From the University of California, San Diego Press Release

A team of chemists from the U.S. and France has found compelling evidence of a previously undocumented large volcanic eruption that occurred exactly 200 years ago, in 1809.
The discovery, published online this week in the scientific journal Geophysical Research Letters, offers an explanation as to why the decade from 1810 to 1819 is regarded by scientists as the coldest on record for the past 500 years.
“We’ve never seen any evidence of this eruption in Greenland that corresponds to a simultaneous explosion recorded in Antarctica before in the glacial record,” said Mark Thiemens, Dean of the Division of Physical Sciences at UC San Diego and one of the co-authors of the study. “But if you look at the size of the signal we found in the ice cores, it had to be huge. It was bigger than the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines, which killed hundreds of people and affected climate around the world.”
![]() |
| Jihong Cole-Dai of South Dakota State U. headed the research team. Credit: South Dakota State U. |
Led by a chemist from South Dakota State University, the team of scientists made its discovery after analyzing chemicals in ice samples from Antarctica and Greenland in the Arctic, where the scientists visited and drilled ice cores three years ago. The year-by-year accumulation of snow in the polar ice sheets records what is going on in the atmosphere.
“We found large amount of volcanic sulfuric acid in the snow layers of 1809 and 1810 in both Greenland and Antarctica,” said professor Jihong Cole-Dai of SDSU’s Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, who was the lead author of the paper.
Joël Savarino of the Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l’Environment in Grenoble, France, and a former postdoctoral fellow at UC San Diego, was also part of the team.
Cole-Dai said climate records show that not only were 1816 — the so-called “year without a summer”— and the following years very cold, the entire decade from 1810 to 1819 was probably the coldest for at least the past 500 years.
![]() |
| The team drilled ice cores in Greenland’s ice sheet. Credit: Mark Thiemens, UCSD |
Scientists have long been aware that the massive and violent eruption in 1815 of an Indonesian volcano called Tambora, which killed more than 88,000 people in Indonesia, had caused the worldwide cold weather in 1816 and after. Volcanic eruptions have a cooling effect on the planet because they release sulfur gases into the atmosphere that form sulfuric acid aerosols that block sunlight. But the cold temperatures in the early part of the decade, before that eruption, suggest Tambora alone could not have caused the climatic changes of the decade.
“Our new evidence is that the volcanic sulfuric acid came down at the opposite poles at precisely the same time, and this means that the sulfate is from a single large eruption of a volcano in 1809,” Cole-Dai said. “The Tambora eruption and the undocumented 1809 eruption are together responsible for the unusually cold decade.”
Cole-Dai said the Tambora eruption was immense, sending about 100 million tons of sulfur gas into the atmosphere, but the ice core samples suggests the 1809 eruption was also very large — perhaps half the size of Tambora — and would also have cooled the earth for a few years. The researchers reason that, because the sulfuric acid is found in the ice from both polar regions, the eruption probably occurred in the tropics, as Tambora did, where wind patterns could carry volcanic material to the entire world, including both poles.
![]() |
| UCSD’s Mark Thiemens (upper left) pulls a cylinder in Greenland containing an ice core. Credit: UCSD |
Cole-Dai said the research specifically looked for and found a special indicator of sulfuric acid produced from the volcanic sulfur gas in the stratosphere.
The special indicator is an unusual make-up of sulfur isotopes in the volcanic sulfuric acid. Isotopes are different types of atoms of the same chemical element, each having a different number of neutrons (but the same number of protons). The unique sulfur isotope composition is like a fingerprint of volcanic material that has reached the stratosphere, said Cole-Dai.
The stratosphere is the second major layer of the Earth’s atmosphere, reaching from about six miles to about 30 miles above the Earth’s surface at moderate latitudes. To impact global climate, rather than local weather, the sulfur gas of a volcanic eruption has to reach up into the stratosphere and once there, be spread around the globe.
“The way in which that these volcanoes affected the average temperatures of our planet gives us a better idea of how particulates in the atmosphere can affect our climate,” said Thiemens. “People talk about the possibility of geo-engineering our climate, but the question is how? In this case, nature has done an experiment for us.”
Other members of the research team were South Dakota State post-doctoral researcher David Ferris and graduate student Alyson Lanciki; and Mélanie Baroni of CEREGE (Le Centre Européen de Recherche et d’Enseignement des Géosciences de l’Environnement) at L’Université Paul Cézanne in Aix-en-Provence, France.
The researchers were funded by the National Science Foundation, French Polar Institute (IPEV) and the Institut National des Sciences del’Univers (INSU).
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.



And yet … my suspicious mind suggests that now that the hockey stick is discredited somebody thought it was important to discredit the Dalton Minimum somehow …
I know … lets find a new volcanic reuption!
