Left Antonio Gutteres speaking at COP30. Xuthoria, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons. Right President Trump.

Global Shipping Carbon Tax Negotiations Stall thanks to President Trump

Essay by Eric Worrall

Apparently there will be another attempt to negotiate an agreement in November, but why bother?

Press Release

Global maritime decarbonisation stalls despite the accelerating impact of climate change

September 4, 2026

States again failed to agree on a deal following pressure from a small minority of fossil-fuel producing nations and division among progressive states.

Negotiations at the IMO have drawn a blank for the third meeting in a row, as US and Saudi-led efforts to scupper progress were successful. With delegates from vulnerable countries highlighting the tragic cost of this year’s climate disasters, action is far too slow, warns T&E. 

While pragmatic negotiators, including the EU, signalled openness to compromise measures such as avoiding a centralised fund and weakening greenhouse gas targets, US and Saudi negotiators largely held their ground. T&E urged negotiators not to cave to the Trump administration’s crusade to sacrifice ambitious targets in favor of fossil gas and crop biofuels – a lose-lose deal for the climate and for future-proofing the industry.

The continued failure to find an ambitious common ground not only puts shipping off course to decarbonise, but locks fossil fuel importing states and the shipping industry into continued dependency. During the Hormuz crisis, dependence on oil cost the industry roughly €340 million a day, according to T&E estimates. 

The next major IMO meeting takes place from November 30th to December 3rd. There, governments must adopt a global deal capable of decarbonising shipping by 2050, rather than giving up on the climate or delaying action again. T&E urged delegations to intensify diplomatic efforts to overcome the obstruction of the US and its allies.

At the same time, ambitious governments must not let the ongoing delays at the IMO put the brakes on shipping’s need to decarbonise. Taking action at regional and national level on international shipping is becoming increasingly urgent in light of the IMO’s failure to move forward.

Alex Springer, interim shipping director at T&E, said: “After a summer of heatwaves, droughts and record sea temperatures, the failure of states to get close to a credible deal is deeply disappointing. It leaves global shipping increasingly adrift of where it needs to be. Governments should push forward with ambitious regional measures and must not wait for a global agreement before taking action.”

Source: https://www.transportenvironment.org/articles/global-maritime-decarbonisation-stalls-despite-the-accelerating-impact-of-climate-change

WUWT first wrote about this attempt to impose a UN tax on global shipping last year;

At the time I pointed out how damaging such a tax could be :- With safe haven investments like gold spiking to an all time high, an Indian property and stock market bubble which is threatening to precipitate a Chinese style crisis, an economic crisis in France threatening to fracture the Euro zone, and China sitting on the mother of all banking crisis, and making all the wrong moves trying to fix the crisis, lets just say by this time next year I doubt a tax which would further damage the global economy will win widespread support.

While the crisis I’ve named haven’t yet torn down the global economy, if anything the global economic situation is even more precarious than when I discussed this absurd tax push last year. And yes, gold is still really expensive, which means a lot of people including some central banks are ditching income producing investments for safe haven investments.

Make no mistake, this International Maritime Organisation (IMO) negotiation is an attempt by the rest of the world to impose a tax on US prosperity. While China handles more maritime traffic than the USA, China had an escape plan, they wanted the UN to mandate use of synthetic Chinese fuel, allegedly produced using renewable energy, in place of the low cost diesel sludge which international cargo ships currently use for fuel.

But this nightmare scenario, everyone paying a tithe to China and the United Nations for every imported good which touches ocean water, for now at least belongs to an alternate reality in which President Trump did not win the election in 2024.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
5 13 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
22 Comments
September 6, 2026 7:19 pm

T&E Funding

> € 1,000,000

  • Sequoia Climate Foundation
  • ClimateWorks Foundation
  • Donor Advised Charitable Giving
  • Schwab Charitable Fund
  • Climate Imperative Foundation
  • European Climate Foundation

If only fossil fuel companies funded climate realists to that amount. !

ResourceGuy
September 6, 2026 7:34 pm

Thank you again Mr. President. Again as in about 50 thank yous ranging tax simplification to borders to federal agencies and fraud investigations etc etc.

September 6, 2026 7:58 pm

It almost doesn’t matter what scheme they concoct. Central planning does not work. Transferring large amounts of capital to unelected bureaucrats is a guarantee of fraud, waste and cronyism. The correct answer to every UN scheme is an unequivocal “NO!”.

Reply to  Shoki
September 7, 2026 8:27 pm

WHO is still paying Dues to the United Nations.
The USA has already promised to defUNd, deport, & delenda est!
Let the UN be funded & hosted in Hong Kong by the P.R.C.’s central-planning control freaks.

John Hultquist
September 6, 2026 7:58 pm

 T&E – summarized from Wikipedia:
The European Federation for Transport and Environment (T&E), is a European umbrella for non-governmental organisations promoting sustainable transport in Europe. Folks there have worked with other environmental lobby groups such as Greenpeace where many of its staff members have previously worked.

Reply to  John Hultquist
September 7, 2026 2:10 am

Thanks, John. I tried to find out what T&E meant and found over 20 different meanings.

Denis
Reply to  Oldseadog
September 7, 2026 4:59 am

Travel and Expenses seemed to be the most popular meaning.

Jeff Alberts
September 6, 2026 9:43 pm

“With delegates from vulnerable countries highlighting the tragic cost of this year’s climate disasters, action is far too slow, warns T&E.”

I’ll bet he can’t name a single climate disaster.

Reply to  Jeff Alberts
September 7, 2026 3:56 am

About 80% of the earth’s climates are water. I haven’t read any recent reports of climate disasters occurring in the vast Pacific ocean.

