German Authorities Start Initiative To Evaluate Public Register For Climate “Disinformation” Spreaders!

From the NoTricksZone

By P Gosselin

Back to the Dark Ages…

Elements within the German government are poised to take the authoritarian step of suppressing and restricting scientific discourse.

Germany’s online Apollo News reports that in Baden-Württemberg, five CDU (Christian Democratic Union) members of parliament—including former Consumer Protection Minister Peter Hauk—have submitted a parliamentary inquiry to the state government calling for an evaluation of a public register for alleged climate “disinformation” spreaders.

The initiative stems from an advisory opinion issued by Baden-Württemberg’s Consumer Protection Commission in October, which proposed establishing a publicly accessible list to track individuals and organizations repeatedly accused of spreading false information about climate change.

Notably, the commission’s definition of climate disinformation extends beyond denying global warming or its human origins; it also includes claims that climate protection policies are “ineffective or harmful.”

This broad scope touches directly on the political debate regarding the viability, costs, and benefits of specific climate measures.

Advocates climate censorship

Moreover, the commission advocates for additional measures, such as forcing social media operators to delete automated accounts spreading false claims and legally penalizing AI chatbots for propagating climate disinformation.

The CDU lawmakers are now asking the state government whether it considers such a registry to be sensible and legally feasible.

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
6 Comments
Stephen Wilde
November 12, 2026 2:07 am

That could be fun.
Court action against false designations of disinformation.
Most of the establishment commentators would be potentially vulnerable.

Eng_Ian
Reply to  Stephen Wilde
November 12, 2026 2:14 am

Stephen,
You made the common mistake of believing that a fact would render the information as NOT being misinformation. The actual definition will be anything that is counter to the government policy.

Government facts are not required to prove misinformation, if it was uttered and it’s against the government, then it’s misinformation. “Them’s the rules”. Facts be damned.

Welcome to the new world. It’s no longer a question of how we got here, it’s now, how do we get off this ride?

Bruce Cobb
November 12, 2026 2:30 am

No one expects the Greenish Inquisition. Repent now, or else!

November 12, 2026 2:34 am

Well, well…

Germany;
Censorship;
Surveillance;
Repression;
Disinformation;
Radical environmentalism.

I don’t like stereotypes or cheap jokes, guys, but you’re not making it easy for us to avoid invoking Godwin’s law.

(Jokes about the French are acceptable in response to this comment. Fair is fair.)

Reply to  Charles Armand
November 12, 2026 2:54 am

Mon ami, there is no such thing as a cheap or bad joke! It all boils down to the therm: “lacking a sense of humor”

Black, noir, schwarz, negro, svart….all of sarcasm’s favourite colours and certainly nowadays “outcasts” in this “soo inclusive” society.

Maybe Blazing saddles and Monty Python’s flying circus should be broadcasted 24/7 all nets all channels in an effort to turn the tide.

Sidenote to the german readers: when was the last time you saw Don Camillo & Peppone on german TV?

Bruce Cobb
November 12, 2026 2:58 am

What they need is an office, or ministry for deciding what is true and what isn’t. It could be called “Minitrue”. All based on “Science”, of course.