…and would also have cooled the earth for a few years.
Another possible cold time the earth recovered from and that recovery unaccounted for in warming from then until today.
With two of those bungers going off in the middle of a couple of solar minimums it was lucky the Napoleonic Wars were on to save us from another ice age.
No wonder Mr Dalton was cold. A pity it has such an effect on the AGW graph.
And helps to manufacture hockey sticks.
I’ve got it: Volcanoes cause short term global cooling while at the same time causing global warming due to increasing the amount of gases accumulating in the earth’s atmosphere (recall Boyle’s Law from chemistry?) higher pressure = higher temps! Now, all we have to do is figure out how to stop all of those firecrackers from going off. Any suggestions? (We need to divert and keep the warmists busy in some area other than cap & trade.)
The article isn’t quite explicit on this point. Is this an eruption for which they have found evidence for in ice cores but haven’t yet pinpointed on the globe?
As I noted yesterday, the current decade is the first in modern times to have no major volcanic eruptions, which is likely ‘artificially’ warming it relative to previous decades.
Shouldn’t this then raise the starting point of GW and thereby reduce the delta from 1820 to 2009?
Assuming that volcanoes have such an impact, it makes the current discussions about “geoengineering” seem even more insane.
Let’s see, we can’t control volcanoes, we can’t control solar output, we can’t control cosmic energy or clouds, so let’s go and try to geoengineer a cooler planet by injecting “stuff” into the upper atmosphere on purpose! Like we really know with absolute certainty exactly how it all fits together.
Insane!
Which volcano erupted in 1809? Was it in Antarctica? Was trying to decipher in this article…
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA
“People talk about the possibility of geo-engineering our climate, but the question is how? In this case, nature has done an experiment for us.”
Let’s hope some Alarmist nut doesn’t get the idea to create some massive man made sulphuric release in response to AGW fears that then causes even further cooling. Cold is the danger.
When and will this ever end? Is this what life without war is all about?…. If so, give me war; At least war is real.
We have seen this kind of hype again and again [“never before seen”, “unprecedented”, etc]
This story is old hat:
Title: Ice core evidence for an explosive tropical volcanic eruption 6
years preceding Tambora
Authors: Dai, Jihong; Mosley-Thompson, Ellen; Thompson, Lonnie G.
Publication: Journal of Geophysical Research (ISSN 0148-0227), vol.
96, Sept. 20, 1991, p. 17,361-17,366. (JGR Homepage)
Abstract
High-resolution analyses of ice cores from Antarctica and Greenland
reveal an explosive volcanic eruption in the tropics in A.D. 1809
which is not reflected in the historical record. A comparison in the
same ice cores of the sulfate flux from the A.D. 1809 eruption to that
from the Tambora eruption (A.D. 1815) indicates a near-equatorial
location and a magnitude roughly half that of Tambora. Thus this event
should be considered comparable to other eruptions producing large
volumes of sulfur-rich gases such as Coseguina, Krakatau, Agung, and
El Chichon. The increase in the atmospheric concentration of sulfuric
acid may have contributed to the Northern Hemisphere cooling observed
in the early nineteenth century and may account partially for the
decline in surface temperatures which preceded the eruption of Tambora
in A.D. 1815.
Title: Two major volcanic cooling episodes derived from global marine
air temperature, AD 1807-1827
Authors: Chenoweth, Michael
Publication: Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 28, Issue 15, p.
2963-2966 (GeoRL Homepage), 2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000GL012648
Abstract
A new data set of global marine air temperature data for the years
1807-1827 is used to show the impact of volcanic eruptions in ~1809
(unlocated) and 1815 (Tambora, Indonesia). Both eruptions produced
cooling exceeding that after Krakatoa, Indonesia (1883) and Pinatubo,
Philippines (1991). The ~1809 eruption is dated to March-June 1808
based on a sudden cooling in Malaysian temperature data and maximum
cooling of marine air temperature in 1809. Two large-scale calibrated
proxy temperature records, one from tree-ring-density data, the other
using multi-proxy sources are compared to the marine air temperature
data. Correlation is highest with maximum latewood density data and
lowest with the multi-proxy data.
—-
but nice to have confirmation….
The large eruption of Mayon http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayon_Volcano in 1814 probably added to the effect.
I am surprised they can distinguish the signal of the hypothetical 1809 volcano from the known 1816 eruption. I didn’t know ice core resolution was that fine, especially for sulfur dioxide, which could migrate in water ice. If it were volcanic ash detected in a core I could understand the proposal.
