pm
….In other words, research indicates that arctic ice could do anything, and we’ve got a weasel clause that will allow us to blame it all on anthropogenic forcing, right?
=================================================================
DJ, it’s worse than that……
..they couldn’t find an anthropogenic signature…..and they tried
It’s nice when you can tune models to observations, isn’t it? /sarc
What I was going to say has already been said by everybody else so far (at this stage the first 5 comments) so I’ll just keep stum and nodding my head.
1) prediction made.
2) prediction falsified.
3) prediction altered such that all results are expected.
4) prediction now impossible to prove incorrect.
5) Meanwhile, real scientists still not making predictions, leaving that to soothsayers.
Wot, wot?! Ice increasing, you say, sir? Nothing to see here …move along now.