Gas Power Station Paid £1.4 Million an Hour to Keep Lights on as Wind Slumps

From THE DAILY SCEPTIC

By Will Jones

Britain’s grid operator, Neso, has paid a gas power station £1.4 million an hour – 10 times the usual rate – to keep the lights on following a slump in wind power. The Telegraph has the story.

Langage Power Station, near Plymouth, was paid the equivalent of £1.4 million an hour on Monday evening, according to market transparency data.

Gas-fired power plants across the country were paid millions of pounds to cover potential shortfalls in electricity after low winds cut the output of renewables.

The National Energy System Operator (Neso) was paying around £1,500 per megawatt hour on Monday to at least three power stations to cover the evening peak in demand. That was about 10 times the average.

The high payments were made between 3.30pm and 5pm. Others handed similar sums included Rye House Power Station in Hertfordshire and Seabank Power Station in Bristol.

Neso separately put generators on standby earlier in the day, from 6am to 11am, as output from wind farms remained low for the third day in a row.

The grid operator told power stations it needed a greater safety cushion, or margin, between power demand and supply for a limited period. It was eventually withdrawn at 10am.

The notices, known formally as an electricity margin notice (EMN), have become more frequent in recent months in a sign that Britain’s electricity grid is under growing strain. Seven have been issued so far this year. Only one was issued for the whole of 2025.

Kathryn Porter, an energy analyst, said Neso’s decision to issue the notice for Monday morning was “unusual”.

She said: “EMNs normally cover the evening peak, not the morning.

“The question is, what happens if the modest wind recovery forecast for tomorrow evening is delayed, or if demand is higher than forecast – given the size of Neso’s forecast errors, when margins are this thin there could be trouble.”

The latest notice will add to concerns that the grid is unable to cope with high demand as it heads toward the cold winter months and periods of low wind and sunlight make green power sources less reliable.

A Neso spokesman said the number of notices “can vary significantly from year to year and there have been comparable periods of EMN use in the past.” They added the notices were “a routine operational tool”.

Andrew Griffiths, the Shadow Chancellor, said: “With barely any wind, it’s gas keeping Britain’s lights on. Yet Labour is now legislating to ban new North Sea oil and gas exploration licences.

“We need gas, but Labour would rather we import it than produce our own. How much more evidence does this Government need before it wakes up to reality?”

Worth reading in full.

5 4 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
2 Comments
Scarecrow Repair
November 11, 2026 10:04 pm

I’d suggest they listen to Andy Griffith. He kept Barney from going overboard, he can do the same to Burnham.

D Sandberg
November 11, 2026 10:35 pm

 The UK might benefit by what German physicist Lion Hirth reports about low wind valuation at~30% grid penetration:

Reason #1: Wind output is correlated, not additive
Wind generation is highly correlated across space and time in Germany‑scale systems.
As penetration rises:

  • New wind capacity mostly produces during the same windy hours
  • It does not create new high‑price hours
  • Instead it deepens oversupply in existing low‑price hours
  • The share of energy produced in those hours grows faster than penetration

This is why Hirth calls it diminishing marginal value, not proportional value loss. [neon.energy]

 Reason #2: Must‑run generation becomes dominant
By ~30% wind:

  • Additional wind cannot lower prices further (they’re already at zero)
  • It simply adds more zero‑price MWh

So the fraction of wind sold at ~€0 rises super‑linearly.

Reason #3: Hirth’s own value‑factor curve already bends downward
Hirth does not show a straight line from 0–30%.
He finds:

  • Wind value falls from ~110% → ~50–80% by 30% penetration
  • Solar reaches similar value loss already by ~15% penetration
  • The curve steepens as penetration rises [neon.energy], [pdfs.seman…cholar.org]

That curvature is the mathematical signal that:
Each additional percentage point of VRE destroys more value than the previous one.