Such a volcano could be almost anywhere. For example Nyiragongo was not discovered by westerners until the late 19th century. To my mind, Nyiragongo represents what might be our best bet for the next supervolcano. It is fed by a mantle plume from deep down inside Earth. Lava from that volcano appears to be almost completely mantle material with very little crustal melt included. The neighboring shield volcano (I cant remember the name off the top of my head) seems to be at the edge of the plume and contains both mantle and crust melt.
There was an eruption in Saudi Arabia at Jabal Yar at about that time, too, but I don’t believe it would have been large enough. And who knows what was going on in Ethiopia at around that time. My guess is that any volcano near water would have been reported as shipping was pretty much covering the earth at that time. A continental volcano either in Africa, Alaska or someplace like far Eastern Siberia might have gone unnoticed.
I doubt an eruption in Indonesia would have gone unnoticed as that area was one of the most heavily traveled sea routes of the time.
Wish they could find some ash. That would help to locate the eruption.
Where was the volcano? The article says “The researchers reason that, because the sulfuric acid is found in the ice from both polar regions, the eruption probably occurred in the tropics, as Tambora did, where wind patterns could carry volcanic material to the entire world, including both poles.”
Where could it have been? If it were in Indonesia or Soufrierre, there should be records of it. I wonder if it could have been an underwater eruption that still allowed the release of hot SO2 into the atmosphere.
I’ll have to update my 1816 page to mention this. I have read other comments claiming there were several eruptions around that time frame, I don’t recall if I have details handy.
Volcanoes don’t impact climate for very long, 1817 was much warmer than 1816, so I’m a bit skeptical that volcanoes alone can be responsible for that cold decade.
BTW, I think the region that was most frozen in 1816 was due to the storm track following a significantly more southern route. Areas of the US like Virginia had temperatures much closer to normal. Don’t assume the impact in places like New England and Europe were similar to the rest of the world.
—-
Proveit count: 880 in, 5851 out. From the steady small gains each hour,
there’s no blatant ballot box stuffing going on.
June 1808
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urzelina_%28volcano%29
Urzelina Azores?
Also confirmation from back in 2002:
So this information does not seem to be anything new.
Also an eruption in 1808 of Taal (VEI2 explosive eruption)
So maybe it wasn’t one eruption, maybe it was several large eruptions at about the same time.
“A team of chemists from the U.S. and France has found compelling evidence of a previously undocumented large volcanic eruption that occurred exactly 200 years ago, in 1809.”
Puke….puke again……..
We did not know?
What else is there that we do not know?
It is the presumption of the vain and foolish to believe that knowledge has ended with them.
Ric Werme (22:50:19) :
: Volcanoes don’t impact climate for very long, 1817 was much warmer than 1816, so I’m a bit skeptical that volcanoes alone can be responsible for that cold decade.
There is also a possibility that there are centennial implications eg Stenchikov et al 2009
Sulfate aerosols resulting from strong volcanic explosions last for 2–3 years in the lower stratosphere. Therefore it was traditionally believed that volcanic impacts produce mainly short-term, transient climate perturbations. However, the ocean integrates volcanic radiative cooling and responds over a wide range of time scales. The associated processes, especially ocean heat uptake, play a key role in ongoing climate change. However, they are not well constrained by observations, and attempts to simulate them in current climate models used for climate predictions yield a range of uncertainty. Volcanic impacts on the ocean provide an independent means of assessing these processes. This study focuses on quantification of the seasonal to multidecadal time scale response of the ocean to explosive volcanism. It employs the coupled climate model CM2.1, developed recently at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, to simulate the response to the 1991 Pinatubo and the 1815 Tambora eruptions, which were the largest in the 20th and 19th centuries, respectively. The simulated climate perturbations compare well with available observations for the Pinatubo period. The stronger Tambora forcing produces responses with higher signal-to-noise ratio. Volcanic cooling tends to strengthen the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Sea ice extent appears to be sensitive to volcanic forcing, especially during the warm season. Because of the extremely long relaxation time of ocean subsurface temperature and sea level, the perturbations caused by the Tambora eruption could have lasted well into the 20th century.
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2009/2008JD011673.shtml
Leif Svalgaard (22:38:06) : “We have seen this kind of hype again and again …This story is old hat:”
Litmus test…
It is the proposition of the arrogant to drastically change a planet-important value of the world they live on. Argon doesn’t have a cycle. Why don’t you go play with that instead?
Rule # 1 Don’t play with elements that have cycles. C, O, N, P, H2O (though not an element).. All determining the existance or nonexistance of life.
If we start altering these values too much in any significant subset where they are important such as air, ocean, land etc. we’re in for some trouble.. Be glad a few of these are impossible to change and the shallow(ing) curve of +temp/+ppm helps us out.