Sweet Old Bob
Reply to  Harold Pierce
September 7, 2026 6:41 am

T&E will claim the hurricanes near Hawaii are ….

😉

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Harold Pierce
September 7, 2026 7:30 am

My point was that there are no “climate” disasters, only weather disasters.

Rahx360
September 7, 2026 2:53 am

You can’t hate bureaucrats enough. Not one has worked a job and understands how private companies work. It’s shipping companies their own interest to purchase energy efficient ships. Taxing CO2 never works because there’s no alternative, and the money wast on taxes would else be used in R&D to invent better technology.
Bureaucrats have no feeling with the world, think everything is throw away. Ships cost +100 million, nobody who own a ship will say after 5 year “Oh, there a newer model, lets by that”. We see the same stupidity with EV’s or heat pumps. You can tax gas more but nobody, like me, who has a gas boiler that has 20 years of life in it is going to run to the store to buy a heatpump. You just can’t hate bureaucrats enough. And yeah, we sure need more taxes.

Reply to  Rahx360
September 7, 2026 3:10 am

With regard to energy efficient ships, here in Scotland Western Ferries have just ordered two new ferries. WF say they will be diesel direct drive, they can’t justify the extra expence of some kind of electric rubbish.

(WF are a private company who make a profit without getting any subsidy from anywhere.)

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Oldseadog
September 7, 2026 7:40 am

Here in Washington State, they’re in the early stages if transitioning the entire ferry fleet to hybrid drive (diesel/electric), with primary power being provided by batteries and the diesel engines as supplementary power.

I asked Gemini about battery fire safety:

Handling battery fire risks—specifically thermal runaway in large marine-grade lithium-ion systems—requires specialized engineering, strict regulatory standards, and dedicated suppression technologies. Because water alone cannot easily extinguish a thermal runaway event inside a sealed battery module, Washington State Ferries (WSF) and the maritime industry employ a multi-layered defense model:

1. Thermal Runaway Isolation & Cell-Level Safety

  • Chemistry & Packaging: Marine battery banks use heavy-duty lithium-iron-phosphate (LFP) or nickel-manganese-cobalt (NMC) chemistries enclosed in heavy, fire-rated steel or composite modules.
  • Cell Isolation: Modules are designed with barrier insulation and physical spacing between individual cells. If a single cell fails or overheats, propagation safeguards prevent the heat from spreading to adjacent cells.

2. Dedicated Off-Gas Sensing & Early Detection

  • Advanced Battery Management Systems (BMS) monitor temperature, voltage, and current at the individual cell level in real time.
  • Off-Gas Detection: Special sensors detect trace gases (such as hydrogen or carbon monoxide) vented by a cell minutes before a thermal runaway event creates significant heat or smoke, triggering automated shutdowns and alerts instantly.

3. Integrated Marine Fire Suppression

  • Gas-Based Inertex Suppression: Battery compartments are isolated in dedicated, fire-rated rooms equipped with clean-agent gaseous suppression systems (such as Novec 1230 / FK-5-1-12 or CO₂) that displace oxygen instantly without shorting electronics.
  • Direct Water-Deluge Cooling: Modern marine regulations (governed by the U.S. Coast Guard and classification societies like DNV) require direct cooling systems. High-pressure water mist or direct-to-module liquid cooling channels flood the interior of the battery rack to absorb heat rapidly and quench thermal propagation.

4. Emergency Ventilation & Containment

  • Battery rooms feature dedicated explosion-proof exhaust ventilation systems to safely discharge flammable or toxic gases away from passenger spaces and crew quarters.
  • Heavy structural fire barriers (A-60 fire-rated bulkheads) separate the battery rooms from the rest of the vessel, containing any potential thermal incident for hours without compromising hull or deck safety.

5. Regulatory Oversight & Crew Training

  • WSF hybrid vessel designs must pass rigorous hazard identification (HAZID) audits approved by the U.S. Coast Guard and marine classification bodies.
  • Vessel crews receive specialized training in high-voltage safety, battery room monitoring, and isolation protocols to manage potential thermal emergencies long before they can escalate.
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
September 7, 2026 10:37 am

All that is correct, but as I already said Western Ferries say that they can’t justify the extra expence of the electric gubbins.
Diesel direct drive is cheaper to build and run and has fewer reliability problems.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Oldseadog
September 7, 2026 11:44 am

Gemini says there are fewer reliability issues with hybrid drives. That remains to be seen. I think the real reliability issues will be with the charging systems. Also, Washington Ferries are run by the gov’t, not a private org, so they don’t have to worry about money.

Fran
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
September 7, 2026 11:04 am

what a lot of SUBSIDY necessary in this little lot.

Jeff Alberts
Reply to  Fran
September 7, 2026 11:47 am

Yes. Though it’s government run, so not really subsidies, just increasing rates for riders, and electric rates for all others so that PSE and other utility companies can improve their grids.

Based on our experiences with other WA state agencies, such as Sound Transit, this will be well over schedule and budget, if it ever gets done.

George Thompson
Reply to  Jeff Alberts
September 7, 2026 6:15 pm

All that, and when a fire occurs-and it will-the boat sinks and people die…so I’m a pessimist, sue me.

Edward Katz
September 7, 2026 2:01 pm

Good, because such a tax would do next-to-nothing to curb emissions and would be guaranteed to drive up shipping costs and in the end consumer prices. Besides I thought with solar- and electric-powered ships just over the horizon, bunker fuel demand will soon evaporate anyway, won’t it?

Bob
September 7, 2026 3:57 pm

When you look up greed in the dictionary you see a picture of the UN.

George Thompson
Reply to  Bob
September 7, 2026 6:16 pm

and Democrats.